Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: 17Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: 17Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson Page: <<   < prev  27 28 [29] 30 31   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: 17Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 8/5/2012 4:11:39 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
The mouseover says that Jim still has 4 bombers at Johore Bahru and that this raid may have done some minor damage there.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by larryfulkerson -- 8/5/2012 4:12:33 PM >

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 841
RE: 17Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 8/5/2012 4:17:59 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
Most of my heavier bombers are in the DEI area and so Operation Beat-Down is proceeding extreamly slowly. More troops are slated
to move to Manila in a few days so maybe I can still turn this around and make more progress faster.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 842
RE: 17Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 8/5/2012 4:21:27 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
The air war is still going on in the skies above Buna. Who is winning is still the question.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 843
RE: 17Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 8/5/2012 4:24:45 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
Not very many Nate's got airborne ( lack of AF dudes at Hanoi ) but those that did put in a good show.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 844
RE: 17Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 8/5/2012 4:33:46 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
I may have to fly in some float planes to Toyohara to help out the ASW assets there. Another Allied sub has surfaced near my major
shipping lanes.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 845
RE: 17Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 8/5/2012 4:38:24 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
I'm not sure I fully understand why the AV of my dudes was only 1/3 of what it might have been in this Clark Field attack. The fatigue
level is only about 28 for my divisions......is that the problem?




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 846
RE: 17Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 8/5/2012 4:43:02 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
I obviously need to soften up the Allied dudes at Canton via air before I try another Bombardment on the ground.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 847
RE: 17Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 8/5/2012 4:46:45 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
Here's another AV reduction by 2/3 in this attack at Koepang. The fort level is 0 now however so I'm thinking of doing it again
tomorrow.





Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 848
RE: 17Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 8/5/2012 4:51:25 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
Kuantan needs some ship-to-shore bombardment a couple of times before I attack there again.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 849
RE: 17Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 8/5/2012 4:58:30 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
Bandy finally fell. Now to move some planes there. No, first move some AF dudes there, THEN the planes. I'm learning.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 850
RE: 17Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 8/5/2012 5:01:31 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
Jim shoots back at Cebu. This doesn't bode well for the Japs.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 851
RE: 17Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 8/5/2012 9:48:45 PM   
moore4807


Posts: 1089
Joined: 6/2/2000
From: Punta Gorda FL
Status: offline
AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR Jan 17, 42
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Larry caught me reinforcing Luganville, its pretty much drawing my line in the sand where I'll make my stand...

Submarine attack near Luganville at 120,150
Japanese Ships
SS RO-60

Allied Ships
xAP Matsonia

Submarine attack near Luganville at 120,150
Japanese Ships
SS RO-60

Allied Ships
xAP Santa Barbara, Torpedo hits 1, heavy damage

Allied ground losses:
10 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Submarine attack near Luganville at 120,150
Japanese Ships
SS RO-60

Allied Ships
xAP Santa Inez, Torpedo hits 2, on fire, heavy damage

Allied ground losses:
Guns lost 3 (1 destroyed, 2 disabled)

My goal of flooding his coast with subs like he has done to me is starting to take shape...


Submarine attack near Hamamatsu at 110,63
Japanese Ships
xAP Miike Maru

Allied Ships
SS Thresher

Sub attack near Etorofu at 128,48
Japanese Ships
PB Sureboko Maru

Allied Ships
SS Pickerel


Sub attack near Utsonomiya at 116,63
Japanese Ships
PB Shintohoku Maru

Allied Ships
SS Shark


Ok, I'll admit putting the KIX in port is a little overambitious...

ASW attack near Makassar at 65,106
Japanese Ships
DD Asagiri

Allied Ships
SS KIX, hits 4

So far, today's ground action is slightly in my favor, P.I. is holding nicely...

Orphan Annie is saluting her forces on Jap radio tonight...
Japanese forces CAPTURE Bandjermasin !!!

_____________________________


(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 852
RE: 17Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 8/6/2012 2:53:16 AM   
geofflambert


Posts: 14863
Joined: 12/23/2010
From: St. Louis
Status: offline
Larry, wouldn't it be simpler to paint out the real TFs than to add a bunch of fake ones? It's a bigger suprise if you suddenly uncloak than if one of your fake TFs turns out to be real.

(in reply to moore4807)
Post #: 853
RE: 17Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 8/6/2012 4:19:31 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: geofflambert
Larry, wouldn't it be simpler to paint out the real TFs than to add a bunch of fake ones? It's a bigger suprise if you suddenly uncloak than if one of your fake TFs turns out to be real.

