RE: Das darf nicht var sein!

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

RE: Das darf nicht var sein!

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Das darf nicht var sein!

Page: << < prev 13 14 [15] 16 17 next > >>

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: Das darf nicht var sein! - 4/13/2011 10:19:23 PM

witpqs

Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel

That's the analysis I've been tailoring my play to, witpqs. But I think Fortress Palembang is important for at least three reasons:

1) It represents a better place to defend than either Soerabaja or Batavia due to terrain and supply, so you might as well (given time) transfer the Java/DEI troops to Palembang.

2) There is a risk Japan could bypass Sumatra and head right for a weakened India. That's a real risk the Aliled player has to consider and try to address. But if Japan doesn't do that, and instead follows a more traditional coure of action, Fortress Palembang should really slow them down and damage their units. It's a good way for the Aliled player to exact a toll.

3) If Japan really messes up and doesn't attend to a Fortress Palembang in a timely manner, the Allies could start their "phase" of the game with an advanced, powerful platform with multiple interlocking bases and airfields supported by a supply-generating base. I would give my right arm to be able to kick off the Allied offensive-phase of the game from such an advanced position. I'd gladly sacrifice less vital places (New Zealand, Line Islands, etc.) if it gave me that advantage.

I was not criticizing your decision in any way. In fact, I think it is the right decision regardless of the economic situation in the scenario. I was just adding to the discussion about the delay and the observations about oil/fuel versus time. And of course, there is no guarantee that EHQ knows about those economic analyses, is there?

I should add that, of course the more he does and the more he increases production, the shorter that "time leash" gets.

(in reply to Canoerebel)

Post #: 421

RE: Das darf nicht var sein! - 4/13/2011 10:57:42 PM

Bullwinkle58

Posts: 11302
Joined: 2/24/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: witpqs

True, but those places only mitigate the time involved. Even ignoring them the time frame is way longer than I had assumed.

Agree. When I was shown figures by a well-known "AE analyst" I was surprised how fueled the Japanese economy was/is. They can't go joy-riding with the KB all over the hemisphere, but for normal ops they're not in bad shape for awhile.

_____________________________

The Moose

(in reply to witpqs)

Post #: 422

RE: Das darf nicht var sein! - 4/14/2011 10:31:27 AM

Jeremy Mac Donald

Posts: 765
Joined: 11/7/2000
From: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Status: offline

Been lurking this AAR, including reading your opponents version as well hence I won't comment on the game. On that note I'm slightly concerned by a few comments a few people have made where there is some danger that they have seen both sides of the story. I've come to the conclusion that those of us following along really need to make a choice - either watch both sides of the story and then commit to never commenting in any way that could influence the players or, alternatively, we pick a side and then you can be an adviser.

In fact I believe that a poster should probably state clearly his intentions one way or another in his first post. This is because the temptation to comment can be very seductive. I don't believe anyone on these forums would go out of their way to ruin the experience for the actual players but, in particular, if you out yourself as watching both sides then that acts as a deterrent to falling for that seductive sirens call of commenting on the game being played when it will almost certianly be coloured by your insider knowledge. In effect outing yourself in an AAR helps to keep you away from temptation.

_____________________________

Necesse est multos timeat quem multi timent

"He whom many fear, fears many"

(in reply to Bullwinkle58)

Post #: 423

RE: Das darf nicht var sein! - 4/14/2011 3:10:52 PM

obvert

Posts: 14050
Joined: 1/17/2011
From: PDX (and now) London, UK
Status: offline

Maybe this is all intentional. It's three months in, which seem like a lot, but if Japan really is much better off on fuel, could this be a trap to lure a bunch of units into an (ultimately) undefendable spot where they will be wiped out?

No basis for this, just looking for any understanding of the seemingly lackadaisical conquests by Japan in this game.

If it's not intentional, could it be used that way to a Japan player's benefit later in another game?

_____________________________

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill

(in reply to Jeremy Mac Donald)

Post #: 424

RE: Das darf nicht var sein! - 4/14/2011 3:14:58 PM

Canoerebel

Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline

2/4/42 and 2/5/42

witpqs: I knew you weren't critizing; my reply was simply to clarify why I think Palembang makes a good choice, at least under these circumstances, even though fuel isn't as big a constraint under Scenario Two.

Jeremy: That's a good reminder and worth stating. Ironically, though, you unintentinally and with the best of motives may have just given me a clue. The main comment I've seen from a reader came from Nemo: that the enemy is probably "focusing on 12 to 6." That was made weeks ago, and everybody knows that Nemo is an unusually astute at evaluating the intentions of other players (he's a pyschologist [psychiatrist?]) and an experienced and capable player. I ascribed his comment totally to his knack for piecing together things, so had no thought that he had been reading my opponent's AAR or had any particular inside info. I am as certain as I can be that it wasn't, in fact, a breach. But my interpretation of your comment, which was admirably vague and certainly not any way improper, is that you think that the comment was a breach because it proved to be right on target. So, now, I might attatch additional signficance to the comment - not because he knew or revealed anything, but simply because you think he did. Of course, I may be completely wrong about any or all of this. So, you're right - reading between the lines can make it possible for a player to deduce things...maybe. How's that for convoluted thinking? P.S. Whether I'm right about the "12 to 6" comment or not, it didn't change my plans because I had already committed to the idea that I would leave the Pacific "open" and send all Allied reinforcements to India and Sumatra. In effect, I'm weaking myself right where the enemy is going, but it suits me to do so and I decided to do so long ago.

