Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Japanese Merchant Convoy Composition

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> The War Room >> RE: Japanese Merchant Convoy Composition Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Japanese Merchant Convoy Composition - 9/13/2009 12:37:53 AM   
vonSchnitter


Posts: 310
Joined: 7/2/2004
From: Germany - still
Status: offline
Well, very interesting.

Since it appears, some of the reallocation issues in the home islands - like the Shimonoseki black hole - have been adressed by the last patch - even though the readme does no say so - an attempt to asses the situation plus play testing is called for.

Assumptions based on "Staff"

a) Honshu is 110k resource points short per day
b) Kyushu has a surplus of 21k resources
c) Shikoku has a surplus of 10k resources
d) Hokkaido has a surplus of 35k resources

Assumptions based on ground network graphics "R" or "Y" key:
There are no road or rail connections between Honshu and the other Home islands except for Shikoku, which is connected by roads

Wich leeds to Assumptions based on the rule book:

9.3.3.3 AUTOMATIC TRANSFER OF BULK CARGO BETWEEN ADJACENT PORTS

And this rule says: 500 resource points per port size of the smaller port in the connection can be transferred per day.

If no other factors play a role this translates into:
Kyushu-Honshu (Fukuoka (10) - Shimoneseki (9) = 9*500=4500 = deficit of 15k resources
Shikoku-Honshu (Takamatsu (4) - Kobe (10) and Matsujama (3) - Hiroshima (9) plus rail = 7*500 = 3500 = deficit of 7500
Hokkaido-Honshu (Hakodate (6) - Ominato (5) = 5*500 )=2500 = deficit of 32k

Other rule book issues:

Since I could not find any references to resource etc. flow restrictions based on ground connections, spolage etc, even though play testing indicates otherwise, I will go ahead with this and see where I get.

However, a few conclusions can be drawn:
a) Solving the transport issue in the home islands will cover 75% of the resource issue
b) Any expansion of LI or HI will take place outside of Honshu
c) Optimizing some of the ports mentioned should be beneficial long term.
d) Sending most of the Home island surplus stock to Honshu asap - using any bottom deemed available - look promising.

I understand, the model is simplistic - and I have at least a dozen ideas for "complications" - but once the pcinciple starts to work - which it did not pre-patch - lets start from here.

Cheers





< Message edited by vonSchnitter -- 9/14/2009 3:06:40 PM >

(in reply to Graymane)
Post #: 31
RE: Japanese Merchant Convoy Composition - 9/13/2009 5:50:20 PM   
guctony


Posts: 669
Joined: 6/27/2009
Status: offline
As a Rokie player I explored most of the other areas of the game.
Now come the The nemesis The Supply and resource management.

Well Before go in to details. I like to define a concept.

I think japan can try to simulate big sized convoy logic it. Which can be beneficial for Sub defence. Imagine small ships channeling resources to local central HUBs. And from the HUBs large Convoys reloading and transfering stuff to Mainland. It will require double loading and selected Ports had to be enlarged in both ends. It would take a while to arrange such a system to work but once started working it will work well I guess. One large well protected Convoy should be better then many small ones. As Atlantic war has teached.

Do you think such a system is manage-able.

Regard



< Message edited by guctony -- 9/13/2009 5:52:55 PM >


_____________________________

"Unless a nation's life faces peril, war is murder."
"Sovereignty is not given, it is taken."
"After having lost their lives on this land they have become our sons as well."
Mustafa Kemal

(in reply to vonSchnitter)
Post #: 32
RE: Japanese Merchant Convoy Composition - 9/13/2009 9:13:52 PM   
morphin

 

Posts: 572
Joined: 4/26/2002
From: Switzerland
Status: offline
For oil and fuel

Singapore will be very important as a hub for quite all of the SRA (Brunei, Miri,Palembang, Singkep, Bengakalis, Medan). So it is important to get singapore asap.
The other one is Soerbaja for the rest( Balikapapan, Boela, Babo and Tarrkan). And if all these are not more than 25% damaged, you need every ship available to get a part of the fuel back to japan (not to mention oil)