I've decided that there's no real need for disinformation yet and so I don't, anymore, doctor my pictures to hide anything. This early-stage of the war is really hard on the Allies and my need for OPSEC is mostly optional right now. Later on, when Jim gets a bunch
of ships to throw around I might decide to change my miind but right now I'm concentrating on helping Jim with his game against TommyG ( where Jim is the Japs ). I'm hoping to be able to display such a masterful show of skill that Jim learns a thing or two in playing the Jap side of things and his game against TommyG will be all the more skillful yet. Or maybe Jim will learn what not to do. What you see in the pictures is what really happened. So far at least. But thanks for the suggestion.

< Message edited by larryfulkerson -- 8/6/2012 4:22:02 AM >

(in reply to geofflambert)
Post #: 854
RE: 17Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 8/6/2012 4:29:33 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
One of my Assault Divisions got split into parts somehow and I've got some rearranging to do to put it back together. I've got some people headed to Tulagi to replace the one part that is parked there and I hope to have this Division back together within a couple of
weeks game time.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 855
RE: 17Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 8/6/2012 4:35:26 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
As you can see most of the non-home-islands Oil is parked at Balikpapan, Miri, ( and it goes without saying...Palembang, which isn't in
my hands yet ) and I've got to organize some convoys to get it moved to the home islands stat. Oil and resources are the name of the
Japanese game and I can't win without some convoys moving the stuff around.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 856
RE: 17Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 8/6/2012 4:53:34 AM   
Ingtar

 

Posts: 194
Joined: 8/1/2004
Status: offline
OK - I give up. How do I see the screen shown in post 855?

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 857
RE: 17Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 8/6/2012 5:32:45 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Ingtar
OK - I give up. How do I see the screen shown in post 855?






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Ingtar)
Post #: 858
RE: 17Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 8/6/2012 10:26:43 AM   
moore4807


Posts: 1089
Joined: 6/2/2000
From: Punta Gorda FL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Ingtar

OK - I give up. How do I see the screen shown in post 855?


Ingtar,
If your referring to not seeing the screen on this AAR, click below it on the paperclip "attachment" and it will display the JIF image that will open up in a new box on your computer... If its a red X where the screen would be, then it may be a flashplayer update you need...hope this helps.

< Message edited by moore4807 -- 8/6/2012 10:27:56 AM >


_____________________________


(in reply to Ingtar)
Post #: 859
RE: 18Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 8/6/2012 12:40:16 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
I really lucked out when I landed some troops at Bandy.......there was an Allied minefield there and only 1 ship, a DD, hit a mine. I've got
some DMS's headed to Bandy to clear out the mines now that I own it. I need to remember to check for mines before I land somewhere.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to moore4807)
Post #: 860
RE: 18Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 8/6/2012 3:19:53 PM   
Ingtar

 

Posts: 194
Joined: 8/1/2004
Status: offline
I was referring to the production detail screen. I am guessing it is a drill down on something else and will hunt further when I get home tonight. Thank you.

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 861
RE: 18Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 8/6/2012 4:02:53 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
Oh, sorry I thought you were refering to the LCU list. Here's the secret button to get to the production detail screen.

EDIT: I'm guessing this button only shows if the PDU's is "on". I've seen other AAR's where it's not showing so..........




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by larryfulkerson -- 8/6/2012 4:26:52 PM >

(in reply to Ingtar)
Post #: 862
RE: 18Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 8/7/2012 4:08:03 AM   
Ingtar

 

Posts: 194
Joined: 8/1/2004
Status: offline
That explains a lot. I do not have that button.

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 863
RE: 18Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 8/7/2012 4:55:15 AM   
moore4807


Posts: 1089
Joined: 6/2/2000
From: Punta Gorda FL
Status: offline
Ingtar,

Are there any other buttons/icons missing from Larry's toolbar screenshot and yours?

_____________________________


(in reply to Ingtar)
Post #: 864
RE: 18Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 8/7/2012 6:13:12 AM   
Ingtar

 

Posts: 194
Joined: 8/1/2004
Status: offline
No. That is the only one I do not see. I wonder if I am behind on a patch or something.

(in reply to moore4807)
Post #: 865
RE: 18Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 8/7/2012 6:26:09 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
Are you playing as the Allies? I'm thinking the Allies wouldn't have that button as their economy is fixed.

