Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: OT - WWII quiz

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> RE: OT - WWII quiz Page: <<   < prev  87 88 [89] 90 91   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: OT - WWII quiz - 2/8/2012 12:39:58 AM   
brian brian

 

Posts: 3191
Joined: 11/16/2005
Status: offline 		some questions are too easy otherwise. Montgomery and Eisenhower left the Mediterranean theater around Christmas 1943. Clark was still in command when the Allies liberated Rome, but to Clark's great regret, they did that nearly simultaneously with D-Day and he lost out on a lot of publicity.....American generals can have interesting post-war careers if they rack up enough of that.

But Orm has it right. Much like Clark entered Vichy territory before the Allied landings in North Africa, the Allies sent in a general to negotiate with the Italians shortly after the Italians deposed Mussolini. That was General Matt Ridgeway of the 82nd Airborne. He negotiated some with the Italians and they jointly considered a paradrop around the capital to help protect it from the Germans, which almost happened. Fortunately it was called off because it would have been a massacre as German veterans poured into Rome. Negotiating with the Germans was still about a year off....

(in reply to paulderynck)
Post #: 2641
RE: OT - WWII quiz - 2/8/2012 6:28:02 PM   
Extraneous

 

Posts: 1810
Joined: 6/14/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Extraneous

In the Royal Navy (British Navy) during World War II how can you tell the difference between a Mechanical Transport (MT) and a Landing Ship Infantry (LSI)?

(1) Check with the Ministry of War Transportation (MoWT).
(2) Check what they are carrying.
(3) The troops are getting in the boats.
(4) They carry landing craft.





The answer is not #4.

Not all LSI carried their own landing craft some were merchant ships or liners that the Royal Navy had pressed into service. During Operation TORCH Landing Ship Gantry RFA Derwentdale carried fourteen LCM I for the LSI’s.



_____________________________

University of Science Music and Culture (USMC) class of 71 and 72 ~ Extraneous (AKA Mziln)

(in reply to brian brian)
Post #: 2642
RE: OT - WWII quiz - 2/8/2012 8:33:30 PM   
Orm


Posts: 22154
Joined: 5/3/2008
From: Sweden
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Extraneous

quote:

ORIGINAL: Extraneous

In the Royal Navy (British Navy) during World War II how can you tell the difference between a Mechanical Transport (MT) and a Landing Ship Infantry (LSI)?

(1) Check with the Ministry of War Transportation (MoWT).
(2) Check what they are carrying.
(3) The troops are getting in the boats.
(4) They carry landing craft.





The answer is not #4.

Not all LSI carried their own landing craft some were merchant ships or liners that the Royal Navy had pressed into service. During Operation TORCH Landing Ship Gantry RFA Derwentdale carried fourteen LCM I for the LSI’s.



I will guess on #2.

_____________________________

Have a bit more patience with newbies. Of course some of them act dumb -- they're often students, for heaven's sake. - Terry Pratchett

(in reply to Extraneous)
Post #: 2643
RE: OT - WWII quiz - 2/8/2012 11:26:27 PM   
ezzler

 

Posts: 863
Joined: 7/4/2004
Status: offline 		On 3 January 1993 the people of St. Nazaire honored Alan Magee and the crew of his bomber by erecting a 6-foot tall memorial to the crew.
Magee was the ball gunner of the B-17. Why was he so honoured?

Clue -His experience started at 22,000 ft.

(in reply to Orm)
Post #: 2644
RE: OT - WWII quiz - 2/8/2012 11:39:57 PM   
Extraneous

 

Posts: 1810
Joined: 6/14/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Orm


quote:

ORIGINAL: Extraneous

quote:

ORIGINAL: Extraneous

In the Royal Navy (British Navy) during World War II how can you tell the difference between a Mechanical Transport (MT) and a Landing Ship Infantry (LSI)?

(1) Check with the Ministry of War Transportation (MoWT).
(2) Check what they are carrying.
(3) The troops are getting in the boats.
(4) They carry landing craft.





The answer is not #4.

