Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

6 PT boats for a CVL

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> 6 PT boats for a CVL Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
6 PT boats for a CVL - 8/5/2013 2:06:09 PM   
catwhoorg


Posts: 686
Joined: 9/27/2012
From: Uk expat lving near Atlanta
Status: offline
Playing against the AI, it made the mistake of putting a carrier task force a little too close to shore near Lunga, which in late 1942 is a major Allied base.

The PT boats sallied forth, and in an engagement where they suffered about 50% casualties, put three torpedoes into the Ryujo and she is sunk.

I'll happily take that trade.


Whats the best return you have had for PT boats ? They appear to be gold in the close waters of the Solomon Islands.
Post #: 1
RE: 6 PT boats for a CVL - 8/5/2013 3:53:58 PM   
koniu


Posts: 2763
Joined: 2/28/2011
From: Konin, Poland, European Union
Status: offline
I my(Japan) game with Docup(Allies) after almost 600 turns Allies manage to sunk DD and send BB to shipyard for 5 month long repairs.

PT are very dangerous in nigh battles with low moon. Especially when they manage to surprise enemy. I must say they are PITA. Sending ships against them is always risky.

< Message edited by koniu -- 8/5/2013 4:02:08 PM >


_____________________________

"Only the Dead Have Seen the End of War"

(in reply to catwhoorg)
Post #: 2
RE: 6 PT boats for a CVL - 8/5/2013 4:02:07 PM   
nashvillen


Posts: 3836
Joined: 7/3/2006
From: Christiana, TN
Status: offline
I had a PT boat in one engagement absorb a valuable 18" round from the Yamato.

Does that count?

_____________________________


(in reply to koniu)
Post #: 3
RE: 6 PT boats for a CVL - 8/5/2013 4:03:05 PM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: nashvillen

I had a PT boat in one engagement absorb a valuable 18" round from the Yamato.

Does that count?

???... costs more than the PT boat, I imagine!

_____________________________


(in reply to nashvillen)
Post #: 4
RE: 6 PT boats for a CVL - 8/5/2013 4:12:16 PM   
koniu


Posts: 2763
Joined: 2/28/2011
From: Konin, Poland, European Union
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: witpqs


quote:

ORIGINAL: nashvillen

I had a PT boat in one engagement absorb a valuable 18" round from the Yamato.

Does that count?

???... costs more than the PT boat, I imagine!

Also much easier to replace PT that rearm 18" round

_____________________________

"Only the Dead Have Seen the End of War"

(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 5
RE: 6 PT boats for a CVL - 8/5/2013 4:14:24 PM   
catwhoorg


Posts: 686
Joined: 9/27/2012
From: Uk expat lving near Atlanta
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: koniu


quote:

ORIGINAL: witpqs


quote:

ORIGINAL: nashvillen

I had a PT boat in one engagement absorb a valuable 18" round from the Yamato.

Does that count?

???... costs more than the PT boat, I imagine!

Also much easier to replace PT that rearm 18" round


I laughed, because its true.

(in reply to koniu)
Post #: 6
RE: 6 PT boats for a CVL - 8/5/2013 4:14:35 PM   
nashvillen


Posts: 3836
Joined: 7/3/2006
From: Christiana, TN
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: koniu


quote:

ORIGINAL: witpqs


quote:

ORIGINAL: nashvillen

I had a PT boat in one engagement absorb a valuable 18" round from the Yamato.

Does that count?

???... costs more than the PT boat, I imagine!

Also much easier to replace PT that rearm 18" round

The rearming is the hard part, indeed!


_____________________________


(in reply to koniu)
Post #: 7
RE: 6 PT boats for a CVL - 8/5/2013 4:52:12 PM   
Lecivius


Posts: 4845
Joined: 8/5/2007
From: Denver
Status: offline
I seem to recall an AAR, or just a post, where Yamato took it on the chin from these & went down. An honest to God David vs. Goliath story.

(in reply to nashvillen)
Post #: 8
RE: 6 PT boats for a CVL - 8/5/2013 4:56:55 PM   
jeffk3510


Posts: 4132
Joined: 12/3/2007
From: Kansas
Status: offline
It was in Greyjoy's game vs Rader...right around GCanal area I think.

_____________________________

Life is tough. The sooner you realize that, the easier it will be.

Currently chasing three kids around the Midwest.

(in reply to Lecivius)
Post #: 9
RE: 6 PT boats for a CVL - 8/5/2013 7:43:18 PM   
Sieppo


Posts: 933
Joined: 12/15/2012
From: Helsinki, Finland
Status: offline
Some allied xAK's took multiple hits each from my BB's 36cm's before sinking at Port Moresby. Luckily they could rearm at Rabaul.. I was really astounded how they could take more than one..

_____________________________

> What is the hardest thing in the universe?
> A diamond?
> No. 500 machine gun men on a mountain.

(in reply to jeffk3510)
Post #: 10
RE: 6 PT boats for a CVL - 8/5/2013 11:50:42 PM   
spence

 

Posts: 5400
Joined: 4/20/2003
From: Vancouver, Washington
Status: offline
quote:

Some allied xAK's took multiple hits each from my BB's 36cm's before sinking at Port Moresby. Luckily they could rearm at Rabaul.. I was really astounded how they could take more than one..


