Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Operations report

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Operations report Page: <<   < prev  8 9 [10] 11 12   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Operations report - 2/11/2011 5:57:43 AM   
bigred


Posts: 3599
Joined: 12/27/2007
Status: offline
Not much info...I would think the report of the DD would be on this screen.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by bigred -- 2/11/2011 5:58:00 AM >

(in reply to bigred)
Post #: 271
RE: Operations report - 2/11/2011 11:45:09 AM   
bigred


Posts: 3599
Joined: 12/27/2007
Status: offline
Auto Victory...could japan get the points for an auto victory if he took SF?

(in reply to bigred)
Post #: 272
RE: September Plans - 2/11/2011 12:26:54 PM   
Blackhorse


Posts: 1983
Joined: 8/20/2000
From: Eastern US
Status: offline
quote:

Chinese elements have linkedw/ the Brits in northern Burma. Ledo controlled by IJA w/ 6 armor regiments...IIRRC I must hold Ledo to get the China suppy. I plan to use the b25/26 w/ chinese Lusu army to clear the hex.


For the 500 daily supply to flow automatically to China, you must clear a road/rail route from Rangoon to China.

Great AAR, btw. Good luck!

_____________________________

WitP-AE -- US LCU & AI Stuff

Oddball: Why don't you knock it off with them negative waves? Why don't you dig how beautiful it is out here? Why don't you say something righteous and hopeful for a change?
Moriarty: Crap!

(in reply to bigred)
Post #: 273
RE: September Plans - 2/12/2011 2:56:08 AM   
bigred


Posts: 3599
Joined: 12/27/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Blackhorse

quote:

Chinese elements have linkedw/ the Brits in northern Burma. Ledo controlled by IJA w/ 6 armor regiments...IIRRC I must hold Ledo to get the China suppy. I plan to use the b25/26 w/ chinese Lusu army to clear the hex.


For the 500 daily supply to flow automatically to China, you must clear a road/rail route from Rangoon to China.

Great AAR, btw. Good luck!

Sorry, not Ledo, But the other L??? Lasho? anyway, thanks for the kind comments...I must remind all I am greatful to Yubari for the dominate Andaman position..I really have done nothing except hold the line. I am looking forward to a 44/45 game. Thought this would be a real test for the allies and me. I sense my skill level below FatR. To be the best you have to play the best.

(in reply to Blackhorse)
Post #: 274
RE: Problems - 2/13/2011 12:47:10 PM   
bigred


Posts: 3599
Joined: 12/27/2007
Status: offline
Big fleet off south Alaska.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to bigred)
Post #: 275
RE: Problems - 2/13/2011 12:48:39 PM   
bigred


Posts: 3599
Joined: 12/27/2007
Status: offline
South China shock attack w/ alot of jap armor. Units got blown out of hex.  All the jap armor in the chinese theatre. Note elements of 1st IJA armored Division in the attack...I use this unit in my other game to help clean up the chinese rear areas.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by bigred -- 2/13/2011 12:55:06 PM >

(in reply to bigred)
Post #: 276
RE:9-15 Umnak - 2/13/2011 5:17:25 PM   
bigred


Posts: 3599
Joined: 12/27/2007
Status: offline
I thought at some point the IJ would go over to the defense.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to bigred)
Post #: 277
RE: RE:9-15 Umnak - 2/13/2011 9:11:55 PM   
bigred


Posts: 3599
Joined: 12/27/2007
Status: offline
B24s trying to suppress the Umnak landing.  IJN fighters unable to stop my ground support. IJA has 3 divisions. I have a doubled defense w/ a level 4 fort, 150AV, one coast AA and one ART Bn.. Just Maybe....and more air support is avialable but I was afraid to commit because I did not know the defensive cap strenght.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by bigred -- 2/13/2011 9:15:32 PM >

(in reply to bigred)
Post #: 278
RE: RE:9-15 Umnak - 2/13/2011 9:36:37 PM   
bigred


Posts: 3599
Joined: 12/27/2007
Status: offline
Umnak was fort 4...air evac of wounded was intercepted. All men on the island realize the end is near unless massive allied air is brought to help.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by bigred -- 2/13/2011 9:47:48 PM >

(in reply to bigred)
Post #: 279
RE: RE:9-16 pearl - 2/14/2011 12:02:22 AM   
bigred


Posts: 3599
Joined: 12/27/2007
Status: offline
Probe at Pearl:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to bigred)
Post #: 280
RE: RE:9-16 Umnak - 2/14/2011 12:26:49 AM   
bigred


Posts: 3599
Joined: 12/27/2007
Status: offline
Umnak has fallen...P40s and SBDs did not link up in air phase and about 10 SBDs were butchered by the IJN CV Cap over Umnak. Probably would not have helped as my b24s did not fly...




