Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Waw4t - West/Russia Bwheatley/Ara vs Japan/Axis 82nd/Bart

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Advanced Tactics Series >> After Action Reports >> Waw4t - West/Russia Bwheatley/Ara vs Japan/Axis 82nd/Bart Page: [1] 2 3   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Waw4t - West/Russia Bwheatley/Ara vs Japan/Axis 82nd/Bart - 5/12/2010 12:35:44 AM   
chestypuller

 

Posts: 52
Joined: 1/3/2006
Status: offline
This will be the Allied AAR location for the game aganist 82ndtrooper & Barthheart.

We have agreed that Axis forces can not look here so we have discuss strategy.
Post #: 1
RE: Waw4t - West/Russia Bwheatley/Ara vs Japan/Axis 82n... - 5/12/2010 12:36:05 AM   
chestypuller

 

Posts: 52
Joined: 1/3/2006
Status: offline
Fond memories setting up the allies supply system on turn 1 is always a bear.

(in reply to chestypuller)
Post #: 2
RE: Waw4t - West/Russia Bwheatley/Ara vs Japan/Axis 82n... - 5/12/2010 12:42:54 AM   
chestypuller

 

Posts: 52
Joined: 1/3/2006
Status: offline
lets see how bwheatley gets his butt kicked. :P

< Message edited by chestypuller -- 5/12/2010 4:51:18 AM >

(in reply to chestypuller)
Post #: 3
RE: Waw4t - West/Russia Bwheatley/Ara vs Japan/Axis 82n... - 5/12/2010 12:58:44 AM   
chestypuller

 

Posts: 52
Joined: 1/3/2006
Status: offline
again roomie logging in to my dang browser. :P He only watches to see me get my butt kicked online lol

< Message edited by chestypuller -- 5/12/2010 1:34:49 AM >

(in reply to chestypuller)
Post #: 4
RE: Waw4t - West/Russia Bwheatley/Ara vs Japan/Axis 82n... - 5/12/2010 1:34:30 AM   
bwheatley

 

Posts: 3650
Joined: 12/13/2004
Status: offline


First turn was just setting up to try to save enough PP to do a block Germany from establishing vichy. That should give me a route into north africa if i play my cards right. But i am also working on destroyers.

< Message edited by bwheatley -- 5/12/2010 4:50:45 AM >

(in reply to chestypuller)
Post #: 5
RE: Waw4t - West/Russia Bwheatley/Ara vs Japan/Axis 82n... - 5/12/2010 2:46:56 PM   
bwheatley

 

Posts: 3650
Joined: 12/13/2004
Status: offline
2nd turn came and went just some minor positioning

(in reply to bwheatley)
Post #: 6
RE: Waw4t - West/Russia Bwheatley/Ara vs Japan/Axis 82n... - 5/12/2010 2:53:08 PM   
bwheatley

 

Posts: 3650
Joined: 12/13/2004
Status: offline
British Isles


Middle East Defenses


Australia and Company


< Message edited by bwheatley -- 5/12/2010 3:02:07 PM >

(in reply to bwheatley)
Post #: 7
RE: Waw4t - West/Russia Bwheatley/Ara vs Japan/Axis 82n... - 5/12/2010 4:14:52 PM   
bwheatley

 

Posts: 3650
Joined: 12/13/2004
Status: offline
Our old WW1 DD got sunk off the coast of germany. She was just investigating the german infrastructure situation.


Britian pledges to help france and plays the vichy card


Reason being i would like to throw him off his game even if a little it. It will also keep north africa open for us to funnel reinforcements into. We can then sneak up on the I-ties from the back.

(in reply to bwheatley)
Post #: 8
RE: Waw4t - West/Russia Bwheatley/Ara vs Japan/Axis 82n... - 5/12/2010 6:10:31 PM   
bwheatley

 

Posts: 3650
Joined: 12/13/2004
Status: offline
Last turn was uneventful next turn i'll have money for level bomber 2. My partner ara wants me to go with fighter 2. So what do you guys think i should get more importantly?

Also i've got my 10th new DD2 for the fleet.