An 18.1" hole extending from top to bottom or side to side of a merchie is not a fatal hit. The fuzes on those big rounds probably didn't even "know" that they passed through multiple layers of 3/8" mild steel.

(in reply to Sieppo)
Post #: 11
RE: 6 PT boats for a CVL - 8/6/2013 1:05:08 AM   
Lokasenna


Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline
I can't tell you how many times I've had Yamato fire at a ship, only to hit the superstructure... I want to see ship's side penetrated, damn it!

Despite being a big shell, if they blow up somewhere that doesn't cause flooding or fires, one hit on anything bigger than a patrol craft isn't going to sink it. Unfortunately... Those 18" shells are so hard to come by.

(in reply to spence)
Post #: 12
RE: 6 PT boats for a CVL - 8/6/2013 1:35:29 AM   
spence

 

Posts: 5400
Joined: 4/20/2003
From: Vancouver, Washington
Status: offline
Against a PT or a merchie those big shells won't explode at all. The armor piercing delayed action fuze needs something like armor to activate it. PTs are plywood. USS Gambier Bay was sunk by cruisers' fire. Even though the Yamato got in a few licks the shells just went right on through without exploding.

In general I have had little success with PTs. But in one PBEM I had PT32 and a pair of friends fight and survive 4 fights with IJN destroyers in which 3 of the latter became artificial reefs. The other PTs were sunk but PT32 scored on 2 of those DDs and ultimately escaped the PI to Darwin.

But on balance it takes quite a few multiples of 5 tons of plywood and 15 men or so to match up to 2000 tons of steel and 300 men (a DD). How many PTs does it take to pay for a Yamato? The victory point totals really don't tell the story very well.

(in reply to Lokasenna)
Post #: 13
RE: 6 PT boats for a CVL - 8/6/2013 2:33:40 AM   
DOCUP


Posts: 3073
Joined: 7/7/2010
Status: offline
I sunk a ship with my PTs..

(in reply to spence)
Post #: 14
RE: 6 PT boats for a CVL - 8/6/2013 12:24:38 PM   
dr.hal


Posts: 3335
Joined: 6/3/2006
From: Covington LA via Montreal!
Status: offline
During the early months I had a group of PTs stop an invasion as my opponent didn't have a strong escort. The moon was right (which appears to be essential for a successful attack) and I had changed out the lead ship's skipper to highly aggressive and high naval value. Part of the group was the British boats from Hong Kong! It was a beautiful thing to see! Surprised the you know what out of my opponent. As I recall a number of Merchants sunk with a WHOLE lot of troops swimming for it.

_____________________________


(in reply to DOCUP)
Post #: 15
RE: 6 PT boats for a CVL - 8/6/2013 4:08:46 PM   
pws1225

 

Posts: 1166
Joined: 8/9/2010
From: Tate's Hell, Florida
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: dr.hal

During the early months I had a group of PTs stop an invasion as my opponent didn't have a strong escort. The moon was right (which appears to be essential for a successful attack) and I had changed out the lead ship's skipper to highly aggressive and high naval value. Part of the group was the British boats from Hong Kong! It was a beautiful thing to see! Surprised the you know what out of my opponent. As I recall a number of Merchants sunk with a WHOLE lot of troops swimming for it.


Ugh! I remember. I hate PT boats!!

(in reply to dr.hal)
Post #: 16
RE: 6 PT boats for a CVL - 8/6/2013 4:46:36 PM   
dr.hal


Posts: 3335
Joined: 6/3/2006
From: Covington LA via Montreal!
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: pws1225

Ugh! I remember. I hate PT boats!!

Paul I wasn't going to point out WHO I was playing!

_____________________________


(in reply to pws1225)
Post #: 17
RE: 6 PT boats for a CVL - 8/6/2013 8:01:00 PM   
pws1225

 

Posts: 1166
Joined: 8/9/2010
From: Tate's Hell, Florida
Status: offline
No problem there, Hal. That little experience taught me to run some DDs in first to chase the little buggars away. But I still hate PT boats.

(in reply to dr.hal)
Post #: 18
RE: 6 PT boats for a CVL - 8/8/2013 3:10:44 AM   
topeverest


Posts: 3376
Joined: 10/17/2007
From: Houston, TX - USA
Status: offline
IME, PT's are best used in restricted water in low light moon turns using very aggressive commanders. They can devastate empire through the 'no radar' period. Lots of nasty tricks with PT's once you learn at sea refueling do's and don'ts. The biggest problem is the limited supply of them in 42.

_____________________________

Andy M

(in reply to pws1225)
Post #: 19
RE: 6 PT boats for a CVL - 8/9/2013 4:30:56 AM   
bigred


Posts: 3599
Joined: 12/27/2007
Status: offline
Off Rangoon in late 43 in Game w/ FatR pt309 put a torp into Musashi. IIRC FatR said it would take 300 days to repair. He was running Yamato and Musashi in same TF. Ship was along way from major port and FatR implied the ship may not be repaired before the end of the war.

< Message edited by bigred -- 8/9/2013 4:32:39 AM >


_____________________________

---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=2597400

(in reply to topeverest)
Post #: 20
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> 6 PT boats for a CVL Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

2.016