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by bigred -- 2/14/2011 1:15:56 AM >

(in reply to bigred)
Post #: 281
RE: RE:9-16 off tavoy - 2/14/2011 1:14:26 AM   
bigred


Posts: 3599
Joined: 12/27/2007
Status: offline
IJN transport fleet skirts around Port Blair, max range for SBDs.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to bigred)
Post #: 282
BFTF - 2/15/2011 4:33:03 AM   
bigred


Posts: 3599
Joined: 12/27/2007
Status: offline
BFTF




Attachment (1)

(in reply to bigred)
Post #: 283
RE: PB 9-17-42 - 2/16/2011 2:48:37 AM   
bigred


Posts: 3599
Joined: 12/27/2007
Status: offline
IJA just landed a division plus at PB.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by bigred -- 2/16/2011 2:49:37 AM >

(in reply to bigred)
Post #: 284
RE: PB 9-17-42 - 2/16/2011 2:50:00 AM   
bigred


Posts: 3599
Joined: 12/27/2007
Status: offline
PT boat look at fleet the night of invasion.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to bigred)
Post #: 285
RE: PB 9-17-42 - 2/16/2011 2:52:19 AM   
bigred


Posts: 3599
Joined: 12/27/2007
Status: offline
Probably had air losses in the 2 to 1 range(70 to 35)w/ alot of shelling of PB airfield. Before this turn I counted 100 allied fighters just at PB.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by bigred -- 2/16/2011 2:58:22 AM >

(in reply to bigred)
Post #: 286
RE: PB 9-17-42 - 2/16/2011 2:53:37 AM   
bigred


Posts: 3599
Joined: 12/27/2007
Status: offline
Up north I nailed an IJN AO off Umnak.

< Message edited by bigred -- 2/16/2011 2:58:47 AM >

(in reply to bigred)
Post #: 287
RE: PB 9-17-42 - 2/16/2011 3:46:38 AM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline
What do you think about the size of that invasion?

(in reply to bigred)
Post #: 288
RE: PB 9-17-42 - 2/16/2011 1:44:31 PM   
bigred


Posts: 3599
Joined: 12/27/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: witpqs

What do you think about the size of that invasion?

Umnak-overwhelming,

I have 4x b24 sqns bombing the port each turn.I have been mixing the missions to see which does the most damage. FatR has to pick up those divisions to be able to use them again and I hope to hit some shipping...I remember in my game w/ P.Hauser I hit 6 transports w50% damage in one turn(he sent me the jpeg and wanted house rules). Cant seem to recreate this against FatR.

PB-underwhelming, but seems to have the entire Jap airforce on site.

I was surprised to see the entire 56th IJA division unload in one turn.

I know that I need a 2nd and 3rd front to spread the enemy air instead of allowing him to concentrate. Moving forward on a massive scale is risky w/out the CV fleet. It may be time to sub -commando some forward islands.

At PB I did send in 4xSBD SQNs in the area to Little andaman this turn w/ a 2hex range. All fighters where set to escort w/ no CAP as I am getting mauled anyway.

In addition the British torpedo bomber was placed at little A to see what happens...all at the same altitude.

If the IJN transport fleet hangs around another turn it will be interesting to see what happens.

I have thought about bringing forward the 1st line british battle fleet but a fleet in being currently is more important than a fleet battle at PB(I could be wrong on this issue, but I have the POW and Repulse in reserve).

< Message edited by bigred -- 2/16/2011 2:16:44 PM >

(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 289
RE: Problems - 2/16/2011 1:50:01 PM   
bigred


Posts: 3599
Joined: 12/27/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: bigred

South China shock attack w/ alot of jap armor. Units got blown out of hex.  All the jap armor in the chinese theatre. Note elements of 1st IJA armored Division in the attack...I use this unit in my other game to help clean up the chinese rear areas.





After this attack the IJA has split his attacking force, sending the INF north and all the armor to the south to clean out the Canton area. I hope this turns into a major mistake for FatR as the southern chinese corp is in the woods fort1 w700AV.