(in reply to bwheatley)
Post #: 9
Invasion!! - 5/12/2010 7:25:45 PM   
bwheatley

 

Posts: 3650
Joined: 12/13/2004
Status: offline

Jan 1940,

A christmas present was landed today by the nazis north of manchester. A division of jerrys landed and started to murder and rape innocent civilians. Where was the royal navy?? The public out cry has been harsh. Today the govt announced that the fleet landing the attack was destroyed. The royal navy vowed that they would shell the germans until they surrendered. The govt vowed they would not let such an event happen again. The royal army announced manchester would be held against all assaults.

In other news the govt today announced a new heavy bomber contract was awarded to the Halifax company. They will begin production of 2 wings of bombers per month.




This turn the dastardly bart launched a little raid into north england. I wasn't ready so it landed successfully. I was busy building bombers and destroyers. Bold move. My ships quickly knocked out his landing craft then went in and bombarded. I moved some troops upto manchester and hopefully it will hold next turn. Annoying.



Invasion!


Landing Craft Destroyed


Level Bomber 2 Purchased

(in reply to bwheatley)
Post #: 10
RE: Invasion!! - 5/12/2010 10:56:53 PM   
bwheatley

 

Posts: 3650
Joined: 12/13/2004
Status: offline

Feb 1940
News Flash

Major Naval battle off the cost of britian! Royal Navy Loses 1 fleet from the great war.
Then in a counter attack the modern home defense navy battles the german kriegsmarine.
It is reported that several carrier air squadrons were lost along with a carrier which had two torpedoes hit her under her magazine and a few new destroyers.
The germans apparently suffered worse though losing a destroyer and two modern heavy cruisers along with two submarines operating in what is called a wolfpack.

The situation north of manchester has not improved the city is still under siege by nazi hordes. The Royal army launched a counter attack and was promptly repulsed. We must hope that the royal navy can continue to interdict the supplies that are keeping these huns out of manchester.


The Situation



Plane Raid on german navy


Royal Navy giving better then they got


Horrid attack north of manchester



I put my fleet into dock because they were running low on supplies so hopefully that wont give the germans a chance to take manchester.
Suprising how strong the german navy is. They wouldn't historically be able to go toe to toe with the royal navy but i like that anything is able to happen :)

(in reply to bwheatley)
Post #: 11
RE: Invasion!! - 5/13/2010 12:32:43 AM   
abulbulian


Posts: 1047
Joined: 3/31/2005
Status: offline
I think something is wrong with this scenario. Germany has 3 BBII to start WWII? Is that some sort of a joke? yeah they had some pocket battleships, but not sure I would categorize these as BBII's.

The really big problem is the combat vs UK air on the German wolf pack and plus German fleet. If you don't have a clue as how effective even the 'older' Swordfish naval bombers were, then google the 'Raid on Taranto' or even learn how the Bismark was damage initially which lead to it being sunk. Even in 1939 airpower dominated the seas and without any aircover, your fleets where very vulnerable to enemy planes. This is a beta version of WaW and these types of inconsistencies need to be addresses. It would be silly to continue this game until we can find out what is wrong here. The issue I have is with the number of planes shot down, the damage the planes did is a bit unrealistic, but the 50% air casualties is absolutely wrong against just those German ships.

BTW: the scale of WaW, means the raid on Taranto would have been carried out by about 2 lvl one carrier air groups.

Go back a few frames if you need to review the battle I'm speaking about.

(in reply to bwheatley)
Post #: 12
RE: Invasion!! - 5/13/2010 2:18:59 AM   
82ndtrooper


Posts: 1083
Joined: 12/19/2008
From: tennessee
Status: offline
actually Germany had 2 new BB's 2 old BB's and 3 pocket BB's in 1939.

http://ww2total.com/WW2/History/Orders-of-Battle/Fleets-September-1939.htm

plus the battleship tirpitz was commissioned in 1939 but she didn't set sail til feb. of 1940 the Bismark in august of 1940.

two of these BBII's sank a british battlecrusier (the Renown) and a carrier (HMS Glorious) in 1940

http://www.history.navy.mil/photos/sh-fornv/germany/gersh-s/scharn2.htm

so I believe the BBII count in febuary of 1940 is correct. And less overall BB's than Germany actually had.

there is a random generator that is used in combat also so there is always a chance that even though you have superior forces you can lose.
if you did this exact combat round again you would get different results about 50% of the time.

the raid on Taranto i believe was against ships docked up not moving at sea.


all in all it was a bold move by Germany  and a lucky break on the combat round. He could have lost the whole fleet had more of the British navy been in range.