So as japan you need not more oil or fuel, you need desperately more TK!!!! Maybe the most valuable ship is a TK and not a CV


(in reply to guctony)
Post #: 33
RE: Japanese Merchant Convoy Composition - 9/13/2009 9:36:59 PM   
Historiker


Posts: 4742
Joined: 7/4/2007
From: Deutschland
Status: offline
Toyohara has a daily surplus of 9.800 resources. Its port can only handle 11.250 per day. So either you have nearly permanently a convoy docked and loading - which means at least two, rather three to four convois only for Toyohara, you MUST enlarge the port!

_____________________________

Without any doubt: I am the spawn of evil - and the Bavarian Beer Monster (BBM)!

There's only one bad word and that's taxes. If any other word is good enough for sailors; it's good enough for you. - Ron Swanson

(in reply to morphin)
Post #: 34
RE: Japanese Merchant Convoy Composition - 9/13/2009 10:46:58 PM   
vaned74

 

Posts: 389
Joined: 11/17/2008
Status: offline
Toyohara (on Sakhalin) is connected by high volume rail to Shikuka to the north. Port cap at Toyohara is 24,000 tons (max ship size of 12,000 tons). A good chunk of resources will head north to Shikuka - it looks like the port tries to keep a good 30-50,000 resources there so if you load resources at Shikuka the system will pull resources to there.

I have been pulling off Sakhalin for sometime now (3 months in this game and 3 months in the prior game) by this method using small ships with a few PBs as escorts.

A word of caution - I always consider this northern front to be an area to watch as Japan. Now with the patch in place, minefields are going into place at both ports and I finally finished training a handful of ASW skilled air groups that will be positioned here. I have also been building up the Kurile islands since the beginning of the game to position ASW and patrol assets as well as a couple of strike capable airfields with support. This is the one area of the map that if the Allies hit early, you have no strategic time to react so I always pay attention to it early. Plus, its also a very close run from ports in Alaska for Allied submarines, and generally one of the areas that the S-boats with their lower endurance can operate.

(in reply to vonSchnitter)
Post #: 35
RE: Japanese Merchant Convoy Composition - 9/13/2009 11:01:32 PM   
Historiker


Posts: 4742
Joined: 7/4/2007
From: Deutschland
Status: offline
quote:

Toyohara (on Sakhalin) is connected by high volume rail to Shikuka to the north.

Edit: misunderstood you...

< Message edited by Historiker -- 9/13/2009 11:41:13 PM >


_____________________________

Without any doubt: I am the spawn of evil - and the Bavarian Beer Monster (BBM)!

There's only one bad word and that's taxes. If any other word is good enough for sailors; it's good enough for you. - Ron Swanson

(in reply to vaned74)
Post #: 36
RE: Japanese Merchant Convoy Composition - 9/13/2009 11:06:04 PM   
erstad

 

Posts: 1944
Joined: 8/3/2004
From: Midwest USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Historiker

Toyohara has a daily surplus of 9.800 resources. Its port can only handle 11.250 per day. So either you have nearly permanently a convoy docked and loading - which means at least two, rather three to four convois only for Toyohara, you MUST enlarge the port!


The 11,250 is what it gets just for the level 3 port. It also gets a daily port bonus equal to the excess resource capacity. (equally important, you get a sizeable bonus to the per-ship load rate).

The limiting factor in Toyohara is the docking capacity, not the daily load. So you probably will want to expand it (I am) for the docking increase.

As vaned74 points out, you can load some of the resources at Shikuka. You'll want to send an occasional convoy there for the oil anyway.


