Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Pseudo-historical setup

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War I] >> Commander - The Great War >> Pseudo-historical setup Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Pseudo-historical setup - 12/30/2012 10:06:18 AM   
JJKettunen


Posts: 3530
Joined: 3/12/2002
From: Finland
Status: offline
For your information, I've started to design a pseudo-historical setup for all the purists. Base units are Corps and reserve Corps. Austria's starting positions look like this (I haven't touched naval units yet):




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Jyri Kettunen

The eternal privilege of those who never act themselves: to interrogate, be dissatisfied, find fault.

- A. Solzhenitsyn
Post #: 1
RE: Pseudo-historical setup - 12/30/2012 10:06:57 AM   
JJKettunen


Posts: 3530
Joined: 3/12/2002
From: Finland
Status: offline
Here's the Serbian side:




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Jyri Kettunen

The eternal privilege of those who never act themselves: to interrogate, be dissatisfied, find fault.

- A. Solzhenitsyn

(in reply to JJKettunen)
Post #: 2
RE: Pseudo-historical setup - 12/30/2012 1:39:06 PM   
warspite1


Posts: 41353
Joined: 2/2/2008
From: England
Status: offline
...now if you could mod the counters so that the unit designation appears at an additional zoom in level then we are really talking!! Nice work!

Where is the 4th Serbian Army though?

_____________________________

England expects that every man will do his duty. Horatio Nelson October 1805



(in reply to JJKettunen)
Post #: 3
RE: Pseudo-historical setup - 12/30/2012 3:28:49 PM   
JJKettunen


Posts: 3530
Joined: 3/12/2002
From: Finland
Status: offline
What 4th Army?

_____________________________

Jyri Kettunen

The eternal privilege of those who never act themselves: to interrogate, be dissatisfied, find fault.

- A. Solzhenitsyn

(in reply to warspite1)
Post #: 4
RE: Pseudo-historical setup - 12/30/2012 3:38:13 PM   
warspite1


Posts: 41353
Joined: 2/2/2008
From: England
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Keke

What 4th Army?
warspite1

According to The World War One Source Book, the Serbian Army contained four armies:

The 1st, 2nd, 3rd and Uzhitse Army (or Army of the West) in addition to the independent brigades (which I assume are contained in the various Garrison units).

_____________________________

England expects that every man will do his duty. Horatio Nelson October 1805



(in reply to JJKettunen)
Post #: 5
RE: Pseudo-historical setup - 12/30/2012 5:00:45 PM   
JJKettunen


Posts: 3530
Joined: 3/12/2002
From: Finland
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1


quote:

ORIGINAL: Keke

What 4th Army?
warspite1

According to The World War One Source Book, the Serbian Army contained four armies:

The 1st, 2nd, 3rd and Uzhitse Army (or Army of the West) in addition to the independent brigades (which I assume are contained in the various Garrison units).


There was no 4th Army.

Ucize (choose your spelling) is currently represented by a garrison unit. It should be stronger (new unit type), but I'm not that far yet.


_____________________________

Jyri Kettunen

The eternal privilege of those who never act themselves: to interrogate, be dissatisfied, find fault.

- A. Solzhenitsyn

(in reply to warspite1)
Post #: 6
RE: Pseudo-historical setup - 12/30/2012 5:57:05 PM   
micha1100

 

Posts: 91
Joined: 12/26/2008
From: Germany
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Keke

For your information, I've started to design a pseudo-historical setup for all the purists. ...


Will you also do the Russian front?

(in reply to JJKettunen)
Post #: 7
RE: Pseudo-historical setup - 12/30/2012 6:21:18 PM   
JJKettunen


Posts: 3530
Joined: 3/12/2002
From: Finland
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: micha1100


quote:

ORIGINAL: Keke

For your information, I've started to design a pseudo-historical setup for all the purists. ...


Will you also do the Russian front?


Yes, of course. I will change the starting dates too (although I haven't yet figured out how).


