Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Honestly How Competant Will the AI be this time ?

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series >> RE: Honestly How Competant Will the AI be this time ? Page: <<   < prev  2 3 4 [5] 6   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Honestly How Competant Will the AI be this time ? - 6/12/2010 10:41:41 PM   
Northern Star


Posts: 1881
Joined: 2/17/2008
Status: offline 		Well said, I never played so far against the AI, only pbem and solo games (both sides).
The results were not satisfactory so far imo, but this is the best way to practice.

< Message edited by Northern Star -- 6/12/2010 10:42:35 PM >

_____________________________

War in the East alpha tester

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xPV9JWWtOQ0

(in reply to Neal_MLC)
Post #: 121
RE: Honestly How Competant Will the AI be this time ? - 6/12/2010 11:44:39 PM   
Flaviusx


Posts: 7750
Joined: 9/9/2009
From: Southern California
Status: offline 		Neal, I basically agree with all that, but this makes me all the more impatient to see more playtesting of the game between human beings. In the long run, I expect this game will create a flourishing PBEM community and that will really test the game model to destruction.

Already the very brief 1943 AAR has yielded excellent data in this regard. (The very weird air results.) And there'll be more surprises to come.

(in reply to Northern Star)
Post #: 122
RE: Honestly How Competant Will the AI be this time ? - 6/13/2010 3:24:07 AM   
Berkut

 

Posts: 757
Joined: 5/16/2002
Status: offline 		I find all this talk about how we hope the AI will be great kind of bemusing.

The AI won't be great. Not to be a ass about it, but it is simply foolish to think that the team developing this game has anything like the expertise or resources to create a better AI than all the wargames that came before this one. Hell, programming a really good AI is probably twice as hard, ten times as hard? as programming the entire game to begin with.

And really, what is an AI anyway, when we talk about wargames? All it is is a set of heuristics - some rules - that govern what the computer will do. It is a combination, at the end of the day, of some rules that someone sits down and codes, and some scripts. And then it tries to execute those scripts and those rules by evaluating a situation.

So here is the thing - assuming that the people doing this are not some insanely intelligent computer science super-brains on the verge of a breakthrough in computer "intelligence", they are going to create the AI in the exact same manner that every AI for a game is made - by hand. And how "good" it is will depend mostly on how much time they can spend coming up with a basic plan. Then coming up with a sub-plan to deal with situation A that is slightly different. And then another sub-plan to deal with situation A1 that is slightly different than A, and A2 that is slightly different than A, and A3, and A4 and A5.

Then they can spend some more time coding up situation A1a, and A1b, and A1c. And of course A2a, and A2b, and A2c. And then some playtested will do something they didn't think of, so they will need a set of rules to handle A1a-i, and A1a-ii, and A1s-iii. And on. And on, And on and on.

So, the question is - how much time do they really have? And, by the way, a lot of this will end up wasted, since until you get a BUNCH of people playing the game, there are going to be decision trees the people doing the AI have never thought of - the playtesters will get some, but not nearly all of them by any means.

So - what am I saying?

I am saying it is not even possible to program a competent AI against decent human players. The only way it could be done, is if the rules and scripts were constantly tweaked in response to human play, and it would take a ridiculously large amount of work and would be an ongoing effort, not something they can code up and then call it a day. And even then...well, humans are tricksy beasts, I am still not putting my money on the computer against any decent human player.

You guys are asking for them to do something that they could not do even if they had a team of 10 people doing nothing but working on the AI, and they don't have that. The AI, at best, will be competent enough to be a stand in for a human opponent while the human player learns the mechanics of the game, and little more. If you cannot stomp a computer opponent once you learn the mechanics of the game, then either the AI is cheating, or, to be completely blunt, you aren't very bright.

I've been playing computer wargames for about as long as there have been computer wargames, and this has always been true, and will continue to be true.

