Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Some Dutch LCU errors

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> Scenario Design and Modding >> RE: Some Dutch LCU errors Page: <<   < prev  10 11 [12] 13 14   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Some Dutch LCU errors - 9/30/2013 10:34:07 PM   
John 3rd


Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Jo van der Pluym


LCU

5800 Mobiele Eenheid Bn has as 2nd weapon 984 180kmm CD Gun. It must be Vickers Carden-Lloyd Tanks. And does not need the suffix Bn.

5808 KNIL Mariener Bde. The Dutch Marines where no part of the KNIL but Navy. And Mariener mus Mariniers

5809 1st KNIL (T) Bde must be Tiger Bde. This was also no KNIL unit but volunteers of the Dutch Army

5823 Marinier Bn must be Mariniers Bn and also not a KNIL unit but Navy.

I do miss Korps Insulinde compagnie size Commando unit. This is also not a KNIL unit. But a part was from the KNIL.





What device are the Carden-Lloyd Tks?


_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to Jo van der Pluym)
Post #: 331
RE: Some Dutch LCU errors - 9/30/2013 10:37:57 PM   
Jo van der Pluym


Posts: 834
Joined: 10/28/2000
From: Valkenburg Lb, Netherlands
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: John 3rd

Should be easy enough to fix. Can you provide the stats for Korps Insulinde?




Here I have some links about it what I have posted on the forum.

http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=1637340&mpage=28&key=korps%2Cinsulinde�

http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=2884097&mpage=2&key=korps%2Cinsulinde�

http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=1135984&mpage=2&key=korps%2Cinsulinde�

http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=827786&mpage=1&key=korps%2Cinsulinde󊌲

http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=3075207&mpage=11&key=korps%2Cinsulinde�


_____________________________

Greetings from the Netherlands

Jo van der Pluym
CrazyDutch

(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 332
RE: Some Dutch LCU errors - 9/30/2013 10:42:02 PM   
Jo van der Pluym


Posts: 834
Joined: 10/28/2000
From: Valkenburg Lb, Netherlands
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: John 3rd


quote:

ORIGINAL: Jo van der Pluym


LCU

5800 Mobiele Eenheid Bn has as 2nd weapon 984 180kmm CD Gun. It must be Vickers Carden-Lloyd Tanks. And does not need the suffix Bn.

5808 KNIL Mariener Bde. The Dutch Marines where no part of the KNIL but Navy. And Mariener mus Mariniers

5809 1st KNIL (T) Bde must be Tiger Bde. This was also no KNIL unit but volunteers of the Dutch Army

5823 Marinier Bn must be Mariniers Bn and also not a KNIL unit but Navy.

I do miss Korps Insulinde compagnie size Commando unit. This is also not a KNIL unit. But a part was from the KNIL.





What device are the Carden-Lloyd Tks?




The following link goes about the KNIL armour.

http://mailer.fsu.edu/~akirk/tanks/Stories/Newsletter1-30-2/KNILArmor.html

The following link goes about Dutch armour, with for a part KNIL.

http://mailer.fsu.edu/~akirk/tanks/hol/Netherlands.htm


< Message edited by Jo van der Pluym -- 9/30/2013 10:57:47 PM >

_____________________________

Greetings from the Netherlands

Jo van der Pluym
CrazyDutch

(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 333
RE: Some Dutch LCU errors - 9/30/2013 10:58:32 PM   
John 3rd


Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline 		As to the CVE replacement squadrons (11F/11FB/14F/13F/13FB) I spread them out over the Commencement Bay, Black Island, Gilbert Islands, Cape Gloucester, and Vella Gulf. Just placed one unit/CVE. The remaining four detailed above are assigned as the squadrons for the new Varennes and Chateau Thierry. They shall come in with the CVLs.


_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to Jo van der Pluym)
Post #: 334
RE: Some Dutch LCU errors - 9/30/2013 11:01:12 PM   
Cpt Sherwood

 

Posts: 837
Joined: 12/1/2005
From: A Very Nice Place in the USA
Status: offline 		It doesn't matter what you do, it is your mod, have fun.

