Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Japanese R&D Question (No Khyberbill Please)

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> Japanese R&D Question (No Khyberbill Please) Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Japanese R&D Question (No Khyberbill Please) - 9/21/2013 3:57:05 PM   
Icedawg


Posts: 1610
Joined: 1/27/2006
From: Upstate New York
Status: offline 		................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
................................................................................................................................................................................................................................

I know the Allied player has no information regarding the Japanese player's aircraft production numbers (which seems a bit inconsistent as the Japanese player knows the Allied player's values), but what about R&D?

Specifically, I was wondering if the Allied player has knowledge of the Japanese player's R&D advances. From the aircraft info screen, you can get the arrival date of each particular airframe and this changes as the Japanese player advances aircraft. Does the Allied player see this as well? I'm guessing the answer is yes, but confirmation would be nice.






Attachment (1)
Post #: 1
RE: Japanese R&D Question (No Khyberbill Please) - 9/21/2013 5:38:52 PM   
Lokasenna


Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline 		Did not know this.

Checking with my AI game loaded up as the Allies, it does appear that the date changes to match. Well then...

(in reply to Icedawg)
Post #: 2
RE: Japanese R&D Question (No Khyberbill Please) - 9/21/2013 6:30:00 PM   
n01487477


Posts: 4779
Joined: 2/21/2006
Status: offline 		Has been this way since the beginning ... same for tracker.

_____________________________

-Damian-
EconDoc
TrackerAE
Tutes&Java

(in reply to Icedawg)
Post #: 3
RE: Japanese R&D Question (No Khyberbill Please) - 9/21/2013 6:54:05 PM   
koniu


Posts: 2763
Joined: 2/28/2011
From: Konin, Poland, European Union
Status: offline 		This thread should be baned for all AFB not only Khyberbill

_____________________________

"Only the Dead Have Seen the End of War"

(in reply to n01487477)
Post #: 4
RE: Japanese R&D Question (No Khyberbill Please) - 9/21/2013 7:11:12 PM   
Icedawg


Posts: 1610
Joined: 1/27/2006
From: Upstate New York
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: n01487477

Has been this way since the beginning ... same for tracker.



Darn. Now I can't ambush him with hordes of Tojo IIcs, Oscar IIbs and A6M5cs in February 43. If he knows I've got 'em, he's not going to be flying much until he gets his P-51s and Corsairs. I had intentionally held off on upgrading my fighter units until they could all upgrade simultaneously. I was then hoping to catch him flying some 4Es into a trap. Looks like it's not going to happen now.

The best made plans of mice and JFBs oft go awry.

(in reply to n01487477)
Post #: 5
RE: Japanese R&D Question (No Khyberbill Please) - 9/21/2013 8:26:20 PM   
Numdydar

 

Posts: 3211
Joined: 2/13/2004
Status: offline 		Yes, but just because he knows you have them does not mean he knows WHERE you have them

(in reply to Icedawg)
Post #: 6
RE: Japanese R&D Question (No Khyberbill Please) - 9/21/2013 8:26:25 PM   
Xargun

 

Posts: 3690
Joined: 2/14/2004
From: Near Columbus, Ohio
Status: offline 		I wouldn't worry to much. I bet most (80%+) allied players do not know this or don't bother to look. We (JFBs) have a lot of advantages - knowing exactly what and when the allies produce (if you bother to look - personally I only bother myself with the first 6 months or so and only worry about CVs to be honest. I would rather play with variable reinforcements, but few players like that option) plus the ability to kick their butts for 18 months straight. So what if the allies get a bit of intel - its only good for 1 ambush anyways.

(in reply to Icedawg)
Post #: 7
RE: Japanese R&D Question (No Khyberbill Please) - 9/21/2013 8:35:16 PM   
Numdydar

 

Posts: 3211
Joined: 2/13/2004
Status: offline 		Exactly. AFBs know no matter what you do as Japan you will lose sooner or later . So why should they care ?

(in reply to Xargun)
Post #: 8
RE: Japanese R&D Question (No Khyberbill Please) - 9/22/2013 4:34:27 AM   
PaxMondo


Posts: 9750
Joined: 6/6/2008
Status: offline 		And truthfully, this is prolly pretty consistent with reality. The allies had such good intel. I'm not sure how intentional this is, but it doesn't really bug me. Good to know though if I ever play a PBEM.