Eastern DEI: The enemy has landed at Makassar and will take the base tomorrow. However, he didn't bring any base forces with him, which will give me a bit of a breather from enhance enemy air threat over eastern Java. This will shut down the flow of Allied xAKL traffic to and from Balikpan.

Western DEI: The Allies currently have 2200 AV in eastern Sumatra distributed as follows: Djambi (24 AV); Palembang (1179 AV and 3.31 forts); Prabaemolith (164 AV and 2.06); Oosthaven (632 and 2.82); Benkolen (106 and 1.50), and Padang (136 and 2.12). A UK brigade is two days away; 6th Aussie cav is on the way; two engineer units and a big base force will arrive within days.

Port Blair: Allied AV is up to 88 and I think I can get it up to about 100 drawing off troops from Rangoon. An Aussie brigade is aboard ship and on the way from Aden. Put 225 or so AV on Port Blair behind three or four forts...and Japan will have a tough time once the invasion bonus expires at the end of March.

Coral Sea: The enemy is landing at Koumac and I'm getting more SigInt of troops bound for Noumea. The American carriers are just east of New Zealand's south island and will pass over the next two or three days. I am hoping that the enemy moves this way indicate this is Japan's main vector of attack. I don't want to go up against the Japanese spearhead and it would suit me if it were aimed at this area, which I consider of far less strategic importance than many others. I will continue to concentrate in the DEI, which I consider more important and having more enemy vulnerability....at least until the enemy commits the KB in the DEI.

China: I was getting a little nervous about the force approaching Changsha, but I know more now and my fears are at least temporarily abated. The Japanese stack did manage to catch one of three infantry units retired from the forested hex to the east of Changsha (bombing raids slowed it down), but the enemy force is only a bit more than 2000 AV (34, 39, 35, 41 divisions plus a bunch of brigades). I already have 2200 AV behind four forts, with another 1,000 AV to arrive in a few days, so I believe Steve will have to reinforce strongly to have a chance.

(in reply to Jeremy Mac Donald)

Post #: 425

RE: Das darf nicht var sein! - 4/14/2011 3:19:14 PM

Canoerebel

Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: obvert
Maybe this is all intentional. It's three months in, which seem like a lot, but if Japan really is much better off on fuel, could this be a trap to lure a bunch of units into an (ultimately) undefendable spot where they will be wiped out?

No basis for this, just looking for any understanding of the seemingly lackadaisical conquests by Japan in this game.

If it's not intentional, could it be used that way to a Japan player's benefit later in another game?

Yes, that is possible. I've had to weigh the very risks you mention against the benefits. I've been monitoring Japanese moves and force disposition - including use of SigInt - to see if I can figure out whether my opponent is trying to lure me into a trap. My strategy has unfolded slowly, but picked up the pace considerably in mid January when I got several indications that my opponent was not putting together a master-stroke plan, but rather seemed somewhat disorganized and allowing events to shape his strategy rather than taking control to shape the game. (The events included the mess in Luzon and his committing reinforcements there). Now I've committed to my strategy fully, so if I've been wrong in my evaluations, I"m in for a world of hurt.

(in reply to obvert)

Post #: 426

RE: Das darf nicht var sein! - 4/14/2011 3:26:35 PM

paullus99

Posts: 1985
Joined: 1/23/2002
Status: offline

Very dangerous to leave a potent enemy stronghold in your rear or on your flank - Canoerebel is maximizing his use of forces that would have otherwise been "chaff in the fire" should the Japanese player go full bore into the DEI at game-on. At this point, conquest is going to be very expensive in terms of firepower necessary (and resources), along with time. Even in Scneario #2 - the Allies will only continue to get stronger and better prepared - and if the Japanese player doesn't push his perimeter out far enough (and secure likely allied jumping off points), the game takes a different turn.

_____________________________

Never Underestimate the Power of a Small Tactical Nuclear Weapon...

(in reply to obvert)

Post #: 427

RE: Das darf nicht var sein! - 4/14/2011 3:54:09 PM

Canoerebel

Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline

One of the things I've been mulling over the past two days is whether to commit Australian forces to Sumatra. I'm short on political points, so I can't strip much more from India, but Oz has quite a few unrestricted units (I think?) or at least units that can be bought relatively cheaply. They are also nearby and I have plenty of xAPs to handle them. But I had decided - at least temporarily - to not weaken Oz, while at the same time not strengthening it. In the event Steve were to commit wholey to a conquest of Oz, my "failsafe" would be the release of the "crossing the deadline" troops. I would use those to invade Burma or Malaya, thus fighting an offensive in the enemy heartland while the enemy was fighting way off on the perimeter.