< Message edited by 82ndtrooper -- 5/13/2010 2:25:29 AM >


_____________________________

HHC 302nd Engineer Battalion
82nd Airborne Division
Honorably Discharged Jul/80

(in reply to abulbulian)
Post #: 13
RE: Invasion!! - 5/13/2010 3:43:52 AM   
abulbulian


Posts: 1047
Joined: 3/31/2005
Status: offline
LOL, the Scharnhorst class were hardly BBII's. Maybe according to German propaganda, but they were nothing compared to the Bismark class. Scharnhorst and Gneisenau were considered armored cruisers, not battleships. Check out the specs on them and get back to me. Once again some research please? Don't even talk about the Bismark because she wasn't commissioned until Aug 1940. But actually still need to finish outfitting and training thus wasn't ready for service until 41. The Tirpitz was later and near 42 when she was ready for sea.


The raid on Taranto was done at night and against a port that was considered to be heavily armed with light and heavy AA. Yes, the allies had surprise for the first wave and the ships were in port. Still, it showed that air power was now the dominate factor in naval actions. Too bad the British didn't learn from this before they tried to sneak Force Z to help against the invasion of Malaysia. The Japanese air force made quick work of that force which consisted of the Prince of Wales and Repulse.



< Message edited by abulbulian -- 5/13/2010 3:49:11 AM >

(in reply to 82ndtrooper)
Post #: 14
RE: Invasion!! - 5/13/2010 6:08:45 AM   
82ndtrooper


Posts: 1083
Joined: 12/19/2008
From: tennessee
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: abulbulian

LOL, the Scharnhorst class were hardly BBII's. Maybe according to German propaganda, but they were nothing compared to the Bismark class. Scharnhorst and Gneisenau were considered armored cruisers, not battleships. Check out the specs on them and get back to me. Once again some research please? Don't even talk about the Bismark because she wasn't commissioned until Aug 1940. But actually still need to finish outfitting and training thus wasn't ready for service until 41. The Tirpitz was later and near 42 when she was ready for sea.


The raid on Taranto was done at night and against a port that was considered to be heavily armed with light and heavy AA. Yes, the allies had surprise for the first wave and the ships were in port. Still, it showed that air power was now the dominate factor in naval actions. Too bad the British didn't learn from this before they tried to sneak Force Z to help against the invasion of Malaysia. The Japanese air force made quick work of that force which consisted of the Prince of Wales and Repulse.




OH my.

I think I detect a challenge here.

as for research I believe I added links where you could read for yourself where I got my info and I see none in your post.

But since you choose not to read my references I will in this one case point out where you are wrong.

while you are right that I was incorrect on when the Tirpitz and Bismarck where commissioned I was also wrong on when they where launched. BOTH where launched in 1939.

The Tirpitz was launched on April 1, 1939 and the Bismarck was launched on February 1939.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_battleship_Tirpitz
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_battleship_Bismarck

In this game we have WWI battleships which are level 1 and level 2 Battleships which are battleships built AFTER WWI and where upgradable.

Both Scharnhorst Class BB"s where built after WWI and both received multiple upgrades throughout their service that makes them BBII's.
http://ww2total.com/WW2/History/Orders-of-Battle/Fleets-September-1939.htm



As far them being nothing more than armored cruisers as you claim I find that they had the same armor as a battleship and 11" guns that the British want to classify as cruisers. So show me clear proof that they deserve to only be classified as cruisers.
also these two Battleships had far more lucrative careers than either the tirpitz or the Bismark, sinking a British Aircraft carrier and her escorts. The HMS Glorious in june of 1940.
Not to mention that both where supposed to have larger guns installed but where rushed through production and wound up with the smaller 11" guns.

They where in fact battleships.

Not to even mention that some battle-cruisers where at least ,if not more deadly than battleships.