(in reply to Ingtar)
Post #: 866
RE: 18Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 8/7/2012 6:32:43 AM   
Ingtar

 

Posts: 194
Joined: 8/1/2004
Status: offline
As the Japanese. I will check the version and see what I can find out. If I cannot get it right, I will go to support. Thank you for the help.


(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 867
RE: 16Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 8/7/2012 12:21:22 PM   
Methuen

 

Posts: 21
Joined: 8/28/2009
From: Durban, South Africa
Status: offline
quote:

All this advice is greatly appreciated and I'm hoping there is something we can tell Jim about his situation also. Fair is as fair does I guess.


I wish I could, but I've never played as the Allies. From what I've read and heard from other
gamers the Allied player should concentrate on trying to get as much as possible out of harms
way (especially pilots), rather than trying for desperate stands "to the last man". The Allies
should also try and make sneaky surface attacks on small invasion fleets (KB & Mini KB can't be
everywhere at once) and then sprint off out of harms way.
As a side note I discovered something quite useful for improving Jap airframe R&D, it's really
obvious but it's taken me years to realize it! (a real Homer "Dow!" moment). So R&D works like
this: for every fully repaired research air-frame factory the game engine will check for
production in the same way as it does for factories that are actually in production, so if you
have a factory of 15 points you've got roughly a 50% chance that it will produce an air-frame in
any given turn, if you have a factory of 30 points it will produce an air-frame every
turn.
The same thing happens for R&D, only here the factory produces 1 R&D point, when an air-frame
type being researched accumulates 100 points the date at which the air-frame becomes available
advances by 1 month (you can see this happening in WitP Tracker). Also some air-frame factories
can be upgraded to the next model without their factory points being damaged, so for instance
in scenario RA 4.6, the A6M2 upgrades to the A6M5.
Now to the blindingly obvious:
What I've done is concentrate R&D and production on just a few a/c models and I've converted a
lot of other factories of less desirable models to just this select few. For instance the D5Y1
Myojo is a pile of cr*p, so I converted it to A6M2, likewise the Ki-36 Ida is horrible and
useless, so I've converted that factory to A6M2 as well, each of these factories I've then
increased to 30 points each, made sure there's more than 10000 supply in their base hexes and
then waited 30 or so days for the factories to fully repair. Great so now I have 2 extra, fully
repaired, 30 point, A6M2 factories, next step - upgrade them to A6M5!! They should convert
without a single point becoming damaged. Now I've got two factories each producing a research
point every turn, and in 50 days the availablity of A6M5 will advance 1 month closer!
But we're not finished yet, at Maebashi you've got R&D going on for the A6M5 already, problem is
the game starts with the factory at 10 points and they are all damaged, and that damage won't
repair itself in 10 days, in fact I doubt it would repair in 50 days! So what to do, no problem,
convert the factory to the earlier A6M2 model, increase it to 30 points and in 30 days you will
have another fully repaired factory - then convert it back to A6M5 - hey presto yet
another fully repaired, fully functioning R&D factory. Now you've got 3 R&D shops producing 3
R&D points every day, and in a little over one month your A6M5 will advance 1 month! Not
bad eh? But we're still not done! Because I've discovered that as of patch V1.01. 08r9 the
number of engines you have "in stock" can also help boost R&D. This is how it works - for the
A6M5 it uses an Ha-35 engine, if you can get your spare engine count up to 500 (and keep it there) you will receive an extra 1 point in R&D on all models that use this engine, every day! So now you have 4 R&D points being produced every day for the A6M5 and in just 25 days it will advance 1 month!

Of course you have to work out which models you want to persue like this and make sure that
their factories have an upgrade path, it's no use converting a whole bunch of factories to
B5N2's and then realising that they don't upgrade to the B6N1!!!

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 868
RE: 16Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 8/7/2012 12:45:29 PM   
Methuen

 

Posts: 21
Joined: 8/28/2009
From: Durban, South Africa
Status: offline
Another quick tip for increasing the size of a factory by an exact amount...





Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 869
RE: 16Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson - 8/7/2012 5:29:59 PM   
moore4807


Posts: 1089
Joined: 6/2/2000
From: Punta Gorda FL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: brotherbaldrick

As a side note I discovered something quite useful for improving Jap airframe R&D, it's really
obvious but it's taken me years to realize it! (a real Homer "Dow!" moment). So R&D works like
this: for every fully repaired research air-frame factory the game engine will check for
production in the same way as it does for factories that are actually in production, so if you
have a factory of 15 points you've got roughly a 50% chance that it will produce an air-frame in
any given turn, if you have a factory of 30 points it will produce an air-frame every
turn.


