Pagan -- problem with ownership? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> Tech Support



Message


viberpol -> Pagan -- problem with ownership? (3/14/2012 11:39:53 AM)

Hi Michael,

Take a look at the attached file, please.
There's a problem that to me seems to have sth to do with Pagan ownership.

I can't transfer airgroups there, it cannot be a home base for TFs.
Try to send an airgroup manually you get "absence of airfield" info.
(But you can pick the base from list of airfields and transfer it this way, though).
Try set a home port you've got "must be friendly base" info.
Sometimes clicking the base brings no info just as if there was no base or the base was enemy's.

Please notice the 86th Nav Gd problem at the same base. It says it has two fragments in the same base, but one is not visible.





michaelm75au -> RE: Pagan -- problem with ownership? (3/15/2012 10:38:14 AM)

Yes the 86th is acting like a base. It is hiding what the actual base as only one base 'item' is expected in a hex.
[Note the 'Secondary airfield' as the unit type when looking at it.]
I'll try a few thing to see if it can be overcome.

Can't trick it to disband or such




michaelm75au -> RE: Pagan -- problem with ownership? (3/15/2012 11:19:23 AM)

I have updated the save to reset the type.




witpqs -> RE: Pagan -- problem with ownership? (3/15/2012 2:47:10 PM)

Michael, a long time ago we had two brigades turn into divisions, but since they kept their brigade TOE it didn't affect the game. There does seem to be a gremlin hiding in the code.

PS: IIRC this was still under 1106i.




crsutton -> RE: Pagan -- problem with ownership? (3/15/2012 4:26:51 PM)

Message removed. We have decided to soldier on and just ignore Pagan...




crsutton -> RE: Pagan -- problem with ownership? (3/16/2012 1:09:41 AM)

Michaelm

OK, Im....back. Can you make that same change in this file? I know it is asking you to do it twice but Ark sent you and old file and we are having trouble backing up due to "events" that have occurred in the last turn or two. Attached in my most recent Allied turn that is to go back to Viperpol.

Sorry, we don't mean to be a pain in the neck for you and know you have plenty on your plate.

CRSutton





michaelm75au -> RE: Pagan -- problem with ownership? (3/16/2012 3:53:14 AM)

Updated




crsutton -> RE: Pagan -- problem with ownership? (3/16/2012 4:34:15 AM)

Thanks so much. My wife and I have decided to name our first son after you. However, it will come as a shock to him, his wife, kids and co workers....[;)]




viberpol -> RE: Pagan -- problem with ownership? (3/17/2012 11:40:34 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: michaelm

Updated


[&o][&o][&o]
Thanks a lot for your help & assistance Michael!




Page: [1]

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI
0.84375