< Message edited by erstad -- 9/13/2009 11:07:32 PM >

(in reply to Historiker)
Post #: 37
RE: Japanese Merchant Convoy Composition - 9/13/2009 11:19:38 PM   
vaned74

 

Posts: 389
Joined: 11/17/2008
Status: offline
I run about 8 Ehime class AKs to Shikuka every week and two smaller convoys rotating in and out of Toyohara back to Honshu (each one about 10 AKL or Gozan AKs - each about 20,000 tons of capacity). Seems that my buildup since game start (after 90 days) on Sakhalin is only about 25,000 resources above what started there on Dec 7th. System seems to work well.

(in reply to erstad)
Post #: 38
RE: Japanese Merchant Convoy Composition - 9/14/2009 2:47:03 PM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Graymane


quote:

ORIGINAL: Mike Solli


[snip]I allocate a set amount of supply to operations, with a reserve that I don't touch unless absolutely necessary. I also track about 20 or so stats daily. I want to catch trends before they become critical. [snip]


What stats do you track and how?


I go to the industry screen from the intel screen. I copy down pretty much all of that data in a spreadsheet. That gives me daily trends. I can graph it when I want to in order to see longer trends, although graphing it is really not necessary. As long as the numbers are going up, life is good.

Once a month, I check track (in a different spreadsheet) the resource/oil/fuel by region to see how that looks. I then calculate what minimums I want to move to each region for each commodity that region needs. I then track on by hand how much goes to each region. It's really not as difficult as it sounds.

_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to Graymane)
Post #: 39
RE: Japanese Merchant Convoy Composition - 9/14/2009 2:54:30 PM   
vonSchnitter


Posts: 310
Joined: 7/2/2004
From: Germany - still
Status: offline
A little testing, to get a feel, what other factors apart from the "math" may influence resource flow in the Home Islands.

Setup: Scen 1, non historic start, using what ships are availabele for Hokaido. Running the "test" for three days. All TFs from Hockaido wil return to Ominato, set to not unload.

As can be seen, between day 1 and day 2 about 200k resource points vanish from Hokkaido (probably Saporro).
That could just be another day one freak.

More interesting is the loading behaviour:

The larger port at Hakkodate loads less than Saporro - (less ships in the Saporro TF - but larger) . even though both are docked. No OP points used for refuelling.
Does ship size - or anything other ship related - matter ?

As far as the non-docked TFs go, the loading speed is remarkebly variable:

On day 1 the Kushiro TF gets about the full share of the ports capacity - if docked. While the Muroran TF is much closer to expectation. Could that be another freak ?

The Wakkanai TF is just another case: The port is low on resources for loading. The interesting part is: The loading TF does not really "pull" resources from other areas.

Now for the balance of things (using day 2 to 3)

At the end of day 3, Hokkaido has 321844 resources left ashore, which is an increase of 15135 points.
According to Staff, Hockaido has a surplus of roughly 35000 points per day.
Since about 10000 points got transferred to ships about 10k points are not accounted for yet.
Ominato - as the transfer port from and to Hokaido - is a size 5 Port - which means 5*500 points capacity - which in turn leaves about 7500 points unaccounted.

If my math is right - just hope so - about 20% of the resource production as predicted by Staff is not there.

Anyone with a clue ?




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by vonSchnitter -- 9/14/2009 2:55:59 PM >

(in reply to vaned74)
Post #: 40
RE: Japanese Merchant Convoy Composition - 9/14/2009 3:34:03 PM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline
This past weekend, I tried to figure out how I want to set up the cargo fleets in the Home Islands.  After much brain sweat, I think I figured out how to do it (last night in bed).  I have a list of what ships are in each port.  I know what the convoy routes are for each port outside of Honshu and how long for one lap.  I know what ships are currently available.  I'm going to total them by type, figure out what goes where, and then decide where each individual ship will go.  I figure I can do that in a couple of hours tops instead of a week (at the rate I was going).