Like I said before Germany had in 1939 2 post WWI BB's 2 WWI BB's and 3 pocket battleships. With 11 Battleships in production.
http://ww2total.com/WW2/History/Orders-of-Battle/Fleets-September-1939.htm

in the game Germany gets 2 BBII's and two more at a later date ( i think). Which is less BB's than they actually had and almost no way to build anymore unlike the west which can build as much as they want once the USA comes online.
According to your way of thinking Germany should have in 1939 2 BBII, and 5 BBI with two BB3 at a later time to represent the Bismarck class.

I Think this is more that your upset because Germany took a gamble and got lucky than it is an unbalance of the game. and what surprises me is that you where not even the player that suffered the losses and yet your upset about them and the player who took the losses understands that sometimes things just don't go your way.

/cheers

PS: I have been thinking about this all night, and wanted to add something else.

Playing this game we the players and especially the western players have an advantage knowing that all of the things that where huge surprises in WWII are coming. The element of surprise that hurt the west so badly in WWII is gone. So you have to do somethings artificially to even things out.

I remember last year when Explorer was first starting this upgrade. that he explained his reasoning for giving Germany BBII's instead of the total count of WWI BB's. There where two factors involved.
The first being supply. in the game all those BB's would have taken more supply and to compensate he would have had to up Germany supply production which would have had a larger effect on the late game.
The second is that during the war Britain gave the Germany navy far more respect than history proved they deserved, by allocating a large part of their navy to do nothing more than be prepared for the German navy should they come out. This was the main importance of the Tirpitz in WWII. Simply tying up a huge amount of allied naval forces by doing nothing. This fear or respect cant be replicated in the game.

Explorers solution was to give Germany the BBII's and a few Cruiser II. Making the German navy just powerful enough to cause some real damage if given the chance but not powerful enough to really do anything else.

And as the above battle shows he has accomplished this.
As the western player you have to always respect the German navy until you sink it or you can take some serious losses. However you don't really have to worry about the German navy ever doing much of anything else.(except for the wolfpacks)
And with the penalties applied to the Germans if they don't invade Russia by a certain time its impossible for Germany to really build more capital ships or any carriers at all. And still have a chance at defeating Russia and winning the game.

its a fine balancing act and I think that Explorer has just about got it right.

< Message edited by 82ndtrooper -- 5/13/2010 12:17:04 PM >


_____________________________

HHC 302nd Engineer Battalion
82nd Airborne Division
Honorably Discharged Jul/80

(in reply to abulbulian)
Post #: 15
RE: Waw4t - West/Russia Bwheatley/Ara vs Japan/Axis 82n... - 5/13/2010 11:59:52 AM   
Josh

 

Posts: 2576
Joined: 5/9/2000
From: Leeuwarden, Netherlands
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: bwheatley

Last turn was uneventful next turn i'll have money for level bomber 2. My partner ara wants me to go with fighter 2. So what do you guys think i should get more importantly?

Also i've got my 10th new DD2 for the fleet.


I see you already bought Bomber2, but personally I'd go for Fighter2, because airsuperiority is everything. Bomber2 might pay off though, it's a gamble.

(in reply to bwheatley)
Post #: 16
RE: Waw4t - West/Russia Bwheatley/Ara vs Japan/Axis 82n... - 5/13/2010 3:05:12 PM   
abulbulian


Posts: 1047
Joined: 3/31/2005
Status: offline
Don't have a lot of time for this post. But the larger issue is the casualties taken by a pure air force vs a pure naval force (no air) and this is in 1939!

Consider this:
- on the scale of WaW, that battle fought was like the German navy shooting down over 100 planes.
- 1939 most naval vessels had small amount of AA considering, remember these ships were laid down many many years before they were completed. Thus, the naval thinking at the time was that planes can't sink big ships. Doolittle was one of those 'radical' thinkers that was able, early on, to prove them all wrong.
- so in 1939, these ships had very little chance to shoot down more than a handful of planes, nothing even remotely close to 100+ (given even best random mod).
- yes, later in war many ships were refitted with 2x, 3x the AA compliment to deal with the no very real concern about planes vs ships. But even then it was still considered absolutely crazy to send ships in range of enemy air with no air cover!
- you won't find any battle of pure ships (no air, no CVs) vs a decent size air force, which had any sort of success against it. Just never happened and especially not in 1939 when ships had such a small compliment of AA to make room for the larger caliber guns.
- USA even started making CLAA class ships to give a fleet some extra protection against air

conclusion: naval vs air in WaW 4T is still broken and should be addresses as it's a key component in the realism factor for WWII.

