Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Chernobyl Revisited

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [General] >> General Discussion >> Chernobyl Revisited Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Chernobyl Revisited - 3/29/2011 3:12:51 AM   
E

 

Posts: 1247
Joined: 9/20/2007
Status: offline 		For those who haven't seen it, a photo essay on a motorcycle trip through the area...

http://www.kiddofspeed.com/chernobyl-land-of-the-wolves/author.html

_____________________________

"Lose" is the opposite of "win." "Loose" is the opposite of "tight."

Friends Don't Let Friends Facebook.

Twitter is for... (wait for it!) ...Twits!
Post #: 1
RE: Chernobyl Revisited - 3/29/2011 3:50:24 AM   
sabre1


Posts: 1928
Joined: 8/15/2001
From: CA
Status: offline 		Thanks E, absolutely fascinating.

(in reply to E)
Post #: 2
RE: Chernobyl Revisited - 3/29/2011 4:04:08 AM   
bairdlander2


Posts: 2264
Joined: 3/28/2009
From: Toronto Ontario but living in Edmonton,Alberta
Status: offline 		The pic cleanup workers (Liquidators) going to the Chornobyl Plant is pretty scary.Wearing dust masks to go clean up radiation?

< Message edited by bairdlander -- 3/29/2011 4:14:49 AM >

(in reply to sabre1)
Post #: 3
RE: Chernobyl Revisited - 3/29/2011 4:22:31 AM   
Raverdave


Posts: 6520
Joined: 2/8/2002
From: Melb. Australia
Status: offline 		Wow.............and now Japan is facing something similar if not as bad.   Thank goodness we don't have atomic power stations here in Oz.

_____________________________




Never argue with an idiot, he will only drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.

(in reply to bairdlander2)
Post #: 4
RE: Chernobyl Revisited - 3/29/2011 6:01:29 AM   
goodwoodrw


Posts: 2661
Joined: 2/14/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Raverdave

Wow.............and now Japan is facing something similar if not as bad.   Thank goodness we don't have atomic power stations here in Oz.


Hey did you forget about Lucas Heights?

_____________________________

Formerly Goodwood


(in reply to Raverdave)
Post #: 5
RE: Chernobyl Revisited - 3/29/2011 12:17:24 PM   
Hertston


Posts: 3564
Joined: 8/17/2002
From: Cornwall, UK
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: bairdlander
The pic cleanup workers (Liquidators) going to the Chornobyl Plant is pretty scary.Wearing dust masks to go clean up radiation?


The whole thing was frightful. The first firefighters there didn't even know it was a 'nuclear' incident and were trying to put out a fire in the exposed reactor core with hoses in the usual fashion. Most were dead within a couple of months, some within a couple of days.

Then there were the 'biorobots'(they called themselves that). Assorted chunks of materials direct from the core explosion ended up on the roof, and with attempts at using remote-control robots to throw them back into the building failed they just used soldiers instead. "Strap on a gas mask and a lead plate, run like hell, pick up a chunk or two of lethally radioactive crap, carry it to the hole and chuck it back in. Then leg it back."

The biggest heroes, though, to my mind were the coal miners drafted in to dig a tunnel under the reactor, so that a barrier could inserted to prevent the molten contents of the core dropping down to the water table, which would have been absolutely catastrophic. These guys knew the risks (including that of a 'meltdown' landing on their heads), only had masks, and chose not to wear those as the heat was so intense they just couldn't work when doing so.





(in reply to bairdlander2)
Post #: 6
RE: Chernobyl Revisited - 3/29/2011 1:36:51 PM   
Cyber Me

 

Posts: 73
Joined: 1/21/2010
From: the Cloud
Status: offline 		Incredible story of incompetent management causing the disaster and brave workers facing the dangers and cleaning up the mess at such a high cost. Technology failures will always plague humans and the planet. I too are thankful that Australia doesn't use atomic power.

(in reply to Hertston)
Post #: 7
RE: Chernobyl Revisited - 3/29/2011 2:35:49 PM   
Jevhaddah


Posts: 626
Joined: 11/24/2005
From: Scotland
Status: offline 		Radiation from Japan has been found in Glasgow... thats all we need radioactive Weeges


Cheers

Jev

_____________________________

I am really quite mad yoo know!

(in reply to Cyber Me)
Post #: 8
RE: Chernobyl Revisited - 3/29/2011 2:41:23 PM   
E

 

Posts: 1247
Joined: 9/20/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Cyber Me

I too are thankful that Australia doesn't use atomic power.

"I too are thankful?" Is that anything like "all your base are belong to us?"

...And yet they've been running a reactor since 1958 (ostensibly for research).


_____________________________

"Lose" is the opposite of "win." "Loose" is the opposite of "tight."

Friends Don't Let Friends Facebook.

Twitter is for... (wait for it!) ...Twits!