_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 41
RE: Japanese Merchant Convoy Composition - 9/14/2009 3:36:28 PM   
Graymane


Posts: 520
Joined: 3/31/2005
From: Bellevue, NE
Status: offline
Not sure if this is the answer or not, but do you get a full 2 phases in the first turn? I think whenever I do a first turn as Allies, My ships only move 1/2 of what they should, so maybe yours aren't getting a full day of unload capacity?

(in reply to vonSchnitter)
Post #: 42
RE: Japanese Merchant Convoy Composition - 9/14/2009 8:04:11 PM   
vonSchnitter


Posts: 310
Joined: 7/2/2004
From: Germany - still
Status: offline
Well Mike,

I do not know what you are smoking - joke - but I am quite sure your wet dreams on ideal tf composition solutions will collide with the game realities rather harshly. For two reasons:
As of yet, the system is not working as intended or/and
the system uses more parameters than the rule book reveals.

Whatever - both will have a rather uncomfortable go at you family yewels ...

Now - just to complicate matters:
How about invasion TFs ?

The bad news is: Any base with some modikum of CD capability will chew up your landing TFs in no time - even CAs or BBs in a landing TF are of limited use - they just chime in to surpress shore based guns after those have had a go at your transports - and the small fry (below CL) gets chewed up pretty badly.

As a recommendation: Use some of your time on cohabitation with the manual to find out about transports which may unload troops at the spot or the line of scremage ...
And places with MINES and CD are extremely unhealthy: A place like Balikpapan is as bad in AE like Singers used to be in WitP.

Cheers

(in reply to Graymane)
Post #: 43
RE: Japanese Merchant Convoy Composition - 9/14/2009 9:13:32 PM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline
vonSchnitter, sure it may not be working as designed but it'll work.  For example, Shikoku needs to transfer 303k resources to Honshu each month.  I've figured out how to do it with a total of 20 xAKs.  There are 2 TFs each of 10 ships (10 Miyatis and 10 Adens) working out of two ports to two ports in Honshu.  I'm assuming only 80% efficiency (24 days a month loading, unloading or moving between ports).  They can haul about 402k resources a month.  That's 33% more than they need to haul.  So, if it works as intended, they'll complete their requirement in 18 days.  The 4 ports being used are not used for any other purpose.  I'm using only xAKs starting in the Home Islands and only 10-12 kt varieties.  If I can haul what's needed in less than a month, I can use the remainder to repair the ships.  What I probably will do in that case is to pull 1-2 ships out of the convoy at any one time to repair while the others work.

Invasions.  Ah yes, that's going to hurt the merchant fleet.  There's no way around it unfortunately.  That's what happened historically.  The way I am going to counter that is to use selective acceleration.  I plan on accelerating ships (all ship types, not only cargos) when they are 10-30x duration in days from being received.  That's the most cost efficient (in shipbuilding points) way to accelerate.  The easy way to see that is to try to accelerate a ship in the queue.  If you can only choose between accelerate and normal, that's when to accelerate.  If you can choose between accelerate, halt and normal, do not accelerate.

_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to vonSchnitter)
Post #: 44
RE: Japanese Merchant Convoy Composition - 9/14/2009 9:21:28 PM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline
Here's a shot of my newest spreadsheet. I'm not done with it yet (I'll finish it tonight). Lower left shows how I stand vs. required. Upper left shows all the classes with the important details (ship tonnage, cargo capacity, speed, fuel capacity and total number in the Home Islands). There are some hidden columns in there that break down how many are in each region. Then you can see Shikoku and the 2 convoys showing the start and end ports. When you add some ships, it'll calculate the TF tonnage and cargo capacity. Below that I show the max tonnage for the lowest size port. Start and end port sizes. Max load/unload per ship per phase and max daily load/unload per day. #/month is the number of round trips the TF can make in 24 days. Finally it shows how many tons per month will be transported to Honshu.