(in reply to Josh)
Post #: 17
RE: Invasion!! - 5/13/2010 3:05:39 PM   
bwheatley

 

Posts: 3650
Joined: 12/13/2004
Status: offline
Yea the german ships that came out were pretty awesome beasts. I've seen the armored cruiser debate and i agree they would probably be cruisers based on their small caliber guns but since they were supposed to have bigger guns i get the BB class. In the end though they were good ships and they whooped a lot of ass. The bismarck ripping the hood to pieces was a fine example. Yes Hood was only a BC from 1918 but she was the pride of the british navy and it was a huge morale blow.

Funny that some old bi planes helped bring her down :).

After working on modding WaW to add weather system and a few other things that ara and I liked i agree its a fine balancing act. It's a fun game and while i think there are things that will always be able to be updated i have fun playing. :)


quote:

ORIGINAL: 82ndtrooper

quote:

ORIGINAL: abulbulian

LOL, the Scharnhorst class were hardly BBII's. Maybe according to German propaganda, but they were nothing compared to the Bismark class. Scharnhorst and Gneisenau were considered armored cruisers, not battleships. Check out the specs on them and get back to me. Once again some research please? Don't even talk about the Bismark because she wasn't commissioned until Aug 1940. But actually still need to finish outfitting and training thus wasn't ready for service until 41. The Tirpitz was later and near 42 when she was ready for sea.


The raid on Taranto was done at night and against a port that was considered to be heavily armed with light and heavy AA. Yes, the allies had surprise for the first wave and the ships were in port. Still, it showed that air power was now the dominate factor in naval actions. Too bad the British didn't learn from this before they tried to sneak Force Z to help against the invasion of Malaysia. The Japanese air force made quick work of that force which consisted of the Prince of Wales and Repulse.




OH my.

I think I detect a challenge here.

as for research I believe I added links where you could read for yourself where I got my info and I see none in your post.

But since you choose not to read my references I will in this one case point out where you are wrong.

while you are right that I was incorrect on when the Tirpitz and Bismarck where commissioned I was also wrong on when they where launched. BOTH where launched in 1939.

The Tirpitz was launched on April 1, 1939 and the Bismarck was launched on February 1939.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_battleship_Tirpitz
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_battleship_Bismarck

In this game we have WWI battleships which are level 1 and level 2 Battleships which are battleships built AFTER WWI and where upgradable.

Both Scharnhorst Class BB"s where built after WWI and both received multiple upgrades throughout their service that makes them BBII's.
http://ww2total.com/WW2/History/Orders-of-Battle/Fleets-September-1939.htm



As far them being nothing more than armored cruisers as you claim I find that they had the same armor as a battleship and 11" guns that the British want to classify as cruisers. So show me clear proof that they deserve to only be classified as cruisers.
also these two Battleships had far more lucrative careers than either the tirpitz or the Bismark, sinking a British Aircraft carrier and her escorts. The HMS Glorious in june of 1940.
Not to mention that both where supposed to have larger guns installed but where rushed through production and wound up with the smaller 11" guns.

They where in fact battleships.

Not to even mention that some battle-cruisers where at least ,if not more deadly than battleships.

Like I said before Germany had in 1939 2 post WWI BB's 2 WWI BB's and 3 pocket battleships. With 11 Battleships in production.
http://ww2total.com/WW2/History/Orders-of-Battle/Fleets-September-1939.htm

in the game Germany gets 2 BBII's and two more at a later date ( i think). Which is less BB's than they actually had and almost no way to build anymore unlike the west which can build as much as they want once the USA comes online.
According to your way of thinking Germany should have in 1939 2 BBII, and 5 BBI with two BB3 at a later time to represent the Bismarck class.

I Think this is more that your upset because Germany took a gamble and got lucky than it is an unbalance of the game. and what surprises me is that you where not even the player that suffered the losses and yet your upset about them and the player who took the losses understands that sometimes things just don't go your way.

/cheers

PS: I have been thinking about this all night, and wanted to add something else.

Playing this game we the players and especially the western players have an advantage knowing that all of the things that where huge surprises in WWII are coming. The element of surprise that hurt the west so badly in WWII is gone. So you have to do somethings artificially to even things out.

