Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Petition: Stop Fog-of-War for friendly units when playing vs AI

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> RE: Petition: Stop Fog-of-War for friendly units when playing vs AI Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Petition: Stop Fog-of-War for friendly units when p... - 8/15/2009 8:53:58 PM   
Don Bowen


Posts: 8183
Joined: 7/13/2000
From: Georgetown, Texas, USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Templer

One more issue.

If I atack a sub, it´s usally dived. So why can I see wich sub (name) do I atack? We are with FOW aren´t we?


(deleted)

< Message edited by Don Bowen -- 8/15/2009 8:54:29 PM >

(in reply to Templer_12)
Post #: 61
RE: Petition: Stop Fog-of-War for friendly units when p... - 8/15/2009 9:30:21 PM   
rockmedic109

 

Posts: 2390
Joined: 5/17/2005
From: Citrus Heights, CA
Status: offline
I've just had a report of BB Maryland sinking in the Ops reports.  I was perplexed, and looked it up after the turn ran and found Maryland happily pumping water out of herself at a drydock in Pearl Harbor.  I am assuming that this was the enemies FOW telling them errorneously that the old battlewagon had sunk.  Should I see that info?  Or just chalk it up to good signals intel that overheard a couple of admirals congratulating themselves over the sinking?

(in reply to Don Bowen)
Post #: 62
RE: Petition: Stop Fog-of-War for friendly units when p... - 8/15/2009 9:58:54 PM   
Don Bowen


Posts: 8183
Joined: 7/13/2000
From: Georgetown, Texas, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: rockmedic109

I've just had a report of BB Maryland sinking in the Ops reports.  I was perplexed, and looked it up after the turn ran and found Maryland happily pumping water out of herself at a drydock in Pearl Harbor.  I am assuming that this was the enemies FOW telling them errorneously that the old battlewagon had sunk.  Should I see that info?  Or just chalk it up to good signals intel that overheard a couple of admirals congratulating themselves over the sinking?


How are you playing?

(in reply to rockmedic109)
Post #: 63
RE: Petition: Stop Fog-of-War for friendly units when p... - 8/15/2009 11:34:53 PM   
rockmedic109

 

Posts: 2390
Joined: 5/17/2005
From: Citrus Heights, CA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Don Bowen


quote:

ORIGINAL: rockmedic109

I've just had a report of BB Maryland sinking in the Ops reports.  I was perplexed, and looked it up after the turn ran and found Maryland happily pumping water out of herself at a drydock in Pearl Harbor.  I am assuming that this was the enemies FOW telling them errorneously that the old battlewagon had sunk.  Should I see that info?  Or just chalk it up to good signals intel that overheard a couple of admirals congratulating themselves over the sinking?


How are you playing?

Poorly? I am playing Scenario 1 against the AI.

It's not a big issue and can be explained away as above, but I thought I would bring it up just in case it wasn't supposed to happen.

< Message edited by rockmedic109 -- 8/15/2009 11:35:00 PM >

(in reply to Don Bowen)
Post #: 64
RE: Petition: Stop Fog-of-War for friendly units when p... - 8/16/2009 3:19:05 PM   
Steely Glint


Posts: 580
Joined: 9/23/2003
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: CV Zuikaku

FOW for enemy units/ships/planes -YES
FOW for friendly units/ships/planes -NO


Exactly. HQ's get accurate daily reports on friendly units/ships/planes via radio.

If the game does otherwise then IMO the game is broken.


_____________________________

“It was a war of snap judgments and binary results—shoot or don’t, live or die.“

Wargamer since 1967. Matrix customer since 2003.

(in reply to CV Zuikaku)
Post #: 65
RE: Petition: Stop Fog-of-War for friendly units when p... - 8/16/2009 3:19:56 PM   
Steely Glint


Posts: 580
Joined: 9/23/2003
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: rockmedic109

I've just had a report of BB Maryland sinking in the Ops reports. I was perplexed, and looked it up after the turn ran and found Maryland happily pumping water out of herself at a drydock in Pearl Harbor. I am assuming that this was the enemies FOW telling them errorneously that the old battlewagon had sunk. Should I see that info? Or just chalk it up to good signals intel that overheard a couple of admirals congratulating themselves over the sinking?