< Message edited by Cpt Sherwood -- 9/30/2013 11:02:03 PM >

_____________________________

“Luck is what happens when preparation meets opportunity.” ― Lucius Annaeus Seneca

(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 335
RE: Some Dutch LCU errors - 9/30/2013 11:08:44 PM   
John 3rd


Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline 		The CVLs have to come in with organic aircraft squadrons. Makes sense to pull four replacement squadrons and 'deploy' them.

A better use for two of the replacement squadrons was to turn them into 'Training Squadrons' that are available Day ONE on Dec 7th. The whole goal is to provide some real opportunity for the Allied Player to form a limited training program like what the Japanese get. Eight squadrons (3 Army/3 Navy/2 Marine) SHOULD provide just that!


< Message edited by John 3rd -- 9/30/2013 11:09:36 PM >

_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to Cpt Sherwood)
Post #: 336
RE: Some Dutch LCU errors - 9/30/2013 11:15:22 PM   
John 3rd


Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline 		As to the Dutch Comments Jo makes I see some room to work but am also limited by the Editor:

5800 Mobiele Eenheid Bn: Dropped device 984 and replaced with 18 Alvis Armored Cars. While not accurate (since the Carden-Lloyd Tks are not in the database) the Armored Cars provide at least a 'spirit' to the unit instead of something that did not exist with the unit (180kmm CD Guns). If there is something existing in the device list that is closer Jo please let me know.

5808 Cannot be changed from KNIL colors to Navy because that option is not in the Editor.

5809 Fixed to simply Tiger Bde.

5823 Same issue as 5808.


_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 337
Dutch LCU errors - 9/30/2013 11:20:52 PM   
John 3rd


Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline 		Neglected to say I changed the name of 5808 as well. Only problem was running out of space. Had to cut off the --s.





Attachment (1)

_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 338
RE: Dutch LCU errors - 9/30/2013 11:53:37 PM   
John 3rd


Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline 		Got the Group Email list put together and will use it once this is wrapped up.

_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 339
RE: Dutch LCU errors - 10/1/2013 12:58:24 PM   
John 3rd


Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline 		I open the store this morning. If no other suggestions or reports of errors occurs between now and then, I'll shoot the revised scenario files with all the fixes to the group email. Will Post when I do that.


_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 340
RE: Dutch LCU errors - 10/1/2013 10:51:54 PM   
John 3rd


Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline 		Having seen nothing more come in I am going to send the files to everyone on my Group List. If you do not see the revised 6.2 Files, email me and let me know.

We are done tinkering around. The whole air group and missing FP issue was serious enough to warrant stopping and correcting. Unless there is a game breaker, we now move forward playing. If little things are spotted, please email me and I shall keep a 'change list' going. Thanks for everyone's participation in finding the issues!

Look to your 'in box'....


_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 341
RE: Dutch LCU errors - 10/2/2013 6:39:47 AM   
John 3rd


Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline 		Looks like everyone got their files. HAVE FUN!

Anyone else interested just needs to send me their email address.


_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 342
RE: Dutch LCU errors - 10/2/2013 1:41:12 PM   
Cpt Sherwood

 

Posts: 837
Joined: 12/1/2005
From: A Very Nice Place in the USA
Status: offline 		For anyone playing as Allies, the following VRF squadrons are not replenishment squadrons, you will need to use them as regular air units. I hope this will negate some confusion later in the game.

VRF-12F
VRF-12T
VRF-14F
VRF-14T
VRF-15F
VRF-15T
VRF-16F
VRF-16B
VRF-17F
VRF-17B
VRF-18F
VRF-18B


< Message edited by Cpt Sherwood -- 10/2/2013 1:42:18 PM >

_____________________________

“Luck is what happens when preparation meets opportunity.” ― Lucius Annaeus Seneca

(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 343
RE: Dutch LCU errors - 10/2/2013 1:57:48 PM   
Cpt Sherwood

 

Posts: 837
Joined: 12/1/2005
From: A Very Nice Place in the USA
Status: offline 		If anyone needs a Tracker Region Definition file, email me and I will send it to you.