Attachment (1)

_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 45
RE: Japanese Merchant Convoy Composition - 9/14/2009 9:58:51 PM   
Historiker


Posts: 4742
Joined: 7/4/2007
From: Deutschland
Status: offline
quote:

I plan on accelerating ships (all ship types, not only cargos) when they are 10-30x duration in days from being received. That's the most cost efficient (in shipbuilding points) way to accelerate.

Will it be cheaper, then?

_____________________________

Without any doubt: I am the spawn of evil - and the Bavarian Beer Monster (BBM)!

There's only one bad word and that's taxes. If any other word is good enough for sailors; it's good enough for you. - Ron Swanson

(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 46
RE: Japanese Merchant Convoy Composition - 9/18/2009 1:36:40 PM   
Historiker


Posts: 4742
Joined: 7/4/2007
From: Deutschland
Status: offline
bump!

_____________________________

Without any doubt: I am the spawn of evil - and the Bavarian Beer Monster (BBM)!

There's only one bad word and that's taxes. If any other word is good enough for sailors; it's good enough for you. - Ron Swanson

(in reply to Historiker)
Post #: 47
RE: Japanese Merchant Convoy Composition - 9/18/2009 2:14:11 PM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Historiker

quote:

I plan on accelerating ships (all ship types, not only cargos) when they are 10-30x duration in days from being received. That's the most cost efficient (in shipbuilding points) way to accelerate.

Will it be cheaper, then?


Yeah, it's the most cost effective way to accelerate. Here's the rule from the manual:

"13.4.1 JAPANESE SHIP PRODUCTION
All ships remove 1 day of delay when the delay is greater than:
»» 10 * Ship Durability
This automatic delay removal does not cost Naval or Merchant shipyard points. Those ships set
for normal construction with a delay less than 10 * Ship Durability require Naval or Merchant
shipyard points equal to their durability to remove 1 delay (each day). If set to accelerated
production, the ship will remove 2 days of delay (each day) for a cost equal to 3 times its
durability. A ship that has a delay over 10 * Ship Durability and less than 30 * Ship Durability
may be accelerated. It will remove 1 additional delay (other than the free 1 delay removal) each
day for a cost of appropriate shipyard points equal to the ship’s durability."

Here's the way I interpret the above:

>30x durability (days) = 0 cost for normal reduction of one day per day; no acceleration possible

10 to 30x durability (days) = 0 cost for normal reduction of one day per day; accelerate 1 additional day per day (for a total of two) at a cost of 1x ship's durability in shipbuilding points for each day accelerated

<10x durability (days) = 1x durability for normal reduction of one day per day; accelerate 1 additional day per day (for a total of two) at an additional cost of 2x durability in shipbuilding points for each day accelerated

Here's a chart:






Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Mike Solli -- 9/18/2009 2:18:31 PM >


_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to Historiker)
Post #: 48
RE: Japanese Merchant Convoy Composition - 9/18/2009 2:23:45 PM   
Historiker


Posts: 4742
Joined: 7/4/2007
From: Deutschland
Status: offline
I see, thank you! :)

_____________________________

Without any doubt: I am the spawn of evil - and the Bavarian Beer Monster (BBM)!

There's only one bad word and that's taxes. If any other word is good enough for sailors; it's good enough for you. - Ron Swanson

(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 49
RE: Japanese Merchant Convoy Composition - 9/18/2009 6:21:07 PM   
vaned74

 

Posts: 389
Joined: 11/17/2008
Status: offline
I don't think this is entirely accurate on ship acceleration. The net yard cost is the same as best I can tell. The difference is on burden on daily shipyard points and whether you have the capacity to accelerate within your production.

An explanation:

Let's say you have a durability 10 ship that is 200 days until delivery.