This kind of nonsense is intolerable. Matrix: fix this bug ASAP.

_____________________________

“It was a war of snap judgments and binary results—shoot or don’t, live or die.“

Wargamer since 1967. Matrix customer since 2003.

(in reply to rockmedic109)
Post #: 66
RE: Petition: Stop Fog-of-War for friendly units when p... - 8/29/2009 4:04:33 AM   
fbs

 

Posts: 1048
Joined: 12/25/2008
Status: offline

Can we get a position from the developers if removing FOW for your own units when playing against the AI will be considered for some patch, please?

Thanks,
fbs

(in reply to Steely Glint)
Post #: 67
RE: Petition: Stop Fog-of-War for friendly units when p... - 8/29/2009 4:23:38 AM   
Zebedee


Posts: 535
Joined: 8/30/2005
Status: offline
Can I respectfully disagree with the sentiments of many on this thread?

I can't play PBEM. So I get my thrills where I can with the AI. And I really, really enjoy the tension of not knowing what exactly has gone on during the turn until it has processed. While I can appreciate many would want to click straight away on the individual eg ship or get cross about missing it when it sinks, I've found checking damage levels using the ship listing tools within the game an excellent way to minimise pointless clicking and identifying 'real' casualties.

If you can persuade the devs to make this an optional toggle for AI games, then it caters for all tastes and more power to your elbow. Removing it fullstop strikes me as being exceptionally unfair on people who can only play the AI (for whatever reason) and do enjoy the fog of war being implemented during the turn resolution.

A very strong nay from me if this is an either/or request for changing something I genuinely am enjoying and which adds no extra micromanagement to my turn routine whatsoever.

(in reply to fbs)
Post #: 68
RE: Petition: Stop Fog-of-War for friendly units when p... - 8/29/2009 5:30:47 AM   
fbs

 

Posts: 1048
Joined: 12/25/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Zebedee

Can I respectfully disagree with the sentiments of many on this thread?

I can't play PBEM. So I get my thrills where I can with the AI. And I really, really enjoy the tension of not knowing what exactly has gone on during the turn until it has processed. While I can appreciate many would want to click straight away on the individual eg ship or get cross about missing it when it sinks, I've found checking damage levels using the ship listing tools within the game an excellent way to minimise pointless clicking and identifying 'real' casualties.

If you can persuade the devs to make this an optional toggle for AI games, then it caters for all tastes and more power to your elbow. Removing it fullstop strikes me as being exceptionally unfair on people who can only play the AI (for whatever reason) and do enjoy the fog of war being implemented during the turn resolution.

A very strong nay from me if this is an either/or request for changing something I genuinely am enjoying and which adds no extra micromanagement to my turn routine whatsoever.



Zebedee,

Do you read the combat reports?

Cheers
fbs

(in reply to Zebedee)
Post #: 69
RE: Petition: Stop Fog-of-War for friendly units when p... - 8/29/2009 6:01:14 AM   
Zebedee


Posts: 535
Joined: 8/30/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: fbs
Zebedee,

Do you read the combat reports?

Cheers
fbs


I do indeed. It saves me posting up bugs which don't exist

(in reply to fbs)
Post #: 70
RE: Petition: Stop Fog-of-War for friendly units when p... - 8/29/2009 6:40:35 AM   
Don Bowen


Posts: 8183
Joined: 7/13/2000
From: Georgetown, Texas, USA
Status: offline

I have yet to find any process by which this occurs. I need a save. Post me a save just before the false report. One just after too, but really need before.

Else there is not much I can do.


(in reply to Zebedee)
Post #: 71
RE: Petition: Stop Fog-of-War for friendly units when p... - 8/29/2009 8:14:05 AM   
Klahn

 

Posts: 184
Joined: 5/8/2007
Status: offline
I'm assuming that means there shouldn't be any friendly FOW then?

