Using settings to decrease Soviet rail capacity?

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

Using settings to decrease Soviet rail capacity?

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series >> Using settings to decrease Soviet rail capacity?

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

Using settings to decrease Soviet rail capacity? - 2/2/2011 8:09:04 PM

Altaris

Posts: 216
Joined: 8/14/2009
Status: offline

Just curious what the Soviet players are thinking about their rail capacity. In my (albeit limited) experience playing the Soviets, it seems the rail capacity is just a bit too high. Since rail points can be modified via settings, I was thinking that in future games this might be one way to help balance things out. Mainly trying to figure out what a good reasonable number would be. Off hand, I was thinking 70% would leave the Soviets enough realistic rail capacity to move some key troops around and get industry evac'd, but wanted to see what the general concensus was here.

Post #: 1

RE: Using settings to decrease Soviet rail capacity? - 2/2/2011 8:17:00 PM

Flaviusx

Posts: 7750
Joined: 9/9/2009
From: Southern California
Status: offline

You could get by with as little as 50%, tbh.

But there are some changes in rail costs for factory evacuation under consideration.

_____________________________

WitE Alpha Tester

(in reply to Altaris)

Post #: 2

RE: Using settings to decrease Soviet rail capacity? - 2/2/2011 9:47:28 PM

bwheatley

Posts: 3650
Joined: 12/13/2004
Status: offline

Ya in the patch i'm playing with its soviet rail costs are increased by 50% (well a bug but should have been) for factories. That feels better.

I will enjoy having to fight to hold cities to have time to get factories out.

(in reply to Flaviusx)

Post #: 3