(in reply to Neal_MLC)
Post #: 123
RE: Honestly How Competant Will the AI be this time ? - 6/13/2010 10:10:33 AM   
karonagames


Posts: 4712
Joined: 7/10/2006
From: The Duchy of Cornwall, nr England
Status: offline 		The issue of the AI really has to be looked at in relation to what players really want from the game overall. For me, I want to test out the other strategic options available to the Axis in 1941 and 1942 e.g. can Leningrad and Moscow be captured before the winter counter offensive. In my 1941 Campaign tests to date with the AI set on Normal I have captured Leningrad in October 1941, survived the winter counter offensive in pretty good shape, and gone on to capture Stalingrad in August 1942 and Moscow by November 1942. On challenging I have not captured Leningrad,had my army wrecked by the winter counter- offensive and therefore got nowhere near Moscow or Stalingrad, but I am not sure what this tells you about the strength of the AI or my lack of mastery of the game mechanics as I have only been playing for 31/2 months.

What I do know is that playing H2H is a completely different experience to playing the AI, and so far has probably been the more rewarding, as I am finding myself making the kind of decisions that I think my historical counterparts were making. I hope that a strong PBEM community develops around WITE, and that I don't get as frustrated as I did with the TOAW community where I never completed a full game of FITE or DNO because people dropped out.



_____________________________

It's only a Game


(in reply to Berkut)
Post #: 124
RE: Honestly How Competant Will the AI be this time ? - 6/13/2010 10:54:51 AM   
SGHunt


Posts: 873
Joined: 1/20/2010
From: Lancaster, England
Status: offline 		Seems the AI is kicking some arse just now in Jon's AAR.  

t does seem strange hat it has not taken on Hoth with a massed armour assault, but when you have mass like the Russians do, maybe multiple attacks will be effective and less prone to the German back hand blow?    Even if most of these attacks are sealed off, and they will be I expect, if just one or two make a significant, strategic break through, then even an experienced player like Jon will have to seriously regroup and shelve his ambitions to just 'holding on'.

S

(in reply to karonagames)
Post #: 125
RE: Honestly How Competant Will the AI be this time ? - 6/14/2010 12:47:08 AM   
Zorch

 

Posts: 7087
Joined: 3/7/2010
Status: offline 		I feel that the benefit of a good AI is to be able to validate historical alternatives...in my mind the playing strength of the AI only needs to be competent, not near perfect. I am less interested in beating the AI and winning the game than I am in learning some historical truths. "A war game is a paper time machine" (Jim Dunnigan).

It would be nice if the human player could give some strategic directive to the AI, to prevent it from aimlessly shuffling units around and falling victim to a well coordinated strategy like PyleDriver's (as someone already said).

I think the excellence of the German infantry is often overlooked; a good wargame like GG's WitE brings this out.

(in reply to karonagames)
Post #: 126
RE: Honestly How Competant Will the AI be this time ? - 6/14/2010 12:51:29 AM   
Flaviusx


Posts: 7750
Joined: 9/9/2009
From: Southern California
Status: offline 		The AI in Jon's AAR lost the game many turns ago. (Which is why I lost interest in it.) Moscow is gone, and the Red Army is dwindling away by salami tactics. Its situation is utterly disastrous. There's no sugarcoating this.

Compared to historical results for that time period, the only metric I really care about, Jon won and handed the AI its ass. He spanked it hard and good. Furthermore I am completely unconvinced that a human opponent playing at Jon's skill level would do anywhere near so badly.

(in reply to SGHunt)
Post #: 127
RE: Honestly How Competant Will the AI be this time ? - 6/14/2010 1:56:27 AM   
Berkut

 

Posts: 757
Joined: 5/16/2002
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Flaviusx

Compared to historical results for that time period, the only metric I really care about, Jon won and handed the AI its ass. He spanked it hard and good. Furthermore I am completely unconvinced that a human opponent playing at Jon's skill level would do anywhere near so badly.