At the risk of being wrong. . . Your statement above is correct, however, succeeding without bankrupting the economy is not sustainable. My reasoning is highlighted in bold below.

13.2.2.4 AIRCRAFT FACTORIES
Aircraft Factories – These are the factories that mass produce the fighters, bombers, and other specialty planes used in the war effort. Each day, aircraft factories that are producing aircraft that are available for production (the date is equal to or later than their availability date) will attempt to produce aircraft. The number of factories in a location represents a monthly production rate. All aircraft produced are added to their country’s replacement pool.
For aircraft to be built, there must be Heavy Industry in the pool equal to 18 times the number of engines required to build each plane; when a plane is built, the appropriate number of Heavy Industry is consumed. For example, to produce a 2 engine plane, 36 Heavy Industry will be consumed, while a single engine plane consumes 18 Heavy Industry.
Each day, each location will build a number of aircraft equal to:
(Number Of Aircraft Factories + random number between 1 and 30) / 30. (Any fractions are rounded down.)

In order for these aircraft to be added to the replacement pool, there must be an equal number of aircraft engines of the appropriate type (see Engine Factories, below) required by the aircraft built (only for Japanese aircraft, Allied aircraft do not require engines) and heavy industry points equal to the number of engines required. These engines and heavy industry from their respective pools are expended when the aircraft are produced and placed in the replacement pool.
This also displays the number of engines mounted by each aircraft for which the player may exchange existing aircraft in the format “aircraft name (engine type x number of engines)”. In addition, the currently selected aircraft on the left of the pop-out has the number of engines mounted written immediately below the aircraft listing

quote:

The same thing happens for R&D, only here the factory produces 1 R&D point, when an air-frame
type being researched accumulates 100 points the date at which the air-frame becomes available
advances by 1 month (you can see this happening in WitP Tracker). Also some air-frame factories
can be upgraded to the next model without their factory points being damaged, so for instance
in scenario RA 4.6, the A6M2 upgrades to the A6M5.


Again true, but HOW are you producing enough HI, fuel and supply to have any war and production at the same time? I'm BARELY keeping Maebashi supplied from Tokyo by air to produce 56 A6M2's each month and the HI demands are more than I can keep up with, I'm paying repair points to expand HI first which will EVENTUALLY allow me to make more supply. What are your Shipyards, Armaments, and Vehicles doing?



13.3.1.1 AIRCRAFT FACTORY ALTERATIONS
Aircraft Factories– Players may convert an aircraft factory to create a different kind of aircraft. This change will cause a reduction in the number of aircraft factories, and damage to the remaining aircraft factories. Subtract the durability of the old aircraft from the durability of the new aircraft and the larger the value the greater the reduction (negative values will still cause a reduction). The choice of aircraft that can be selected for conversion will also depend on the selection of the Realism option “Realistic R&D” (see section 2.4.8)
Aircraft factories that exist prior to the availability date of the aircraft will be considered to be researching the aircraft and may move up the availability date of the aircraft. Aircraft factories will upgrade on their own to produce new models of aircraft when those aircraft become available (instant upgrade with no damage to factories). However, this will not happen prior to 1942. On January 1, 1942, all factories will upgrade if there is a new aircraft to upgrade to, and then thereafter factories will upgrade as new planes become available.

I hate being the killjoy, I think if you have done this and survived the economic chaos, then by all means I'm in! I am in late Jan42 in my game against TommyG (playing as the Japanese) and I'm having all kinds of problems sustaining supply and production... I did just as you did and streamlined my aircraft types to a couple engines and maximized production of those for a two year war plan. Little did I realize that I was going to use MASSIVE amounts of Supply and HI to pay for these "fixes".