Not all LSI carried their own landing craft some were merchant ships or liners that the Royal Navy had pressed into service. During Operation TORCH Landing Ship Gantry RFA Derwentdale carried fourteen LCM I for the LSI’s.



I will guess on #2.


Sorry #2 is incorrect.

There are several instances where ships were carrying troops but were considered Mechanical Transport (MT) or Troopships not LSI's.

At Algiers, Algeria HMS Cathay (15,225 tons) is a Transport without reloading or embarking troops sails directly to Bougie, Algeria and becomes a Landing Ship Infantry (Large).


Although the Ministry of War Transportation (MoWT) did not list all LSI unless they were built specifically to be LSI, merchant ships and liners were listed as Troopships.

So the answer is "(3) The troops are getting in the boats" were a LSI now.


< Message edited by Extraneous -- 2/8/2012 11:54:04 PM >

_____________________________

University of Science Music and Culture (USMC) class of 71 and 72 ~ Extraneous (AKA Mziln)

(in reply to Orm)
Post #: 2645
RE: OT - WWII quiz - 2/17/2012 10:01:49 PM   
british exil


Posts: 1686
Joined: 5/4/2006
From: Lower Saxony Germany
Status: offline 		Now I don't know any tricky, confusing questions but I do enjoy reading them. Seeing how much I learn from all those questions. I've read every post here and I hope the posting isn't going to stop.

Please post more.

Mat


_____________________________

"It is not enough to expect a man to pay for the best, you must also give him what he pays for." Alfred Dunhill

WitE,UV,AT,ATG,FoF,FPCRS

(in reply to Extraneous)
Post #: 2646
RE: OT - WWII quiz - 2/17/2012 10:27:43 PM   
michaelbaldur


Posts: 4774
Joined: 4/6/2007
From: denmark
Status: offline 		1. famous battlefield in world war II
2. fighting on me was. American, British; German and ost troops
3. the allied forces was only 2 divisions and smaller units

< Message edited by michaelbaldur -- 2/17/2012 10:35:27 PM >

_____________________________

the wif rulebook is my bible

I work hard, not smart.

beta tester and Mwif expert

if you have questions or issues with the game, just contact me on Michaelbaldur1@gmail.com

(in reply to british exil)
Post #: 2647
RE: OT - WWII quiz - 2/17/2012 10:34:17 PM   
british exil


Posts: 1686
Joined: 5/4/2006
From: Lower Saxony Germany
Status: offline 		I first think of the battlefields in Normandy, but I fear that was just too easy. So it must be something else.

Mat

_____________________________

"It is not enough to expect a man to pay for the best, you must also give him what he pays for." Alfred Dunhill

WitE,UV,AT,ATG,FoF,FPCRS

(in reply to michaelbaldur)
Post #: 2648
RE: OT - WWII quiz - 2/17/2012 10:37:28 PM   
michaelbaldur


Posts: 4774
Joined: 4/6/2007
From: denmark
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: michaelbaldur

1. famous battlefield in world war II
2. fighting on me was. American, British; German and ost troops
3. the allied forces was only 2 divisions and smaller units


4. the main strong point was a Cigar factory
5. one of the small units were ranger
6. another small unit was a paratrooper regiment
7. other units involved were royal marine commandos and British guards

< Message edited by michaelbaldur -- 2/17/2012 10:47:32 PM >

_____________________________

the wif rulebook is my bible

I work hard, not smart.

beta tester and Mwif expert

if you have questions or issues with the game, just contact me on Michaelbaldur1@gmail.com

(in reply to michaelbaldur)
Post #: 2649
RE: OT - WWII quiz - 2/18/2012 12:15:21 AM   
ezzler

 

Posts: 863
Joined: 7/4/2004
Status: offline 		Must be part of Arnhem. I vaguely remember something about Dutch seamen and a cigar industry built up from their colonial possessions.
Can't really remeber.

So will say Eindhoven.

(in reply to michaelbaldur)
Post #: 2650
RE: OT - WWII quiz - 2/18/2012 9:00:52 AM   
monkla

 

Posts: 56
Joined: 3/16/2003
From: Adelaide, Australia
Status: offline 		I don't know of any cigar factory but I reckon there were rangers at Anzio, so I'll go for that.