(in reply to bigred)
Post #: 290
RE: Problems - 2/16/2011 2:02:57 PM   
bigred


Posts: 3599
Joined: 12/27/2007
Status: offline
I am considering a technique to use against FatR I would call cheap ship scouting.  The plan is for all theatre commands to have some forces(brigade/division plus++) on standby to move forward in all areas at the same time.
SWPAC
SOPAC
CEntPac
Eastern
Norpac
AKLs would be about 10 hexes ahead of TFs to draw out any CV activity.  If found then abort mission.  If not then move forward.  Seems simple.  But complex.  I like consolidated commands for increased firepower results.
Also I would expect to get nailed by FatR once or twice as this is very dangerous. 
The other option is to wait in a boring fashion untill 44.

Also note I play another RA70 as the IJ player. The fuel situation for the fleet is very tight!!(In other words, after these missions the fleet will have no fuel in forward areas.)

This is going to be a  llllllllllllllllong game


< Message edited by bigred -- 2/16/2011 2:18:49 PM >

(in reply to bigred)
Post #: 291
RE: Problems - 2/16/2011 3:30:40 PM   
pat.casey

 

Posts: 393
Joined: 9/10/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: bigred

I am considering a technique to use against FatR I would call cheap ship scouting.  The plan is for all theatre commands to have some forces(brigade/division plus++) on standby to move forward in all areas at the same time.
SWPAC
SOPAC
CEntPac
Eastern
Norpac
AKLs would be about 10 hexes ahead of TFs to draw out any CV activity.  If found then abort mission.  If not then move forward.  Seems simple.  But complex.  I like consolidated commands for increased firepower results.
Also I would expect to get nailed by FatR once or twice as this is very dangerous. 
The other option is to wait in a boring fashion untill 44.

Also note I play another RA70 as the IJ player. The fuel situation for the fleet is very tight!!(In other words, after these missions the fleet will have no fuel in forward areas.)

This is going to be a  llllllllllllllllong game



I've seen this done before in other AARs (using trash ships as pickets or scouts), usually followed by a lively debate as to whether or not its "gamey".

I don't recall a consensus on the board though as to whether or not this was considered cheeze, suspect its up to each pair of players to decide for themselves. Might expect some pushback from your opponent though.

(in reply to bigred)
Post #: 292
RE: PB 9-17-42 - 2/16/2011 4:00:24 PM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline
I am not reading FatR's AAR, so I feel I can say anything.

quote:

ORIGINAL: bigred

quote:

ORIGINAL: witpqs

What do you think about the size of that invasion?

Umnak-overwhelming,

I have 4x b24 sqns bombing the port each turn.I have been mixing the missions to see which does the most damage. FatR has to pick up those divisions to be able to use them again and I hope to hit some shipping...I remember in my game w/ P.Hauser I hit 6 transports w50% damage in one turn(he sent me the jpeg and wanted house rules). Cant seem to recreate this against FatR.


Perhaps bomb the crap out of the port until ships arrive. That way the ships will have to be there longer when they arrive.

quote:



PB-underwhelming, but seems to have the entire Jap airforce on site.


I was wondering if he thought the force was adequate provided he succeeds in stopping all resupply of the Allied forces?

(in reply to bigred)
Post #: 293
RE: 9-18-42 - 2/16/2011 4:23:12 PM   
bigred


Posts: 3599
Joined: 12/27/2007
Status: offline
Allied signet report.  This is the second division reported to prep for the Russians.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by bigred -- 2/16/2011 4:24:06 PM >

(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 294
RE: Problems - 2/16/2011 4:26:31 PM   
bigred


Posts: 3599
Joined: 12/27/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: pat.casey


quote:

ORIGINAL: bigred

I am considering a technique to use against FatR I would call cheap ship scouting.  The plan is for all theatre commands to have some forces(brigade/division plus++) on standby to move forward in all areas at the same time.
SWPAC
SOPAC
CEntPac
Eastern
Norpac
AKLs would be about 10 hexes ahead of TFs to draw out any CV activity.  If found then abort mission.  If not then move forward.  Seems simple.  But complex.  I like consolidated commands for increased firepower results.
Also I would expect to get nailed by FatR once or twice as this is very dangerous. 
The other option is to wait in a boring fashion untill 44.

Also note I play another RA70 as the IJ player. The fuel situation for the fleet is very tight!!(In other words, after these missions the fleet will have no fuel in forward areas.)

This is going to be a  llllllllllllllllong game



I've seen this done before in other AARs (using trash ships as pickets or scouts), usually followed by a lively debate as to whether or not its "gamey".