I've made similar important decisions previously One of the first was to leave the two Aussie brigades in Malaya to defend Singapore. On the one hand, I wanted to evacuate them to Sumatra, but I began to sense that the Japanese advance on Singapore might not be strong enough to take the base within a reasonable time. This was a judgment call, but it proved to be right. The enemy attack on Janauary 10 mauled them rather than the Allies. They haven't attacked since then. As I think you can see, Singapore, if it can be held, forms an important road block - both to an enemy end-around on Port Blair, Ceylon and India, and possibly also for Sumatra (because many players, once committed to Singapore, will want to vanguish it before moving forward to what they perceive would be new targets). The decision to commit a decent amount of troops to Singapore was made in December, and turned out to be a good call.

The next big decision point came in mid January when I got confirmation that SigInt reports that IJA divisions were heading for Luzon was right. This told me that the enemy was committing to a protracted campaign in Luzon, which also meant he wouldn't have those troops to commit elsewhere. It was at this point that I decided to commit the British and Australian troops in India and at Aden to the defense of Sumatra. It's still too early to know if I made the right call here.

When the enemy force that congregated at Clark Field launched a distastrous (for them) attack in late January, I knew Steve would reinforce there and that Luzon would mire him down even longer. So I've committed a few more units from India to Sumatra, though I've currently pumped the well fairly dry until reinforcements arrive (an Indian brigade arrives at Madras in less than a week, so that's the next possibility).

There are other pieces to the puzzle: I decided some time ago - a month? - to commit the Allied carriers to the DEI. This decision was based on the enemy repeated use of Mini-KB forces in the southern DEI. I'm hoping I can jump all over that, though the opportunity may vanish before my ships make it to theater (they're nearly at New Zealand now).

I decided to reinforce Port Blair about ten days ago as I realized the more roadblocks I can create the less likely the enemy will have time to move on India when and if he should vanquish (or bypass) Sumatra. The Aussie unit bound there will take a good ten days to two weeks to arrive.

At the outset, I determined that I would try to bolster India's defenses by committing all American reinforcements that became available. This decision was made gradually beginning in December and fully implemented, I think, in early January. The first infantry unit, a raider battalion, will reach Capetown in three days. I probably have about 400 AV in total on the way to Capetown - not alot, but a start.

Vast numbers of American aircraft squadrons have been sent to India and Sumatra, with some already there. Included in this number is 30 P-39s at Tjilitjap. I haven't used them yet, as I don't want jolt Steve with just how great the Allied commitment is. I also have nearly all the DEI/British navy at or near Cocos Island, with reinforcmenes on the way (an American CA and CL Boise are nearing Perth; an American BB, CA, and two DDs departed San Francisco a couple of days ago).

I mention all this to give readers - especially newcomers - an idea of how large the Allied commitment is, how it evolved in stages, and how big a role reading enemy intentions and capabilities played. And the fun part is that there is a chance that I could have evaluated incorrectly.

(in reply to paullus99)

Post #: 428

RE: Das darf nicht var sein! - 4/14/2011 4:08:38 PM

JohnDillworth

Posts: 3100
Joined: 3/19/2009
Status: offline

Well you have the Boise near Australia, that should be enough to defend with! Seriously, I think you have a lot of troops in Sumatra and you might be falling in love with the concept that you will hold it throughout the war. You might, but I wouldn't be the house on it. Committing free troops in Australia would be betting the house. Most of those troops are of militia quantity, and would not add much real backbone to your defense in Sumatra. Same is true in Australia but Australia is big. IF they serve as speed bumps in Australia they buy time. That time might be the time you need to get your "He crossed the line" bonus troops to where you can really use them. Might be Australia, Sumatra or offensives in Malaya. Point is, if Australia is stripped bare, you might not have a Sumatra or Malay option

_____________________________

Today I come bearing an olive branch in one hand, and the freedom fighter's gun in the other. Do not let the olive branch fall from my hand. I repeat, do not let the olive branch fall from my hand. - Yasser Arafat Speech to UN General Assembly

(in reply to Canoerebel)

Post #: 429

RE: Das darf nicht var sein! - 4/14/2011 4:48:42 PM

paullus99

Posts: 1985
Joined: 1/23/2002
Status: offline

Looking at the hypothetical map, here is my general evaluation:

1) To invade India, a Japanese player needs to secure his SLOCs through the DEI - which means a succesful campaign in the PI, Singapore, and perhaps even Northwest Australia to eliminate threats to his flanks. Canoerebel has created a very potent roadblock that will require a major committment of resources to clear (at this point, the forces committed to all of these campaigns is contraindicative of a push in the direction of India).

