Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: THE THREAD!!!

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> The War Room >> RE: THE THREAD!!! Page: <<   < prev  134 135 [136] 137 138   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 9/26/2009 12:40:23 AM   
Onime No Kyo


Posts: 16842
Joined: 4/28/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Terminus


quote:

ORIGINAL: Onime No Kyo

Tithe.

Instead of my usual drivel, I have a serious question today. Does anyone recall if the Washington Naval Treaty imposed any displacement limits on CVs? I was under the impression that it did not, but an article I read suggests that it does.

Thanks!


It did. Only two carriers per signatory nation could displace more than 27,000 tons and these could be no more than 33,000 tons. This was to allow reconstruction of battlecruisers.


Thanks T. But I thought the Lex and Sara displaced significantly more.

_____________________________

"Mighty is the Thread! Great are its works and insane are its inhabitants!" -Brother Mynok

(in reply to Terminus)
Post #: 4051
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 9/26/2009 12:41:00 AM   
USSAmerica


Posts: 18715
Joined: 10/28/2002
From: Graham, NC, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: AW1Steve


quote:

ORIGINAL: Onime No Kyo


quote:

ORIGINAL: USS America

My wife can do amazingly delicious things with a goose.  


I know I've said this before, but are you sure you dont want to rephrase that.


Or tell us more!


Not in a "family friendly" forum.

_____________________________

Mike

"Good times will set you free" - Jimmy Buffett

"They need more rum punch" - Me


Artwork by The Amazing Dixie

(in reply to AW1Steve)
Post #: 4052
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 9/26/2009 12:42:07 AM   
AW1Steve


Posts: 14507
Joined: 3/10/2007
From: Mordor Illlinois
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Onime No Kyo


quote:

ORIGINAL: Terminus


quote:

ORIGINAL: Onime No Kyo

Tithe.

Instead of my usual drivel, I have a serious question today. Does anyone recall if the Washington Naval Treaty imposed any displacement limits on CVs? I was under the impression that it did not, but an article I read suggests that it does.

Thanks!


It did. Only two carriers per signatory nation could displace more than 27,000 tons and these could be no more than 33,000 tons. This was to allow reconstruction of battlecruisers.


Thanks T. But I thought the Lex and Sara displaced significantly more.



Not empty. Full they were around 33,000 tons (including boiler water, fuel, Ammo, People, etc).

(in reply to Onime No Kyo)
Post #: 4053
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 9/26/2009 12:44:58 AM   
Terminus


Posts: 41459
Joined: 4/23/2005
From: Denmark
Status: offline
Standard displacement was 33,000 tons. Maximum displacement added about 10,000.

_____________________________

We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.

(in reply to AW1Steve)
Post #: 4054
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 9/26/2009 12:57:07 AM   
JWE

 

Posts: 6580
Joined: 7/19/2005
Status: offline
Ok, just seriously urinated on a trash-mouth pissant on the main boards. I'm ducking for cover, but I know Mynok just loves that stuff, so ...

_____________________________


(in reply to Terminus)
Post #: 4055
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 9/26/2009 1:27:52 AM   
USSAmerica


Posts: 18715
Joined: 10/28/2002
From: Graham, NC, USA
Status: offline
Keep your head down, John.  

_____________________________

Mike

"Good times will set you free" - Jimmy Buffett

"They need more rum punch" - Me


Artwork by The Amazing Dixie

(in reply to JWE)
Post #: 4056
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 9/26/2009 2:59:18 AM   
Mynok


Posts: 12108
Joined: 11/30/2002
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: USS America


quote:

ORIGINAL: Speedy


quote:

ORIGINAL: stuman


quote:

ORIGINAL: Speedy

T i'm jealous.........

My favourite band are playing 'near you' on 15th August 2010.............


Which band ?


U2.....

Saw them twice this summer.



8 days to go until we go see them here in Raleigh.


We'll be there!! My wife would lock me in the attic for years if we didn't go.

