Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Road to Smolensk bug?

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series >> Road to Smolensk bug? Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Road to Smolensk bug? - 12/17/2010 1:39:42 AM   
Sherban_MatrixForum

 

Posts: 17
Joined: 4/17/2009
Status: offline 		In the Road to Smolensk scenario, the LVI and XXXXI Panzer Corps in the North have 0 supply and 0 fuel. They are also withdrawn on turn 2, so what's the deal considering that with no supply they cannot reaaly be used on turn 1?
Post #: 1
RE: Road to Smolensk bug? - 12/17/2010 1:54:13 AM   
Flaviusx


Posts: 7750
Joined: 9/9/2009
From: Southern California
Status: offline 		Not a bug. These are Army Group North forces temporarily included in the scenario to help the German breakthrough during the surprise attack. They get withdrawn afterwards, representing their advance in the direction of Leningrad.



_____________________________

WitE Alpha Tester

(in reply to Sherban_MatrixForum)
Post #: 2
RE: Road to Smolensk bug? - 12/17/2010 1:58:34 AM   
Sherban_MatrixForum

 

Posts: 17
Joined: 4/17/2009
Status: offline 		I was thinking that might be the reason. But why include them at all with 0 supply/fuel? Withdrawing them should have been enough, shoudn't it?

(in reply to Flaviusx)
Post #: 3
RE: Road to Smolensk bug? - 12/17/2010 2:01:13 AM   
Flaviusx


Posts: 7750
Joined: 9/9/2009
From: Southern California
Status: offline 		Yeah, zero supply thing might be an oversight. Not sure. Nobody ever caught that because it mostly doesn't matter, the mech units start with their full 50 mps and get the job done before they withdraw.

_____________________________

WitE Alpha Tester

(in reply to Sherban_MatrixForum)
Post #: 4
RE: Road to Smolensk bug? - 12/17/2010 2:05:07 AM   
Sherban_MatrixForum

 

Posts: 17
Joined: 4/17/2009
Status: offline 		Well, they certainly push the first front line Soviet unit with ease. However, although this is a hasty attack, most their MPs are spent afterwards (probably due to no fuel/supply), so they cannot be used for a second attack anylonger.

(in reply to Flaviusx)
Post #: 5
RE: Road to Smolensk bug? - 12/17/2010 3:05:59 AM   
Sabre21


Posts: 8231
Joined: 4/27/2001
From: on a mountain in Idaho
Status: offline 		No, it's not an oversight but as designed. That was brought up a while back I recall on the tester forum. I know it looks odd and don't see why those Hq's couldn't have had extra fuel/supplies/ammo assigned to them but since they move off on turn 2 it wasn't considered all that necessary. Walt or Joel could probably answer why better than me on this one.

_____________________________


(in reply to Sherban_MatrixForum)
Post #: 6
RE: Road to Smolensk bug? - 12/17/2010 3:09:36 AM   
Joel Billings


Posts: 32265
Joined: 9/20/2000
From: Santa Rosa, CA
Status: offline 		The 0 supply/fuel/ammo is a known bug on our list. I've seen a tester post that it has no impact on these units on turn 1, although I would expect that having 0 ammo would have an impact in combats.

_____________________________

All understanding comes after the fact.
-- Soren Kierkegaard

(in reply to Sherban_MatrixForum)
Post #: 7
RE: Road to Smolensk bug? - 12/17/2010 12:56:46 PM   
Zaratoughda


Posts: 714
Joined: 11/15/2008
From: NE Pa, USA
Status: offline 		I believe this occurred during one of the times where the scenarios were frozen and worked on with the campaign games, and I was told it was gonna get fixed automatically but I imagine the bug has to do with this not happenning.

So, I manually fixed the problem (was all of 4PG in both RtS and RtM) and have sent you the new scenario files.

Because these units get withdrawn after a turn or two it is not a big deal but still should be fixed.

Zaratoughda

(in reply to Joel Billings)
Post #: 8
RE: Road to Smolensk bug? - 12/17/2010 1:01:12 PM   
Zaratoughda


Posts: 714
Joined: 11/15/2008
From: NE Pa, USA
Status: offline 		Hmmm... checked these scenarios (been a while) and, all of 4PG gets withdrawn on turn 2 so, this problem should be more of a confusion factor than anything else. In any case, it should be fixed next time these scenarios are released.

Zaratoughda

(in reply to Zaratoughda)
Post #: 9
RE: Road to Smolensk bug? - 12/17/2010 3:55:33 PM   
Magnum88

 

Posts: 46
Joined: 12/17/2010
Status: offline 		4 PzG is very useful even for only one turn. They can isolate almost all the Soviet units east of the Daugava allowing the remaining infantry divisions to mop them up on Turn 2.

(in reply to Sherban_MatrixForum)
Post #: 10
RE: Road to Smolensk bug? - 12/17/2010 8:11:30 PM   
Zaratoughda


Posts: 714
Joined: 11/15/2008
From: NE Pa, USA
Status: offline 		That's pretty much what the AI does in the campaign game. 4PG, then heads north.

Zaratoughda

(in reply to Magnum88)
Post #: 11
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series >> Road to Smolensk bug? Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.938