I remember last year when Explorer was first starting this upgrade. that he explained his reasoning for giving Germany BBII's instead of the total count of WWI BB's. There where two factors involved.
The first being supply. in the game all those BB's would have taken more supply and to compensate he would have had to up Germany supply production which would have had a larger effect on the late game.
The second is that during the war Britain gave the Germany navy far more respect than history proved they deserved, by allocating a large part of their navy to do nothing more than be prepared for the German navy should they come out. This was the main importance of the Tirpitz in WWII. Simply tying up a huge amount of allied naval forces by doing nothing. This fear or respect cant be replicated in the game.

Explorers solution was to give Germany the BBII's and a few Cruiser II. Making the German navy just powerful enough to cause some real damage if given the chance but not powerful enough to really do anything else.

And as the above battle shows he has accomplished this.
As the western player you have to always respect the German navy until you sink it or you can take some serious losses. However you don't really have to worry about the German navy ever doing much of anything else.(except for the wolfpacks)
And with the penalties applied to the Germans if they don't invade Russia by a certain time its impossible for Germany to really build more capital ships or any carriers at all. And still have a chance at defeating Russia and winning the game.

its a fine balancing act and I think that Explorer has just about got it right.


(in reply to 82ndtrooper)
Post #: 18
RE: Waw4t - West/Russia Bwheatley/Ara vs Japan/Axis 82n... - 5/13/2010 3:08:15 PM   
bwheatley

 

Posts: 3650
Joined: 12/13/2004
Status: offline
Wellthe games over now :)

But yea i went NO vichy and then bomber 2. So ara was giving me grief telling me to go fighter 2.

Does anyone besides ara think the no vichy card is worth it? My reasoning is that it will give me a foothold on north africa where i can help close in on the italians from behind and give me another area that i can bring american reinforcements into fairly easily.


quote:

ORIGINAL: Josh


quote:

ORIGINAL: bwheatley

Last turn was uneventful next turn i'll have money for level bomber 2. My partner ara wants me to go with fighter 2. So what do you guys think i should get more importantly?

Also i've got my 10th new DD2 for the fleet.


I see you already bought Bomber2, but personally I'd go for Fighter2, because airsuperiority is everything. Bomber2 might pay off though, it's a gamble.


(in reply to Josh)
Post #: 19
RE: Waw4t - West/Russia Bwheatley/Ara vs Japan/Axis 82n... - 5/13/2010 3:17:09 PM   
abulbulian


Posts: 1047
Joined: 3/31/2005
Status: offline
You still don't get it with these German ACs. Don't get me wrong the Scharnhorst and Gneisenau were very capable ships with great radar gunnery and speed.

But they had 11'' guns and not the same armor as a BBII (in WaW that is not a WWI battleship). They couldn't stand toe to toe with a UK BBII unless lucky, because a 14'' or 15'' gun can hit you further away. It's as simple as that almost. Granted there really is no ship class in WaW to put them that would do justice(CA would be insult) to them, so maybe BBII is fine. I give in to that. Remember most of their upgrades came post 39.

Either way, my previous post addresses my major concern.

(in reply to abulbulian)
Post #: 20
RE: Waw4t - West/Russia Bwheatley/Ara vs Japan/Axis 82n... - 5/13/2010 3:22:39 PM   
abulbulian


Posts: 1047
Joined: 3/31/2005
Status: offline
BTW: I apologize if I came across rude in previous posts.  Not trying to be at all.  So use to messing around with Bill that I guess I need to watch how I come across with people that don't really know me.  Bill is special, or so his parents and classmates use to say. 

(in reply to abulbulian)
Post #: 21
RE: Waw4t - West/Russia Bwheatley/Ara vs Japan/Axis 82n... - 5/13/2010 4:08:24 PM   
82ndtrooper


Posts: 1083
Joined: 12/19/2008
From: tennessee
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: abulbulian

Don't have a lot of time for this post. But the larger issue is the casualties taken by a pure air force vs a pure naval force (no air) and this is in 1939!