2) To invade Australia, a Japanese player has many more options as far as strategic directions go. He can go through the DEI & go down the west coast (though his lack of progress in the DEI puts this option in doubt) or proceed to secure the Solomons and New Guinea for a thrust against the North and East Coasts, with the potential to also include New Caledonia, Fiji & Auckland as a buffer against quick reinforcement from America. But, again we aren't seeing a major committment of ground & air forces in this region either for a quick conquest & follow up - though Australia is still a very viable target based on current operations.

3) To invade Hawaii, a Japanese player should be pushing the Line Islands & already prepping to secure Midway as well. The operations in the Aleutians could be a move to distract US resources from the Central Pacific, but we've yet to see any meaningful moves that might indicate a Central Thrust.

We are still very early in the game & the Japanese player may still be concentrating his critical mass just out of site of Canoerebel's "range of information" but I think we can start to dicern a general pattern of operations with leans towards a more Southeastern movement.

Just the $.10 tour of my thoughts on the subject.

_____________________________

Never Underestimate the Power of a Small Tactical Nuclear Weapon...

(in reply to JohnDillworth)

Post #: 430

RE: Das darf nicht var sein! - 4/14/2011 5:25:48 PM

Canoerebel

Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline

That's sharp analysis, paullus99. I agree that all visible factors are pointing to a SoPac emphasis. I would welcome that.

Somebody (Bullwinkle?) pondered whether Chez is familiar with the current edge thinking on IJ fuel stocks in Scenario Two. I haven't gotten the impression that he is a deep reader of the forums. At the same time, I think he was getting some counsel from certain players (Chickenlad) that bowed out of this AAR. So he should be getting some good advice if he's keeping his AAR active and listening to input.

(in reply to paullus99)

Post #: 431

RE: Das darf nicht var sein! - 4/14/2011 5:29:05 PM

John 3rd

Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline

He would be insane (personal opinion) to attack India! After Dan's last match, reading other AARs, and my own current experience, I don't think India can be taken by the Japanese.

Australia is the logical next choice, however, with the lack of aggressive movement this option will begin to close.

Hawaii is a truly interesting choice to make. The major problem there is the long supply line and horrific cost in fuel the operation would consume without major benefit.

The key factor here is with the Allied commitment now in full swing there are definite vulnerabilities that, perhaps, wouldn't be there in a normal scenario. Australia is weaker--slightly--due to troops being moved into the Sumatra defense and I would imagine Hawaii isn't as built up as it normally would be at this point.

Perhaps your opponent is waiting to see your CVs Dan? If he sees them far from his target (read Hawaii) then he might move much more quickly.

_____________________________

Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to paullus99)

Post #: 432

RE: Das darf nicht var sein! - 4/14/2011 5:51:09 PM

Canoerebel

Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline

I get the feeling that Chez is not a big risk taker. I think Hawaii is a pretty high risk gamble, so I rate the odds of an attack as fairly small.

As for India, I think an aggressive, experienced IJ player in Scenario Two definately has a good shot at taking it out. Were I playing Q-Ball or Nemo (two players with lots of experience who are quite aggressive, and I'm sure there are plenty of others), I'd be scared to death.

(in reply to John 3rd)

Post #: 433

RE: Das darf nicht var sein! - 4/14/2011 7:23:38 PM

Alfred

Posts: 6685
Joined: 9/28/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: obvert

Maybe this is all intentional. It's three months in, which seem like a lot, but if Japan really is much better off on fuel, could this be a trap to lure a bunch of units into an (ultimately) undefendable spot where they will be wiped out?

No basis for this, just looking for any understanding of the seemingly lackadaisical conquests by Japan in this game.

If it's not intentional, could it be used that way to a Japan player's benefit later in another game?

Yes, I've posted at length elsewhere about this issue.

Whether Chez is intending this is another matter. Even if it isn't his current intention, he certainly would still retain that possibility into the medium term.

Alfred

(in reply to obvert)

Post #: 434

RE: Das darf nicht var sein! - 4/14/2011 7:28:30 PM

Alfred

Posts: 6685
Joined: 9/28/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: John 3rd

He would be insane (personal opinion) to attack India! After Dan's last match, reading other AARs, and my own current experience, I don't think India can be taken by the Japanese.

India most definitely can be taken. Don't be misled by the very sub optimal play displayed by other Japanese players to date. Whether it is the best utilisation of Japanese assets is another matter. Much depends on which of the five strategic approaches I have posted elsewhere Japan chooses to achieve victory.

Alfred

(in reply to John 3rd)

Post #: 435

RE: Das darf nicht var sein! - 4/14/2011 8:44:22 PM

Nomad

Posts: 5905
Joined: 9/5/2001
From: West Yellowstone, Montana
Status: offline

I agree with Alfred, India is certainly doable. If a player uses the 18th British and the three Indian Brigades to defend in the SRA and loses them, India will be quite weak. A good to excellent player should be able to take India. This does limit what else can be done.