(in reply to Don Bowen)
Post #: 72
RE: Petition: Stop Fog-of-War for friendly units when p... - 8/29/2009 3:36:37 PM   
fbs

 

Posts: 1048
Joined: 12/25/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Don Bowen

I have yet to find any process by which this occurs. I need a save. Post me a save just before the false report. One just after too, but really need before.

Else there is not much I can do.



This thread ended up mixing two different issues.

The issue that was originally raised is this: are the combat results for friendly forces fogged on the combat reports or not? That is, the combat report saying that a squadron lost 10 P-40 when only 1 was lost. Or Akagi being sunk (for Jap player) when it wasn't. In WITP friendly forces are fogged, and it seems that they still are here in AE; the petition is to remove FOW on combat reports for friendly forces when playing against the AI, and that's a change. The rationale for the change is that the commander of the squadron will know how many aircrafts he has in his base, so he knows how many were shot down.

A separate issue is ships sinking and getting damage for no apparent reason. This may or may not be related to the FOW for friendly forces; or may be related to ships being hit by patrol aircrafts; or may be a bug. The example I have is my AMc Condor being sunk by a 60kg bomb without ever being in any combat report. I think that the relevant question about this is: which existing game mechanism can make a ship to be damaged/sunk in 1 turn and not reported in the combat reports? patrol aircrafts? search aircrafts? or is this a bug?

Thanks!
fbs7

< Message edited by fbs -- 8/29/2009 3:39:26 PM >

(in reply to Don Bowen)
Post #: 73
RE: Petition: Stop Fog-of-War for friendly units when p... - 8/29/2009 3:46:20 PM   
fbs

 

Posts: 1048
Joined: 12/25/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Zebedee
quote:

ORIGINAL: fbs

Do you read the combat reports?



I do indeed. It saves me posting up bugs which don't exist



So how valuable do you find the combat reports if their results are inaccurate? It may print that your ship had heavy damage, but when you check it it has no damage at all; or your ship was sunk when it wasn't; or the wrong ship was sunk; or you lost 30 aircrafts but you check the squadron and it lost 1 aircraft in fact.

I'm just trying to understand the rationale that you use when reading the combat reports. What I do is to check the actual ships and groups involved one by one, then reload the last turn and compare your air groups one by one, in order to find out how many of my assets I lost.


Thanks!
fbs

(in reply to Zebedee)
Post #: 74
RE: Petition: Stop Fog-of-War for friendly units when p... - 8/29/2009 3:54:57 PM   
Don Bowen


Posts: 8183
Joined: 7/13/2000
From: Georgetown, Texas, USA
Status: offline

A save????

(in reply to fbs)
Post #: 75
RE: Petition: Stop Fog-of-War for friendly units when p... - 8/29/2009 3:59:42 PM   
Chris21wen

 

Posts: 6249
Joined: 1/17/2002
From: Cottesmore, Rutland
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: CV Zuikaku

It is not problem in the subs. I allways check any sub that has been under attack. Problem is in the merchants- they got hit by patrol planes and we don't get any message. Problem is when your TF commander sends wrong reports about his own ships hit and sunk- that is the major problem. Let me know if Tonan maru is hit by Do-24 so I can try to save her- not just to got message after 3 turns "Tonan maru have sunk". By what? By who? How? Alliens?



You may not get a ops report but listing all ship and sorting by damge works fine for me. Sunk ships is different, a roport should be generated even if it say ship xxx is missing or some such meassage.

(in reply to CV Zuikaku)
Post #: 76
RE: Petition: Stop Fog-of-War for friendly units when p... - 8/29/2009 4:30:45 PM   
fbs

 

Posts: 1048
Joined: 12/25/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Don Bowen


A save????



Don, I got a save of Dec 8, 1941 on Tech Support as "FOW for friendly forces + unreported ship sunk". It has all cases discussed here:

(a) A friendly air group with losses incorrectly reported on Combat Reports (this is not a bug, this is intended behavior, but we're asking to change it)

(b) A friendly air group with losses not reported anywhere in Combat Reports (looks like a bug)

(c) A ship being sunk not reported anywhere in Combat Reports (looks like a bug)

Thanks
fbs

(in reply to Don Bowen)
Post #: 77
RE: Petition: Stop Fog-of-War for friendly units when p... - 8/29/2009 4:34:28 PM   
Zebedee


Posts: 535
Joined: 8/30/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: fbs
So how valuable do you find the combat reports if their results are inaccurate? It may print that your ship had heavy damage, but when you check it it has no damage at all; or your ship was sunk when it wasn't; or the wrong ship was sunk; or you lost 30 aircrafts but you check the squadron and it lost 1 aircraft in fact.

