Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: War and Peas - Hortlund (J) vs. Canoe (A)

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: War and Peas - Hortlund (J) vs. Canoe (A) Page: <<   < prev  24 25 [26] 27 28   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: War and Peas - Hortlund (J) vs. Canoe (A) - 7/30/2012 5:25:39 PM   
Cap Mandrake


Posts: 23184
Joined: 11/15/2002
From: Southern California
Status: offline
Nice, succinct, and I might add, lawyerly summary of "lame-gamey play". That is quite a sound two step test.


One question on "sub-born infantry". Does that mean they were actually delivered on the boat (likely a rare event) or does it also include future infantrymen whose father served on a sub? Also, could you comment on whether they could run for President if they were "sub-born"?

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 751
RE: War and Peas - Hortlund (J) vs. Canoe (A) - 7/30/2012 5:27:25 PM   
SqzMyLemon


Posts: 4239
Joined: 10/30/2009
From: Alberta, Canada
Status: offline
How much air power has Japan committed to China? You'll probably make China a real grind for him if he's not bludgeoning your troops with air attacks and causing massive disruption and inherent supply loss.

_____________________________

Luck is the residue of design - John Milton

Don't mistake lack of talent for genius - Peter Steele (Type O Negative)

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 752
RE: War and Peas - Hortlund (J) vs. Canoe (A) - 7/30/2012 5:36:16 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
Japan has employed a steady bombing campaign in China, primarily to hit the stack of Chinese troops at Nanyang (ineffectively, IMO) and to keep down base building at Changsha, Hengyang, Kweilin, etc. Some of this is "disinformation," I think, but he's kept up the pressure for a long time.

Steve and I have already discussed the use of strategic bombing in China. I suggested it was possibly a game-breaker in the sense that the Chinese cannot defend against it, it will eradicate supply, and it wasn't really possible in the real war (Japan didn't have unilateral bombing ability and the Allies would have, if necessary, incrased fighter support, but fighter support in the game isn't really possible in China due to lack of supply at bases). Steve said he'd take this under advisement. That was two or three weeks ago and it hasn't come up again.

As for CapMandrake's questions, "sub-born infantrymen" have something to do with Operation Petticoat, I think. Sheriff Joe wants to arm all USN sub-born infantrymen and post them off Tijiuana.

< Message edited by Canoerebel -- 7/30/2012 5:37:00 PM >

(in reply to SqzMyLemon)
Post #: 753
RE: War and Peas - Hortlund (J) vs. Canoe (A) - 7/30/2012 11:07:32 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
3/09/42

North America: The KB moves closer to LA and San Diego but flies no strike missions. Marauders from March Field sortie ineffectively, escorted by some Wildcats, but report sightings of Akagi and Ryujo. This is signficiant, becuase I just don't think can mount a campaign for India absent the KB, and anything across the Australian LOD isn't likely any time soon because he couldn't impose a blockade to stop the Allies from bringing in reinforcements. So I think the Allies can afford to fight further forward.

Indian Ocean: Allied carriers continue to avoid direct encounters with the host of IJN subs near Cocos Island, but I'm sure Steve has derived some helpful intel by "flooding the zone." The carriers are further west now. It will take at least a day or maybe two before they could rally to support Cocos. Formidable is in theate now, over near Diego Garcia, though she's await some escorts before moving further forward. Yesteday, I bought one of the USA RCTs at Capetown. This unit will report to Bombay, though she might be diverted before reaching that port.

China: The Chinese are moving in good order to meet the various and serious threats outlined in the post for March 7.

The Date: March 7 is a significant day in my AE experience because that's when Q-Ball came ashore at Ceylon, the first step in a massive invasion of India. With time on the side of the Allies, the further we go into a game, the harder it is for Japan to prevail in a massive move that has potential auto-victory implications. I felt like Q-Ball did a great job to launch an Indian invasion that early in the game on such a scale. Since then, I've always used that date as kind of a benchmark to see where I am and where the enemy is. Steve's obviously advanced far in NoPac, but I doubt he plans to come farther (except likely moves on Coal Harbor and Prince Rupert and perhaps Victoria). I think that's a dead end for him now.

< Message edited by Canoerebel -- 7/30/2012 11:10:33 PM >

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 754
RE: War and Peas - Hortlund (J) vs. Canoe (A) - 7/31/2012 4:15:28 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
03/10/42

A pretty good turn for the Allies with some big action coming, me thinks.