_____________________________

Jyri Kettunen

The eternal privilege of those who never act themselves: to interrogate, be dissatisfied, find fault.

- A. Solzhenitsyn

(in reply to micha1100)
Post #: 8
RE: Pseudo-historical setup - 1/3/2013 11:32:15 AM   
JJKettunen


Posts: 3530
Joined: 3/12/2002
From: Finland
Status: offline
Latest: AH forces facing Russia.

edit: image removed, some errors there.

< Message edited by Keke -- 1/4/2013 5:43:22 PM >


_____________________________

Jyri Kettunen

The eternal privilege of those who never act themselves: to interrogate, be dissatisfied, find fault.

- A. Solzhenitsyn

(in reply to JJKettunen)
Post #: 9
RE: Pseudo-historical setup - 1/3/2013 5:24:52 PM   
fodder


Posts: 2160
Joined: 4/11/2010
From: Daytona Beach
Status: offline
Whoa, look at all them units.!

I assume you are raising the base PP to cover the upkeep of all these units.

If so will you be raising the PP of all countries equally?

_____________________________


(in reply to JJKettunen)
Post #: 10
RE: Pseudo-historical setup - 1/3/2013 6:44:26 PM   
JJKettunen


Posts: 3530
Joined: 3/12/2002
From: Finland
Status: offline
PPs will be adjusted according to test results.

_____________________________

Jyri Kettunen

The eternal privilege of those who never act themselves: to interrogate, be dissatisfied, find fault.

- A. Solzhenitsyn

(in reply to fodder)
Post #: 11
RE: Pseudo-historical setup - 1/5/2013 11:30:08 AM   
JJKettunen


Posts: 3530
Joined: 3/12/2002
From: Finland
Status: offline
Ok, I need to rethink the basic unit level, because with Corps the western front is going to be crammed with several rows of units...

_____________________________

Jyri Kettunen

The eternal privilege of those who never act themselves: to interrogate, be dissatisfied, find fault.

- A. Solzhenitsyn

(in reply to JJKettunen)
Post #: 12
RE: Pseudo-historical setup - 1/5/2013 9:08:12 PM   
JJKettunen


Posts: 3530
Joined: 3/12/2002
From: Finland
Status: offline
Ok, I think I have a proper unit scale now. Every German land unit here represents 4 divisions (regular or reserve), which basically means 2 Corps per unit.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Jyri Kettunen

The eternal privilege of those who never act themselves: to interrogate, be dissatisfied, find fault.

- A. Solzhenitsyn

(in reply to JJKettunen)
Post #: 13
RE: Pseudo-historical setup - 1/7/2013 11:20:20 AM   
JJKettunen


Posts: 3530
Joined: 3/12/2002
From: Finland
Status: offline
Ok, after some testing it is obvious that the AI can handle higher scale better. Here one infantry unit is 6 divisions, one garrison is 6 reserve divs:




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Jyri Kettunen

The eternal privilege of those who never act themselves: to interrogate, be dissatisfied, find fault.

- A. Solzhenitsyn

(in reply to JJKettunen)
Post #: 14
RE: Pseudo-historical setup - 1/7/2013 11:38:49 AM   
Myrddraal

 

Posts: 335
Joined: 11/13/2012
Status: offline
When playing on highest difficulty level, the AI uses some scripted opening moves for the Germans. Changing the starting setup may cause issues here, as the units you've put in place might have lower movement points or attack points making the scripted moves rather bad. It's easy to disable the scripted AI effects (although it might have other impacts on AI performance). Open up the scenario file (1914.lua) and change the scenario.scriptedAI line to = "default"

scenario.scriptedAI = "default"

Alternatively, you could make sure the units around Liege are the same types as the original, so the AI can still pull off its scripted moves.

(in reply to JJKettunen)
Post #: 15
RE: Pseudo-historical setup - 1/7/2013 11:46:38 AM   
JJKettunen


Posts: 3530
Joined: 3/12/2002
From: Finland
Status: offline
Thanks for the info!

