Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Once Again into the Breech - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A)

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Once Again into the Breech - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) Page: <<   < prev  37 38 [39] 40 41   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Once Again into the Breech - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) - 4/23/2012 10:27:04 PM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline
26 Feb 42

Sub War

No significant activity to report. I did find an island in the SE Pacific that have air units and ships in port. Unfortunately, I am not at home and can’t tell you which one it is. It may start with an R possibly. At any rate, I’m sending a couple of midget subs to stake the place out. It’ll be awhile before they get there though. I am also sending some subs to see if they can locate a SLOC.

5 Fleet

The second Naval Guard landed safely at Dutch Harbor. I’m going to try a shock attack tomorrow.

4 Fleet

Nothing new to report.

SE Fleet

31 Zeros met 5x P-40Es and 18 F4F-3s over Pt. Moresby in a swirling dogfight. For the loss of 1x Zero (and its pilot MIA), 1x P-40 and 6 F4Fs were shot down (along with 1 and 2 op losses respectively). Keep that nice exchange rate up guys! Another new Allied squadron will be burned out in a day or two.

China

Still more maneuvering.

Burma

No aerial combat here today.

I moved a 9 plane daitai of Zeros from Pt. Blair to Tongoo today. Hopefully, this will cause Ted a few headaches in the near future. Unfortunately, no more are available right now.

There are 70+ Allied fighters at Akyab. I am going to form a CA TF to bombard Akyab and hopefully cause some damage. That’s about all I can do at this point. All of my airfields in Burma (except Rangoon) are still level one. I can only perform CAP. That will change soon, but it’s a slow process with lots of support units still enroute to the front.

Malaya

The 5x divisions at Singapore are at disruption levels in the 20s and fatigue in the 50s. They’ll get there. In the meantime, I’ll continue to bombard by ground and air.

Java

The 16 Army HQ is one hex away from Soerabaja. I’ll try an attack tomorrow. I have in the hex the following:

8th Tank Regiment
20th Engineer Regiment
7th Tank Regiment
1st Ind. Engineer Regiment
2nd Tank Regiment
4th Tank Regiment
Yokosuka 1st SNLF
17th Medium Field Artillery Regiment

Here’s a list of defenders:

Marinier Battalion
2nd KNIL Landstorm Battalion
Artilleriecommando Coastal Gun Battalion
3rd KNIL Landstorm Battalion
6th KNIL Regiment
Commandement Marine
3rd KNIL AA Battalion
2 ML-KNIL Aviation
MLD
Soerabaja Base Force
Bandoeng Base Force
South Java Base Force
Malang Base Force

I don’t have a lot of infantry, but we’ll see what it does. More infantry is on the way, but if I can take Soerabaja in a coup, that would be great!

SRA

I have a small TK TF (5x 1250 TKs & escort) idling at Oosthaven waiting for Palembang to be liberated so I can start hauling fuel to Java. Two Dutch Catalinas attacked it today. Eight Tojos base at Merak provided cover and shot down both Cats!

Other Stuff

Reinforcements:

CS Nisshin – She arrived at Nagasaki, which is perfect. Some Tonan Whalers will arrive at Nagasaki in a couple days to drop their load of oil and resources. The Nisshin will be attached to that TF to provide ASW coverage. I’m going to upgrade the Nisshin air units to Jakes and outfit them with the best ASW pilots I have available.

I-29 – This Glen carrying sub will head to the 5 Fleet area to provide much needed Glen coverage in the Aleutians. Tomorrow, I receive her sister sub, the I-30. She’ll also head to the 5 Fleet area.

These two ships free up 71 Naval Shipbuilding points. That allows me to accelerate a 4th CV and 6th DD.

Seeing F4F-3s is a significant event. He has only what he starts with for this aircraft type +24 replacements. Also, these are naval aviators vs. USAAF pilots seen to date. I guess it could mean several things, but I don't have a problem with any of them. Maybe he’s running out of decent USAAF pilots. I don’t have a clue really. Maybe he wants to get some of his naval aviators some experience? Possible. I like this because it’s more losses for those pilots meaning the trained pool will shrink and that pool is really needed for the carrier pilots. I think the most likely reason is that he’s running out of USAAF airframes. That’s a great thing! When he decides to use his bombers, they’ll have little or no fighter cover with inferior pilots. That also means more kills for me meaning increased Japanese fighter pilot quality.

