Tac2i
Posts: 2001
Joined: 4/12/2005 From: WV USA Status: offline
|
I suppose I'm not as organized as some of you. Like Allan, I tend to compose my units according to the task at hand and the threat level I'm defending against or attacking. I usually end up with ad hoc formations of various kinds. My game play probably would be better if I were a little more organized in my approach to formations. Battle conditions often dictate changes. We'll soon find out since phatkarp, Allan and myself along with one other just started a 2vs2 battle. Not yet sure who is going to ally with whom at this point. Just played my turn and the map does suggest at least two potential alliances. quote:
ORIGINAL: phatkarp With all this talk about templates, I would like to hear how other (better) players typically compose their formations. Here are my standards: - Infantry Division: 40 rifles, 5 bazookas, 5 machine guns, 3 mortars Sometimes I sprinkle in either 2 light tanks or 2 armored cars. If I expect to operate in forest or jungle, then I substitute SMGs for rifles. - Infantry Garrison: 30 rifles, 10 machine guns, 4-6 AT guns, 4-6 flak. - Early Armored Division: 4, 6, or 8 light tanks, with 5 rifles for each tank, as they can ride along. - Aircraft - I try to organize into groups of 8, though early on I sometimes can only muster 4. I never mix aircraft types. Is there any advantage to doing that? quote:
Sometimes I sprinkle in either 2 light tanks or 2 armored cars.
_____________________________
Tac2i (formerly webizen)
|