North America: The KB stood offshore and hit the oil fields at Bakersfield. The Allied CAP leaked over from Los Angelese and did a good job, downing quite a few Zeros and Kates. The Allies lost 19 oil points. Steve's CAP isn't all that impressive, so he'd better not get too close to San Francicso. No air raids over Canada or the northwest USA.

Oz: The Japanese TFs retired before reaching Port Headland and the Japanese haven't been able to take Port Moresby yet.

Cocos Island: A long chain of Japanese TFs inbound including an advance TF of APDs and other fast transports. CA Dorsetshire with four DDS is close by and will cover Cocos tomorrow. The carriers are going to move half way east and could cover the base day after tomorrow. It looks like Steve's "big guns" (BBs, major transport fleets) are back near the Sunda Straights. I am not detecting any sign of carriers. Forts at Cocos just went to level two with 271 AV.

India: A new Indian division arrived at Madras and will report immediately to Chittagong. The Allies are very close now to moving to occupy that base plus Cox's Bazaar and Akyab in strength.

China: Another failed IJ shock attack in the woods east of Ankang, plus an IJ division attacked, failed, and is very weak way out at Hami in the northwest. The big move is coming for Lanchow, but I think the Chinese are doing good in getting reinforcements positioned to contest the enemy offensive. Overall I think the Chinese are doing very, very well. But the big and critical contests are soon to come and I'm still not certain just how much Japan is bringing to Lanchow.

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 755
RE: War and Peas - Hortlund (J) vs. Canoe (A) - 7/31/2012 4:25:35 PM   
Cap Mandrake


Posts: 23184
Joined: 11/15/2002
From: Southern California
Status: offline
"AIR RAID BAKERSFIELD STOP THIS IS NOT A DRILL"


Doesn't quite have the same impact, does it?

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 756
RE: War and Peas - Hortlund (J) vs. Canoe (A) - 7/31/2012 9:03:03 PM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Cap Mandrake

"AIR RAID BAKERSFIELD STOP THIS IS NOT A DRILL"


Doesn't quite have the same impact, does it?

Is that a direct crib from the movie "1942"??

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Cap Mandrake)
Post #: 757
RE: War and Peas - Hortlund (J) vs. Canoe (A) - 7/31/2012 9:57:56 PM   
crsutton


Posts: 9590
Joined: 12/6/2002
From: Maryland
Status: offline
Can't believe he would waste his time hitting your oil. What could he possibly be thinking? I doubt that even the complete destruction of any west coats oil facilities would put a dent in the Allied fuel supply. He is wasting valuable KB pilots on something that will not gain him anything and can be quickly rebuilt once he leaves the area. Got me scratching my head here.

_____________________________

I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 758
RE: War and Peas - Hortlund (J) vs. Canoe (A) - 7/31/2012 10:16:41 PM   
Andav

 

Posts: 474
Joined: 5/8/2007
Status: offline

He does get stratigic bombing points for the oilfields I guess. I am not saying it is woth KB pilots but it is a reason to bomb them ... I guess ...

Wa

(in reply to crsutton)
Post #: 759
RE: War and Peas - Hortlund (J) vs. Canoe (A) - 7/31/2012 10:18:17 PM   
Alfred

 

Posts: 6685
Joined: 9/28/2006
Status: offline
I keep reading people saying that PH is just wasting his time on these NoPac operations. You just don't understand what is the purpose. PH is doing more than fine with his NoPac operations. In fact the ROI is very good.

There is zero slack in oil capacity in North America. Every single oil centre damaged results in a commensurate reduction in fuel production. That in turn results in less Heavy Industry output. Reduce Heavy Industry output sufficiently and you actually impact on the production of American aircraft production. Reduce fuel production sufficently and you impact on the capacity to send fuel to Australia.

Canoerebel isn't providing the exact figures but to date there is no evidence that PH is actually suffering unsustainable aircraft losses. More significantly you have no idea whether PH has replaced his elite pilots with cannon fodder.

Frankly whilst I think PH has made some relatively minor tactical errors, what I see is Japan completely outplaying the Allies strategically.

Alfred

(in reply to crsutton)
Post #: 760
RE: War and Peas - Hortlund (J) vs. Canoe (A) - 7/31/2012 11:30:05 PM   
obvert


Posts: 14050
Joined: 1/17/2011
From: PDX (and now) London, UK
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Alfred

I keep reading people saying that PH is just wasting his time on these NoPac operations. You just don't understand what is the purpose. PH is doing more than fine with his NoPac operations. In fact the ROI is very good.