I'm just trying to understand the rationale that you use when reading the combat reports. What I do is to check the actual ships and groups involved one by one, then reload the last turn and compare your air groups one by one, in order to find out how many of my assets I lost.


Thanks!
fbs


First I watch the combat animation. Very useful for spotting what went on precisely. Gives a lot of information which can be translated to altering CAP levels, bombing heights, judging how many escorts are required etc.

Then the combat report pops up which summarises some of the information gleaned from the animations. Is it accurate? No. It's a summary of the combat animation which is also inaccurate for both sides. I'll find out what really happened later - in the case of air units, I'd need to check for ops losses post combat later anyways, for ships I'd want to check on ammo levels too or system damage, so it's hardly adding to my workload. Just giving a bit of tension when I see a CV sunk in the combat report or seeing 20 zeros shot down by Hurricanes etc.

My turn routine is to filter all ships by damage. Newly damaged ships are fairly easily spotted. Investigate any which are sufficiently eye catching (tends to be any ship which has crossed the 10 system damage level or worse) and take action. Check air losses, then filter groups according to air type to spot which are down from previous turn, also I identify units with pilots overly fatigued at this point. For LCU units, I run through the units which were involved in combat to get an idea of disruption and fatigue levels. I'll check every unit in a malarial zone weekly.

This is the same routine as WitP for me. These are things I'd check every turn anyway because not all your air losses will be from combat, not all your ships' damage will be caused by enemy action and not all losses to LCU are a result of enemy activity.

The only inconvenience the combat report adds for me is a slight delay in my desire to know exactly what the results for each combat were precisely. This information might perhaps be of more use if I did not watch the combat animations (of which it is a bastardised summary in any case) but the combat animations reveal differences in skill and equipment quite well enough without this, and in addition some losses relevant to the combat in question won't be tallied by the game until later in the processing of the turn in any case.

In return, the fog of war increases the enjoyability of the game by introducing a tension into a game which now actually has an AI capable of surprising the human player (in a good way now!) strategically, operationally and also tactically. It might be a little thing but I'll take my cheap thrills where I can find them.

Where I would agree with you is that there should be some ingame notification that something has happened (so no mysterious sinkings). Perhaps when such things are absent, this is a bug? Of course, the notification does not need to be exact, but there should be some indication or link (however vague) to be able to spot what has happened. eg I don't need to know that a Catalina has put a torpedo into my xAK while on naval search, but it would be good to know that a ship has either seen a plane in the area or reports being hit by something.

Hope that gives you an insight into why I don't find FoW during combat animations/reports problematic but instead find them an additional factor in my enjoyment of the game. I can appreciate where you guys are coming from, but would ask you to consider that not everyone zips through the combat resolutions at high speed and that a middle way would cater for all of us while your current 'petition' caters only for your way of playing.

< Message edited by Zebedee -- 8/29/2009 4:45:16 PM >

(in reply to fbs)
Post #: 78
RE: Petition: Stop Fog-of-War for friendly units when p... - 8/29/2009 4:51:50 PM   
fbs

 

Posts: 1048
Joined: 12/25/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Zebedee
I can appreciate where you guys are coming from, but would ask you to consider that not everyone zips through the combat resolutions at high speed and that a middle way would cater for all of us while your current 'petition' caters only for your way of playing.



I also appreciate where you're coming from, but the way I see it it's no a matter of way of playing. It's a matter of realism: it makes no sense that the commander of an air group doesn't know how many aircrafts he lost: he can count how many aircraft are in his airfield at any moment. It was argued that some commanders knew his losses but lied when reporting to superiors, but that's difficult to model. I'd rather see the experience, morale and fatigue of the crews being fogged than the combat results -- that's more realistic, as these measures are, by definition, estimates.

