Pagan -- problem with ownership?

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

Pagan -- problem with ownership?

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> Tech Support >> Pagan -- problem with ownership?

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

Pagan -- problem with ownership? - 3/14/2012 11:39:53 AM

viberpol

Posts: 838
Joined: 10/20/2005
From: Gizycko, Poland, EU
Status: offline

Hi Michael,

Take a look at the attached file, please.
There's a problem that to me seems to have sth to do with Pagan ownership.

I can't transfer airgroups there, it cannot be a home base for TFs.
Try to send an airgroup manually you get "absence of airfield" info.
(But you can pick the base from list of airfields and transfer it this way, though).
Try set a home port you've got "must be friendly base" info.
Sometimes clicking the base brings no info just as if there was no base or the base was enemy's.

Please notice the 86th Nav Gd problem at the same base. It says it has two fragments in the same base, but one is not visible.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Przy lackim orle, przy koniu Kiejstuta Archanioł Rusi na proporcach błysł

Post #: 1

RE: Pagan -- problem with ownership? - 3/15/2012 10:38:14 AM

michaelm75au

Posts: 13500
Joined: 5/5/2001
From: Melbourne, Australia
Status: offline

Yes the 86th is acting like a base. It is hiding what the actual base as only one base 'item' is expected in a hex.
[Note the 'Secondary airfield' as the unit type when looking at it.]
I'll try a few thing to see if it can be overcome.

Can't trick it to disband or such

< Message edited by michaelm -- 3/15/2012 11:08:47 AM >

_____________________________

Michael

(in reply to viberpol)

Post #: 2

RE: Pagan -- problem with ownership? - 3/15/2012 11:19:23 AM

michaelm75au

Posts: 13500
Joined: 5/5/2001
From: Melbourne, Australia
Status: offline

I have updated the save to reset the type.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Michael

(in reply to michaelm75au)

Post #: 3

RE: Pagan -- problem with ownership? - 3/15/2012 2:47:10 PM

witpqs

Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline

Michael, a long time ago we had two brigades turn into divisions, but since they kept their brigade TOE it didn't affect the game. There does seem to be a gremlin hiding in the code.

PS: IIRC this was still under 1106i.

(in reply to michaelm75au)

Post #: 4

RE: Pagan -- problem with ownership? - 3/15/2012 4:26:51 PM

crsutton

Posts: 9590
Joined: 12/6/2002
From: Maryland
Status: offline

Message removed. We have decided to soldier on and just ignore Pagan...

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by crsutton -- 3/15/2012 7:53:23 PM >

_____________________________

I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg

(in reply to michaelm75au)

Post #: 5

RE: Pagan -- problem with ownership? - 3/16/2012 1:09:41 AM

crsutton

Posts: 9590
Joined: 12/6/2002
From: Maryland
Status: offline

Michaelm

OK, Im....back. Can you make that same change in this file? I know it is asking you to do it twice but Ark sent you and old file and we are having trouble backing up due to "events" that have occurred in the last turn or two. Attached in my most recent Allied turn that is to go back to Viperpol.

Sorry, we don't mean to be a pain in the neck for you and know you have plenty on your plate.

CRSutton

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg

(in reply to crsutton)

Post #: 6

RE: Pagan -- problem with ownership? - 3/16/2012 3:53:14 AM

michaelm75au

Posts: 13500
Joined: 5/5/2001
From: Melbourne, Australia
Status: offline

Updated

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Michael

(in reply to crsutton)

Post #: 7

RE: Pagan -- problem with ownership? - 3/16/2012 4:34:15 AM

crsutton

Posts: 9590
Joined: 12/6/2002
From: Maryland
Status: offline

Thanks so much. My wife and I have decided to name our first son after you. However, it will come as a shock to him, his wife, kids and co workers....