My PPs are starting to build up again (500+). I don’t have any planned purchases out of Manchuoko until June 42, when I buy the units comprising the 1 and 2 Tank Divisions for Burma. Until then, I plan on upgrading key leaders (primarily air, but some ground as well). I’m open to suggestions for other ways to spend my scarce PPs. I am considering some infantry for 5 Fleet. I may need some better/additional infantry to take Dutch Harbor. Gotta ponder that and look at potential candidates. I will wait until tomorrow to see how the Dutch Harbor SA fares. As always, planning for the worst and hoping for the best.

_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 1141
RE: Once Again into the Breech - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) - 4/23/2012 11:04:14 PM   
ny59giants


Posts: 9869
Joined: 1/10/2005
Status: offline
quote:

Another air fur ball over Pt. Moresby. This time, 27 Zeros met 10 P-40Es. Eight of the P-40s were shot down for no Japanese losses. Banzai!

Ted had mentioned that he has half a dozen squadrons each of bombers and fighters to throw into the fray. He has admitted that his war of attrition isn’t working as planned. My fighter strength doesn’t seem to be diminishing. Heh, heh…..


In Australia in mid-January, you get 5 or 6 groups of P-40s (about 20 planes each out of max of 25) that are attached to ABDA for two months before they are withdrawn. The good news is that those planes and pilots go into the pool when they are withdrawn. The bad news is the pilot quality is poor and it takes about two months to train up their Air skill and some of their Defend skill, if they don't see extensive combat. If Ted is throwing them into the air war over Pt Moresby, you are winning on multiple levels.

_____________________________


(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 1142
RE: Once Again into the Breech - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) - 4/23/2012 11:34:19 PM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline
I'm not sure if he's used them or not. For the most part, he's getting slaughtered. It might be my pilot quality superiority. Not sure.

_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to ny59giants)
Post #: 1143
RE: Once Again into the Breech - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) - 4/24/2012 7:09:55 PM   
Teikoku Kaigun

 

Posts: 43
Joined: 3/23/2011
Status: offline
Sorry to be a pain but about those auxliary conversions.

Im really having tough time deciding the numbers im going to need, like 4th fleet will need a ton of them.
For exsample how many AGPs do you have?

(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 1144
RE: Once Again into the Breech - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) - 4/25/2012 2:13:07 AM   
PaxMondo


Posts: 9750
Joined: 6/6/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Teikoku Kaigun

Sorry to be a pain but about those auxliary conversions.

Im really having tough time deciding the numbers im going to need, like 4th fleet will need a ton of them.
For exsample how many AGPs do you have?

A lot of this is playing style.

EX: I like to use a lot of float planes for patrol and trip wires. That said, I have to convert a lot of AV's. Others prefer to use PB's in this role, in which case you need to convert more PB's. AGP's are primarily to service PT type craft as they can load torps. But you would only build these if you plan to use PT's forward. If PT's are defensive, you won't need as many.

So even when Mike shares with you his numbers, it won't help you that much UNLESS your playing style is like his.

_____________________________

Pax

(in reply to Teikoku Kaigun)
Post #: 1145
RE: Once Again into the Breech - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) - 4/25/2012 2:29:54 AM   
Teikoku Kaigun

 

Posts: 43
Joined: 3/23/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: PaxMondo


quote:

ORIGINAL: Teikoku Kaigun

Sorry to be a pain but about those auxliary conversions.

Im really having tough time deciding the numbers im going to need, like 4th fleet will need a ton of them.
For exsample how many AGPs do you have?

A lot of this is playing style.

EX: I like to use a lot of float planes for patrol and trip wires. That said, I have to convert a lot of AV's. Others prefer to use PB's in this role, in which case you need to convert more PB's. AGP's are primarily to service PT type craft as they can load torps. But you would only build these if you plan to use PT's forward. If PT's are defensive, you won't need as many.

So even when Mike shares with you his numbers, it won't help you that much UNLESS your playing style is like his.