Case 1 - No acceleration
Time to deliver - 200 days
Cost - 100 days at 10 durability = 1,000 yard points

Case 2 - Acceleration prior to "cost period" (ie delivery < 10x durability days)
Accelerate for 50 turns (means 100 days advance)
Time to deliver - 150 days
Cost - 50 turns of pre-cost accel at 1x durability = 500 yard points +
100 turns of normal cost = 1,000 yard points
Total Cost = 1,500 yard points

Case 3 - Acceleration in cost period100 days of no acceleration and no cost = 0 cost
50 days running at 3x durability cost
Cost = 50 x 3 x 10 = 1,500 points
Time to deliver - 150 days

So the total cost is the same whether you advance in the <10x durability period or in the >10x<30x durability period.

The difference lies in that if you wait to accelerate when your ships are all in the less than 10x durability days period (ie the normal cost days) then you put a lot of extra daily demand on your shipyard point production and if you have a lot of ships accelerated in this period and not a lot of surplus yard points stockpiled, you may not be able to afford it.

If you do no acceleration, the ship will

< Message edited by vaned74 -- 9/18/2009 6:25:03 PM >

(in reply to vonSchnitter)
Post #: 50
RE: Japanese Merchant Convoy Composition - 9/18/2009 6:46:30 PM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline
I stated at the beginning that it was my interpretation.  Here's the part that is vague (in my mind, at least).

"A ship that has a delay over 10 * Ship Durability and less than 30 * Ship Durability
may be accelerated. It will remove 1 additional delay (other than the free 1 delay removal) each
day for a cost of appropriate shipyard points equal to the ship’s durability."

The way I read it is that the cost is 1x the ship's durability to accelerate it during this period and no additional cost for the normal 1 day per day.

_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to vaned74)
Post #: 51
RE: Japanese Merchant Convoy Composition - 9/18/2009 7:02:28 PM   
vaned74

 

Posts: 389
Joined: 11/17/2008
Status: offline
Yes, I agree completely with your costing interpretation. I am just saying that I think (and emphasis on "I think") is that the total costs in yard points is the same regardless of whether you accelerate in the less than 10x durability days or in the pre-normal cost days. By normal cost I mean those days < 10 x durability where the only the ship advances is if you have yard points available.

Where things even out is that in the period 10x to 30x durability days - there is no cost for the ship to advance at the rate of 1 day per turn.

But, in the period less than 10x durability days it costs yard points equal to the durability of the ship to advance one day (there are no automatic, non costing advancements). Thus, the additional cost you have in accelerating (2x durability per day accelerated) is partly offset by the fact that there are less "normal costing days".

I could be wrong - but this seems to track with my spreadsheets on costing that I have done for this and Witp.

(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 52
RE: Japanese Merchant Convoy Composition - 9/18/2009 7:11:14 PM   
Woos

 

Posts: 683
Joined: 6/5/2005
From: Germany
Status: offline
I completely agree with vaned (and tried to point it out to Mike in a previous thread already). IMHO the manual is quite clear:

Further out than 10*durability:
No acceleration:
2 days for 2 days delay
No cost

Acceleration:
1 day for 2 days delay
1 point cost
(so 1 day less for 1 point cost)

Less out than 10*durability:
No acceleration:
2 days for 2 days delay
2 points cost

Acceleration:
1 day for 2 days delay
3 points cost
(so 1 day less for 1 point cost)

So there is no gain in cost effectiveness independent on when you accelerate. Accelerating lots of ships which are more than 10 times out just means that you increase the number of ships which are less than 10 times out until they will use (even unaccelerated) more Nav/Merch Points than available.

Note that all costs are of course times durability.

(in reply to vaned74)
Post #: 53
RE: Japanese Merchant Convoy Composition - 9/18/2009 7:23:08 PM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline
I see where you guys are coming from.  Let me wrap my brain around it this weekend when I have some time.

_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to Woos)
Post #: 54
RE: Japanese Merchant Convoy Composition - 8/15/2010 8:27:17 PM   
Mac Linehan

 

Posts: 1484
Joined: 12/19/2004
From: Denver Colorado
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: pompack

Well Mike, I kinda approached it from a different direction. This example is for resources; oil is more complex because there are fewer size choices for tankers.