Indeed - and it is because I *know* that no matter how much effort they put into it, unless it cheats (which will become obvious if it does, and hence still be a failure), the AI is going to stink against decent play, I would much rather they NOT put a lot of time and effort into it. The difference between an AI that they spend a lot of time on, and one that they spend a minimum of time on, is going to be one of degree, and not much degree at that.

So, IMO, I would MUCH rather see development resources go into creating a seamless and smooth PBEM system, for example, rather than the standard half-assed system that most wargames "enjoy".

(in reply to Flaviusx)
Post #: 128
RE: Honestly How Competant Will the AI be this time ? - 6/14/2010 3:11:25 AM   
PyleDriver


Posts: 6152
Joined: 4/19/2006
From: Occupied Mexico aka Rio Grand Valley, S.Texas
Status: offline 		Guys I played against the AI also going south also... In 42 the Germans still have the skill and the power and must and I mean must go straight after the Soviets...

_____________________________

Jon Pyle
AWD Beta tester
WBTS Alpha tester
WitE Alpha tester
WitW Alpha tester
WitE2 Alpha tester

(in reply to Berkut)
Post #: 129
RE: Honestly How Competant Will the AI be this time ? - 6/14/2010 5:00:21 AM   
Neal_MLC

 

Posts: 180
Joined: 2/2/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Berkut


quote:

ORIGINAL: Flaviusx

Compared to historical results for that time period, the only metric I really care about, Jon won and handed the AI its ass. He spanked it hard and good. Furthermore I am completely unconvinced that a human opponent playing at Jon's skill level would do anywhere near so badly.



Indeed - and it is because I *know* that no matter how much effort they put into it, unless it cheats (which will become obvious if it does, and hence still be a failure), the AI is going to stink against decent play, I would much rather they NOT put a lot of time and effort into it. The difference between an AI that they spend a lot of time on, and one that they spend a minimum of time on, is going to be one of degree, and not much degree at that.

So, IMO, I would MUCH rather see development resources go into creating a seamless and smooth PBEM system, for example, rather than the standard half-assed system that most wargames "enjoy".


Too each his own I suppose but I rarely play PBEM as I do not have the will to play a game on a schedule. For me I want a relatively competent AI. Please do not discourage the developers from making the AI as competent as they can. Please keep in mind that Matrix has to make this game appeal to the broadest market possible and to do that they have to consider the people who WILL play this game and this includes AIers and well as PBEMers. So let let them do what they do best.

I am guilty of being being impatient too but the folks at Matrix are doing the best they can.

_____________________________

no matter where you go, there you are

(in reply to Berkut)
Post #: 130
RE: Honestly How Competant Will the AI be this time ? - 6/14/2010 6:03:18 AM   
Wild


Posts: 364
Joined: 12/10/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Neal_MLC


quote:

ORIGINAL: Berkut


quote:

ORIGINAL: Flaviusx

Compared to historical results for that time period, the only metric I really care about, Jon won and handed the AI its ass. He spanked it hard and good. Furthermore I am completely unconvinced that a human opponent playing at Jon's skill level would do anywhere near so badly.



Indeed - and it is because I *know* that no matter how much effort they put into it, unless it cheats (which will become obvious if it does, and hence still be a failure), the AI is going to stink against decent play, I would much rather they NOT put a lot of time and effort into it. The difference between an AI that they spend a lot of time on, and one that they spend a minimum of time on, is going to be one of degree, and not much degree at that.

So, IMO, I would MUCH rather see development resources go into creating a seamless and smooth PBEM system, for example, rather than the standard half-assed system that most wargames "enjoy".


Too each his own I suppose but I rarely play PBEM as I do not have the will to play a game on a schedule. For me I want a relatively competent AI. Please do not discourage the developers from making the AI as competent as they can. Please keep in mind that Matrix has to make this game appeal to the broadest market possible and to do that they have to consider the people who WILL play this game and this includes AIers and well as PBEMers. So let let them do what they do best.

I am guilty of being being impatient too but the folks at Matrix are doing the best they can.