There is zero slack in oil capacity in North America. Every single oil centre damaged results in a commensurate reduction in fuel production. That in turn results in less Heavy Industry output. Reduce Heavy Industry output sufficiently and you actually impact on the production of American aircraft production. Reduce fuel production sufficently and you impact on the capacity to send fuel to Australia.

Canoerebel isn't providing the exact figures but to date there is no evidence that PH is actually suffering unsustainable aircraft losses. More significantly you have no idea whether PH has replaced his elite pilots with cannon fodder.

Frankly whilst I think PH has made some relatively minor tactical errors, what I see is Japan completely outplaying the Allies strategically.

Alfred


With all due respect, his ability to hit these targets will be so limited it will amount to almost nothing compared to the assets used and lost. The invasion bonus is nearly gone and the KB is off the coast of the US. That means nothing else can be taken securely in OZ, India, the IO or even in So Pac.

This is a strategic blunder IMHO. This will have no real impact on US production or ability to move fuel to OZ because it cannot be sustained. These losses will be made up within a month or two and at the cost of irreplaceable pilots. If these are replacement KB pilots then the KB is very vulnerable and shouldn't be sailing so close to enemy waters.

_____________________________

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill

(in reply to Alfred)
Post #: 761
RE: War and Peas - Hortlund (J) vs. Canoe (A) - 8/1/2012 2:42:32 AM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
3/11/42

Reply: I think the Allies have done pretty darn well to this point, especially in China. I admit that it can be hard or impossible for a player to accurately gauge his play, so that he's prone to overestimating, so I concede that I might be wrong. But I'm enjoying the game at my current level of commitment. I'm still learning, but I'm not willing to invest the time it would take to become a truly elite player (assuming I could achieve such a level even if I devoted the time). I must say that I greatly appreciate that all the readers/lurkers of this AAR have resfrained from giving advice. As noted early on, I'd rather struggle through on my own rather than being a puppet on the end of the strings.

Indian Ocean: Big decision here. Japanese fleet carriers including at least Shokaku and Soryu are between Cocos and Java. Kates and Vals sortied in big numbers and seriously damaged CA Dorsetshire after she tangled with some torpedo boats at Cocos. Ent and Lex plus Indomitable and Hermes are just 18 hexes to the west. I'm debating whether to commit them further or to retire. I'm not sure yet what I'm going to do. The Japanese are landing at Christmas Island (IO), but I'm also not sure yet their coming for Cocos yet. Further to the west, more IJ transports are off Sumatra's western tip. I have Formidable and a combat TF led by BC Repulse not too far away. A sub sank CL Kiso. (I forgot to mention that another sub nailed another IJN CL at Soerabaja yesterday, doing heavy or perhaps mortal damage). Steve could possibly be making for India, so I'm watching with interst.

India: Japanese paratroops hit two dot hexes west of the Imphal/Ledo line. I had both garrisoned. One held, the other didn't. I'll have to scramble to recaputre that one, but I think I can do so.

China: At least part of the Japanese stack is still moving south towards Lanchow. We'll have a battle in the desert/rough hex (3x defense, I think) one hex to the north of Lanchow. By the time the Japanes cross, the Chinese should have roughly 1200 to 1500 AV present. That would be sufficient to handle two to four divisions in all likelihood, but it would be a calamity to face a force big enough to win a battle and force a retreat. Were it to lose hundreds of squads, my left flank would immediately collapse. So I have to be careful here. Chinese bombers hit the various IJA stacks nearly every day, hopefully slowing the advance considerably.

North America: KB pulled further off the coast. A USN sub heavily damaged one of the KB's destroyers.

(in reply to obvert)
Post #: 762
RE: War and Peas - Hortlund (J) vs. Canoe (A) - 8/1/2012 3:58:42 AM   
princep01

 

Posts: 943
Joined: 8/7/2006
From: Texas
Status: offline
Just my 2 cents and I know you play a different game than I do, but IF YOU ARE REASONABLY SURE that those 2 CVs are the only CV/CVLs present, I'd attack.  Perhaps putting Hermes and escorts 1 hex in front of the other three CVs (in two different TFs), get close and throw the kitchen sink at him.  Those British torpedo planes can really do a number on him and the SBDs are nothing to ignore.  I see this as a rare opportunity at this point in the game.

Good luck.