Assume little ships are less efficient (ton-miles move per dollop of fuel); note that every ship will be sailing every day (unless loading/unloading) but the short haul routes will spend proportionally more time loading/unloading thus that is where you want the small ships.
Assume that I will deliver to a port that is the same size or larger than the source port
Assume that escorts will be the limiting factor so strive to maximize the convoy size
Assume that all of the two smallest AKs are converted to PBs

So I find the closest port that is a source of goodies.
I take one escort (1941, I expect to have to add an additional escort every six months as the subs get better) and as many of the smallest AKs required to be just below the size of the source port.
I determine the transit time; divide capacity by twice transit time plus two days (not always true but this assumes one day load/unload) to give mean daily transfer rate (MDTR); divide daily resource production (or overland movement if port not resource center) by MDTR to determine ROUGHLY how many convoys are required to service the source.
Create the required number of convoys and start them moving. Note that they will bunch up at first but that doesn't matter; in the steady state they will NOT interfere unless you have created too many convoys.

Now repeat for each successively more distant source. Note that as you go further out, the ships in the individual convoys get larger simply because you run out of small ships.

Now I have found that the source ports are not fully utilized; a level 3 port is capable of handling 10k- 20k (big ship versus little ship) and that is more than can be made available in every case I have found (so far). The bottleneck can come at the receiving end with many convoys coming into a limited number of ports at irregular intervals. HOWEVER I have found that there are not really a limited number of ports. The trick is to insure that you direct (for as long as possible) single convoy STREAMS to a single port. When you have a case where the desination port is big enough to simultaneously take a convoy for each of two (or more) streams, then you can direct those multiple streams to a single port.

Now you will still run out of ports that way, so the next step is to monitor the loading of each destination port: a destination port can be considered as a one-convoy-port or a two-convoy-port, etc based upon the size of the convoys and the port. Each day simply note how many additional convoys of the largest size scheduled for that port could be accomidated there and note the most underutilized port on Honshu (this is actually more rigorous than necessary, I just eyeball it myself). When it is necessary to add the next convoy stream, route it to that port. As usual, there will be short-term conflicts but they will work themselves out as the convoys space out to to initial congestion (usually, there will always be recurring conflicts due to the beat frequecies generated by the varying convoy voyage times from different streams using the same destination port.)

The selection of a destination port is not as significant as it seems at first glance. When you use multiple destination ports, some convoys will have to steam further than others but it really doesn't matter that much as long as you avoid crossing routes (e.g. a southbound convoy from Sakahlin heading for Hiroshima meeting a northbond convoy from Luzon heading for Hirosaki would be a Bad Thing). By spreading the load among many destination ports you do tend to increase the sailing distance but you drastically reduce the congestion at the few big ports. Also note that you should be cautious about using a destination port that is adjacent to port on another island; that can reduce the amount of inter-island transfer by "osmosis" and require you to use precious shipping for inter-island transfers.

Now reading this, it sounds much more complicated than it really is. At a basic level it is use convoys that fit the source port and send them to as many destination ports as possible. They will conflict at first but then space themselves out automatically




pompack - was doing a forum search on the Japanese Economy and came across your entry. Could I trouble you give a more detailed explanation of your formula; I am a math wannabe but am not getting the whole picture.

Outstanding work; thank you for your help

His Imperial Japanese Majesties Economics Minister Macsan



_____________________________

LAV-25 2147

(in reply to pompack)
Post #: 55
RE: Japanese Merchant Convoy Composition - 8/18/2010 7:39:54 PM   
d0mbo

 

Posts: 592
Joined: 8/21/2009
From: Holland
Status: offline
Indeed an interesting find, this thread.

Did the latest patch make the task of running the convoys easier? I understand it made improvements to the CS command.

So, how do you Jap grunts go about the convoy side of the game nowadays?


(in reply to Mac Linehan)
Post #: 56
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> The War Room >> RE: Japanese Merchant Convoy Composition Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.922