Maizuru 2nd SNLF

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

Maizuru 2nd SNLF

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> Maizuru 2nd SNLF

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

Maizuru 2nd SNLF - 8/20/2012 10:21:20 PM

Icedawg

Posts: 1610
Joined: 1/27/2006
From: Upstate New York
Status: offline

This unit has a fragment (4 SNLF squads and 4 support squads). Right now, I have it at Wake with the rest of the unit and I'd like to rebuild it, but I'm a bit leery to do so.

Is there some sort of base force that this fragment will turn into later, or is it just a bug that this fragment exists?

Post #: 1

RE: Maizuru 2nd SNLF - 8/21/2012 4:28:42 PM

bk19@mweb.co.za

Posts: 258
Joined: 7/26/2011
Status: offline

No technical reason not to rebuild it at all..

Go ahead.

(in reply to Icedawg)

Post #: 2

RE: Maizuru 2nd SNLF - 8/21/2012 5:45:36 PM

treespider

Posts: 9796
Joined: 1/30/2005
From: Edgewater, MD
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Icedawg

This unit has a fragment (4 SNLF squads and 4 support squads). Right now, I have it at Wake with the rest of the unit and I'd like to rebuild it, but I'm a bit leery to do so.

Is there some sort of base force that this fragment will turn into later, or is it just a bug that this fragment exists?

IIRC the fragment was introduced into the OOB during development because the Maizuru 2nd SNLF would be wiped out assaulting Wake. The fragment allowed the unit to rebuild... However subsequent patches have introduced the ability to rebuild destroyed units thus neutering the need for the fragment.

< Message edited by treespider -- 8/21/2012 5:46:41 PM >

_____________________________

Here's a link to:
Treespider's Grand Campaign of DBB

"It is not the critic who counts, .... The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena..." T. Roosevelt, Paris, 1910

(in reply to Icedawg)

Post #: 3

RE: Maizuru 2nd SNLF - 8/23/2012 4:48:44 PM

Icedawg

Posts: 1610
Joined: 1/27/2006
From: Upstate New York
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: treespider

quote:

ORIGINAL: Icedawg

This unit has a fragment (4 SNLF squads and 4 support squads). Right now, I have it at Wake with the rest of the unit and I'd like to rebuild it, but I'm a bit leery to do so.

Is there some sort of base force that this fragment will turn into later, or is it just a bug that this fragment exists?

IIRC the fragment was introduced into the OOB during development because the Maizuru 2nd SNLF would be wiped out assaulting Wake. The fragment allowed the unit to rebuild... However subsequent patches have introduced the ability to rebuild destroyed units thus neutering the need for the fragment.

Thanks for the clarification. I always wondered about this fragment. I'm glad to hear it has a logical reason for existing and is not some bug.

(in reply to treespider)

Post #: 4

RE: Maizuru 2nd SNLF - 8/24/2012 2:25:06 PM

Shark7

Posts: 7937
Joined: 7/24/2007
From: The Big Nowhere
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: treespider

quote:

ORIGINAL: Icedawg

This unit has a fragment (4 SNLF squads and 4 support squads). Right now, I have it at Wake with the rest of the unit and I'd like to rebuild it, but I'm a bit leery to do so.

Is there some sort of base force that this fragment will turn into later, or is it just a bug that this fragment exists?

IIRC the fragment was introduced into the OOB during development because the Maizuru 2nd SNLF would be wiped out assaulting Wake. The fragment allowed the unit to rebuild... However subsequent patches have introduced the ability to rebuild destroyed units thus neutering the need for the fragment.

Always wondered about that myself. Seems that you could now free up that slot to use for additional LCUs in a mod then.

_____________________________

Distant Worlds Fan

'When in doubt...attack!'

(in reply to treespider)

Post #: 5