_____________________________

(in reply to Alfred)

Post #: 436

RE: Das darf nicht var sein! - 4/14/2011 11:54:03 PM

Nemo121

Posts: 5821
Joined: 2/6/2004
Status: offline

Jeremy Mac Donald,

I fear your faith in the forum and its members is sadly misplaced. In my last game one forum member ( FatR) TWICE knowingly broke FOW to inform my opponent of my entire strategic assessment and plan ( my opponent didn't solicit this, but what can you do when you get a PM? ). So, some people here have no integrity whatsoever.

With that said, I think that some posters to the forum can see trends and conduct analysis at a reasonably high level and can, without reading both sides of an AAR, do quite a good strategic analysis of what the possibilities are and how things will probably turn out. I would suggest there are roughly 12 people on the forum who could, IMO, conduct such an analysis from reading a single-sided AAR and be right almost all of the time. I think that you might be misinterpreting something like that as coming from unfairly gotten knowledge.

Since my name has been mentioned as a possible originator for Jeremy's concern ( although not confirmed ) I will say that I amn't following Chez Da Jez's AAR. After the first few days and the AO action it was absolutely clear just how this game would go. That AO error was hugely telling - particularly in terms of WHY they would be there at that time, although, obviously, that wasn't something to highlight in the analysis at the time as it would simply have given Canoerebel far too much of a head's up on the 3 to 6pm strategic focus.

I would also state that after my intense annoyance at the FatR fiasco and my own non-AARing in the aftermath I'd be one of the more careful people around here re: commenting if I read both sides. With that said, one doesn't need to read both sides here to see what is going on.

Re: the Orwellian doublethink re: Chez Da Jez's current pace of advance and lack of clear strategic focus...
When you read Chez Da Jez's other postings on the forum ( of which I read a sample as SOP for performing the minor level of character assessment needed before offering input re: his likely thinking, level of insight and so on and so forth ) you'll see a focus on the tactical issues and not the strategic issues. I have read other of his AARs and there has always been that ( I believe ) mis-focus.

Throw into that the issue with divisions prepping for distant targets suddenly popping up in the Phillipines to lend their weight to initially understrength thrusts and I think we are seeing that lack of clear strategic focus resulting in Order, Counter-order and Disorder as a certain famous Prussian would have said.

I have no doubt that what we are seeing is not some deeply subtle, plan but, rather, the failure of an insufficiently focussed, honed, timetabled and weighted plan.

While Alfred is absolutely correct that the situation is still recoverable I believe that absent external advice on a grand strategic and strategic level Chez Da Jez won't rescue this situation.

Canoerebel,
Commit the Australians. I've been advocating an "all in" policy from Day 1. I think that you've held back till now but not you can see the benefits of such a policy in the future.

Sure, CDJ could bypass etc BUT if you have sufficient forces forward in supplied bases his bypass will not encircle you but merely result in his forward units advancing until they are, themselves, cut off. It would be damnably difficult to supply an Indian invasion from Singapore while Palembang is a functional bomber base for the Allies. Read my AAR and the amount of hell I created for Japanese shipping at Singapore with CL, DD and bomber raids in the waters around Singapore. I sank dozens of Japanese ships every month in that small region.

Southern Sumatra is the best roadblock to the invasion of India you can develop at this stage of the war. Don't rob it to put a few troops at Port Blair when those few troops will be easily pushed aside by any reasonably strong Japanese committment. The benefit of garrisoning Port Blair with 100 AV of troops is minimal. If Japan wants they can defeat 100 AV with an amphibiously landed regiment + 100 bombers. So, this garrisoning is illusory.

Re: India.
India can absolutely be taken. Based on forum posts I think there are, at present, only about 6 people on the forum who would be able to be the first to take India. Once they've devised the appropriate strategem there are probably a dozen others who could adopt it ( but couldn't come up with it themselves ) who would then be able to invade and capture India.

Your last game showed some good pointers on how to do it but also showcased a large number of very serious strategic errors, which point the way towards how to do it successfully.

_____________________________

John Dillworth: "I had GreyJoy check my spelling and he said it was fine."
Well, that's that settled then.

(in reply to Nomad)

Post #: 437

RE: Das darf nicht var sein! - 4/15/2011 9:57:41 AM

String

Posts: 2661
Joined: 10/7/2003
From: Estonia
Status: offline

About AAR security.

I think it's a fine balance between getting the readers interested with the strategic details and keeping OpSec. Reading the same old DEI invasion over and over again isn't very interesting to most AAR followers. Even if they read it, they don't feel the need to comment on it, and thus, the AAR will consist of mostly just the players posts. For me personally, that's a bad thing, as I write my AAR's for the comments mostly, and to stroke my ego

.

I have a situation similar to Canoerebels in my game, the Japanese player has advanced very slowly, and I'm not sure what he's up to. I would like to be more clear about my plans, but after the Pzb/Nomad121 debacle I'm not sure I can, considering the OpSec. In the past I've used certain other forums for more open AAR's, but these days I'm afraid that that certain other developer has become too popular for my AAR's to be protected by obscurity.

Just my two cents.

edit: By the way, I read both AAR's so I won't comment on the game on neither, but I have noticed a few leading questions on the other one. Luckily, they're only clearly leading if you know both sides of the story.