I don't recall a consensus on the board though as to whether or not this was considered cheeze, suspect its up to each pair of players to decide for themselves. Might expect some pushback from your opponent though.

i agreed to play the game w/ no rules. Anything goes.

(in reply to pat.casey)
Post #: 295
RE: Problems - 2/16/2011 4:40:20 PM   
bigred


Posts: 3599
Joined: 12/27/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: pat.casey

I've seen this done before in other AARs (using trash ships as pickets or scouts), usually followed by a lively debate as to whether or not its "gamey".

I don't recall a consensus on the board though as to whether or not this was considered cheeze, suspect its up to each pair of players to decide for themselves. Might expect some pushback from your opponent though.

quote:

quote:

From: topeverest
To: bigred
Date: 12/8/2010 9:12:53 PM
Subject: RE: house rule

Sorry for the delay...hectic work schedule.

Keeping in mind I do play with 'No New Allied TF's on dec 7" but I believe that is universal if you are playing surprise on first turn. It wont do for the Americans to move the BB's out of Pearl. The only HR I play with is "No strategic bombing until Jan 1, 1943." I find the game loses balance quickly if the allies can strat bomb in 42. Burma, china, and Malaya can go, and enterprising allied players will find a way to SB the Home islands and DEI before the empire can shore up reasonably. The empire can and will get behind in booty hauling and never recover against a skilled allied opponent that can do this - and significantly shorten the war...but that is a topic for another day.

Every HR I can think of is a player rationalization to take away a combat option of the enemy under the ruse of some proposed 'lack of accuracy' or 'lack of realism' in the game. Example, No HB naval attack under 10K - that has to be the silliest HR yet. Players that agree to this have never even looked and seen that no allied HB starts with any skill in naval bombardment. It would take a minimum of 3 to 4 months of straight training to gain 60+ skill to have any possible chance of hitting an enemy ship. If the owning player spends the time to train some and then deploy them at 6K to bomb, why shouldn't that be possible. Just because the allies rarely committed HB's this way does not mean it was impossible to do or would not have worked. Another example is invading only at base hexes. We all know the opposite occurred on a number of occasions where it was feasible.

The game is already packed with practically impossible and highly improbable capabilities in favor of good gaming, and I think that is a good thing in most cases. Perhaps the quintessential example - restricted HQ's, units, and releases that are meant to slow down the allied war and delay the allied strength from deployment at the same time the Empire has large land unit availability. This creates the quite artificial (but most exciting) ability to smash 14-17 Empire divisions most at any place in the Pacific and force desperate allied defensive gaming with artificially limited ground forces in 42.

Don't get swayed by the 'masses'. The game is well balanced in that it provides actual and potential capabilities (and the chance for other even greater capabilities). Play her as she is, and she will run true.

Let me know if you have questions on specific HR's.


It just turns me really off to have a game w/ someone who wants alot of house rules..maybe one or two.

< Message edited by bigred -- 2/17/2011 1:03:27 AM >

(in reply to pat.casey)
Post #: 296
RE: Problems - 2/17/2011 1:00:36 AM   
bigred


Posts: 3599
Joined: 12/27/2007
Status: offline
quote:

If the IJN transport fleet hangs around another turn it will be interesting to see what happens.


Looks like a fast speed 19(5/4) amphib TF. It moved half way to Georgetown in one turn(9hexes).

< Message edited by bigred -- 2/17/2011 1:04:10 AM >

(in reply to bigred)
Post #: 297
RE: 9-19 - 2/17/2011 2:38:08 PM   
bigred


Posts: 3599
Joined: 12/27/2007
Status: offline
North of Kukong is a 43 unit stack. defense consist of 2 large chinese corp at level3 fort in WR. Attack will break thru. I may have overcommitted to the west.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by bigred -- 2/17/2011 2:40:51 PM >

(in reply to bigred)
Post #: 298
RE: 9-21 - 2/18/2011 12:51:45 AM   
bigred


Posts: 3599
Joined: 12/27/2007
Status: offline
Off Umnak s-32 found the Hiyo:




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by bigred -- 2/18/2011 12:52:25 AM >

(in reply to bigred)
Post #: 299
RE: 9-21 - 2/18/2011 12:54:17 AM   
bigred


Posts: 3599
Joined: 12/27/2007
Status: offline
North of Kukong as expected..The IJA main body consist of 14 divisions.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to bigred)
Post #: 300
Page:   <<   < prev  8 9 [10] 11 12   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Operations report Page: <<   < prev  8 9 [10] 11 12   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.656