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 763
RE: War and Peas - Hortlund (J) vs. Canoe (A) - 8/1/2012 5:43:03 AM   
Wirraway_Ace


Posts: 1400
Joined: 10/8/2007
From: Austin / Brisbane
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel


Para Fragments: Steve and I have discussed this at length. Bottom line is that we have mutually agreed not to use tiny fragments of paras or sub-born infantry to engage purely in reonnaissance missions. I explained to Steve that my defination of "lame-gamey play", which I am just now trying to define in my own mind, is two-fold: (1) is the move wildly unrealistic and/or does it offer a side a unrealistic result; and (2) is there an effective counter to the move. If a move is wildly unrealistic (such as providing complete garrison/AV/fort information by para-fragment assault) and if there is no way to counter the move, it's suspect.

That's why I don't have a problem with the use of picket ships. It provides a reasonable amount of knowledge not otherwise obtainable though it should have been historically and my opponent can counter the use of pickets. However, I have come to rely more and more on patroling ships (DDs, small ASW TFs, small minelayer TFs) as opposed to merchants. I still employ the latter, but lean more towards the former. There is no freaking way Japan could have used massed carriers just off the West Coast in March 1942 without the Allies knowing about it; but in this game it's totally possible unless I post picket ships.

Oh great canoe-borne rebel, I humbly submit to you a counter opinion of an old paratrooper.

Bottom Line Up Front: The use of platoon or company sized units (say 3-10 squads) for operational reconnaissance should be considered acceptable regardless of whether delivered by airdrop, flying boat, fast transport or submarine transport.

Reasons against:
1. Unrealistic - The troops were not employed in this way
2. Game Engine Exploit - Intelligence gained is too precise (i.e. AV, unit names, prep)

Reasons for:
1. Realistic, if slightly anachronistic. The Alamo Scouts were certainly examples of troops employed in this manner during the War in the Pacific, although operational reconnaissance and strategic reconnaissance, and the development of Special Forces, are more properly considered missions that developed as a result of WW2 experience. That being said, nearly all of our concepts of tactics, operational art and strategy are anachronistic.
2. Not an exploit of the game engine – The game allows players a much more precise understanding of their own forces strength and there are other ways to collect a similar understanding of the enemy. We know the exact experience of a unit we are considering for a mission, its exact combat power, and the exact strengths and weaknesses of its commander. By conducting multiple air attacks, we can identify which enemy units occupy the hex, whether they are fragments or the parent unit, and with perfect knowledge of the enemy OOB, deduce the combat power. We can do the same thing by naval bombardment. I don’t understand why this is possible within the game model, but it is. Sending in a element of a specialized unit such a one of the airborne SNLFs, US Marine Raiders, Aussie Commandoes, etc, to recon an objective seems very reasonable by comparison.

Bottom Line: I strongly support the use of a small airborne unit (parafragment) for an operational reconnaissance of Cocos Island (the main atoll is only 5.3 square miles) by the Japanese. It is simply good operational preparation. There is no defense against it except that you know he is interested enough to lose a platoon of highly trained men, and you can reinforce or withdraw forces while he prepares. I also really like the submarines nearby. If I were trying to do the thing realistically, I would post a submarine in the target hex so the recon platoon would relay the collected intelligence by FM to a submarine if their HF set failed, and be withdrawn after the mission was conducted. Of course, in the game, there is unlikely to be a unit to withdraw after the shock attack….


< Message edited by Wirraway_Ace -- 8/1/2012 6:02:17 AM >

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 764
RE: War and Peas - Hortlund (J) vs. Canoe (A) - 8/1/2012 6:00:38 AM   
Wirraway_Ace


Posts: 1400
Joined: 10/8/2007
From: Austin / Brisbane
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: obvert


quote:

ORIGINAL: Alfred

I keep reading people saying that PH is just wasting his time on these NoPac operations. You just don't understand what is the purpose. PH is doing more than fine with his NoPac operations. In fact the ROI is very good.

There is zero slack in oil capacity in North America. Every single oil centre damaged results in a commensurate reduction in fuel production. That in turn results in less Heavy Industry output. Reduce Heavy Industry output sufficiently and you actually impact on the production of American aircraft production. Reduce fuel production sufficently and you impact on the capacity to send fuel to Australia.

Canoerebel isn't providing the exact figures but to date there is no evidence that PH is actually suffering unsustainable aircraft losses. More significantly you have no idea whether PH has replaced his elite pilots with cannon fodder.

Frankly whilst I think PH has made some relatively minor tactical errors, what I see is Japan completely outplaying the Allies strategically.