(in reply to michaelbaldur)
Post #: 2651
RE: OT - WWII quiz - 2/18/2012 1:17:40 PM   
british exil


Posts: 1686
Joined: 5/4/2006
From: Lower Saxony Germany
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: monkla

I don't know of any cigar factory but I reckon there were rangers at Anzio, so I'll go for that.

I don't think there were any British paras in Anzio or Osttruppen.

What about the fighting in Caen? I guess I'm wrong again, as if I'm not mistaken the Canadians were the inf forces there. And the Rangers were on the other flank in the US sector.

Then again what about Antwerpen? That might be the battlefield!

Mat

_____________________________

"It is not enough to expect a man to pay for the best, you must also give him what he pays for." Alfred Dunhill

WitE,UV,AT,ATG,FoF,FPCRS

(in reply to monkla)
Post #: 2652
RE: OT - WWII quiz - 2/18/2012 3:54:28 PM   
michaelbaldur


Posts: 4774
Joined: 4/6/2007
From: denmark
Status: offline
the right answer is anzio

the paratroopers: the 504 regiment.
the commandos: the 2nd special service brigade
24. guard brigade was part of the British first division...
and part of the reinforcements were 2 battalions of ost troop

_____________________________

the wif rulebook is my bible

I work hard, not smart.

beta tester and Mwif expert

if you have questions or issues with the game, just contact me on Michaelbaldur1@gmail.com

(in reply to british exil)
Post #: 2653
RE: OT - WWII quiz - 2/18/2012 4:06:33 PM   
michaelbaldur


Posts: 4774
Joined: 4/6/2007
From: denmark
Status: offline
new battle field.

1. there were major fighting on me
2. but there were no clear winner


_____________________________

the wif rulebook is my bible

I work hard, not smart.

beta tester and Mwif expert

if you have questions or issues with the game, just contact me on Michaelbaldur1@gmail.com

(in reply to michaelbaldur)
Post #: 2654
RE: OT - WWII quiz - 2/18/2012 7:29:33 PM   
michaelbaldur


Posts: 4774
Joined: 4/6/2007
From: denmark
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: michaelbaldur


new battle field.

1. there were major fighting on me
2. but there were no clear winner



3. there were many prototype weapons on the battlefield
4. there were major losses on both side. but nobody really took much ground

< Message edited by michaelbaldur -- 2/18/2012 8:16:04 PM >

_____________________________

the wif rulebook is my bible

I work hard, not smart.

beta tester and Mwif expert

if you have questions or issues with the game, just contact me on Michaelbaldur1@gmail.com

(in reply to michaelbaldur)
Post #: 2655
RE: OT - WWII quiz - 2/18/2012 10:34:27 PM   
paulderynck


Posts: 8201
Joined: 3/24/2007
From: Canada
Status: offline 		Kursk ?

_____________________________

Paul

(in reply to michaelbaldur)
Post #: 2656
RE: OT - WWII quiz - 2/18/2012 10:39:22 PM   
michaelbaldur


Posts: 4774
Joined: 4/6/2007
From: denmark
Status: offline
yes kursk was the right answer

_____________________________

the wif rulebook is my bible

I work hard, not smart.

beta tester and Mwif expert

if you have questions or issues with the game, just contact me on Michaelbaldur1@gmail.com

(in reply to paulderynck)
Post #: 2657
RE: OT - WWII quiz - 2/18/2012 10:59:10 PM   
warspite1


Posts: 41353
Joined: 2/2/2008
From: England
Status: offline 		Kursk had no clear winner? Mmmm, not sure about that.....