_____________________________

"Measure civilization by the ability of citizens to mock government with impunity" -- Unknown

(in reply to USSAmerica)
Post #: 4057
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 9/26/2009 3:04:05 AM   
Mynok


Posts: 12108
Joined: 11/30/2002
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: JWE

Ok, just seriously urinated on a trash-mouth pissant on the main boards. I'm ducking for cover, but I know Mynok just loves that stuff, so ...


I prefer bouncing stupidity and idiots spouting off about things they have no experience with.

_____________________________

"Measure civilization by the ability of citizens to mock government with impunity" -- Unknown

(in reply to JWE)
Post #: 4058
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 9/26/2009 3:13:01 AM   
stuman


Posts: 3907
Joined: 9/14/2008
From: Elvis' Hometown
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: JWE

So there I was at the super-market, getting stuff to eat, and was wandering past the frozen fowls, when I look, and what do I see in the midst of all the capons, but a goose.

Well, I got some friends coming over tomorrow, so I think to myself – self, hmm, a goose, yeah, cool, I can do a goose. So I snag the goose. I get a bunch of other stuff and head for the checkout line.

Whoah, Nellie. Everything goes ‘beep’ except Ms Goose.

“Oh, this doesn’t have a tag, so we’ll have to get a price.” Yeah, okay, no worries. And on, and on.

“Sir, I’m afraid we can’t find a price, on this.” Oh, that’s ok, says I – I found it in the bin of frozen capons. “Oh, but this is a goose, it isn’t a capon.” No worries, says I, just think about it – a goose is just a great big chicken. So just charge me for a great big fat capon. “But sir, that’s going to be expensive.” Oh, says I, that’s quite all right.

So a 7lb goose for $18.00. Woof! It was all I could do to keep from ROTFFLMAO.



" ...a goose is just a great big chicken ". Hilarious. I have cooked up lots of other birds, but never a goose. Tell us how it comes out.

_____________________________

" Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the War Room. " President Muffley


(in reply to JWE)
Post #: 4059
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 9/26/2009 3:15:14 AM   
Wirraway_Ace


Posts: 1400
Joined: 10/8/2007
From: Austin / Brisbane
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: JWE

Ok, just seriously urinated on a trash-mouth pissant on the main boards. I'm ducking for cover, but I know Mynok just loves that stuff, so ...


The guy who really, really wanted to ensure you knew that ensigns should not be commanding CLs may also come looking for you JWE....

(in reply to JWE)
Post #: 4060
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 9/26/2009 4:17:49 AM   
stuman


Posts: 3907
Joined: 9/14/2008
From: Elvis' Hometown
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Wirraway_Ace


quote:

ORIGINAL: JWE

Ok, just seriously urinated on a trash-mouth pissant on the main boards. I'm ducking for cover, but I know Mynok just loves that stuff, so ...


The guy who really, really wanted to ensure you knew that ensigns should not be commanding CLs may also come looking for you JWE....


I was going to quote that guy about the Leander, ensigns, etc. But I thought that JWE might get mad and come beat me to death with a boat oar. So never mind.

_____________________________

" Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the War Room. " President Muffley


(in reply to Wirraway_Ace)
Post #: 4061
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 9/26/2009 5:31:59 AM   
comte


Posts: 2358
Joined: 2/4/2009
From: Be'eri, Hadarom, Israel
Status: offline
Half Past Midnight Tithe

(in reply to stuman)
Post #: 4062
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 9/26/2009 8:30:35 AM   
Apollo11


Posts: 24082
Joined: 6/7/2001
From: Zagreb, Croatia
Status: offline
Hi all,

Good morning!


Leo "Apollo11"

_____________________________



Prior Preparation & Planning Prevents Pathetically Poor Performance!

A & B: WitW, WitE, WbtS, GGWaW, GGWaW2-AWD, HttR, CotA, BftB, CF
P: UV, WitP, WitP-AE

(in reply to comte)
Post #: 4063
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 9/26/2009 10:07:37 AM   
Terminus


Posts: 41459
Joined: 4/23/2005
From: Denmark
Status: offline
Tithe...