_____________________________

“Luck is what happens when preparation meets opportunity.” ― Lucius Annaeus Seneca

(in reply to Cpt Sherwood)
Post #: 344
RE: Dutch LCU errors - 10/3/2013 9:47:23 AM   
thinman

 

Posts: 19
Joined: 9/24/2013
Status: offline 		Hi John,

FUSO-BB can convert to ISE- and FUSO-Hybrid. No conversion from ISE-BB to ISE-Hybrid avaiable. Bind 104 + 105 (only ISE-BB). Was reporting that some days ago.

< Message edited by thinman -- 10/3/2013 10:06:52 AM >

(in reply to Cpt Sherwood)
Post #: 345
RE: Dutch LCU errors - 10/3/2013 2:40:10 PM   
John 3rd


Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline 		I'll start a list. Thought that was OK when I looked earlier. Will check again.

We are rolling and I hope everyone has FUN!


_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to thinman)
Post #: 346
RE: Dutch LCU errors - 10/3/2013 5:34:14 PM   
Symon


Posts: 1928
Joined: 11/24/2012
From: De Eye-lands, Mon
Status: offline 		Hi John,

Hit a speed bump on the plane work. have to do interactions with bomber operational ceilings. Think best thing for me to do is just finish the project in Babes context (with all the data changes in red in the spreadsheets) and do a manual port into your RA Airplane file and send you a final copy. You can see most of the new stuff in the Babes spreadsheets and I'll try my best to remember how I extrapolated to any of your (shall we say, interesting) alternatives.

Sorry 'bout this. JWE

_____________________________

Nous n'avons pas peur! Vive la liberté! Moi aussi je suis Charlie!
Yippy Ki Yay.

(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 347
RE: Dutch LCU errors - 10/3/2013 11:44:22 PM   
John 3rd


Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Symon

Hi John,

Hit a speed bump on the plane work. have to do interactions with bomber operational ceilings. Think best thing for me to do is just finish the project in Babes context (with all the data changes in red in the spreadsheets) and do a manual port into your RA Airplane file and send you a final copy. You can see most of the new stuff in the Babes spreadsheets and I'll try my best to remember how I extrapolated to any of your (shall we say, interesting) alternatives.

Sorry 'bout this. JWE


That will be fine John. I have a game starting and we'll look at your creation when it is finished. When you want to do that import please let me know and I shall send you the latest files.

Good luck and stay with it!


_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to Symon)
Post #: 348
RE: Dutch LCU errors - 10/6/2013 3:10:17 AM   
Cpt Sherwood

 

Posts: 837
Joined: 12/1/2005
From: A Very Nice Place in the USA
Status: offline 		John, I think ship class 280 is supposed to be New Zealand instead of British.
It is part of bind 382, but the other two classes are New Zealand and you can
not make a class 280.


_____________________________

“Luck is what happens when preparation meets opportunity.” ― Lucius Annaeus Seneca

(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 349
RE: Playtesting RA 6.0 - 10/7/2013 12:35:27 AM   
pcellsworth

 

Posts: 47
Joined: 4/28/2013
Status: offline 		Algerie - authorized in 1930, this vessel was the last and best French 'treaty' cruiser, and one of the most outstanding examples of the type in any navy. A radical departure from the widely criticized 'tin-clad' heavy cruisers, she was built in response to the Italian Zara class. Armor weight totaled 2657 tons compared with 1553 tons in the preceding Dupleix class and it was better distributed; emphasis was placed on protection against aerial bombs and underwater attack, an extensive torpedo bulkhead being separated from the main belt by oil and coal(?) bunkers.

Strange that a cruiser designed in 1929/30 would have coal bunkers.

(in reply to DOCUP)
Post #: 350
RE: Playtesting RA 6.0 - 10/7/2013 4:35:44 PM   
Lecivius


Posts: 4845
Joined: 8/5/2007
From: Denver
Status: offline 		Just fired up an R6 Allies vs. AI game. Two things in my first few hours of observation.

The art for Charlottesville is not showing up. It does for the new French ships. What did I miss?

The AI, so far, is incredibly weak. I’m into January & I still hold most of Malaysia. And I have all my units in Singapore. Hong Kong still stands. Wake is still mine, as the AI only tried to take it with a small unit on 2 PB’s. Sothern Borneo remains uncontested, as does everything south of it. Same with Sumatra and the Celebes. Rabaul is still uncontested.