My war plans are crimped due to supply issues (and my own incompetence!) and I'm just starting to see planes (A6M2 + Oscar fighter variants, Sally, Lily, Nell & Betty bombers) rolling off the line in any appreciable numbers. So far as I know the plants will upgrade to the A6M3/3A then the Sen Baku before the M5...am I wrong here? Even with your moving the A6M5 variant up on a month for month schedule it would take a year to get it into 1943 and the existing production would already be onto the Sen Baku??? (I'd rather have the Sen Baku then Oscars anyway...)



quote:

Now to the blindingly obvious:
What I've done is concentrate R&D and production on just a few a/c models and I've converted a
lot of other factories of less desirable models to just this select few. For instance the D5Y1
Myojo is a pile of cr*p, so I converted it to A6M2, likewise the Ki-36 Ida is horrible and
useless, so I've converted that factory to A6M2 as well, each of these factories I've then
increased to 30 points each, made sure there's more than 10000 supply in their base hexes and
then waited 30 or so days for the factories to fully repair. Great so now I have 2 extra, fully
repaired, 30 point, A6M2 factories, next step - upgrade them to A6M5!! They should convert
without a single point becoming damaged. Now I've got two factories each producing a research
point every turn, and in 50 days the availablity of A6M5 will advance 1 month closer!
But we're not finished yet, at Maebashi you've got R&D going on for the A6M5 already, problem is
the game starts with the factory at 10 points and they are all damaged, and that damage won't
repair itself in 10 days, in fact I doubt it would repair in 50 days! So what to do, no problem,
convert the factory to the earlier A6M2 model, increase it to 30 points and in 30 days you will
have another fully repaired factory - then convert it back to A6M5 - hey presto yet
another fully repaired, fully functioning R&D factory. Now you've got 3 R&D shops producing 3
R&D points every day, and in a little over one month your A6M5 will advance 1 month! Not
bad eh? But we're still not done! Because I've discovered that as of patch V1.01. 08r9 the
number of engines you have "in stock" can also help boost R&D. This is how it works - for the
A6M5 it uses an Ha-35 engine, if you can get your spare engine count up to 500 (and keep it there) you will receive an extra 1 point in R&D on all models that use this engine, every day! So now you have 4 R&D points being produced every day for the A6M5 and in just 25 days it will advance 1 month!

Of course you have to work out which models you want to persue like this and make sure that
their factories have an upgrade path, it's no use converting a whole bunch of factories to
B5N2's and then realising that they don't upgrade to the B6N1!!!



This post is from Damian in The Japan Econ 101 setup doc. it explains much better than I can...

quote:

ORIGINAL: icepharmy

Do engines advance separately from airframes? I understand that 1 R&D advance needs 1 R&D engine of the right type.

Separately, and that's right
quote:


In RA3 for example both the Judy and its engine the Aichi 60 appear at 42/10 with no research allocated. But lets say for example I want to advance both by a month.
Would that mean I need 100 R&D airframes plus 100 Aichi engines AND an additional 100 Aichi engines for the engine to move forward at the same rate as the airframe?

You need 100 points, not 100 engine factories (or airframes) to advance. I don't know about RA3, but I would say that R&D for engines and airframes seem to work at the same rate;So say you are getting 30(0) = 30 points/mth frames, you'll need the same for engines 30(0).
*1* Individual airframe factories are pretty much limited to 30 points per month. [Edit] Both frames and engines are inefficient over 30 R&D

quote:


Another example (and more important in this case) is the Nakajima Ha-45. Lets say I want to move the george from 43/5 to 43/3. That would mean that I would have to move the engine forward from 43/9 to 43/3. Would that mean I have to build enough Ha45 engines to get 200 engines just for the george advancement, plus X amount of engines to match R&D airframes for Franks,Frances,Peggys and 600 PLUS Ha-45 on top of those requirements?

If this is the way it works, then I would probably also need even more then the above numbers of extra engines, as die rolls mean not every 100 will produce a 1 month advance

Once again you are confusing factories with points. Points are accumulative, factories are per month. You just need to work on the same rate of advance.

So say you get all the George factories repaired by 11/42, giving you 4 months to produce 200 points for the 2 months advance. You'd need 200/4 = 50 points/mth = 30(0) + 20(0)

Whereas the engine factory can be 50(0) IIRC see *1* above. I will double check this with a test later to ease my mind.
[edit]Tested and I was incorrect, you'd need a 30(0) and a 20(0) engine factories too.
Cheers

< Message edited by n01487477 -- 11/30/2011 5:42:49 AM >

_____________________________

--Damian--


< Message edited by moore4807 -- 8/7/2012 5:32:46 PM >


_____________________________


(in reply to Methuen)
Post #: 870
Page:   <<   < prev  27 28 [29] 30 31   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: 17Jan42 Moo v. Fulkerson Page: <<   < prev  27 28 [29] 30 31   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.031