_____________________________

We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.

(in reply to Apollo11)
Post #: 4064
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 9/26/2009 10:35:10 AM   
Wolfpack_MatrixForum

 

Posts: 181
Joined: 3/1/2004
From: Raleigh,NC
Status: offline
Good Morning Tithe!

(in reply to Terminus)
Post #: 4065
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 9/26/2009 10:35:58 AM   
Wolfpack_MatrixForum

 

Posts: 181
Joined: 3/1/2004
From: Raleigh,NC
Status: offline
Off to run 20 miles this morning. 2 weeks until the Baltimore marathon!

(in reply to Wolfpack_MatrixForum)
Post #: 4066
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 9/26/2009 10:42:11 AM   
Dixie


Posts: 10303
Joined: 3/10/2006
From: UK
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mynok


quote:

ORIGINAL: JWE

Ok, just seriously urinated on a trash-mouth pissant on the main boards. I'm ducking for cover, but I know Mynok just loves that stuff, so ...


I prefer bouncing stupidity and idiots spouting off about things they have no experience with.


Speaking of which, I'm thinking about a career as a fan-boy. I'm not sure which side to take, but I can manage a complete disdain for others and a disregard for all established (and so-called) facts. All those fan-boys seem to have so much fun out there...

_____________________________



Bigger boys stole my sig

(in reply to Mynok)
Post #: 4067
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 9/26/2009 10:44:49 AM   
USSAmerica


Posts: 18715
Joined: 10/28/2002
From: Graham, NC, USA
Status: offline
"A career as a fan-boy."  

Thanks for starting my day off right, Martin. 


_____________________________

Mike

"Good times will set you free" - Jimmy Buffett

"They need more rum punch" - Me


Artwork by The Amazing Dixie

(in reply to Dixie)
Post #: 4068
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 9/26/2009 10:45:05 AM   
USSAmerica


Posts: 18715
Joined: 10/28/2002
From: Graham, NC, USA
Status: offline
Good Saturday morning - Tithe. 

_____________________________

Mike

"Good times will set you free" - Jimmy Buffett

"They need more rum punch" - Me


Artwork by The Amazing Dixie

(in reply to USSAmerica)
Post #: 4069
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 9/26/2009 10:45:45 AM   
USSAmerica


Posts: 18715
Joined: 10/28/2002
From: Graham, NC, USA
Status: offline
0645 departure for the first of two hockey rinks this morning.  Should be home by noon for a afternoon full of football and napping.  

_____________________________

Mike

"Good times will set you free" - Jimmy Buffett

"They need more rum punch" - Me


Artwork by The Amazing Dixie

(in reply to USSAmerica)
Post #: 4070
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 9/26/2009 11:17:22 AM   
Mike Scholl

 

Posts: 9349
Joined: 1/1/2003
From: Kansas City, MO
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Onime No Kyo


quote:

ORIGINAL: Terminus


quote:

ORIGINAL: Onime No Kyo

Tithe.

Instead of my usual drivel, I have a serious question today. Does anyone recall if the Washington Naval Treaty imposed any displacement limits on CVs? I was under the impression that it did not, but an article I read suggests that it does.

Thanks!


It did. Only two carriers per signatory nation could displace more than 27,000 tons and these could be no more than 33,000 tons. This was to allow reconstruction of battlecruisers.


Thanks T. But I thought the Lex and Sara displaced significantly more.



Treaty limit was 20,000 tons per CV..., but a clause was included to allow the conversion of two vessels already under construction to CV's at the behest of the Japanese and the Americans. These were the Lexington and Saratoga for the US and the Akagi and Amagi for the Japanese. Amagi's destruction in the 1923 earthquake resulted in the substitution of the Kaga.

Another such clause allowed the British to build the post WW I designed Nelson and Rodney while most participants were restricted to compleating BB's designed before any post-war tests were conducted.