I understand, i think i will start easy and convert more when i seet what i need.
So how many Jakes are you producing for those AVs?

(in reply to PaxMondo)
Post #: 1146
RE: Once Again into the Breech - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) - 4/25/2012 3:32:14 AM   
PaxMondo


Posts: 9750
Joined: 6/6/2008
Status: offline
I typically run Jakes at about 60 - 90 /month.  I want to replace all the Pete and Daves that are on ships along with populating all the other FP units.  Takes several months even at that rate.  Once I have them, I will only produce ~20/month to cover losses the rest of the war.  I do that by toggling the factory on/off to hold a minimum pool of 20.

_____________________________

Pax

(in reply to Teikoku Kaigun)
Post #: 1147
RE: Once Again into the Breech - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) - 4/25/2012 4:12:40 AM   
Teikoku Kaigun

 

Posts: 43
Joined: 3/23/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: PaxMondo

I typically run Jakes at about 60 - 90 /month.  I want to replace all the Pete and Daves that are on ships along with populating all the other FP units.  Takes several months even at that rate.  Once I have them, I will only produce ~20/month to cover losses the rest of the war.  I do that by toggling the factory on/off to hold a minimum pool of 20.


How many units have you managed to get by rezising and dividing? Im also a big fan of Jakes.

(in reply to PaxMondo)
Post #: 1148
RE: Once Again into the Breech - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) - 4/25/2012 12:32:12 PM   
PaxMondo


Posts: 9750
Joined: 6/6/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Teikoku Kaigun


How many units have you managed to get by rezising and dividing? Im also a big fan of Jakes.

Depends upon my game and my HR's. I only rarely divide, and I size based upon what the Husimi AV can support. Since I have these forward, my losses tend to be quite high. But I find them more mobile and provide better coverage than PB pickets. That's just me though. YMMV.

_____________________________

Pax

(in reply to Teikoku Kaigun)
Post #: 1149
RE: Once Again into the Breech - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) - 4/25/2012 7:53:33 PM   
Jorge_Stanbury


Posts: 4320
Joined: 2/29/2012
From: Toronto and Lima
Status: offline
Question related to Float Planes

It will take me some time to put Jakes in all my FP squadrons, even at high levels of production. So for the time being, has someone experimented with Pete as a 3rd rate AV/ CAP plane? obviosuly for forward base areas with low threat risks meaning no enemy fighters expected.

Maybe a mix of 70% Jakes for naval search and 30% Pete for AV protection.
If this won't work, then it might be better to replace all Petes with Alf until I have enough Jakes

EDIT: Important to highlight this idea against the AI; against a human opponent this will not work

< Message edited by Jorge_Stanbury -- 4/25/2012 8:21:02 PM >

(in reply to PaxMondo)
Post #: 1150
RE: Once Again into the Breech - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) - 4/25/2012 9:23:32 PM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline
You can put a Pete on CAP. I have never tried it. I try to use every plane I have. They all have a use. For me, the Pete is the trainer for FP units. I replace them as soon as possible. If I have to use them (mainly early war), they are on ASW. Their short range makes them useless for pretty much anything else. They are marginal at best for ASW too. Don't know about CAP.

_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to Jorge_Stanbury)
Post #: 1151
RE: Once Again into the Breech - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) - 4/25/2012 9:27:36 PM   
obvert


Posts: 14050
Joined: 1/17/2011
From: PDX (and now) London, UK
Status: offline

As CAP they won't knock much down but can distract bombers if unescorted and nothing else is available. They were used as CAP in the war on a limited basis.

Just build a lot of Jakes and change the rest out.

(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 1152
RE: Once Again into the Breech - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) - 4/25/2012 9:27:56 PM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline
27 Feb 42

Sub War

Nothing to speak of. About 3-4 different attacks by both sides with no damage done on either side.

5 Fleet

I made a mistake here and paid for it. The second Naval Guard landed at Dutch Harbor without incident yesterday. “Without incident” means the US CD guns didn’t hit anything. I then gave orders for the Amph TF to head back to Adak. Unfortunately, I forgot to cancel the supply unload. Well, the enemy CD guns didn’t miss today. Down went an AMC and the other AMC took some sys damage but is burning pretty well. If the fire goes out tomorrow, she’ll be ok. If not, well, I’ll probably lose a second one. Dumb mistake.