_____________________________

England expects that every man will do his duty. Horatio Nelson October 1805



(in reply to michaelbaldur)
Post #: 2658
RE: OT - WWII quiz - 2/19/2012 1:50:14 AM   
roth2006

 

Posts: 4
Joined: 2/17/2012
Status: offline 		As far as I know




(in reply to terje439)
Post #: 2659
RE: OT - WWII quiz - 2/19/2012 3:35:10 AM   
michaelbaldur


Posts: 4774
Joined: 4/6/2007
From: denmark
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1

Kursk had no clear winner? Mmmm, not sure about that.....


then who was the clear winner

< Message edited by michaelbaldur -- 2/19/2012 5:04:33 PM >

_____________________________

the wif rulebook is my bible

I work hard, not smart.

beta tester and Mwif expert

if you have questions or issues with the game, just contact me on Michaelbaldur1@gmail.com

(in reply to warspite1)
Post #: 2660
RE: OT - WWII quiz - 2/19/2012 3:34:24 PM   
Centuur


Posts: 8802
Joined: 6/3/2011
From: Hoorn (NED).
Status: offline 		New battle field:

1. Last battle field of WW II in Europe
2. 822. "Georgian" Battaljon.

_____________________________

Peter

(in reply to michaelbaldur)
Post #: 2661
RE: OT - WWII quiz - 2/19/2012 9:14:29 PM   
warspite1


Posts: 41353
Joined: 2/2/2008
From: England
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: michaelbaldur

quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1

Kursk had no clear winner? Mmmm, not sure about that.....


then who was the clear winner
Warspite1

Well I would say it was the Soviets - after Citadel, the Germans never regained the initiative.

_____________________________

England expects that every man will do his duty. Horatio Nelson October 1805



(in reply to michaelbaldur)
Post #: 2662
RE: OT - WWII quiz - 2/19/2012 9:20:22 PM   
michaelbaldur


Posts: 4774
Joined: 4/6/2007
From: denmark
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1


quote:

ORIGINAL: michaelbaldur

quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1

Kursk had no clear winner? Mmmm, not sure about that.....


then who was the clear winner
Warspite1

Well I would say it was the Soviets - after Citadel, the Germans never regained the initiative.


you can still loss the battle and take initiative..

if you look at ground gained and casualties. it looks more like a tie

_____________________________

the wif rulebook is my bible

I work hard, not smart.

beta tester and Mwif expert

if you have questions or issues with the game, just contact me on Michaelbaldur1@gmail.com

(in reply to warspite1)
Post #: 2663
RE: OT - WWII quiz - 2/19/2012 10:40:07 PM   
british exil


Posts: 1686
Joined: 5/4/2006
From: Lower Saxony Germany
Status: offline 		The Soviets won with the reason that the Germans were never in the position to launch any serious attacks anymore, for the Wehrmacht the campaign was from that point a matter of a controled retreat.

The Germans did not lose, due to the fact that the losses inflicted on the Soviet war machine were tremendous. The amount of tanks lost were huge, but the Soviets were able to replace their losses, whereas the Germans would never be able to.


So from the perspective of both sides: both won. It just depends on what angle you look at the battle.

Mat

_____________________________

"It is not enough to expect a man to pay for the best, you must also give him what he pays for." Alfred Dunhill

WitE,UV,AT,ATG,FoF,FPCRS

(in reply to michaelbaldur)
Post #: 2664
RE: OT - WWII quiz - 2/20/2012 1:12:46 AM   
michaelbaldur


Posts: 4774
Joined: 4/6/2007
From: denmark
Status: offline 		we are talking about the battle of Kursk.

not who won the campaign.

the reason Germany could not make more offensives was not because of the battle. but more because of the second front in Italy.

which sucked up most of the elite units. (most SS panzer was transferred to other fronts)

and Russia was not ready to attack anywhere before winter (because of its tanks casualties)




< Message edited by michaelbaldur -- 2/20/2012 1:18:07 AM >

_____________________________

the wif rulebook is my bible

I work hard, not smart.

beta tester and Mwif expert

if you have questions or issues with the game, just contact me on Michaelbaldur1@gmail.com

(in reply to british exil)
Post #: 2665
RE: OT - WWII quiz - 2/20/2012 7:08:45 AM   
warspite1


Posts: 41353
Joined: 2/2/2008
From: England
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: michaelbaldur


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1


quote:

ORIGINAL: michaelbaldur

quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1

Kursk had no clear winner? Mmmm, not sure about that.....


then who was the clear winner
Warspite1

Well I would say it was the Soviets - after Citadel, the Germans never regained the initiative.



you can still loss the battle and take initiative..

if you look at ground gained and casualties. it looks more like a tie
Warspite1

quote:

you can still loss the battle and take initiative..