Alfred


With all due respect, his ability to hit these targets will be so limited it will amount to almost nothing compared to the assets used and lost. The invasion bonus is nearly gone and the KB is off the coast of the US. That means nothing else can be taken securely in OZ, India, the IO or even in So Pac.

This is a strategic blunder IMHO. This will have no real impact on US production or ability to move fuel to OZ because it cannot be sustained. These losses will be made up within a month or two and at the cost of irreplaceable pilots. If these are replacement KB pilots then the KB is very vulnerable and shouldn't be sailing so close to enemy waters.

I play almost exclusively as Japan. All pilots are very replaceable. Pilots, planes and ships are the coin of war; the must be spent wisely, but spent none the less. The invasion bonus is helpful tactically and operationally, but is not critical to strategy for Phase II objectives. It is my opinion the scenario 2 players as Japan are trying to win through autovictory. I suspect PH has done the math and is playing to win, vice playing to lose less quickly like us scenario 1 types.

Mike

(in reply to obvert)
Post #: 765
RE: War and Peas - Hortlund (J) vs. Canoe (A) - 8/1/2012 7:54:15 AM   
castor troy


Posts: 14330
Joined: 8/23/2004
From: Austria
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: obvert


quote:

ORIGINAL: Alfred

I keep reading people saying that PH is just wasting his time on these NoPac operations. You just don't understand what is the purpose. PH is doing more than fine with his NoPac operations. In fact the ROI is very good.

There is zero slack in oil capacity in North America. Every single oil centre damaged results in a commensurate reduction in fuel production. That in turn results in less Heavy Industry output. Reduce Heavy Industry output sufficiently and you actually impact on the production of American aircraft production. Reduce fuel production sufficently and you impact on the capacity to send fuel to Australia.

Canoerebel isn't providing the exact figures but to date there is no evidence that PH is actually suffering unsustainable aircraft losses. More significantly you have no idea whether PH has replaced his elite pilots with cannon fodder.

Frankly whilst I think PH has made some relatively minor tactical errors, what I see is Japan completely outplaying the Allies strategically.

Alfred


With all due respect, his ability to hit these targets will be so limited it will amount to almost nothing compared to the assets used and lost. The invasion bonus is nearly gone and the KB is off the coast of the US. That means nothing else can be taken securely in OZ, India, the IO or even in So Pac.

This is a strategic blunder IMHO. This will have no real impact on US production or ability to move fuel to OZ because it cannot be sustained. These losses will be made up within a month or two and at the cost of irreplaceable pilots. If these are replacement KB pilots then the KB is very vulnerable and shouldn't be sailing so close to enemy waters.



If someone says the oil bombing of CONUS will have any effect (other than scoring some vp) then he got no clue about the game, let alone when he says

There is zero slack in oil capacity in North America. Every single oil centre damaged results in a commensurate reduction in fuel production. That in turn results in less Heavy Industry output. Reduce Heavy Industry output sufficiently and you actually impact on the production of American aircraft production. Reduce fuel production sufficently and you impact on the capacity to send fuel to Australia.

There is so much fuel, so much supply in CONUS you can't even transport it out no matter how hard you try. And reducing the HI output? LMAO!

Glad somone told me that I don't understand the purpose.

< Message edited by castor troy -- 8/1/2012 7:56:24 AM >


_____________________________


(in reply to obvert)
Post #: 766
RE: War and Peas - Hortlund (J) vs. Canoe (A) - 8/1/2012 8:49:37 AM   
JeffroK


Posts: 6391
Joined: 1/26/2005
Status: offline
Re the Paratrooper Recce Raids.

I cant see how anyone considers this legitimate.

But, goes both ways.

By now you should have 2-3 Parachute Marine Battalions.

These could find interesting usage in the CBI area cutting the LOC, or making PJH garrison his rear to avaoid these attacks.

You only need 2-3 Transports to drop your recce section.

_____________________________

Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum

(in reply to castor troy)
Post #: 767
RE: War and Peas - Hortlund (J) vs. Canoe (A) - 8/1/2012 12:44:31 PM   
obvert


Posts: 14050
Joined: 1/17/2011
From: PDX (and now) London, UK
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Wirraway_Ace


quote:

ORIGINAL: obvert


With all due respect, his ability to hit these targets will be so limited it will amount to almost nothing compared to the assets used and lost. The invasion bonus is nearly gone and the KB is off the coast of the US. That means nothing else can be taken securely in OZ, India, the IO or even in So Pac.

