Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

actual game play outcomes versus historical outcomes

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series >> actual game play outcomes versus historical outcomes Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
actual game play outcomes versus historical outcomes - 8/21/2011 10:06:42 AM   
shane56

 

Posts: 91
Joined: 1/16/2010
Status: offline
As I have mentioned in another thread I am developing my own GC and one of the reasons for doing this is to recognise and accept the fact that we will all play this game differently with different strategies, but rarely will it be the same as it was played out historically, as we know that failed and why would you want to play the game with a known failed strategy.

So I have cranked up the editor and retained all those divisions/units that were historically lost at stalingrad as in now way will I play a strategy resulting in a stalingrad debacle. This is one of the faults with the OB in that we are required to loose units (ie they are mandatorily withdrawn) based on a historical outcome (stalingrad) when we might never launch an attack out to stalingrad based on what ever strategy we are employing at the time. This is not right...

The only time units should be withdrawn are those that were historically removed to go to the west or italian fronts.
I am also amazed at how many units are missing from the OB which I have researched and have now added them in.
I have also added in all the german units in the northern balkans, the ost troops, and am in the process of adding in the bulgarians and croatians.

My view is that the OB's should be redone to cutout the mandatory withdrawl of units based on historical outcomes as we will all play this game much differently to history, and to have units mandatorily withdrawn based on a historically lost battle that we will never end up fighting is again not right...

Thanks ..shane
Post #: 1
RE: actual game play outcomes versus historical outcomes - 8/21/2011 10:18:09 AM   
EisenHammer


Posts: 440
Joined: 9/1/2008
Status: offline
I don't think Army or Corps HQ should be withdrawn unless you want them to be withdrawn.
Division units I understand being withdrawing

(in reply to shane56)
Post #: 2
RE: actual game play outcomes versus historical outcomes - 8/21/2011 12:48:52 PM   
Commanderski


Posts: 927
Joined: 12/12/2010
From: New Hampshire
Status: offline
When you are finished, you should make it available to be downloaded in the Scenario section. I would like to see how the differences play out.

(in reply to shane56)
Post #: 3
RE: actual game play outcomes versus historical outcomes - 8/21/2011 2:09:26 PM   
Great_Ajax


Posts: 4774
Joined: 10/28/2002
From: Alabama, USA
Status: offline
Units destroyed historically are not removed from the game unless they were transferred to another theater. It just so happens that many of the divisions destroyed at Stalingrad were rebuilt and deployed to Italy in the summer of 43. If the division was destroyed at Stalingrad and it returns to the Eastern Front, it never withdraws in the game. If you find a unit that was destroyed historically and removed from the game, let me know and I will fix it.

Trey


quote:

ORIGINAL: shane_056

As I have mentioned in another thread I am developing my own GC and one of the reasons for doing this is to recognise and accept the fact that we will all play this game differently with different strategies, but rarely will it be the same as it was played out historically, as we know that failed and why would you want to play the game with a known failed strategy.

So I have cranked up the editor and retained all those divisions/units that were historically lost at stalingrad as in now way will I play a strategy resulting in a stalingrad debacle. This is one of the faults with the OB in that we are required to loose units (ie they are mandatorily withdrawn) based on a historical outcome (stalingrad) when we might never launch an attack out to stalingrad based on what ever strategy we are employing at the time. This is not right...

The only time units should be withdrawn are those that were historically removed to go to the west or italian fronts.
I am also amazed at how many units are missing from the OB which I have researched and have now added them in.
I have also added in all the german units in the northern balkans, the ost troops, and am in the process of adding in the bulgarians and croatians.

My view is that the OB's should be redone to cutout the mandatory withdrawl of units based on historical outcomes as we will all play this game much differently to history, and to have units mandatorily withdrawn based on a historically lost battle that we will never end up fighting is again not right...

Thanks ..shane



_____________________________

"You want mercy!? I'm chaotic neutral!"

WiTE Scenario Designer
WitW Scenario/Data Team Lead
WitE 2.0 Scenario Designer

(in reply to shane56)
Post #: 4
RE: actual game play outcomes versus historical outcomes - 8/22/2011 9:10:35 AM   
glvaca

 

Posts: 1312
Joined: 6/13/2006
Status: offline
Interesting.
The point raised about all the Ost troops not being included has been on my mind as well. We're not talking about Hiwi's which will be added in the enxt patch(es). But lot's of Cav regiments, brigades, battalions which are so useful in OCS seem never to appear.

Is this a concious design decision?


< Message edited by glvaca -- 8/22/2011 9:11:03 AM >

(in reply to Great_Ajax)
Post #: 5
RE: actual game play outcomes versus historical outcomes - 8/22/2011 1:20:31 PM   
jaw

 

Posts: 1045
Joined: 7/24/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: shane_056

I am also amazed at how many units are missing from the OB which I have researched and have now added them in.



Oh, could you please cite an example of what units are missing from the Eastern Front? In the game the Eastern Front DOES NOT include Yugoslavia, Greece or Bulgaria.

(in reply to shane56)
Post #: 6
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series >> actual game play outcomes versus historical outcomes Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.563