Agreed. Please make the AI as good as possible.

(in reply to Neal_MLC)
Post #: 131
RE: Honestly How Competant Will the AI be this time ? - 6/14/2010 6:47:42 AM   
Berkut

 

Posts: 757
Joined: 5/16/2002
Status: offline 		"As good as possible" isn't going to be very good though.

My point is that they should not spend any inordinate amount of time trying to create something that will, in the end, be pretty poor regardless. They can, and should, spend enough time to make an AI that can handle the basics and give the player a slight challenge as they learn the mechanics of the game, and the tendencies of the AI.

Beyond that, you will spend a lot of effort for very, very minimal gains.

quote:

Please keep in mind that Matrix has to make this game appeal to the broadest market possible and to do that they have to consider the people who WILL play this game and this includes AIers and well as PBEMers. So let let them do what they do best.


You are acting as if this is something under their control - as if they had the option to make a decent AI if only they have the will to do so. They do not. Nobody does - and many a company with vastly greater resources than Matrix and Co. have not managed to create a competent AI.

(in reply to Wild)
Post #: 132
RE: Honestly How Competant Will the AI be this time ? - 6/14/2010 7:32:08 AM   
PyleDriver


Posts: 6152
Joined: 4/19/2006
From: Occupied Mexico aka Rio Grand Valley, S.Texas
Status: offline 		First of all its Gary, not Matrix on the AI. I can't begin to count the saves I have sent to him... Were not done, and I scramble for ideas now...I have played so many lame game AI's that I have that I don't play anymore...I press Joel and Gary for a better one, give us some time...Right now 90% of the players will be hard pressed with it...

_____________________________

Jon Pyle
AWD Beta tester
WBTS Alpha tester
WitE Alpha tester
WitW Alpha tester
WitE2 Alpha tester

(in reply to Berkut)
Post #: 133
RE: Honestly How Competant Will the AI be this time ? - 6/14/2010 8:29:35 AM   
Wild


Posts: 364
Joined: 12/10/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Berkut

"As good as possible" isn't going to be very good though.

My point is that they should not spend any inordinate amount of time trying to create something that will, in the end, be pretty poor regardless. They can, and should, spend enough time to make an AI that can handle the basics and give the player a slight challenge as they learn the mechanics of the game, and the tendencies of the AI.

Beyond that, you will spend a lot of effort for very, very minimal gains.

quote:

Please keep in mind that Matrix has to make this game appeal to the broadest market possible and to do that they have to consider the people who WILL play this game and this includes AIers and well as PBEMers. So let let them do what they do best.


You are acting as if this is something under their control - as if they had the option to make a decent AI if only they have the will to do so. They do not. Nobody does - and many a company with vastly greater resources than Matrix and Co. have not managed to create a competent AI.


Any gains to the AI no matter how minimal are worth it to me as i'm an AI only player who plans to play this game for a very long time. As has been stated before most people who buy the game will
only play against the AI.
Besides if anyone can program a good east front AI it's Gary. Let's give him the opportunity to do so, thereby increasing the enjoyment of all us poor deluded fools out there that have not acknowledged the wisdom that is PBEM.
I mean i really don't see what the problem is.

(in reply to Berkut)
Post #: 134
RE: Honestly How Competant Will the AI be this time ? - 6/14/2010 9:44:48 AM   
wodin


Posts: 10762
Joined: 4/20/2003
From: England
Status: offline 		I'm an AI only player and I wish those who only play PBEM would to be blunt shut up....listen you will have to wait so that we (AI only players) get the best AI we can...I play a certain game PBEM but I don't begrudge the time put into the AI for those who dont...I think it's just selfishness....if you think the AI will be lame and you play PBEM then why are you worring about it? It has to be because you want the game quicker...well wait...don't be so selfish....your not the only one who wants the game and experience it...

The only way around this is if they release two versions one with and one without...relase the one without early to keep them happy..