Consider this:
- on the scale of WaW, that battle fought was like the German navy shooting down over 100 planes.
- 1939 most naval vessels had small amount of AA considering, remember these ships were laid down many many years before they were completed. Thus, the naval thinking at the time was that planes can't sink big ships. Doolittle was one of those 'radical' thinkers that was able, early on, to prove them all wrong.
- so in 1939, these ships had very little chance to shoot down more than a handful of planes, nothing even remotely close to 100+ (given even best random mod).
- yes, later in war many ships were refitted with 2x, 3x the AA compliment to deal with the no very real concern about planes vs ships. But even then it was still considered absolutely crazy to send ships in range of enemy air with no air cover!
- you won't find any battle of pure ships (no air, no CVs) vs a decent size air force, which had any sort of success against it. Just never happened and especially not in 1939 when ships had such a small compliment of AA to make room for the larger caliber guns.
- USA even started making CLAA class ships to give a fleet some extra protection against air

conclusion: naval vs air in WaW 4T is still broken and should be addresses as it's a key component in the realism factor for WWII.


No worries bro on the being taken wrong thing

I want you to know that I agree with you about some things on your argument above.
in some ways the air versus ship thing is a little out of whack.

BUT.

it all goes back to balancing.
if you make carrier air too strong than there is no reason to have anything but carriers.
and since this is a game where you want every unit to have a place and have value you have to make some exceptions.

in this case for carrier air the cost is lower than land based air. Which in real life was exactly the opposite. Carrier aircraft had many more modifications and where a lot more expensive to produce.
So while your air losses are more than they should be they are cheaper to replace then they should be.

its a give and take thing.


also in the air attack in question lets look at a few things from the game perspective.

the land based aircraft that participated in the attack where mostly all fighters which are weak against ships, and 1 unit of level bombers which at that time where weak against ships.

plus

it was winter so they didn't have full readiness for their attack.

so what we really had was the aircraft from one lone carrier-II against 3 BB-II and 2 CA-II.
(and at that time the Royal Navy carriers only carried from 30 planes to 60 planes depending on the class.)
http://www.hazegray.org/navhist/carriers/uk_fleet.htm

In the game that's a bit much for 1 lone carrier to chew. Those CA-II are plane killers designed to reflect the ability of all the DD's that where the primary air defense in WWII. But if we gave the air defense to DD's in this game then it would make the air defenses for fleets way to strong and throw things further out of balance because they have to be cheap to make.

Also remember the random generator that's used in the combat rounds. its there to keep things interesting and to reflect how anything can happen due to peoples actions a mechanical failure etc...

if you did that combat round 10 times you would get a different result each time going from both ends of the spectrum. from the air doing massive damage with few losses to the air getting creamed. in this case the air just happened to get that rare outcome where it got creamed.

I agree its not perfect but I don't know how it can be improved without throwing everything else out of balance.


< Message edited by 82ndtrooper -- 5/13/2010 4:17:17 PM >


_____________________________

HHC 302nd Engineer Battalion
82nd Airborne Division
Honorably Discharged Jul/80

(in reply to abulbulian)
Post #: 22
RE: Waw4t - West/Russia Bwheatley/Ara vs Japan/Axis 82n... - 5/13/2010 4:10:30 PM   
82ndtrooper


Posts: 1083
Joined: 12/19/2008
From: tennessee
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: bwheatley

Wellthe games over now :)

But yea i went NO vichy and then bomber 2. So ara was giving me grief telling me to go fighter 2.

Does anyone besides ara think the no vichy card is worth it? My reasoning is that it will give me a foothold on north africa where i can help close in on the italians from behind and give me another area that i can bring american reinforcements into fairly easily.


quote:

ORIGINAL: Josh


quote:

ORIGINAL: bwheatley

Last turn was uneventful next turn i'll have money for level bomber 2. My partner ara wants me to go with fighter 2. So what do you guys think i should get more importantly?

Also i've got my 10th new DD2 for the fleet.


I see you already bought Bomber2, but personally I'd go for Fighter2, because airsuperiority is everything. Bomber2 might pay off though, it's a gamble.




yes it can be worth it just for the fact it keeps the french navy out of German hands.

where if Vichy is declared and then you have to declare war on them to open up north africa the french navy joins the axis.

