Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Victory at Sea vs. The World at War

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [General] >> General Discussion >> Victory at Sea vs. The World at War Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Victory at Sea vs. The World at War - 1/20/2010 9:04:27 PM   
Joe D.


Posts: 4004
Joined: 8/31/2005
From: Stratford, Connecticut
Status: offline 		Recently I bought the V@C collection on DVD for a bargain tnx to Blu Ray; it was my intent to watch it while doing AE turns.

Coincidently, V@C and the WaW were both 26-episode television documentaries on WW II.

V@C was narrated by Leonard Graves, who tended to mock the Axis, where WaW's Sir Lawrence Olivier simply used sarcasm.

I guess if you're knighted you have to behave better, even towards your nation's enemies.

Any opinions on which series you would buy, and why?

_____________________________

Stratford, Connecticut, U.S.A.

"The Angel of Okinawa"

Home of the Chance-Vought Corsair, F4U
The best fighter-bomber of World War II
Post #: 1
RE: Victory at Sea vs. The World at War - 1/20/2010 9:38:57 PM   
JudgeDredd


Posts: 8573
Joined: 11/14/2003
From: Scotland
Status: offline 		I've never seen Victory at Sea, however I have watched (several times) the World at War series, I bought the boxed VHS set for over £140 and recently bought the boxed DVD set for the bargain price of £28.

World at War is a must have for any historical enthusiast interested in the gings on in World War II. It's comprehensive yet light (as in not over burdoning with detail), it's beautifully narrated and has a touching sound score.

I don't recall Sir Olivier being sarcastic, but then I haven't watched it in many years. From what I remember he was the epitome of professionalism and called it how it was.

Time for a re-watch I think.

As for Victory at Seaa, I probably wouldn't be too interested in it. I've never been a naval afn, though I am interested in some carrier battles.

(in reply to Joe D.)
Post #: 2
RE: Victory at Sea vs. The World at War - 1/20/2010 9:46:53 PM   
Adam Parker


Posts: 1848
Joined: 4/2/2002
From: Melbourne Australia
Status: offline 		When I was working on HPS's Sicily I came across Victory at Sea and found it filled a hole that World at War covered broadly.

However, if wanting an overview of the Battle for the Atlantic, I feel that W@W does it a bit better.

You can really feel V@S being a blockbuster for the 50's whereas W@W offers a bit more polish.

(in reply to JudgeDredd)
Post #: 3
RE: Victory at Sea vs. The World at War - 1/20/2010 11:14:15 PM   
Joe D.


Posts: 4004
Joined: 8/31/2005
From: Stratford, Connecticut
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: JudgeDredd

... As for Victory at Seaa, I probably wouldn't be too interested in it. I've never been a naval afn, though I am interested in some carrier battles.


V@C was only 30 min segments, and the CV battles were pre-Shattered Sword, more like a B&W Midway.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Adam Parker

... You can really feel V@S being a blockbuster for the 50's whereas W@W offers a bit more polish.


That's the BBC for you.

Richard Rodger's score for V@C recorded by RCA was high tech back then.

_____________________________

Stratford, Connecticut, U.S.A.

"The Angel of Okinawa"

Home of the Chance-Vought Corsair, F4U
The best fighter-bomber of World War II

(in reply to JudgeDredd)
Post #: 4
RE: Victory at Sea vs. The World at War - 1/21/2010 1:05:37 AM   
Johnus

 

Posts: 615
Joined: 5/23/2002
Status: offline 		I have both. Victory at Sea is certainly dated (1950's) but has its own charm. WAW is, in my opinion, more accurate and certainly a more modern (1970's) and scholarly documentary.

I would get them both. Victory at Sea, anyway, can be had for peanuts.

< Message edited by Johnnie -- 1/21/2010 1:06:10 AM >

(in reply to Joe D.)
Post #: 5
RE: Victory at Sea vs. The World at War - 1/21/2010 4:29:03 AM   
SlickWilhelm


Posts: 1854
Joined: 7/22/2007
From: Rochester, MN
Status: offline 		World at War is the ultimate documentary on WWII. There are some holes, to be sure, but overall it covers everything in a straight-forward, yet poetic way.

Outstanding narration by Sir Laurence Oliver(I don't hear any sarcasm, either), an evocative musical score and unsurpassed use of interviews of people who fought and suffered during the war. Required viewing for anyone interested in WWII.

The best thing about Victory at Sea is Richard Rodgers' fantastic score. I bought the soundtrack and listen to it often.


_____________________________

Beta Tester - Brother Against Brother
Beta Tester - Commander: The Great War
Beta Tester - Desert War 1940-42

(in reply to Johnus)
Post #: 6
RE: Victory at Sea vs. The World at War - 1/21/2010 12:54:01 PM   
Joe D.


Posts: 4004
Joined: 8/31/2005
From: Stratford, Connecticut
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Johnnie
... Victory at Sea, anyway, can be had for peanuts.


About a dozen dollars US for a 5-disc DVD set.

_____________________________

Stratford, Connecticut, U.S.A.

"The Angel of Okinawa"

Home of the Chance-Vought Corsair, F4U
The best fighter-bomber of World War II

(in reply to Johnus)
Post #: 7
RE: Victory at Sea vs. The World at War - 1/22/2010 4:54:25 AM   
SLAAKMAN


Posts: 2725
Joined: 7/24/2002
Status: offline 		Both are interesting and have great actual footage and some great facts about the period but they are also a clear case of the winners writing the history books. Nevertheless I recommend owning both complete sets.

_____________________________

Germany's unforgivable crime before the Second World War was her attempt to extricate her economy from the world's trading system and to create her own exchange mechanism which would deny world finance its opportunity to profit.
— Winston Churchill

(in reply to Joe D.)
Post #: 8
RE: Victory at Sea vs. The World at War - 1/22/2010 7:15:03 AM   
ilovestrategy


Posts: 3611
Joined: 6/11/2005
From: San Diego
Status: offline 		I like both!

_____________________________

After 16 years, Civ II still has me in it's clutches LOL!!!
Now CIV IV has me in it's evil clutches!

(in reply to SLAAKMAN)
Post #: 9
RE: Victory at Sea vs. The World at War - 2/2/2010 9:43:04 PM   
goodfoot

 

Posts: 7
Joined: 2/1/2010
Status: offline 		Honestly, there's really no need to pick one over the other. WaW gives you ALOT of stuff that V@C doesn't, and vice versa. In fact, if you REALLY want a more definitive understanding to WWII (and don't really feel like READING!!), you really should watch both.

(in reply to ilovestrategy)
Post #: 10
RE: Victory at Sea vs. The World at War - 2/4/2010 7:53:04 AM   
ilovestrategy


Posts: 3611
Joined: 6/11/2005
From: San Diego
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: goodfoot

Honestly, there's really no need to pick one over the other. WaW gives you ALOT of stuff that V@C doesn't, and vice versa. In fact, if you REALLY want a more definitive understanding to WWII (and don't really feel like READING!!), you really should watch both.


This^^

Having seen both, I say that goodfoot is totally right. I got Victory at Sea for 3.99 at Ross. Good deal!

_____________________________

After 16 years, Civ II still has me in it's clutches LOL!!!
Now CIV IV has me in it's evil clutches!

(in reply to goodfoot)
Post #: 11
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [General] >> General Discussion >> Victory at Sea vs. The World at War Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.703