It really does annoy me to be honest....

_____________________________

My website


https://www.awargamersneedfulthings.co.uk/

(in reply to Wild)
Post #: 135
RE: Honestly How Competant Will the AI be this time ? - 6/14/2010 12:52:05 PM   
Karri

 

Posts: 1137
Joined: 5/24/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Berkut


quote:

ORIGINAL: Flaviusx

Compared to historical results for that time period, the only metric I really care about, Jon won and handed the AI its ass. He spanked it hard and good. Furthermore I am completely unconvinced that a human opponent playing at Jon's skill level would do anywhere near so badly.



Indeed - and it is because I *know* that no matter how much effort they put into it, unless it cheats (which will become obvious if it does, and hence still be a failure), the AI is going to stink against decent play, I would much rather they NOT put a lot of time and effort into it. The difference between an AI that they spend a lot of time on, and one that they spend a minimum of time on, is going to be one of degree, and not much degree at that.

So, IMO, I would MUCH rather see development resources go into creating a seamless and smooth PBEM system, for example, rather than the standard half-assed system that most wargames "enjoy".


Obivous solution is to make the AI moddable.

(in reply to Berkut)
Post #: 136
RE: Honestly How Competant Will the AI be this time ? - 6/14/2010 2:36:00 PM   
Berkut

 

Posts: 757
Joined: 5/16/2002
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: wodin

I'm an AI only player and I wish those who only play PBEM would to be blunt shut up....listen you will have to wait so that we (AI only players) get the best AI we can...I play a certain game PBEM but I don't begrudge the time put into the AI for those who dont...I think it's just selfishness....if you think the AI will be lame and you play PBEM then why are you worring about it? It has to be because you want the game quicker...well wait...don't be so selfish....your not the only one who wants the game and experience it...

The only way around this is if they release two versions one with and one without...relase the one without early to keep them happy..

It really does annoy me to be honest....



Well, you really should get over your annoyance. It only harms you - I can assure that I do not care one bit whether the truth annoys you. And more improtantly, the truth doesn't care that you are annoyed by it either.

In any case, you guys are simply not listening. I am not saying that they should ignore the AI because it isn't important to *me*, I am saying that you guys need to adjust your expectations because the AI is not going to be any better than the AIs in any number of other similar wargames - in other words, it isn't going to be very good. And it doesn't really matter how much time they put into it - because the reason AIs in complex wargames are not very good has very little to do with a problem than is fixable by pouring more and more time into it.

This has nothing to do with anything under the control of Matrix, Gary, or anyone else. It is the simple reality of how incredibly hard it is to program a decent AI for any game more complex than checkers, or chess, or any other "simple" game with an extremely finite and measurable space.

(in reply to wodin)
Post #: 137
RE: Honestly How Competant Will the AI be this time ? - 6/14/2010 2:39:42 PM   
Berkut

 

Posts: 757
Joined: 5/16/2002
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Karri


quote:

ORIGINAL: Berkut


quote:

ORIGINAL: Flaviusx

Compared to historical results for that time period, the only metric I really care about, Jon won and handed the AI its ass. He spanked it hard and good. Furthermore I am completely unconvinced that a human opponent playing at Jon's skill level would do anywhere near so badly.



Indeed - and it is because I *know* that no matter how much effort they put into it, unless it cheats (which will become obvious if it does, and hence still be a failure), the AI is going to stink against decent play, I would much rather they NOT put a lot of time and effort into it. The difference between an AI that they spend a lot of time on, and one that they spend a minimum of time on, is going to be one of degree, and not much degree at that.

So, IMO, I would MUCH rather see development resources go into creating a seamless and smooth PBEM system, for example, rather than the standard half-assed system that most wargames "enjoy".


Obivous solution is to make the AI moddable.


That is a rather good idea on its own merits, but it isn't a solution - just a neat idea that would make the game more interesting, as people could devise new AI strategies. It won't make the game more challenging against the AI in general though - it will still be operating under the same limited constraints, and a competent human player will still be able to predict how it will respond to a given circumstances, and hence be able to exploit it.


