Current version

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

Current version

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> Tech Support >> Current version

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

Current version - 9/26/2010 2:56:35 AM

tbridges

Posts: 263
Joined: 6/25/2005
From: North Carolina
Status: offline

My game screen says: Version1.0.4.1106g-Jul6 2010 22:38:41

I've been gone since early July and am just now getting back to the game. Do I have the most current version or have there been recent updates/patches? If so, what is the most current version and where do I go to download it?

Thanks.

Post #: 1

RE: Current version - 9/26/2010 2:59:02 AM

witpqs

Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline

That looks like the one. They are working on more.

(in reply to tbridges)

Post #: 2

RE: Current version - 9/26/2010 2:17:29 PM

tbridges

Posts: 263
Joined: 6/25/2005
From: North Carolina
Status: offline

My version says: Version1.0.4.1106g-Jul6 2010 22:38:41

Note it says July 6. The update version currently offered on the Matrix site states "July 21", but when I download and attempt to install the July 21 version I get a message that says my version is already current. How do I get the newest July 21 version to overwrite my July 6 version?

< Message edited by tbridges -- 9/28/2010 2:45:15 AM >

_____________________________

Tom

The easy way is always mined...

(in reply to witpqs)

Post #: 3

RE: Current version - 9/28/2010 3:05:06 PM

tbridges

Posts: 263
Joined: 6/25/2005
From: North Carolina
Status: offline

bump

_____________________________

Tom

The easy way is always mined...

(in reply to tbridges)

Post #: 4

RE: Current version - 9/28/2010 3:10:42 PM

witpqs

Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline

Where did you get the version you have installed now? What is the public beta that became Patch 4? If so, they are the same - that's why the version numbers are the same - so the date doesn't matter.

(in reply to tbridges)

Post #: 5

RE: Current version - 9/28/2010 3:33:28 PM

tbridges

Posts: 263
Joined: 6/25/2005
From: North Carolina
Status: offline

I got my current version from the Matrix update site before I left in early July. Now that I'm back I just thought there might be a more current version that was released in my absence. But I guess not. I will proceed with my new PBEM game with the version I have now.

Thanks for your help.

Tom

_____________________________

Tom

The easy way is always mined...

(in reply to witpqs)

Post #: 6

RE: Current version - 9/28/2010 8:40:56 PM

mikkey

Posts: 3142
Joined: 2/10/2008
From: Slovakia
Status: offline

your version 1.0.4.1106g-Jul6 2010 22:38:41 is current version. Jul 6 is not release date of the patch but date of compiling of witp *.exe file (I suppose).

_____________________________

(in reply to tbridges)

Post #: 7

RE: Current version - 9/28/2010 10:50:37 PM

tbridges

Posts: 263
Joined: 6/25/2005
From: North Carolina
Status: offline

Got it, thanks.

_____________________________

Tom

The easy way is always mined...

(in reply to mikkey)

Post #: 8

RE: Current version - 11/13/2010 5:31:11 PM

jmscho

Posts: 126
Joined: 9/21/2004
From: York, UK
Status: offline

Hi Tom, glad to see you are back with us again.

John

(in reply to tbridges)

Post #: 9

RE: Current version - 11/14/2010 1:26:28 AM

michaelm75au

Posts: 13500
Joined: 5/5/2001
From: Melbourne, Australia
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mikkey

your version 1.0.4.1106g-Jul6 2010 22:38:41 is current version. Jul 6 is not release date of the patch but date of compiling of witp *.exe file (I suppose).

Yep. It takes a bit of time from when the EXE is submitted to Matrix and when the patch package is ready for distribution.

_____________________________

Michael

(in reply to mikkey)

Post #: 10