Anyway, I’m attacking again tomorrow. We’ll see if 2x Naval Guards can take Dutch Harbor.

4 Fleet

The first wave of Naval Guard units have arrived on the fringe. Another bunch of Naval Guard reinforcements arrive in a week or 2 for the 4 Fleet. Naval Guard units aren’t wonderful, but they require the enemy to send a couple of regiments if they really want to take the place.

SE Fleet

Not much to discuss here. No air combat occurred today. I own the skies over Pt. Moresby, at least temporarily. A supply convoy is headed to Rabaul. I’ve discovered that I need some moderately sized xAKs to move supply from Truk to Rabaul. All I currently have here are large ones which I don’t want to risk against enemy subs or xAKLs, which don’t allow enough supply to be sent in one TF.

Kavieng finally made a level 1 airfield. I need a bit of AS there and I’ll be able to shift Claudes from Truk to Rabaul (via Kavieng) for upgrade.

Philippines

The 16 Division will land at Cebu tomorrow, the last enemy occupied island between Luzon and Mindanao. I expect this to be a brief battle. After the conclusion of this battle, the 16 Division will go to Bataan and we’ll try a DA or two.

Davao is working nicely as a hub (instead of Babeldaob). It port should reach level 4 in a day or two, with an ultimate goal of 6.

China

Nothing new to report.

Burma

Well, Ted threw in his bombers for the first time, and it worked out pretty well for him. My drawback is that all of my airfields in Burma (with the exception of Rangoon) are still at level one. I don’t have the flexibility I need to counter Ted’s air force by concentrating my fighters. Level 2 will happen soon at some of the airfields, but it’ll probably be too late for Magwe.

The first attack was over Meiktila. 14 planes of the AVG met 3 Oscars and 5 Zeros. The result was 2x H81-A3s shot down for the loss of 1 Zero (and it’s pilot) and one additional op loss.

Next was the first bombing attack of the Magwe oil fields. 56 bombers of various flavors escorted by 19x P-40Es met 8 Oscars and 7 Zeros. The P-40s did their job but paid the price. They prevented my fighters from reaching the bombers but lost 7 of their number (and an op loss) at the cost of 3 Oscars and 1 Zero (but no pilots).

Finally, 16 Blenheim IVs came in unescorted against 4 Zeros and an Oscar defending the Magwe oil fields again. One Blenheim was shot down and a second crashed on the way home, but they successfully bombed the oil fields.

The oil fields lost 70 of 300. Ouch. It’s inevitable, but it still sucks. The oil has all migrated to Rangoon. I hope it moves out of there soon.

Malaya

The 5 divisions at Singapore are still in need of rest before attacking again. Their disruption is down to the 20s but their fatigue is still around 50. Three of the 5 divisions are completely repaired.

Other Stuff

Reinforcement: I-30 – She’s headed to the Aleutians.

Saigon’s port reached its goal of level 7.

I culled the training units. Here’s what I got:

IJN
F: 4
NavB: 4
NavS: 13

IJA
F: 23
ASW: 2
NavS: 16
GrdB: 12
Rcn: 3

There seems to be a high number of IJA NavS. It happened for a reason. One recon chutai that was training NavS actually is supposed to upgrade to a fighter unit. I had pulled out 5 pilots that had reached the magic 50+/70+ goal and tried to replace them with 35 exp rookies. I ended up getting experienced fighter pilots instead. I tried this three times and the same thing happened every time. I gave up and yanked out the rest of the pilots (NavS stats ~65-68, good enough) and converted the unit to Nates. I added 35 exp rookies and it took them out of the pool. Strange.

I had expected the naval shipbuilding pool to jump by 71 today. It only went up by 33. Does a CS use naval or merchant points? I thought it was naval points. Either way, the increase wasn’t what I had hoped, for whatever reason. I had hoped to accelerate a CV and DD. Ah well, maybe tomorrow. The sub I got today is worth 33 points. That’ll allow me to accelerate an additional CV tomorrow. Current accelerations are 3x CVs and 5x DDs.