(in reply to Karri)
Post #: 138
RE: Honestly How Competant Will the AI be this time ? - 6/14/2010 2:41:02 PM   
Berkut

 

Posts: 757
Joined: 5/16/2002
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: PyleDriver

First of all its Gary, not Matrix on the AI. I can't begin to count the saves I have sent to him... Were not done, and I scramble for ideas now...I have played so many lame game AI's that I have that I don't play anymore...I press Joel and Gary for a better one, give us some time...Right now 90% of the players will be hard pressed with it...



Awesome - sounds like they are pretty close to having the AI about as good as it is going to get then - that is certainly very good news.

(in reply to PyleDriver)
Post #: 139
RE: Honestly How Competant Will the AI be this time ? - 6/14/2010 3:52:57 PM   
Hard Sarge


Posts: 22741
Joined: 10/1/2000
From: garfield hts ohio usa
Status: offline 		Awesome - sounds like they are pretty close to having the AI about as good as it is going to get then - that is certainly very good news.

Hmmm, not so sure we are that close, Jon is sending in his AI saves, and so is Andy and I, along with the rest of the gang

(LOL, I got told I was doing good with a Explotable Bug, so my results shouldn't count, but until someone tried to explote it, we didn't know there was a bug there !!)

we are working

_____________________________


(in reply to Berkut)
Post #: 140
RE: Honestly How Competant Will the AI be this time ? - 6/14/2010 5:02:33 PM   
wodin


Posts: 10762
Joined: 4/20/2003
From: England
Status: offline 		Berkut,

It wasn't really aimed at you my friend....some people around feel the AI should be scrapped altogether...I have a problem with that...I get the AI isn't as good as a human but I'm really not bothered by that...I've been beaten by the AI enough times in games in the past and beaten even more...the thing is was it FUN...and I have to say games with apparent poor AI like the CLose Combat series I had loads of fun playing so thats whats important...I have a great time palying CMSF and at the moment BftB both against the AI both games I have a great time playing...some of the best game playing experiences I've had was against an AI in CC and Combat MissionBB and SF.

So I know its not going to be as good as a human opponent but as long as I enjoy it I really don't care...when I do win it's because I'm such a great tactician not becasue the AI was dumb

_____________________________

My website


https://www.awargamersneedfulthings.co.uk/

(in reply to Hard Sarge)
Post #: 141
RE: Honestly How Competant Will the AI be this time ? - 6/14/2010 5:19:17 PM   
Neal_MLC

 

Posts: 180
Joined: 2/2/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: wodin


So I know its not going to be as good as a human opponent but as long as I enjoy it I really don't care...when I do win it's because I'm such a great tactician not becasue the AI was dumb


EXACTLY!!!!!!

_____________________________

no matter where you go, there you are

(in reply to wodin)
Post #: 142
RE: Honestly How Competant Will the AI be this time ? - 6/14/2010 5:33:34 PM   
Berkut

 

Posts: 757
Joined: 5/16/2002
Status: offline 		Well, I would not say anything like that the AI ought to be scrapped - that would be fine with me, but I realize that would be a foolish business decision.

I am just saying that people should not get their hopes up that the AI is going to be fundamentally any better than AIs in complex wargames have always been - not very good. And the more complex the game is (both mechanically and in the strategic complexity of the operational situation), the less competent the AI is going to be.

This looks like a rather highly complex game mechanically about a highly complex situation. I have no great hopes for the AI.

(in reply to Neal_MLC)
Post #: 143
RE: Honestly How Competant Will the AI be this time ? - 6/14/2010 6:33:00 PM   
Neal_MLC

 

Posts: 180
Joined: 2/2/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Berkut

Well, I would not say anything like that the AI ought to be scrapped - that would be fine with me, but I realize that would be a foolish business decision.