< Message edited by String -- 4/15/2011 10:00:03 AM >

_____________________________

Surface combat TF fanboy

(in reply to Nemo121)

Post #: 438

RE: Das darf nicht var sein! - 4/15/2011 5:19:40 PM

Canoerebel

Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline

I'm going to post an update in a moment, but first a note about OpSec. I am aware of the occasional OpSec breaches, in particular the one in Nemo's game (though I wasn't aware who had committed it). Yet I still post in great detail in my AARs. This is because I derive as much pleasure from writing an AAR as I do playing the game. I'm not sure I could play without writing an AAR, so I'm willing to take the risk. In the unlikely event of an OpSec failure, I would simply try to revise my plans to somehow re-achieve some surprise.

So...thanks for reading because that makes the writing even more enjoyable.

(in reply to String)

Post #: 439

RE: Das darf nicht var sein! - 4/15/2011 5:24:00 PM

GreyJoy

Posts: 6750
Joined: 3/18/2011
Status: offline

This AAR is really good. Thanks Canoerebel for taking the time to write it down

(in reply to Canoerebel)

Post #: 440

RE: Das darf nicht var sein! - 4/15/2011 5:33:26 PM

Canoerebel

Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline

2/6/42 and 2/7/42

Thanks for the comments, gents. In particular, I'm glad to see Nemo posting. I haven't seen him around in weeks.

Eastern DEI: The Mini-KB is on the move again, and once again is split between the force moving west from Kendari towards the Java Sea and a force still at Kendari. (Oh, that my opponent continues this trend long enough for me to pounce on him when the American carriers arrive!). All Allied bombers in the area on set to strike, with fighters set to escort. This includes the 30 A-24 bombers based at Soerabaja. Not sure where this Mini-KB is heading yet. I suspect it's a raid through the Java Sea. That's risk taking, in my opinion.

Westeren DEI: Another UK brigade has unloaded at Oosthaven and will depart for Palembang. A Brit base force and an Indian engineer unit will unload tonight. A Brit recce unit will arrive at Oosthaven as soon as tomorrow. More troops are on the way.

Bay of Bengal: Nemo, I read you on Port Blair, but I think the circumstances are a bit different and make reinforcing worthwhile. Here's my thinking: Steve should take Singapore in a about a month or less, I'm guessing. At that point I think he'll consider his options, which could include a move into the Bay of Bengal or an invasion of southern Sumatra by sailing through the Malacca Straits rather than through the Sunda Strait. If I put the Aussie brigade at Port Blair, I'll have roughly 250 AV. That will stop - or very seriously drag out - all but a mammoth invasion. I think it will frustrate Steve. Also, if Japan focues on Oz (or, far less likely, Hawaii), I want to be in a position to invade Burma or Malaya as a counter. To do so, I need to hold Port Blair. Right now that base has 100 AV made up of part of an Indian brigade and some of the Burma units. An Aussie brigade would more than double that in quantity and in quality. Nevertheless, I think enough of Nemo's advice to mull this over more while the Aussie brigade is on the way (it's still up in the Aden channel).

SoPac: The Japanese have landed a few naval guards and other small units at Noumea. They failed to take the base on the first attack. Other IJ units have taken Koumac and Luganville.

China: More IJA troops on the way to the Changsha front (though I'm not 100% sure that's the target, yet). The Allies have 3,700 AV at Changsha behind 4.82 forts. More troops are on the way and I'm hoping I can get the forts to five before the enemy attacks.

Auto Victory: I'm not convinced Steve is trying for an auto-victory, but if he is there's probably only one route open to him now, given current deployments and strengths. He could try to conquer China, pick off some high value bases (Noumea, Auckland, Suva) and try a massive strategic bombing campaign against Oz. I'm not sure that's what's he's up to, but it's a possibility.

(in reply to Canoerebel)

Post #: 441

RE: Das darf nicht var sein! - 4/15/2011 6:00:32 PM

Canoerebel

Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline

P.S. In reading through recent posts, I think Nemo may have gotten the impression that I haven't committed Australian troops to Sumatra (see my post 427 above for something that might give that impression). Actually, I was referring in that post to Australian troops that begin the game in Oz. I have indeed decided not to commit them to Sumatra. But as for the Australian troops that start elsewehre, most of then have been or will be committed. I currently have one Aussie division (the one that arrived at Aden in January) in Sumatra. The second is just now beginning to arrive at Aden - the first of those brigades is currently bound for Port Blair (unless I change my mind). Also, of course, there's the two Aussie brigades in Singapore, which turned out to be a good use of them (as discussed in recent posts).