MKB is still in port at Davao. No mission yet but I’m considering sending it to the Aleutians to support an offensive I am tentatively planning in case Dutch Harbor gambit doesn’t succeed. MKB will provide air support (obviously) and surface support will be provided by the 5 Fleet (3 CL & 12 DD). I’m going to have to find some infantry out of Kwantung Army to use. The 5 Fleet gets an SNLF and 3 independent infantry battalions on 1 May 42, but that’s too late. I guess I know how I’m spending my PPs.

KB is still sitting at Truk. No mission for them yet either. The Allied half of the Pacific has been very quiet. I refuse to use them just to use them. Ted has no clue where they are. I like it that way. When I use them, I want them appearing out of the fog, doing their dirty work, and vanishing back into the fog. That’s safer for them and usually more disastrous for Ted.

_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 1153
RE: Once Again into the Breech - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) - 4/25/2012 9:28:37 PM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline
TK, I agree with Pax, it all depends on how you play the game. To use Pax’s example of the AV, I use them too, but not to the extent he does and I don’t convert Husimis either. They have a different mission in my game. I’m going to show you what I do with each class. Here goes:

Yusen S: It’s an AK and it remains an AK.

Lima: I convert some to AKEs for a total of 8. If I remember correctly, I converted 6. I use the AKEs in pairs scattered around the map. Currently they are in Balikpapan, Rabaul, Singkawang and Davao. I will also convert either 3 or 6 (probably 3) to AKVs. Why groups of 3? Good question. If I want to move a sentai/daitai, I’ll break it down and put a chutai in each ship. That way, the whole unit doesn’t die if that ship is sunk. The rest of the Limas will haul resources from Pt. Arthur/Shanghai to the Home Islands (HI).

Yusen N: Remain as is to haul resources/oil from Singapore to the HI.

Yusen A: Convert to AK.

Kyushu: Remain as is to haul resources/oil from Singapore to the HI.

Aden: Remain as is.

Husimi: I like this as a nice, medium sized xAK for hauling troops/equipment near/at the front. I may convert a few to AVs, but not more than a few. I use the AV the same way as Pax, but it sounds like I’m not as aggressive with them. I’ll move them forward but behind the front line and use them to support the Mavis/Emily. Unfortunately, this class is not destined to survive the war. It’s used too close to the front to survive. When available, I’ll convert 6 to ARs. They take a long time to convert unfortunately.

Akasi: Remain as is to haul resources from Hakodate to Ominato (primarily). I converted ~3 to the AD.

Ehime: I converted ~12 to the AG. I scattered around the AGs in various resource/oil producing ports to assist in repairing the small craft they excel in repairing.

Toho: I converted these to the –t conversion. These are the primary people haulers from hubs to at or near the front line. They’re relatively quick (14 kts) and not too big.

Std-C (and all the other Std- models): These will be converted to TKs. You can’t get enough TKs. They are small, which is a blessing. They can be used in smaller ports, which many of the oil/resource/fuel producing bases have.

Ansyu-C: I converted every one of these to PBs. They are sturdy and long ranged (for a PB). You can’t have enough PBs early war. It’ll be your primary escort. I have over 200 PBs currently.

Gozan, Miyati, Kasu-D, Daigen: These are small and slow, at 10 kts. I consider the best of them to be the Kasu-D, which is 12 kts. They are destined to be at the front line, moving troops and supplies to outposts and doing invasions. I’ll be surprised if 10% of them survive the war.

Kiso-E and To’su: I convert all of these to either ACM s or PBs. For me, it’s about 40% & 60% but it is all based on your needs.

So, to sum up, here’s my list of conversions:

AKE: 6
AKV: 3 or 6
AG: 12
AS: 0 - may add a couple if necessary but I doubt it.
AV: 0 - may add a couple if necessary.
AR: 6 when available.
PB: ~200
ACM: ~40? Not sure exactly.

Remember, you can always convert your conversion. It just takes time. Occasionally, I’ll convert something temporarily then change it to something else I need

_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 1154
RE: Once Again into the Breech - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) - 4/25/2012 9:38:21 PM   
Zorch

 

Posts: 7087
Joined: 3/7/2010
Status: offline
There should be an award for the best AAR for each game, each year (call it an AARGY).