I am just saying that people should not get their hopes up that the AI is going to be fundamentally any better than AIs in complex wargames have always been - not very good. And the more complex the game is (both mechanically and in the strategic complexity of the operational situation), the less competent the AI is going to be.

This looks like a rather highly complex game mechanically about a highly complex situation. I have no great hopes for the AI.


I don't think anyone is expecting a DEEP BLUE AI nor do I think anyone is expecting anything near human competence either. But after reading the testers' comments about the AI I think Gary is well on the way to achieving something remarkable in terms of the AI.

What I would like to know is what Gary believes to be acceptable AI performance.

_____________________________

no matter where you go, there you are

(in reply to Berkut)
Post #: 144
RE: Honestly How Competant Will the AI be this time ? - 6/14/2010 7:34:06 PM   
PyleDriver


Posts: 6152
Joined: 4/19/2006
From: Occupied Mexico aka Rio Grand Valley, S.Texas
Status: offline 		Well in my AAR, the AI is filling gaps, springing reserves, and doing counters now. Were not done yet and it is a headache already. We have testers testing every game we have, and thank god for Pavel (Helpless), he has picked up so much of the bug work to allow Gary to do alot of AI work...This is one hell of a test and program team, and everything is being looked at...Theres alot of smart guys here, and I'm not close to being the brightest...

_____________________________

Jon Pyle
AWD Beta tester
WBTS Alpha tester
WitE Alpha tester
WitW Alpha tester
WitE2 Alpha tester

(in reply to Neal_MLC)
Post #: 145
RE: Honestly How Competant Will the AI be this time ? - 6/14/2010 7:48:11 PM   
Northern Star


Posts: 1881
Joined: 2/17/2008
Status: offline 		You are one of the best testers of the team, unlike me... I'm only a witch who must improve a lot to reach the level of you, Jose and Andy.

_____________________________

War in the East alpha tester

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xPV9JWWtOQ0

(in reply to PyleDriver)
Post #: 146
RE: Honestly How Competant Will the AI be this time ? - 6/14/2010 11:31:10 PM   
Joel Billings


Posts: 32265
Joined: 9/20/2000
From: Santa Rosa, CA
Status: offline 		We believe that the majority of players will only play against the AI, so as with all of Gary's games we will work hard to make an AI that provides an enjoyable game. So far so good.

The AI (as with all AI's) will never be as good as a good human player. However, if you're willing to give it various advantages, it can give you a good challenge and a fun game.

We have had 5 programmers working on this game at one time or another. For the past 6 months Gary has spent at least 1/2 his time on the AI. Thanks to the help of Pavel, Karl and Jim, Gary has been able to spend more time on the AI than he otherwise would have, and we have more features than we otherwise would have had. The AI is still not the critical path item in development. We expect Gary will continue to work on it and improve it up until release. Gary'and I have been doing this together for 28 years, and it's an art not a science when balancing trying to get a good AI done and trying to get a game published in a reasonable time.

_____________________________

All understanding comes after the fact.
-- Soren Kierkegaard

(in reply to Northern Star)
Post #: 147
RE: Honestly How Competant Will the AI be this time ? - 6/15/2010 6:41:28 PM   
goranw

 

Posts: 1551
Joined: 10/23/2001
From: Uppsala,Sweden
Status: offline 		Hi!
The AI is in its development and of course it should be. So is the AI for chess.Not so many years ago it was said that
the AI for a chess program never could beat a human master. We know now about that. Of course thats an another thing with more limited rules and space.
Its also a bit easier to compare by using the chess rating system- The ELO-points.
But what if the development had stopped?