This is a strategic blunder IMHO. This will have no real impact on US production or ability to move fuel to OZ because it cannot be sustained. These losses will be made up within a month or two and at the cost of irreplaceable pilots. If these are replacement KB pilots then the KB is very vulnerable and shouldn't be sailing so close to enemy waters.


I play almost exclusively as Japan. All pilots are very replaceable. Pilots, planes and ships are the coin of war; the must be spent wisely, but spent none the less. The invasion bonus is helpful tactically and operationally, but is not critical to strategy for Phase II objectives. It is my opinion the scenario 2 players as Japan are trying to win through autovictory. I suspect PH has done the math and is playing to win, vice playing to lose less quickly like us scenario 1 types.

Mike


I play currently as Japan as well. Of course pilots must be used, but these particular pilots, the starting KB pilots, by virtual consensus on the forum and from my own experience, are not replaceable. You will never have the same quality. So use them, yes, but for necessary or well chosen missions.

This particular use is what I'm questioning. If I were CR playing the Allies right now I'd be smiling and stacking CAP hoping he keeps going for the West Coast. The more of these lost here, the fewer that will be around for any CV clash later.

Japan's best tool in the first 6 months is to bring the hammer. Bring everything you can, and dominate. If you're diffusing strength by operating piecemeal across the map and losing assets to little gain, then you're most likely not going to get to the VP total you're looking for, no matter how good your starting maths. Scenario 2 offers a slight cushion, but this can also be deceptive, as players feel so much is possible they don't focus on a concise strategical goal. Just my instinct, but that's what I feel is going on here.


_____________________________

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill

(in reply to Wirraway_Ace)
Post #: 768
RE: War and Peas - Hortlund (J) vs. Canoe (A) - 8/1/2012 2:15:12 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
3/12/42

Indian Ocean: Major developments here as it seems a major Japanese amphibious operation is underway, possibly targeting Sabang, Port Blair or, more unlikely, Ceylon or India. Last night, I ultimately decided to slide my carriers two hexes west in order to gather more information about the strength and disposition of the enemy forces, especially carriers. Today, those IJN carriers moved west and are close to the Sunda Straits. Additional IJN carriers (probably no more that a CVE or the like) is much further west, near Sinabang, in company with what appears to be a large amphibious concentration. These TFs are within a day or two of Sabang, which is a sensible target. The Allied carriers will continue to slide west, as I'm sure Steve's main fleet carrier concentration will. If I obtain an advtanageous position, I would consider striking any force moving on Sabang. But an incursion any deeper would - such as Port Blair, Assam or Ceylon - will definately trigger employment of the carriers. Overall the Allies are in decent position to consider striking and have pretty good defenses all along the perimeter.

Cocos Island: No move apparent here. CA Dorsetshire is pumping out water and might be able to retire in a few days if left unmolested.

Burma: Another enemy paratroop assault, this one west of Imphal at another small and ungarrisoned base. I don't think Steve can hold the two bases he's taken long term, but we'll see. Much of the Burma Army will remain in upper Burma. If Steve is coming for NE India, I'll fight him in both places. If he switches up and moves on the Bombay/Karachi sector (unlikely but still possible), I can either maintain my army in Burma or retire through the jungle if Japan brings enough to be a threat here.

China: Tomorrow the Allies will have about 1300 AV in the hex north of Lanchow. Steve has five units another hex further north. I think that stack may include one or two divisions with more further back. I think here will come a key if not decisive battle/campaign. At the moment, though, the Chinese MLR is intact and doing very well.

North America: IJN carriers further west. No enemy air raids. US CD unit in place at Prince Rupert. I'm still looking for an IJ move there and/or Coal Harbor. Without the latter Japan presence in NoPac does not pose a real threat. Allied bombers set to bomb Bella Bella for more than a month now finally elected to fly their first mission today. I'll try to keep the field their suppressed.

Australia: Minneapolis and Helena led a combat TF into Port Moresby, tanling with an IJN CL TF followed by a TF led by CA Furutaka. The Allies claimed one destroyer sunk and didn't lose any ships, but overall I was disappointed in the outcome. Minneapolis took a torp and will require some time in the yards.