(in reply to Cyber Me)
Post #: 9
RE: Chernobyl Revisited - 4/12/2011 9:42:49 AM   
Hertston


Posts: 3564
Joined: 8/17/2002
From: Cornwall, UK
Status: offline 		I'll punt this just to point out that according to the BBC the Fukushima incident has now been upgraded (if that's the word) to the highest level, 7, on the nuclear incident scale. The only previous such incident was Chernobyl.

This seems very worrying as although they are saying radiation leakage is (it hasn't stopped yet, of course) was 'only' 10% of that from Chernobyl, even that figure is far higher than has been indicated previously. And, of course, Japan is far more densely populated than the equivalent area around Chernobyl.

< Message edited by Hertston -- 4/12/2011 9:44:24 AM >

(in reply to E)
Post #: 10
RE: Chernobyl Revisited - 4/12/2011 7:31:34 PM   
Jeffrey H.


Posts: 3154
Joined: 4/13/2007
From: San Diego, Ca.
Status: offline 		I think the radiation is more in the water and less in the air than Chernobyl was.

Was any of this really in doubt after we saw the lids blowing off the reactor buildings ?


_____________________________

History began July 4th, 1776. Anything before that was a mistake.

Ron Swanson

(in reply to Hertston)
Post #: 11
RE: Chernobyl Revisited - 4/12/2011 11:20:06 PM   
htuna


Posts: 591
Joined: 1/19/2009
From: Boston, MA
Status: offline 		Amazing stuff.. thanks for sharing..

(in reply to Jeffrey H.)
Post #: 12
RE: Chernobyl Revisited - 4/12/2011 11:43:46 PM   
Aurelian

 

Posts: 3916
Joined: 2/26/2007
Status: offline 		http://www.uer.ca/forum_showthread_archive.asp?threadid=8951

http://www.broadbandreports.com/forum/remark,11034749

http://www.bluecoatboy.co.uk/#/chernobyl/4518779222

< Message edited by Aurelian -- 4/12/2011 11:50:39 PM >

(in reply to htuna)
Post #: 13
RE: Chernobyl Revisited - 4/13/2011 4:58:33 PM   
RareGoldfish


Posts: 1
Joined: 8/31/2010
Status: offline 		I would just want to point out that she didn't actually ride her bike through the whole area. You can actually take tours and thats what she did and just brought her helmet with her. There some pictures that where shot outside the exclusion zone with her bike.

_____________________________

Lucky

(in reply to Aurelian)
Post #: 14
RE: Chernobyl Revisited - 4/13/2011 5:11:52 PM   
doomtrader


Posts: 5321
Joined: 7/22/2008
From: Poland
Status: offline 		I've lurked this site couple of years ago when I was working on Fallout's Doomsday mod for HoI2.
It's one of the best with actual pictures of the 'modern' Chernobyl.

_____________________________


(in reply to RareGoldfish)
Post #: 15
RE: Chernobyl Revisited - 4/14/2011 10:59:14 PM   
Fred98


Posts: 4430
Joined: 1/5/2001
From: Wollondilly, Sydney
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BASB


quote:

ORIGINAL: Raverdave

Thank goodness we don't have atomic power stations here in Oz.


Hey did you forget about Lucas Heights?



Its not a power station.

Next time you get cancer and need radiation therapy, remember where the nuclear medicine came from.

-

(in reply to goodwoodrw)
Post #: 16
RE: Chernobyl Revisited - 4/14/2011 11:01:33 PM   
Fred98


Posts: 4430
Joined: 1/5/2001
From: Wollondilly, Sydney
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeffrey H.

Was any of this really in doubt after we saw the lids blowing off the reactor buildings ?




No lids blew off "Reactor" buildings!

Steam built up and the tin shed could not handle the pressure.

-

(in reply to Jeffrey H.)
Post #: 17
RE: Chernobyl Revisited - 4/15/2011 4:44:14 AM   
Jeffrey H.


Posts: 3154
Joined: 4/13/2007
From: San Diego, Ca.
Status: offline 		Joe, the lid blew off the buildings. The buildings that housed the reactors were blown into the sky. You don't really know the status of the equiment in there.

"Tin sheds" are not designed to hold pressure. Explosions happen because pressure is released quickly. Think about that.


_____________________________

History began July 4th, 1776. Anything before that was a mistake.

Ron Swanson

(in reply to Fred98)
Post #: 18
RE: Chernobyl Revisited - 4/26/2011 4:34:28 AM   
Hertston


Posts: 3564
Joined: 8/17/2002
From: Cornwall, UK
Status: offline 		Just a brief point to mention that today is the 25th anniversary of the Chernobyl accident.

(in reply to Jeffrey H.)
Post #: 19
RE: Chernobyl Revisited - 4/26/2011 3:35:21 PM   
ilovestrategy


Posts: 3611
Joined: 6/11/2005
From: San Diego
Status: offline 		25 years? Where did the time go? I actually had hair back then and was 50 lbs lighter!

_____________________________

After 16 years, Civ II still has me in it's clutches LOL!!!
Now CIV IV has me in it's evil clutches!

(in reply to Hertston)
Post #: 20
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [General] >> General Discussion >> Chernobyl Revisited Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.891