The AI must go on being better and better. We all benefit from that.
So it had been earlier. Remember steps like the war games Subhunter( u-boat) and Firebrigade (arond Kiew-43) in the 80's.
( to mention the start)

This game ,War in the East, is a part of the ongoing work on the AI and a big effort is made.
Another thing is that it has a long way to go to beat an experienced human,
who could either play "too" sound or using errors of the AI.
An unique thing with the wargaming AI is that its coupled to the map,
deployment,time elements and the historical flow. Its not a technical thing alone.
That interference makes possibilities.
Even AI-AI play has its value but of course a human to human play exceeds in many aspects.
I guess that is hard to beat but we know that to play the AI often is the only possibility at hand.

GoranW

< Message edited by goranw -- 6/16/2010 6:58:55 AM >

(in reply to Joel Billings)
Post #: 148
RE: Honestly How Competant Will the AI be this time ? - 6/15/2010 7:19:53 PM   
The SNAFU


Posts: 48
Joined: 3/10/2010
Status: offline 		So it's probably safe to say that however hard the creators work on the AI it will not be a match for a very good human player. It is also safe to say that without a credible AI the game cannot succeed economically in the long run given the market demand from players not interested in PBEM.

What I find rather amusing in some respects is the high place some put PBEM. While I prefer the competition of playing vs human opponents there are major issues with PBEM which while not the same problems, often rise to the same level as the problems we associate with playing against AI. Very good (experienced) PBEM opponents will know the order of appearance and initial placement of their enemies forces, they know what units are fixed and when or how they are released, they know when and where reinforcements arrive. And in my experience, the better PBEM players use that information to their distinct advantage. In some respects that smacks of "gamey" because to know what one should not know and then use it to win is not entirely right.

I'm guessing some here will insist that they dont examine in some detail their opponents status before they play a scenario but I've played enough PBEM to know most good players know all they need to know to gain advantages they shouldnt have. This may not be a blatant attempt at cheating. Rather it may simply be the result of the amount of experience a player has with the game and scenarios. If both sides have it well then maybe it all balances out in the end. If one side is more experienced and knowledgable about the scenario played then the advantages to one side are in some ways the same as the advantages held by human opponents over AI.

The game needs both a "good" AI and a well implemented PBEM component. If that is achived the game will be a smashing success.

From what I've seen my hopes are high that's exactly what we will get.

_____________________________

However beautiful the strategy, you should occasionally look at the results. Winston Churchill

(in reply to goranw)
Post #: 149
RE: Honestly How Competant Will the AI be this time ? - 6/16/2010 7:49:10 AM   
goranw

 

Posts: 1551
Joined: 10/23/2001
From: Uppsala,Sweden
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: The SNAFU

"So it's probably safe to say that however hard the creators work on the AI it will not be a match for a very good human player. It is also safe to say that without a credible AI the game cannot succeed economically in the long run given the market demand from players not interested in PBEM. "

That depends on what you mean by " be a match" and a "very good human player".
I think that the AI in this game is credible and gives a match, that is a challenging opposition, even to an experienced wargame player.

"What I find rather amusing in some respects is the high place some put PBEM. While I prefer the competition of playing vs human opponents there are major issues with PBEM which while not the same problems, often rise to the same level as the problems we associate with playing against AI. Very good (experienced) PBEM opponents will know the order of appearance and initial placement of their enemies forces, they know what units are fixed and when or how they are released, they know when and where reinforcements arrive. And in my experience, the better PBEM players use that information to their distinct advantage. In some respects that smacks of "gamey" because to know what one should not know and then use it to win is not entirely right. "

Its an interesting aspect of PBEM you mention. Although the problem is lessend by the fact that the deployment and time elements in this game
is very " historically true" and in that way depending on common facts open to everybody. ( Like special technics in chess ex rook -endings and so on.)
This is possible in a game which is specialized in a certain war/operation, however in this case gigantic in itself.
The game is also so complex that details like " time and deployment of a certain reinforcement" have less distinct importance.


/quote]
GoranW

(in reply to The SNAFU)
Post #: 150
Page:   <<   < prev  2 3 4 [5] 6   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series >> RE: Honestly How Competant Will the AI be this time ? Page: <<   < prev  2 3 4 [5] 6   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

4.281