< Message edited by Canoerebel -- 4/15/2011 6:01:00 PM >

(in reply to Canoerebel)

Post #: 442

RE: Das darf nicht var sein! - 4/15/2011 9:03:32 PM

Canoerebel

Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline

2/8/42

Tale of the Dragon: On 12/13/41, RN CL Dragon was badly damaged in the Battle of Singkawang (a tactical draw, but an important strategic victory for the Allies). I did not think Dragon could make port, and once or twice she changed course due to various threats, until I ordered her to steam to Ketapang disregarding any threat level. She made Ketapang and remained there, undetected while various Mini-KB's sailed by over the course of the next six weeks. Finally, she lowered FLT damage into the 50s and her speed was up to 9 (from a low of 2). I decided to try to get her to Soerabaja, though I knew the odds were long. Sure enough, she ran across a sub on the way. Two torpedoes finished her off.

Eastern DEI: A Mini-KB is has moved south (actually SE) of Java and is steaming west as though she is on the trail of the Allied shipping in and around Cocos Island. That base is distant enough that I think I can clear everything out of the way (it's more likely that Steve is on a cruise seeking whatever targets he might find). Oh, that my carriers were present! He shouldn't be acting so cavilierly (my word for it) with his carriers! I want to make him pay.

Western DEI: An engineer unit landed at Oosthaven and will report to Palembang to help with fort building. Current AVs and forts: Palemband 1320 (3.36); Oosthaven 638 (3.0); Prabaemolith 164 (2.10); Djambi 24 (1.06); Benkolen 107 (1.06); Padang 136 (2.16). Still no attacks at Singapore, where the Allied AV is up to 951, since the bad (for Japan) attack on January 10.

Port Blair: Allied AV up to about 108 with two forts.

India: A marine raider battalion arrived at Capetown and will be sent to Bombay (the first of what will be a long line of American troops sent to India, either to help defend or as a staging base for future operations in SEAC).

China: More IJ troops on the way to the Changsha front (though Steve may ultimately move on Hengyang or the base between Changsha and Hengyang). The Allies have 3500 AV at Hengyang, 3700 AV at Changsha, and one unit at the base in between (important, because it is building forts and defending against para assault). I have the inside lines here, so I can shift troops between the bases easier than Steve can. Forts at Changsha are up to 4.87, so it looks like the base will make five before the enemy can attack. Most of my troops are 100% prepped for Changsha, though four are prepped 100% for Chengte (I just moved them from there).

American Carriers: Lex and Sara are nearing the south end of Tasmania; York and Ent are two days behind. These ships will refuel at Adelaide and then move into the Indian Ocean.

< Message edited by Canoerebel -- 4/15/2011 9:05:46 PM >

(in reply to Canoerebel)

Post #: 443

RE: Das darf nicht var sein! - 4/15/2011 9:12:06 PM

Nemo121

Posts: 5821
Joined: 2/6/2004
Status: offline

Canoerebel,

You might think if something like that happened ( an intentional OPSEC breach ) that you'd be able to continue on happily. I, personally, found that while that's what I tried I found that every time a trap I'd laid was avoided because of the OPSEC breach my enjoyment of the game just leeched away. I think an OPSEC breach in AE will end up being terminal because this game just takes too long and is too involved for an OPSEC breach to be overcome or just written off as "one of those things". The OPSEC breach is also the reason for my absence... It is hard to get enthused about something when someone willfully comes along and ruins it

. Especially since he has given every indication that if I play another game he'll do the same. Add in the fact that he is still welcome and deeply involved in various mods etc - why they'd be willing to associate with a self-confessed cheat is beyond me - and my general level of enthusiasm for AE and the AE community is about zero right now.

I read your AAR, PzB/AndyMacs and jrcar's. That's it.

Now back to nicer topics....
As re: the Ozzies. Ah, I missed that. I found the same issue with my game in the same scenario. I squared the circle by committing the 2nd wave of Ozzies ( previously restricted Ozzies ) to the southern DEI region. I didn't end up committing most of them to Sumatra but, instead, committed them to closing off the Southern Borneon route into Java/Northern Oz by pushing relatively aggressively forward.

Re: Port Blair:
I've recently been subjected to serious ground bombing campaigns in AE and the effect of the disruption on units is unreal. The only defence, IMO, apart from massive forts is to have so many units that only a couple of them get disrupted, leaving another 4 or 5 units undisrupted to bear the burden of the defence. My rule of thumb is that IF the enemy really wants somewhere then the first two units in the defending stack will be 80% disrupted by bombing raids.

So, 250 AV spread between 2 large units could find itself reduced to just 50 AV of effective combat power. I, personally, think the air to ground combat model is off and should spread lesser amounts of disruption over more units but with the current combat model I just don't think 250 AV in Port Blair would be able to hold vs a serious Japanese invasion. Given that only a serious Japanese thrust would make it to Port Blair it stands to reason ( to me ) that Port Blair will fall under such circumstances.

Overall though I don't think you really need to worry about this. CDJ isn't, IMO, a deep strike kind of guy. I think we're far more likely to see him continue the Phillipines operation, extending through Borneo and then hitting Java/Sumatra - at which point in time ( Sumatra ) his offensive will get sucked into the quagmire ( if you've poured in sufficient forces - which it just about looks like you're doing... I'd be more comfortable if you were going all in here but I think you'll commit enough to hold vs CDJ ) and he'll prove unable to come up with a new strategy. He'll just commit more and more to the Sumatra region.