(in reply to Onime No Kyo)
Post #: 4071
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 9/26/2009 11:53:38 AM   
Grollub


Posts: 6674
Joined: 10/9/2005
From: Lulea, Sweden
Status: offline
Good morning gents.

_____________________________

“Not mastering metaphores is like cooking pasta when the train is delayed"

(in reply to Mike Scholl)
Post #: 4072
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 9/26/2009 12:29:55 PM   
Dixie


Posts: 10303
Joined: 3/10/2006
From: UK
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: USS America

"A career as a fan-boy."  

Thanks for starting my day off right, Martin. 



I'm doing well lately I made Eric smile yesterday and today I've started your day with a smile

_____________________________



Bigger boys stole my sig

(in reply to USSAmerica)
Post #: 4073
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 9/26/2009 1:18:04 PM   
Terminus


Posts: 41459
Joined: 4/23/2005
From: Denmark
Status: offline
Fanboyism is not a very rewarding career.

_____________________________

We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.

(in reply to Dixie)
Post #: 4074
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 9/26/2009 1:26:12 PM   
stuman


Posts: 3907
Joined: 9/14/2008
From: Elvis' Hometown
Status: offline
Hello everyone. It has finally stopped raining here. I think we have had rain for about 10 straight days. But for the next week sunny with mild temperatures !

_____________________________

" Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the War Room. " President Muffley


(in reply to Dixie)
Post #: 4075
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 9/26/2009 1:54:29 PM   
JWE

 

Posts: 6580
Joined: 7/19/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: stuman
quote:

ORIGINAL: Wirraway_Ace
The guy who really, really wanted to ensure you knew that ensigns should not be commanding CLs may also come looking for you JWE....

I was going to quote that guy about the Leander, ensigns, etc. But I thought that JWE might get mad and come beat me to death with a boat oar. So never mind.


Oh, heavens. I didn't mind that a bit. Actually, he reminded me that I promised those two Ensigns an extra helping of strawberries.

< Message edited by JWE -- 9/26/2009 1:59:33 PM >


_____________________________


(in reply to stuman)
Post #: 4076
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 9/26/2009 2:12:54 PM   
Onime No Kyo


Posts: 16842
Joined: 4/28/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mike Scholl


quote:

ORIGINAL: Onime No Kyo


quote:

ORIGINAL: Terminus


quote:

ORIGINAL: Onime No Kyo

Tithe.

Instead of my usual drivel, I have a serious question today. Does anyone recall if the Washington Naval Treaty imposed any displacement limits on CVs? I was under the impression that it did not, but an article I read suggests that it does.

Thanks!


It did. Only two carriers per signatory nation could displace more than 27,000 tons and these could be no more than 33,000 tons. This was to allow reconstruction of battlecruisers.


Thanks T. But I thought the Lex and Sara displaced significantly more.



Treaty limit was 20,000 tons per CV..., but a clause was included to allow the conversion of two vessels already under construction to CV's at the behest of the Japanese and the Americans. These were the Lexington and Saratoga for the US and the Akagi and Amagi for the Japanese. Amagi's destruction in the 1923 earthquake resulted in the substitution of the Kaga.

Another such clause allowed the British to build the post WW I designed Nelson and Rodney while most participants were restricted to compleating BB's designed before any post-war tests were conducted.


Thank you Mike, and T and Steve. I was just a bit confused by some displacement figures of 50k I saw for the Sara of 1944.

Did the treaty make any allowance for the number of decks?

_____________________________

"Mighty is the Thread! Great are its works and insane are its inhabitants!" -Brother Mynok

(in reply to Mike Scholl)
Post #: 4077
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 9/26/2009 2:37:25 PM   
Terminus


Posts: 41459
Joined: 4/23/2005
From: Denmark
Status: offline
No. You had a total tonnage allowed and a maximum tonnage per ship, but no set number of ships that could be built.

That was the reason why some of the small carriers, like the Ryujo and the Ranger, were built, to "use up" the allowable tonnage.