I'd like to see fog of war being implemented in a realistic way: submarines should not report they were sunk (they were underwater, hahaha), and should have some mechanism for fogging their position and stats. Task forces on "radio silence" should also fog themselves quit a bit; and isolated units, specially small ones, should be fogged too. Moreover, "human dimensions" should show an indicative like "Very low" for 0-30xp, "Low" for 31-50xp, and so forth, instead of a clear-value number.

These are realistic things; but combat reports have no relationship whatsoever with reality, and I doubt they were created that way to increase playing satisfaction either. They are this way just because the same report is shared by both sides on PBEM, so all results are fogged. The approach is arbitrary and unrealistic, and I'm happy someone has fun going through that.

Cheers!
fbs


< Message edited by fbs -- 8/29/2009 4:54:07 PM >

(in reply to Zebedee)
Post #: 79
RE: Petition: Stop Fog-of-War for friendly units when p... - 8/29/2009 4:53:50 PM   
Don Bowen


Posts: 8183
Joined: 7/13/2000
From: Georgetown, Texas, USA
Status: offline

Sorry guys, I need more help.

This is a very difficult issue to find - a little tweak somewhere down in the guts. A save after it happens is not any good. I need a save just before it happens, along with a hint of what ship and where.


(in reply to fbs)
Post #: 80
RE: Petition: Stop Fog-of-War for friendly units when p... - 8/29/2009 5:16:09 PM   
Don Bowen


Posts: 8183
Joined: 7/13/2000
From: Georgetown, Texas, USA
Status: offline

Actually, looking at the save posted in the Tech Support forum, I do not think I understand the issue.

Can some one please state the perceived problem for me? "Naval" only, as I only handle those issues.

(in reply to Don Bowen)
Post #: 81
RE: Petition: Stop Fog-of-War for friendly units when p... - 8/29/2009 5:42:16 PM   
Zebedee


Posts: 535
Joined: 8/30/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: fbs
I also appreciate where you're coming from, but the way I see it it's no a matter of way of playing. It's a matter of realism: it makes no sense that the commander of an air group doesn't know how many aircrafts he lost: he can count how many aircraft are in his airfield at any moment. I
Cheers!
fbs



My elderly eyes may be playing tricks on me, but doesn't every squadron display daily losses and cause as well as keeping track of total losses? This information is available on each individual squadron's screen (see pages 143 and 144 of the manual for where to find this info on the screen).

In any case, I'll bow out here as it's obvious there may be a bug which Don Bowen is trying to track down and I can't assist with finding it right now.

All the best,

Zeb

(in reply to fbs)
Post #: 82
RE: Petition: Stop Fog-of-War for friendly units when p... - 8/29/2009 5:52:38 PM   
fbs

 

Posts: 1048
Joined: 12/25/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Don Bowen
Actually, looking at the save posted in the Tech Support forum, I do not think I understand the issue.

Can some one please state the perceived problem for me? "Naval" only, as I only handle those issues.



The naval problem is that AMc Condor was sunk without being involved in any combat in the combat report, or in any attack on operational report.

Hmm... perhaps that's actually an Aerial issue, given that it was sunk by a bomb?

Thanks,
fbs

< Message edited by fbs -- 8/29/2009 5:58:56 PM >

(in reply to Don Bowen)
Post #: 83
RE: Petition: Stop Fog-of-War for friendly units when p... - 8/29/2009 6:22:25 PM   
bradfordkay

 

Posts: 8683
Joined: 3/24/2002
From: Olympia, WA
Status: offline
"Friendly air losses will be known with certainty once the squadron returns so it seems to me freindly air losses should be accurate."

The problem is that the combat report is supposed to be the same for both sides, isn't it? Thus the FOW on both sides units in the combat report.

You have to look at the units afterwards to see their real status. SAIEW.

The problem of the search plane attacks on shipping not being reported in the Ops report is a different matter. This should be addressed if found to be repeatable.