It'll come down to, IMO, whether you have enough troops there to hold by the time he commits KB and Netties ( based in Java, which he will take ) and cuts off the possibility of further reinforcements ( although, to be fair, I set up two very useful airbridges you should look into:

a) India to Rangoon to Port Blair to Northern Sumatra to Palembang: Using C47s etc.

b) Darwin to one of the island bases south of Southern Java and from that base into Oosthaven: Using floatplanes.

I committed almost every PBY/Catalina and EVERY transport on the map to this task and was able to fly in a Bde a week by February 42 - that's about 400 AV per month, which over 2 or 3 months quickly adds up to a very sizeable force.... I was then able to load remaining heavy items on to fast APs/AKs and rush them in with minimal risk in heavily escorted, small TFs, which were able to go unspotted despite numerous IJA and IJN recon units operating out of Singers.

< Message edited by Nemo121 -- 4/15/2011 9:16:26 PM >

_____________________________

John Dillworth: "I had GreyJoy check my spelling and he said it was fine."
Well, that's that settled then.

(in reply to Canoerebel)

Post #: 444

RE: Das darf nicht var sein! - 4/15/2011 9:24:59 PM

desicat

Posts: 542
Joined: 5/25/2008
Status: offline

CR - Are you running outside supply into Sumatra/Palemband or are you relying on the local production? Nemo brings up the point of if Chez commits the KB Sumatra will be basically isolated.

(in reply to Nemo121)

Post #: 445

RE: Das darf nicht var sein! - 4/15/2011 9:29:20 PM

Canoerebel

Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline

At the moment I'm relying totally on Palembang to generate supply. I'm using transports with "load troops only" so that I can get troops from India to Sumatra as quickly as possible.

I am not yet sure whether I need to tote supplies to Sumatra. Palembang currently has about 65k and the amount has been growing despite the presence of 2,350 AV in eastern Sumatra. I am concerend about the possibility that Japan will be able to gain air superiority and then knock down (or even out) supplies. I'm just now getting engineers to Palemang and Oosthaven to help with airfield and fortification building. Right now, though, Steve could close those airfields if he really tried. I have plenty of planes, but not enough airfield levels to handle them.

(in reply to desicat)

Post #: 446

RE: Das darf nicht var sein! - 4/15/2011 11:39:32 PM

JohnDillworth

Posts: 3100
Joined: 3/19/2009
Status: offline

If you have the docking space it could not hurt to run supply in. just use the little xAKL's You should have a bunch with short range and you don't want to leave any supply in the DEI for your opponent. If you stripped Java it's not going to last long anyway.

_____________________________

(in reply to Canoerebel)

Post #: 447

RE: Das darf nicht var sein! - 4/15/2011 11:46:10 PM

Ossian

Posts: 100
Joined: 7/7/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel

I'm going to post an update in a moment, but first a note about OpSec. I am aware of the occasional OpSec breaches, in particular the one in Nemo's game (though I wasn't aware who had committed it). Yet I still post in great detail in my AARs. This is because I derive as much pleasure from writing an AAR as I do playing the game. I'm not sure I could play without writing an AAR, so I'm willing to take the risk. In the unlikely event of an OpSec failure, I would simply try to revise my plans to somehow re-achieve some surprise.

So...thanks for reading because that makes the writing even more enjoyable.

I've written AArs for other games in the past but I'm currently writing one for my first WiTP PBEM. I find that, aside from it being a lot of fun to do, I also tend to focus and think about what's going on far more than I would otherwise. I think doing an AAR is a great way to improve as a player and not just from the extra input you receive from other people.

_____________________________

(in reply to Canoerebel)

Post #: 448

RE: Das darf nicht var sein! - 4/15/2011 11:49:33 PM

Cribtop

Posts: 3890
Joined: 8/10/2008
From: Lone Star Nation
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ossian

I've written AArs for other games in the past but I'm currently writing one for my first WiTP PBEM. I find that, aside from it being a lot of fun to do, I also tend to focus and think about what's going on far more than I would otherwise. I think doing an AAR is a great way to improve as a player and not just from the extra input you receive from other people.

+1

_____________________________

(in reply to Ossian)

Post #: 449

RE: Das darf nicht var sein! - 4/16/2011 6:28:23 AM

bradfordkay

Posts: 8683
Joined: 3/24/2002
From: Olympia, WA
Status: offline

Dan, I just re-read through Chez' whole AAR, and I see no OPSEC violations. The two closest were where one fellow asked him his timeline for SRA acquisition (that was the entirety of his post) and a post of mine after he told us of re-routing those troops to the PI from their original destinations. I just asked him if it was a good idea to change his original plans (and gave no indication of what you were doing).

I believe that it is possible to participate in both AARs without revealing any secrets. One just has to be careful of what one says.

_____________________________

fair winds,
Brad

(in reply to Cribtop)

Post #: 450