So you are saying the Soviets lost

quote:

if you look at ground gained and casualties. it looks more like a tie


But the Soviets could take those casualties and material losses - the Germans couldn't. The Germans did not achieve the objectives of Zitadelle and forever lost the initiative.

_____________________________

England expects that every man will do his duty. Horatio Nelson October 1805



(in reply to michaelbaldur)
Post #: 2666
RE: OT - WWII quiz - 2/20/2012 6:29:47 PM   
Centuur


Posts: 8802
Joined: 6/3/2011
From: Hoorn (NED).
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Centuur

New battle field:

1. Last battle field of WW II in Europe
2. 822. "Georgian" Battaljon.

3. The arrival of allied troops ended the fighting on the 20th. may 1945
4. Russianwar

_____________________________

Peter

(in reply to Centuur)
Post #: 2667
RE: OT - WWII quiz - 2/21/2012 4:15:25 AM   
Extraneous

 

Posts: 1810
Joined: 6/14/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Centuur


quote:

ORIGINAL: Centuur

New battle field:

1. Last battle field of WW II in Europe
2. 822. "Georgian" Battaljon.

3. The arrival of allied troops ended the fighting on the 20th. may 1945
4. Russianwar




Your dates are wrong on clue 3.

The "Allied" tanks arrived on May 15, 1945.

But the fighting did continue until May 20, 1945.



_____________________________

University of Science Music and Culture (USMC) class of 71 and 72 ~ Extraneous (AKA Mziln)

(in reply to Centuur)
Post #: 2668
RE: OT - WWII quiz - 2/21/2012 7:51:30 AM   
JeffroK


Posts: 6391
Joined: 1/26/2005
Status: offline 		Hexel?

_____________________________

Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum

(in reply to Extraneous)
Post #: 2669
RE: OT - WWII quiz - 2/21/2012 7:46:43 PM   
Centuur


Posts: 8802
Joined: 6/3/2011
From: Hoorn (NED).
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Extraneous


quote:

ORIGINAL: Centuur


quote:

ORIGINAL: Centuur

New battle field:

1. Last battle field of WW II in Europe
2. 822. "Georgian" Battaljon.

3. The arrival of allied troops ended the fighting on the 20th. may 1945
4. Russianwar




Your dates are wrong on clue 3.

The "Allied" tanks arrived on May 15, 1945.

But the fighting did continue until May 20, 1945.



According to my sources, the first Canadian soldiers arrived in force in the early morning of the 20th. of may (and not before). I've looked further, and it seems that only a couple of Allied negotiators arrived on the Island earlier and found that both the Georgians and the Germans weren't prepared to lay down their weapons.

It was Texel, where the Georgians of the Ostlegion rioted against the Germans. Of the 1.200 men from this battallion, there were 800 Georgians and 400 Germans stationed on the Island. Apart from this, there was also a substantial German navy presence on the island, since there were some heavy bunkers with gun emplacements build on the Island as part of the Atlantic Wall.
On the 6th. of april 1945, the Georgian soldiers killed 450 Germans during the night, without fighting one shot. Only knifes and bajonets were used...
The Germans reacted almost immediately and did put 600 Germans on the ferry the next day, equipped with heavy MG's, mortars and even some tanks. The fighting did continue until the 20th. of may 1945.

Of the 800 Georgian soldiers, about 500 were killed. The German losses are estimated at about 600. Those losses are very, very high, if you take into account that only about 3.000 soldiers in total took part in the actual fighting on the Island...

The fighting didn't end on the 5th. of may, because of the fact that the Germans and Georgians kept killing each other, even after the official capitulation of the German forces was signed...

_____________________________

Peter

(in reply to Extraneous)
Post #: 2670
Page:   <<   < prev  87 88 [89] 90 91   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> RE: OT - WWII quiz Page: <<   < prev  87 88 [89] 90 91   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.938