USA production

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

USA production

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> The War Room >> USA production

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

USA production - 1/13/2011 5:37:37 PM

jgsIII

Posts: 67
Joined: 8/25/2009
From: Annapolis, Maryland, U.S.A.
Status: offline

Does the USA player have to manage production in a game? I see lots of forum items on JPN production and how to do it but I don't see much on the USA. So for USA is it a mange if you want to situation?

Post #: 1

RE: USA production - 1/13/2011 6:05:40 PM

Mundy

Posts: 2869
Joined: 6/26/2002
From: Neenah
Status: offline

Nope.

Ed-

(in reply to jgsIII)

Post #: 2

RE: USA production - 1/13/2011 6:40:57 PM

SuluSea

Posts: 2358
Joined: 11/17/2006
Status: offline

You can keep a plane model from upgrading by turning it off but that's about it as far as production.

It wouldn't hurt to have a few AKLs ferrying resources from Hilo to Pearl and one tanker full of oil per year from maybe Abadan to Melbourne/Sydney to feed refineries but it's not a must for the allied player.

< Message edited by SuluSea -- 1/13/2011 6:43:13 PM >

_____________________________

"There�s no such thing as a bitter person who keeps the bitterness to himself.� ~ Erwin Lutzer

(in reply to Mundy)

Post #: 3

RE: USA production - 1/13/2011 8:15:48 PM

Bullwinkle58

Posts: 11302
Joined: 2/24/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: SuluSea

You can keep a plane model from upgrading by turning it off but that's about it as far as production.

It wouldn't hurt to have a few AKLs ferrying resources from Hilo to Pearl and one tanker full of oil per year from maybe Abadan to Melbourne/Sydney to feed refineries but it's not a must for the allied player.

The beta and thus the coming patch has more Allied production options. For example, I have all of the HI production in Oz turned off now. Makes sending fuel there a lot easier.

_____________________________

The Moose

(in reply to SuluSea)

Post #: 4

RE: USA production - 1/14/2011 12:41:03 AM

vettim89

Posts: 3615
Joined: 7/14/2007
From: Toledo, Ohio
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bullwinkle58

quote:

ORIGINAL: SuluSea

You can keep a plane model from upgrading by turning it off but that's about it as far as production.

It wouldn't hurt to have a few AKLs ferrying resources from Hilo to Pearl and one tanker full of oil per year from maybe Abadan to Melbourne/Sydney to feed refineries but it's not a must for the allied player.

The beta and thus the coming patch has more Allied production options. For example, I have all of the HI production in Oz turned off now. Makes sending fuel there a lot easier.

Helelujah! If the Allies cannot have any control over their production, it seems unfair to make them pay for it anyway

_____________________________

"We have met the enemy and they are ours" - Commodore O.H. Perry

(in reply to Bullwinkle58)

Post #: 5

RE: USA production - 1/14/2011 12:48:38 AM

Bullwinkle58

Posts: 11302
Joined: 2/24/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: vettim89

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bullwinkle58

quote:

ORIGINAL: SuluSea

You can keep a plane model from upgrading by turning it off but that's about it as far as production.

It wouldn't hurt to have a few AKLs ferrying resources from Hilo to Pearl and one tanker full of oil per year from maybe Abadan to Melbourne/Sydney to feed refineries but it's not a must for the allied player.

The beta and thus the coming patch has more Allied production options. For example, I have all of the HI production in Oz turned off now. Makes sending fuel there a lot easier.

Helelujah! If the Allies cannot have any control over their production, it seems unfair to make them pay for it anyway