_____________________________

Pax

(in reply to Numdydar)
Post #: 9
RE: Japanese R&D Question (No Khyberbill Please) - 9/22/2013 5:38:56 PM   
Bullwinkle58


Posts: 11302
Joined: 2/24/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: koniu

This thread should be baned for all AFB not only Khyberbill


Too late.

Good info. I did not know this and had never looked for it.

_____________________________

The Moose

(in reply to koniu)
Post #: 10
RE: Japanese R&D Question (No Khyberbill Please) - 9/22/2013 8:44:51 PM   
Lokasenna


Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: PaxMondo

And truthfully, this is prolly pretty consistent with reality. The allies had such good intel. I'm not sure how intentional this is, but it doesn't really bug me. Good to know though if I ever play a PBEM.


My thoughts too, but didn't know it was possible. I'm fine with the Allied player being rewarded if they pay attention to this much detail.

(in reply to PaxMondo)
Post #: 11
RE: Japanese R&D Question (No Khyberbill Please) - 9/22/2013 10:11:39 PM   
Icedawg


Posts: 1610
Joined: 1/27/2006
From: Upstate New York
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bullwinkle58


quote:

ORIGINAL: koniu

This thread should be baned for all AFB not only Khyberbill


Too late.

Good info. I did not know this and had never looked for it.


Oh no! I have inadvertently given highly valuable information to the enemy. Where is my sword? It is time to commit seppuku!

(in reply to Bullwinkle58)
Post #: 12
RE: Japanese R&D Question (No Khyberbill Please) - 9/23/2013 3:12:16 AM   
PaxMondo


Posts: 9750
Joined: 6/6/2008
Status: offline

_____________________________

Pax

(in reply to Icedawg)
Post #: 13
RE: Japanese R&D Question (No Khyberbill Please) - 9/23/2013 2:14:16 PM   
Bullwinkle58


Posts: 11302
Joined: 2/24/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Icedawg

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bullwinkle58


quote:

ORIGINAL: koniu

This thread should be baned for all AFB not only Khyberbill


Too late.

Good info. I did not know this and had never looked for it.


Oh no! I have inadvertently given highly valuable information to the enemy. Where is my sword? It is time to commit seppuku!


At a minimum. Buy a round before you go, hey?


_____________________________

The Moose

(in reply to Icedawg)
Post #: 14
RE: Japanese R&D Question (No Khyberbill Please) - 9/23/2013 3:07:16 PM   
obvert


Posts: 14050
Joined: 1/17/2011
From: PDX (and now) London, UK
Status: offline 		Very interesting. Good to know about for both sides.

So he'll know all about my jets coming right up then?

_____________________________

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill

(in reply to Bullwinkle58)
Post #: 15
RE: Japanese R&D Question (No Khyberbill Please) - 9/23/2013 5:44:34 PM   
Banzan

 

Posts: 288
Joined: 3/13/2010
From: Bremen, Germany
Status: offline 		I never thought of this.

I use the database very rarly to check for new seen aircrafts, never thought it may update on the release dates in game. :)

(in reply to obvert)
Post #: 16
RE: Japanese R&D Question (No Khyberbill Please) - 9/24/2013 3:38:12 AM   
Commander Stormwolf

 

Posts: 1623
Joined: 2/19/2008
Status: offline
the fact that the allied player knows the stats of the STOCK jap AC stats,
is a major disadvantage to japan

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P84llyNugqA

I suppose the answer is to only play against those who are historically inept



_____________________________

"No Enemy Survives Contact with the Plan" - Commander Stormwolf

(in reply to Banzan)
Post #: 17
RE: Japanese R&D Question (No Khyberbill Please) - 9/24/2013 3:39:48 AM   
Commander Stormwolf

 

Posts: 1623
Joined: 2/19/2008
Status: offline
the fighter 96 has an armored bucket seat.. and the fighter 97 has a 20mm cannon under its fuselage

_____________________________

"No Enemy Survives Contact with the Plan" - Commander Stormwolf

(in reply to Commander Stormwolf)
Post #: 18
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> Japanese R&D Question (No Khyberbill Please) Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.797