(in reply to obvert)
Post #: 769
RE: War and Peas - Hortlund (J) vs. Canoe (A) - 8/1/2012 2:34:14 PM   
Wirraway_Ace


Posts: 1400
Joined: 10/8/2007
From: Austin / Brisbane
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: obvert


....If you're diffusing strength by operating piecemeal across the map and losing assets to little gain, then you're most likely not going to get to the VP total you're looking for, no matter how good your starting maths....

agreed

Mike

(in reply to obvert)
Post #: 770
RE: War and Peas - Hortlund (J) vs. Canoe (A) - 8/1/2012 3:24:54 PM   
Wirraway_Ace


Posts: 1400
Joined: 10/8/2007
From: Austin / Brisbane
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: JeffK

Re the Paratrooper Recce Raids.

I cant see how anyone considers this legitimate.

But, goes both ways.

By now you should have 2-3 Parachute Marine Battalions.

These could find interesting usage in the CBI area cutting the LOC, or making PJH garrison his rear to avaoid these attacks.

You only need 2-3 Transports to drop your recce section.

Jeff,
I have struggled with the definition of what is too small on a game of this scale and of this detail. The Australian paracommando units are company sized formations, 9 squads if memory serves. These elite (90 exp) units, while not airborne, can be delivered by SST, fast transport or PBY to conduct raids or recce throughout the enemy's operational and strategic depth. This was their mission. These are full units. If you deliver them to an atoll, they will shock attack like an airborne unit. Otherwise, they are simply ordered to attack to gain the same intel as the paratroop fragment. The Alamo Scouts conducted operational recce for the 6th Army--over 100 missions. They were a company sized unit that operated in teams approximately the size of a single squad. In the ETO, operation Squatter was a platoon sized airborne raid to attack forward airfields. I stuggle to make an arguement that Japan could not have done similiar operations, airborne, air transport or seaborne with their 1st and 3rd Yokosuku rikusentai in preparation or support of Phase II objectives.

I don't see how this skews rear area garrison requirements. Key choke points, airfields and depots have to be garrisioned against the risk of a raid or major deep operation. A mobile rear battle formation is also an operational requirement. Small raids like Squatter are important economy of force operations. Too often, players focus on telephone pole style operations involving 100,000 troops like the ETO or Eastern Front and miss out on the flavor of Pacific operations that were, until late in the war, on a much smaller scale because of logistics.

If I were trying to propose a house rule, I would recommend that airborne, raider, ranger and commando units of 90+ experience can be employed without restriction (that is a intentional or unintentional fragments) to conduct raids and or recce.

Canoerebel, sorry for the hijack, but I hope it at least cools some of your ire over these tactics.

Mike

(in reply to JeffroK)
Post #: 771
RE: War and Peas - Hortlund (J) vs. Canoe (A) - 8/1/2012 4:10:39 PM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Wirraway_Ace

I play almost exclusively as Japan. All pilots are very replaceable. Pilots, planes and ships are the coin of war; the must be spent wisely, but spent none the less. The invasion bonus is helpful tactically and operationally, but is not critical to strategy for Phase II objectives. It is my opinion the scenario 2 players as Japan are trying to win through autovictory. I suspect PH has done the math and is playing to win, vice playing to lose less quickly like us scenario 1 types.

Mike


Agreed, Japan has enough power to bulldoze through Allied defences almost anywhere, but most players seem to think it is necessary to minimize cost because she cannot replace losses indefinitely and must keep experienced troops for later defence. The big value in the landing bonus is the "no prep" freebie. With no prep the Allies cannot use their superior SIGINT to discern where attacks are likely and so beef up the defences. CR has done a great job of setting up recon so that he can detect invasion convoys and their general heading, but he cannot say where they are bound. Reinforcing Ceylon or Port Blair ahead of a landing needs a week's lead time. Japan has only 19 more days to keep the allies guessing. My guess is that he will have to launch that amphib attack before then.

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Wirraway_Ace)
Post #: 772
RE: War and Peas - Hortlund (J) vs. Canoe (A) - 8/1/2012 4:34:23 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
3/13/42

Indian Ocean: The mass of enemy amphibious TFs ended the turn about two hexes from Sabang with an "outlier" TF well to the west, very close to BC Repulse. CV Formidable, without a single escort, is ten hexes south of that outlier, but will hang back while awaiting arrival of her escorts. The Allied CVs continue to steam west. I didn't get a sighting on the main Japanese carrier concentration, but I will err on the side of assuming it is continuing west just south of the Sumatr coast to support he invaions. It looks like Sabang is the target, though Port Blair, Assam or (very unlikely) Ceylon could be it. I'll post some maps shortly.