_____________________________

fair winds,
Brad

(in reply to fbs)
Post #: 84
RE: Petition: Stop Fog-of-War for friendly units when p... - 8/29/2009 6:26:38 PM   
Don Bowen


Posts: 8183
Joined: 7/13/2000
From: Georgetown, Texas, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: fbs

quote:

ORIGINAL: Don Bowen
Actually, looking at the save posted in the Tech Support forum, I do not think I understand the issue.

Can some one please state the perceived problem for me? "Naval" only, as I only handle those issues.



The naval problem is that AMc Condor was sunk without being involved in any combat in the combat report, or in any attack on operational report.

Hmm... perhaps that's actually an Aerial issue, given that it was sunk by a bomb?

Thanks,
fbs


I do believe this issue was addressed in the patch. It's actually not "naval" but results from air attack. The save is from pre-patch. Does the issue still exists with the beta patch?

(in reply to fbs)
Post #: 85
RE: Petition: Stop Fog-of-War for friendly units when p... - 8/29/2009 8:40:04 PM   
fbs

 

Posts: 1048
Joined: 12/25/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: bradfordkay

"Friendly air losses will be known with certainty once the squadron returns so it seems to me freindly air losses should be accurate."

The problem is that the combat report is supposed to be the same for both sides, isn't it? Thus the FOW on both sides units in the combat report.




Right, that's why the request for the change is when playing against the AI; there doesn't seem to be any easy way of working around that on a PBEM game.

Cheers
fbs

(in reply to bradfordkay)
Post #: 86
RE: Petition: Stop Fog-of-War for friendly units when p... - 8/29/2009 8:48:06 PM   
fbs

 

Posts: 1048
Joined: 12/25/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Don Bowen
I do believe this issue was addressed in the patch. It's actually not "naval" but results from air attack. The save is from pre-patch. Does the issue still exists with the beta patch?


Oh, that's fantastic. I didn't see that in the path list of fixes. I'll keep an eye on the gameplay after patch in to see if that happens again.

Thanks,
fbs

(in reply to Don Bowen)
Post #: 87
RE: Petition: Stop Fog-of-War for friendly units when p... - 8/29/2009 9:16:37 PM   
jb123


Posts: 276
Joined: 8/6/2009
Status: offline
aye, outside the scope of the game. I don't want to argue, as I customer of this fine game I would prefer a switch to toggle it on off. PBEMs can work it out in house rules

(in reply to Tazo)
Post #: 88
RE: Petition: Stop Fog-of-War for friendly units when p... - 1/17/2010 5:51:55 AM   
Runyon

 

Posts: 10
Joined: 10/27/2009
Status: offline
I'd like to add my vote to changing the way FOW works for friendly units. I lost three ships in the past two turns through mysterious attacks. The last one seemed so unlikely to be a FOW issue that I came to the boards to see if it is a bug. Apparently it is not.

For example, I just lost an AP that had been completely undamaged and was disbanded in a port. The port has good CAP, and is completely supplied and supported. There are other ships in the harbor including three task forces, and many troops in the base including AA with radar. Now I can accept that the port was attacked and I lost the ship to a 500 lb bomb, but at least I would expect somebody to get around to telling me that an attack was actually taking place. Somehow the enemy launched an airstrike on my port, sank the ship and none of the thousands of people there seemed to notice this until they found a big chunk of metal the next day, where there used to be a ship. Somehow I find this rather difficult to accept as a FOW issue.

(in reply to Don Bowen)
Post #: 89
RE: Petition: Stop Fog-of-War for friendly units when p... - 1/17/2010 8:07:13 AM   
usersatch

 

Posts: 400
Joined: 6/1/2005
Status: offline
I vote that FOW remain for the Allies. I know from personal experience, that even on a micro-scale, FOW exists. As a platoon sergeant, there were times that I THOUGHT I knew what was going on with my squads, but I was dead wrong. Eventually, it was cleared up, but combat is so dynamic that by the time you figured it out, you were on to the next FOW problem. The nature of the beast.

(in reply to fbs)
Post #: 90
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> RE: Petition: Stop Fog-of-War for friendly units when playing vs AI Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.875