_____________________________

Jyri Kettunen

The eternal privilege of those who never act themselves: to interrogate, be dissatisfied, find fault.

- A. Solzhenitsyn

(in reply to Myrddraal)
Post #: 16
RE: Pseudo-historical setup - 1/11/2013 11:16:32 AM   
JJKettunen


Posts: 3530
Joined: 3/12/2002
From: Finland
Status: offline
It was necessary to add third type of infantry. Currently the categories are:

A: 6 regular divisions
B: 4 regular or 6 reserve divisions
C: 2 regular or 3 reserve divisions

With those it is possible to keep correct strength balance between the fronts, while having enough counters for the less dense ones. As a consequence both AH and Serbia will be significantly weaker.







_____________________________

Jyri Kettunen

The eternal privilege of those who never act themselves: to interrogate, be dissatisfied, find fault.

- A. Solzhenitsyn

(in reply to JJKettunen)
Post #: 17
RE: Pseudo-historical setup - 1/11/2013 1:12:16 PM   
Myrddraal

 

Posts: 335
Joined: 11/13/2012
Status: offline
You could also use counters which start at half strength

(in reply to JJKettunen)
Post #: 18
RE: Pseudo-historical setup - 1/11/2013 2:14:09 PM   
JJKettunen


Posts: 3530
Joined: 3/12/2002
From: Finland
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Myrddraal

You could also use counters which start at half strength


How do you do that? Can the limit be permanent?

_____________________________

Jyri Kettunen

The eternal privilege of those who never act themselves: to interrogate, be dissatisfied, find fault.

- A. Solzhenitsyn

(in reply to Myrddraal)
Post #: 19
RE: Pseudo-historical setup - 1/12/2013 10:53:33 AM   
JJKettunen


Posts: 3530
Joined: 3/12/2002
From: Finland
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Keke


quote:

ORIGINAL: Myrddraal

You could also use counters which start at half strength


How do you do that? Can the limit be permanent?


I would really like have answers to these two questions please, because it could save a lot of needless work...


_____________________________

Jyri Kettunen

The eternal privilege of those who never act themselves: to interrogate, be dissatisfied, find fault.

- A. Solzhenitsyn

(in reply to JJKettunen)
Post #: 20
RE: Pseudo-historical setup - 1/14/2013 10:09:39 AM   
JJKettunen


Posts: 3530
Joined: 3/12/2002
From: Finland
Status: offline
So I guess it is impossible, eh?

I have to say that initial playtests with this mod show very promising results, especially against Entente AI. Russia is a threat!

_____________________________

Jyri Kettunen

The eternal privilege of those who never act themselves: to interrogate, be dissatisfied, find fault.

- A. Solzhenitsyn

(in reply to JJKettunen)
Post #: 21
RE: Pseudo-historical setup - 1/14/2013 11:22:21 AM   
Myrddraal

 

Posts: 335
Joined: 11/13/2012
Status: offline
Sorry Keke, haven't had a chance to browse these forums the last few days.

To add half strength units you have to first define the unit, then damage them in the scenario initialisation function (also in 1914.lua). The line should be something like:

GetHex(x,y).unit:Damage(50)

Although the caveat is that I'm writing that from the top of my head, so the syntax might be wrong.

(in reply to JJKettunen)
Post #: 22
RE: Pseudo-historical setup - 1/14/2013 12:01:48 PM   
JJKettunen


Posts: 3530
Joined: 3/12/2002
From: Finland
Status: offline
Ok, thanks. I'm pretty happy with the 3-level infantry setup, so I didn't need it for them, but for naval units it could be quite useful...

_____________________________

Jyri Kettunen

The eternal privilege of those who never act themselves: to interrogate, be dissatisfied, find fault.

- A. Solzhenitsyn

(in reply to Myrddraal)
Post #: 23
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War I] >> Commander - The Great War >> Pseudo-historical setup Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

2.172