China: The Japanese stack is still moving on Lanchow, though it's movement keeps stlowing due to pesky Chinese bombers. The Chinese have 1400 AV in their own stack now, which I think gets a 3x terrain boost because the hex is desert/rough. The Chinese air raids continue to report the same three enemy divisions, so I'm not sure whether Steve has more out there or not. I think, but I'm not sure yet, that the Chinese successfully countered each of the three major vectors of threat: Lanchow, Ankang, and Hengyang. We'll see.

North America: Japanese carriers moving north well off the coast. No IJ air raids except small and ineffective ones against Prince Rupert.

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 773
RE: War and Peas - Hortlund (J) vs. Canoe (A) - 8/1/2012 5:10:13 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
Position of Allied carriers vis-a-vis the enemy amphibious TFs nearing Sabang. I didn't get a patrol sighting of the main IJN carrier TF today, but it was roughly parallel to the Allied carriers yesterday. I think it's within supporting distance of the amphibious TFs.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 774
RE: War and Peas - Hortlund (J) vs. Canoe (A) - 8/1/2012 5:17:31 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
This appears to be the likely area of convergence over the coming days.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 775
RE: War and Peas - Hortlund (J) vs. Canoe (A) - 8/1/2012 5:26:54 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
Coinciding with the big amphibious presence nearing Sabang, Steve executed three paratroop assaults in northeasst India; two succeeded and one failed. This could be part of an elaborate feint to stir things up or it could be "the real thing" - the initial shock assaults opening a campaign for northeastern India or India proper.

I don't think Steve will hold these bases long.

The Allied army at Schwebo, Burma, has 350 AV and will remain in place. Steve divided his army - part remaining in a blocking position across the river at Mandalay, the rest moving on Lashio. I don't think Steve plans to move on Schewebo yet, so the Allied army will remain in place even while we evaluate the threat to the rear.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 776
RE: War and Peas - Hortlund (J) vs. Canoe (A) - 8/1/2012 5:37:13 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
The action in northern China where the Chinese thus far seem to be effectively countering major IJ thrusts towards Lanchow and Ankang. There are several other small campaigns much further NW, where the Chinese have also held their ground.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 777
RE: War and Peas - Hortlund (J) vs. Canoe (A) - 8/1/2012 5:44:25 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
The rest of the MLR in China.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 778
RE: War and Peas - Hortlund (J) vs. Canoe (A) - 8/1/2012 6:13:02 PM   
Cap Mandrake


Posts: 23184
Joined: 11/15/2002
From: Southern California
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel

Coinciding with the big amphibious presence nearing Sabang, Steve executed three paratroop assaults in northeasst India; two succeeded and one failed. This could be part of an elaborate feint to stir things up or it could be "the real thing" - the initial shock assaults opening a campaign for northeastern India or India proper.

I don't think Steve will hold these bases long.

The Allied army at Schwebo, Burma, has 350 AV and will remain in place. Steve divided his army - part remaining in a blocking position across the river at Mandalay, the rest moving on Lashio. I don't think Steve plans to move on Schewebo yet, so the Allied army will remain in place even while we evaluate the threat to the rear.





Surely the paradrops are designed to isolate/impair movement/supply between "NE" India and the big centers to the West. This would make large scale air transport out of Ledo impracticable. Also it would stop you from moving troops west and perhaps attract your area reserves...this would be desirable if he is going to land at Chittagong or something.

(in reply to Canoerebel)
Post #: 779
RE: War and Peas - Hortlund (J) vs. Canoe (A) - 8/1/2012 6:28:37 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
I've been through a similar campaign against Q-ball two games back. The seizue of the bases is definately to disrupt transportation from India proper to the Assam frontier or else it's to create the appearance of a threat to serve as a distraction. Either way I don't think it will be effective. I have too many troops nearby to reclaim the two bases taken. As for Chittagong and poitns east, they aren't strongly held and typically I won't defend them strongly, though we're getting late enough into the game where I'm beginning to make movemetns in order to do so. For now, I think it will be pretty tough for Steve to go all the way to Assam/Chittagong region. He'd have to bypass Port Blair and Ceylon and he'd be deep in Indian country with large Allied forces able to threaten his path of retreat.

(in reply to Cap Mandrake)
Post #: 780
Page:   <<   < prev  24 25 [26] 27 28   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: War and Peas - Hortlund (J) vs. Canoe (A) Page: <<   < prev  24 25 [26] 27 28   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.656