Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Desirable upgrades for the lists

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Uncommon Valor - Campaign for the South Pacific >> Tech Support >> Desirable upgrades for the lists Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Desirable upgrades for the lists - 6/12/2002 4:45:20 AM   
Bernd Hesberg

 

Posts: 114
Joined: 10/11/2001
From: Germany
Status: offline
It has been mentioned a few times that they should keep the last position, and that the mouse wheel should be supported.
Both options would be useful imho, but what I really would like to see is, that some of these lists (all A/C, all LCU) show the current stats of the units, at least the most important ones like morale, fatigue, average skill (where applicable) and current task. That way you could see at a glance which units need your immediate attention. At the moment you have to select every single unit at every location to see what's going on, a tiresome and lengthy procedure.
Another list comes to my mind, that is the list of ships sunk. It always switches its sorting order back to 'Sunk by' whenever new entries are made (or even every turn, but I'm not sure). Can't it remain in the most recently used order? And it would be great if the sinking date could be shown as well.
Post #: 1
- 6/14/2002 3:44:05 AM   
entemedor

 

Posts: 65
Joined: 6/14/2002
From: Barcelona (Spain)
Status: offline
I eagerly support this proposal! Date of sinking will be most useful. And better still if sunken Allied/Japanese ships are listed separately and not all mixed up.

(in reply to Bernd Hesberg)
Post #: 2
- 6/14/2002 6:18:05 AM   
Spooky


Posts: 816
Joined: 4/1/2002
From: Froggy Land
Status: offline
[QUOTE]Originally posted by entemedor
[B]I eagerly support this proposal! Date of sinking will be most useful. And better still if sunken Allied/Japanese ships are listed separately and not all mixed up. [/B][/QUOTE]

I am not sure that date of sinking and FOW will mix very well :)

Of course, you know the date of sinking for your ships ... but not for your opponent's ship - maybe it can be replaced by some kind of "confirmation day of sinking" ?

(in reply to Bernd Hesberg)
Post #: 3
- 6/14/2002 8:06:14 AM   
Bernd Hesberg

 

Posts: 114
Joined: 10/11/2001
From: Germany
Status: offline
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Spooky
[B]

I am not sure that date of sinking and FOW will mix very well :)

Of course, you know the date of sinking for your ships ... but not for your opponent's ship - maybe it can be replaced by some kind of "confirmation day of sinking" ? [/B][/QUOTE]

Agreed. That would be the right name for the date. If anybody wants to get around the FOW he could use the preference settings.
So, if each entry gets its date when it enters the list, we can easily see what's new.

(in reply to Bernd Hesberg)
Post #: 4
- 6/14/2002 8:50:33 AM   
Nixuebrig

 

Posts: 1138
Joined: 1/2/2001
From: (c) Lübeck, now Berlin
Status: offline
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Spooky
[B]

I am not sure that date of sinking and FOW will mix very well :)

Of course, you know the date of sinking for your ships ... but not for your opponent's ship - maybe it can be replaced by some kind of "confirmation day of sinking" ? [/B][/QUOTE]


The showing of the victory points doesn`T fit in the FOW not well too. Maybe they should been calculated for each side, based on the known info.

Greg

(in reply to Bernd Hesberg)
Post #: 5
- 6/14/2002 4:54:42 PM   
Spooky


Posts: 816
Joined: 4/1/2002
From: Froggy Land
Status: offline
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Prince
[B]


The showing of the victory points doesn`T fit in the FOW not well too. Maybe they should been calculated for each side, based on the known info.

Greg [/B][/QUOTE]

They are calculated based on the known info (at least for the sunk ships part).

When a ship is not confirmed sunk (not listed in the sunk ships listing), its VP are not included in the VP screen.

(in reply to Bernd Hesberg)
Post #: 6
- 6/14/2002 8:00:35 PM   
Nixuebrig

 

Posts: 1138
Joined: 1/2/2001
From: (c) Lübeck, now Berlin
Status: offline
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Spooky
[B]

They are calculated based on the known info (at least for the sunk ships part).

When a ship is not confirmed sunk (not listed in the sunk ships listing), its VP are not included in the VP screen. [/B][/QUOTE]

after a carries battle with no ships shown sunk, the VP go up by about 400 points. No US carriers has been shown as sunk, but hte points have gone up. Guess I destroyed a really large number of planes in this turn.

I always do it correct when calculating ships sunk by looking at the VP, even when ships are not confirmed sunk.

(in reply to Bernd Hesberg)
Post #: 7
- 6/14/2002 8:32:55 PM   
Spooky


Posts: 816
Joined: 4/1/2002
From: Froggy Land
Status: offline
:confused: :confused: :confused:

I have to check again - maybe other players could give their reports on it ???

(in reply to Bernd Hesberg)
Post #: 8
- 6/14/2002 8:43:29 PM   
Nixuebrig

 

Posts: 1138
Joined: 1/2/2001
From: (c) Lübeck, now Berlin
Status: offline
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Spooky
[B]:confused: :confused: :confused:

I have to check again - maybe other players could give their reports on it ??? [/B][/QUOTE]

I will check too, will hot seat against my self.

(in reply to Bernd Hesberg)
Post #: 9
- 6/14/2002 8:59:50 PM   
Nixuebrig

 

Posts: 1138
Joined: 1/2/2001
From: (c) Lübeck, now Berlin
Status: offline
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Prince
[B]

I will check too, will hot seat against my self. [/B][/QUOTE]


Before the battle both sides showed 1132 Jap 1544 US Points.

Battle did occur, Shokaku and Zuikaku were sunk.

Both listed sunk for the Jap player: points 1132 Jap/ 2032 Allied

Allied side listed only Shokaku as sunk: Points shown for the allied
1132 Jap / 2032 Allied.

Looks like the points are updated when the ship is sunk, not when it is listed as sunk.

Greg

(in reply to Bernd Hesberg)
Post #: 10
- 6/15/2002 1:59:24 AM   
Yamamoto

 

Posts: 743
Joined: 11/21/2001
From: Miami, Fl. U.S.A.
Status: offline
The game’s creators mentioned that the total VP shown is correct, even with FOW.

Yamamoto

(in reply to Bernd Hesberg)
Post #: 11
- 6/15/2002 2:41:45 AM   
Nixuebrig

 

Posts: 1138
Joined: 1/2/2001
From: (c) Lübeck, now Berlin
Status: offline
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Yamamoto
[B]The game’s creators mentioned that the total VP shown is correct, even with FOW.

Yamamoto [/B][/QUOTE]

Noticed that, sunk ships can be shown everytime, you see it at your points if something important has been sunk. Would much more better if the VPs are calculated on the knowledge of each side. So there is no FOW, just hidden movement.

(in reply to Bernd Hesberg)
Post #: 12
- 6/15/2002 2:50:55 AM   
Spooky


Posts: 816
Joined: 4/1/2002
From: Froggy Land
Status: offline
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Yamamoto
[B]The game’s creators mentioned that the total VP shown is correct, even with FOW.

Yamamoto [/B][/QUOTE]

You are right, I just checked it. The total VP shown is correct even if the VP sunk ships total is not correct because of FOW.

(in reply to Bernd Hesberg)
Post #: 13
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Uncommon Valor - Campaign for the South Pacific >> Tech Support >> Desirable upgrades for the lists Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.875