I nominate you Mike, for Best Performance by a JFB in a campaign game.
There is so much great info here.

(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 1155
RE: Once Again into the Breech - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) - 4/25/2012 9:41:24 PM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline
Thanks, I appreciate that, but I wouldn't say I have played well. I lost the Hiryu in Jan 42 and am embarrassed to say that 3 Allied DDs sailed into Saigon harbor and sank 3 AOs.

_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to Zorch)
Post #: 1156
RE: Once Again into the Breech - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) - 4/25/2012 11:00:27 PM   
Teikoku Kaigun

 

Posts: 43
Joined: 3/23/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Zorch

There should be an award for the best AAR for each game, each year (call it an AARGY).

I nominate you Mike, for Best Performance by a JFB in a campaign game.
There is so much great info here.


x1

Thank you for your reply, as usual clear and full of good tips im sure to use myself in some form.

(in reply to Zorch)
Post #: 1157
RE: Once Again into the Breech - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) - 4/25/2012 11:55:16 PM   
Hanzberger


Posts: 921
Joined: 4/26/2006
From: SE Pennsylvania
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mike Solli

25 Feb 42

I forgot to mention that yesterday, Meiktila spontaneously changed allegiance from Brit to Japanese. All of the infrastructure is intact so now I have an additional 300 oil factories pumping out oil. I shut off the 100 refineries as well as the 200 refineries in Rangoon. The oil (~35-40k) is pooling at Meiktila and Rangoon. Hopefully, it’ll start to flow south soon.



I thought the objective was fuel more then oil. Why not produce fuel and have it flow South? What am I missing here?
And I agree with CB and SQMYLemon above.


_____________________________

Planning for #17 Ironman Tier2

Japan AC wire chart here
http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=2769286&mpage=1&key=?

(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 1158
RE: Once Again into the Breech - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) - 4/26/2012 12:07:29 AM   
Teikoku Kaigun

 

Posts: 43
Joined: 3/23/2011
Status: offline
I think fuel has spoilage on the way but oil will move without loss.

(in reply to Hanzberger)
Post #: 1159
RE: Once Again into the Breech - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) - 4/26/2012 12:27:20 AM   
PaxMondo


Posts: 9750
Joined: 6/6/2008
Status: offline
Fuel is subject to spoilage, Oil isn't.  Like Mike, I tend to ship a lot of oil to the HI.

_____________________________

Pax

(in reply to Hanzberger)
Post #: 1160
RE: Once Again into the Breech - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) - 4/26/2012 1:04:40 AM   
obvert


Posts: 14050
Joined: 1/17/2011
From: PDX (and now) London, UK
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: PaxMondo

Fuel is subject to spoilage, Oil isn't.  Like Mike, I tend to ship a lot of oil to the HI.


I like the refineries on. Why not have the extra supply they produce, which in the Burma area especially can be critical? It would be a waste of fuel to ship a bunch of supply here that I could just produce here in the first place. The excess fuel is taken to various places by any troop or cargo ships that stops by and keeps the IJN going at the Port Blair sub base and outpost.

(in reply to PaxMondo)
Post #: 1161
RE: Once Again into the Breech - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) - 4/26/2012 1:17:47 AM   
Prydwen


Posts: 156
Joined: 2/23/2009
Status: offline
quote:

Thanks, I appreciate that, but I wouldn't say I have played well. I lost the Hiryu in Jan 42 and am embarrassed to say that 3 Allied DDs sailed into Saigon harbor and sank 3 AOs.


Maybe but there isn't another AAR that I've copied production notes from so I'll have them on file with me. Seriously I have a 40 page word document full of great information I've gotten from this AAR.

IAM

_____________________________


(in reply to obvert)
Post #: 1162
RE: Once Again into the Breech - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) - 4/26/2012 1:54:58 AM   
Empire101


Posts: 1950
Joined: 5/20/2008
From: Coruscant
Status: offline
This is a great AAR to glean production and strategy from the Japanese perspective. I've certainly learnt alot from Mike's AAR.
Keep up the good work!!

Looking forward to reading about this!!