_____________________________

HHC 302nd Engineer Battalion
82nd Airborne Division
Honorably Discharged Jul/80

(in reply to bwheatley)
Post #: 23
RE: Waw4t - West/Russia Bwheatley/Ara vs Japan/Axis 82n... - 5/13/2010 4:53:25 PM   
bwheatley

 

Posts: 3650
Joined: 12/13/2004
Status: offline
I also wanted to keep bart off guard.

(in reply to 82ndtrooper)
Post #: 24
RE: Waw4t - West/Russia Bwheatley/Ara vs Japan/Axis 82n... - 5/13/2010 4:55:49 PM   
GrumpyMel

 

Posts: 864
Joined: 12/28/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: bwheatley

Wellthe games over now :)

But yea i went NO vichy and then bomber 2. So ara was giving me grief telling me to go fighter 2.

Does anyone besides ara think the no vichy card is worth it? My reasoning is that it will give me a foothold on north africa where i can help close in on the italians from behind and give me another area that i can bring american reinforcements into fairly easily.


quote:

ORIGINAL: Josh


quote:

ORIGINAL: bwheatley

Last turn was uneventful next turn i'll have money for level bomber 2. My partner ara wants me to go with fighter 2. So what do you guys think i should get more importantly?

Also i've got my 10th new DD2 for the fleet.


I see you already bought Bomber2, but personally I'd go for Fighter2, because airsuperiority is everything. Bomber2 might pay off though, it's a gamble.




Not a bad decision. I normaly use the PP's to build a factory in India instead, but having no Vichy means that you get to keep hold of the resources at Mosul as well as French Indochina, which can be a big benefit outside of Europe. It also as you said leaves N.Africa open to use as a base.

Finally, it may help to trip up the Axis time-table in Europe a bit. Might also give you more breathing room to withdraw forces from France, if the Krouts manage to block easy egress from your guys. Not a bad call, and you force them to defend Southern France as well...not a terrible trade off for giving them Marseille.

It's a tough call....as the West there are just so many things you'd like to spend PP's on early on in the game.




(in reply to bwheatley)
Post #: 25
RE: Waw4t - West/Russia Bwheatley/Ara vs Japan/Axis 82n... - 5/13/2010 5:38:51 PM   
Barthheart


Posts: 3194
Joined: 7/20/2004
From: Nepean, Ontario
Status: offline
Well not being able to establish Vichy would have thrown me off this game! I have never played a game where anyone has played that card.

Would have been interseting for sure... dragged out France conquest, delayed other stuff.

_____________________________

Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty & well preserved body,
but rather to skid in broadside, totally worn out & proclaiming "WOW, what a ride!"

(in reply to GrumpyMel)
Post #: 26
RE: Waw4t - West/Russia Bwheatley/Ara vs Japan/Axis 82n... - 5/14/2010 12:53:03 AM   
bwheatley

 

Posts: 3650
Joined: 12/13/2004
Status: offline
Well i wont tell you ifi do it next time i was in the the air about it.

(in reply to Barthheart)
Post #: 27
now waw 6t - 5/20/2010 2:31:39 PM   
bwheatley

 

Posts: 3650
Joined: 12/13/2004
Status: offline
we're now replaying as waw6t
No More axis looking :)

(in reply to chestypuller)
Post #: 28
RE: now waw 6t - 5/20/2010 2:32:17 PM   
bwheatley

 

Posts: 3650
Joined: 12/13/2004
Status: offline
So the first couple turns go off typically. I'm going to be much more careful about guarding york and coastal cities this time. :) Hopefully my fleet doesn't get its ass handed to it this time either.

(in reply to bwheatley)
Post #: 29
RE: now waw 6t - 5/20/2010 9:04:14 PM   
bwheatley

 

Posts: 3650
Joined: 12/13/2004
Status: offline
Ok Start of turn2



Wolfpack comes by to visit


No vichy card researched


Fighter 2 Researched


Force deployment before winter



currently winter is set in we're just researching and building sea scouts and destroyers. In australia we're building destroyers too. Indian is building engineers then infantry to hopefully hold the middle east.

I'll put more detail into the AAR once i know if this gamn will go past a few more turns :)

(in reply to bwheatley)
Post #: 30
Page:   [1] 2 3   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Advanced Tactics Series >> After Action Reports >> Waw4t - West/Russia Bwheatley/Ara vs Japan/Axis 82nd/Bart Page: [1] 2 3   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

2.016