Marshal Villars
Posts: 976
Joined: 8/21/2009 Status: offline
|
"about"... :) There are major differences, believe me. :) In my opinion the current COGEE values in Saxony, Silesia, Cracow, Tyrolia, other mountain economies, and many others, are off the mark and this would help out dramatically. It was campaigning in these areas which again and again had me scratching my head. Also, the eastern European, Hungarian, Russian, and Swedish/Finish values are different. Also note the incredibly rich regions of Flanders, Batavia, Cleves, and the Po river valley (Lombardy and Venice). Just one example of KEY differences: Tyrolia (an Alpine economy with a very low population density) has a current COGEE forage value of 60k. Fine. But not when compared to some of the richest regions of the period--Bohemia, Saxony, and Silesia, which have many provinces ranging from 20k-30k! These numbers should be totally reversed. In the case of Tyrolia, I can promise you it is just as impassible and sparsely populated as much of Switzerland, but in COGEE, it has no supply restrictions and a forage value of 60k! Yet, Prague, one of the richest and most densely populated regions in Europe at the time has a forage value of 20k! Another example: The reversal of Jutland and Zeeland (Copenhagen) in terms of their forage values. Again, the numbers here are in keeping with what I have learned about campaigning in the era and based on two population density maps I managed to find which bracket the era relatively well.
< Message edited by Marshal Villars -- 11/8/2009 12:11:07 PM >
|