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Empire101 -- 4/26/2012 1:55:21 AM >


_____________________________

Our lives may be more boring than those who lived in apocalyptic times,
but being bored is greatly preferable to being prematurely dead because of some ideological fantasy.
- Michael Burleigh


(in reply to Prydwen)
Post #: 1163
RE: Once Again into the Breech - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) - 4/26/2012 2:55:29 AM   
Hanzberger


Posts: 921
Joined: 4/26/2006
From: SE Pennsylvania
Status: offline
I don't like spoilage~ Thanks guys.

_____________________________

Planning for #17 Ironman Tier2

Japan AC wire chart here
http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=2769286&mpage=1&key=?

(in reply to Empire101)
Post #: 1164
RE: Once Again into the Breech - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) - 4/26/2012 10:45:08 AM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Teikoku Kaigun

I think fuel has spoilage on the way but oil will move without loss.


Bingo!

_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to Teikoku Kaigun)
Post #: 1165
RE: Once Again into the Breech - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) - 4/26/2012 10:47:18 AM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: obvert


quote:

ORIGINAL: PaxMondo

Fuel is subject to spoilage, Oil isn't.  Like Mike, I tend to ship a lot of oil to the HI.


I like the refineries on. Why not have the extra supply they produce, which in the Burma area especially can be critical? It would be a waste of fuel to ship a bunch of supply here that I could just produce here in the first place. The excess fuel is taken to various places by any troop or cargo ships that stops by and keeps the IJN going at the Port Blair sub base and outpost.


That's the down side. It equates to 300 supply per day until the oil center gets hit. In my case, the oil center is now down to 206 (one turn not posted yet). That supply would dry up quickly and you still lose some fuel. For me, oil here is worth more than losing some fuel.

_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to obvert)
Post #: 1166
RE: Once Again into the Breech - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) - 4/26/2012 10:48:22 AM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ItsAMadhouse

quote:

Thanks, I appreciate that, but I wouldn't say I have played well. I lost the Hiryu in Jan 42 and am embarrassed to say that 3 Allied DDs sailed into Saigon harbor and sank 3 AOs.


Maybe but there isn't another AAR that I've copied production notes from so I'll have them on file with me. Seriously I have a 40 page word document full of great information I've gotten from this AAR.

IAM


Thanks. I'm a logistician in the real world as well. I love this stuff.

_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to Prydwen)
Post #: 1167
RE: Once Again into the Breech - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) - 4/26/2012 10:49:51 AM   
Mike Solli


Posts: 15792
Joined: 10/18/2000
From: the flight deck of the Zuikaku
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Empire101

This is a great AAR to glean production and strategy from the Japanese perspective. I've certainly learnt alot from Mike's AAR.
Keep up the good work!!

Looking forward to reading about this!!





You and me both Empire. I'm currently torn about attacking again. Fatigue is in the 40s in the divisions. Still high for me. Maybe next turn. I think Singapore's days are numbered.

_____________________________


Created by the amazing Dixie

(in reply to Empire101)
Post #: 1168
RE: Once Again into the Breech - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) - 4/26/2012 9:11:42 PM   
Hanzberger


Posts: 921
Joined: 4/26/2006
From: SE Pennsylvania
Status: offline
How much AV should you hit Singers with?

_____________________________

Planning for #17 Ironman Tier2

Japan AC wire chart here
http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=2769286&mpage=1&key=?

(in reply to Mike Solli)
Post #: 1169
RE: Once Again into the Breech - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) - 4/26/2012 9:31:09 PM   
Empire101


Posts: 1950
Joined: 5/20/2008
From: Coruscant
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hanzberger

How much AV should you hit Singers with?


As much as possible is the easy answer to that!!

I also saturate bomb Singers every turn with every available bomber, to destroy supply and add more disabled units to the 'dead' pile


_____________________________

Our lives may be more boring than those who lived in apocalyptic times,
but being bored is greatly preferable to being prematurely dead because of some ideological fantasy.
- Michael Burleigh


(in reply to Hanzberger)
Post #: 1170
Page:   <<   < prev  37 38 [39] 40 41   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Once Again into the Breech - Mike (J) vs. tc464 (A) Page: <<   < prev  37 38 [39] 40 41   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.281