< Message edited by Terminus -- 9/26/2009 2:42:30 PM >


_____________________________

We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.

(in reply to Onime No Kyo)
Post #: 4078
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 9/26/2009 5:23:33 PM   
Onime No Kyo


Posts: 16842
Joined: 4/28/2004
Status: offline
Ah. Thank you T. That must be where I got the idea that there were no restrictions. Silly me.

_____________________________

"Mighty is the Thread! Great are its works and insane are its inhabitants!" -Brother Mynok

(in reply to Terminus)
Post #: 4079
RE: THE THREAD!!! - 9/26/2009 5:34:18 PM   
Apollo11


Posts: 24082
Joined: 6/7/2001
From: Zagreb, Croatia
Status: offline
Hi all,

Oh my...

Martin?


quote:


Justice system 'failing veterans'

by BBC


More than 20,000 former servicemen and women are in prison, on probation or on parole in England and Wales, according to the probation officers' union Napo.


The figure, which includes 8,500 veterans in jail, is twice the number of troops serving in Afghanistan.

Napo warned that "support is not available of sufficient calibre" for ex-forces personnel.

But a Ministry of Defence spokesman said the "vast majority" made a successful return to civilian life.

Downing Street said the issue was at the "forefront of the prime minister's mind".

'Very macho'

According to Napo research, around 12,000 former Army, Navy and Air Force personnel with criminal convictions are on the Probation Service's books.

It says that almost one prisoner in 10 is ex-forces.

A study of 90 former personnel on probation or parole suggested that one-in-three suffered from chronic alcohol abuse while one-in 10 abused illegal drugs.

Among them, domestic violence accounted for one-in-three convictions while other violent crimes accounted for around one-in-five.

A quarter said they suffered from post-traumatic stress disorder and others reported depression and behavioural problems.

Harry Fletcher, Napo's assistant general secretary, said the "very macho" culture of the services made it "very difficult to admit that you need help".

He said: "We've got to put effort into trying to divert as many veterans as possible from being in the justice system.

"It's the hidden kind of consequences of war. And I think there are things we can do to divert them away."

Shadow justice secretary Dominic Grieve said the public would be "shocked" that so many former servicemen and women were in custody.

He added: "It is a disgrace that so many who have served their country are languishing in our prisons.

"No-one is above the law, but this government has failed to provide proper support to our troops on return home."

David Hill, chief executive of charity Combat Stress, said he was "not surprised" by the findings.

He added: "We think it is time for a fresh look, and we are keen to engage with ministers to progress this."

Susan Bickerton, chief executive of housing charity Norcare, said authorities needed to act quicker to deal with the "army of forgotten war veterans sleeping on sofas of friends and families, a number of whom can and do turn to crime in desperation".

A Ministry of Justice spokesman said: "We take our duty of care for all offenders very seriously, irrespective of background.

"Our first priority is protecting the public, and by providing offenders with support and information which will aid their resettlement in the community, we reduce the risk that they will re-offend."

The MoD spokesman added that a National Audit Office report had found that 94% of ex-service personnel had found work within six months of leaving.

He added: "A small minority can face serious difficulties and we provide a wide range of support, before, during and after leaving the services, including the MoD's Prison In-Reach initiative."

Downing Street said it took the issue "enormously seriously".

A spokesman added: "We have a resettlement package for people leaving the forces to help them make the transition into civilian life as smoothly as possible.

"In 2008, the National Audit Office said the resettlement package was at the forefront of best practice."



Leo "Apollo11"

_____________________________



Prior Preparation & Planning Prevents Pathetically Poor Performance!

A & B: WitW, WitE, WbtS, GGWaW, GGWaW2-AWD, HttR, CotA, BftB, CF
P: UV, WitP, WitP-AE

(in reply to Onime No Kyo)
Post #: 4080
Page:   <<   < prev  134 135 [136] 137 138   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> The War Room >> RE: THE THREAD!!! Page: <<   < prev  134 135 [136] 137 138   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.672