I realize this game is already toast, I’m just playing for a few game months to see what else happens. In RA 4.6 the AI was a LOT more aggressive. I am not sure what changes impacted what with this regard.

(in reply to pcellsworth)
Post #: 351
RE: Playtesting RA 6.0 - 10/7/2013 9:22:11 PM   
John 3rd


Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lecivius

Just fired up an R6 Allies vs. AI game. Two things in my first few hours of observation.

The art for Charlottesville is not showing up. It does for the new French ships. What did I miss?

The AI, so far, is incredibly weak. I’m into January & I still hold most of Malaysia. And I have all my units in Singapore. Hong Kong still stands. Wake is still mine, as the AI only tried to take it with a small unit on 2 PB’s. Sothern Borneo remains uncontested, as does everything south of it. Same with Sumatra and the Celebes. Rabaul is still uncontested.

I realize this game is already toast, I’m just playing for a few game months to see what else happens. In RA 4.6 the AI was a LOT more aggressive. I am not sure what changes impacted what with this regard.



How are you Sir?

Charlotte's Art is in the art folder along with the B-64 Command Cruiser. Take another look. They should be there.

I've gotten mixed reviews on RA vs. the AI. Sounds like you have had BOTH extremes!

Let me know about the art. I can send again if needed.


_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to Lecivius)
Post #: 352
RE: Playtesting RA 6.0 - 10/7/2013 9:22:47 PM   
John 3rd


Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: pcellsworth

Algerie - authorized in 1930, this vessel was the last and best French 'treaty' cruiser, and one of the most outstanding examples of the type in any navy. A radical departure from the widely criticized 'tin-clad' heavy cruisers, she was built in response to the Italian Zara class. Armor weight totaled 2657 tons compared with 1553 tons in the preceding Dupleix class and it was better distributed; emphasis was placed on protection against aerial bombs and underwater attack, an extensive torpedo bulkhead being separated from the main belt by oil and coal(?) bunkers.

Strange that a cruiser designed in 1929/30 would have coal bunkers.


Algerie got buffed up some due to comments from the playtesters. She is oil-fired in 1941.


_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to pcellsworth)
Post #: 353
RE: Playtesting RA 6.0 - 10/8/2013 3:29:38 PM   
Skyland


Posts: 280
Joined: 2/8/2007
From: France
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: John 3rd


quote:

ORIGINAL: pcellsworth

Algerie - authorized in 1930, this vessel was the last and best French 'treaty' cruiser, and one of the most outstanding examples of the type in any navy. A radical departure from the widely criticized 'tin-clad' heavy cruisers, she was built in response to the Italian Zara class. Armor weight totaled 2657 tons compared with 1553 tons in the preceding Dupleix class and it was better distributed; emphasis was placed on protection against aerial bombs and underwater attack, an extensive torpedo bulkhead being separated from the main belt by oil and coal(?) bunkers.

Strange that a cruiser designed in 1929/30 would have coal bunkers.


Algerie got buffed up some due to comments from the playtesters. She is oil-fired in 1941.



No coal or coal bunkers on Algerie. Except may be for BBQ.


_____________________________

War Options 1941 mod : https://sites.google.com/site/waroptionswitpaemod/

(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 354
RE: Playtesting RA 6.0 - 10/8/2013 10:18:07 PM   
John 3rd


Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Skyland


quote:

ORIGINAL: John 3rd


quote:

ORIGINAL: pcellsworth

Algerie - authorized in 1930, this vessel was the last and best French 'treaty' cruiser, and one of the most outstanding examples of the type in any navy. A radical departure from the widely criticized 'tin-clad' heavy cruisers, she was built in response to the Italian Zara class. Armor weight totaled 2657 tons compared with 1553 tons in the preceding Dupleix class and it was better distributed; emphasis was placed on protection against aerial bombs and underwater attack, an extensive torpedo bulkhead being separated from the main belt by oil and coal(?) bunkers.

Strange that a cruiser designed in 1929/30 would have coal bunkers.



Hey Skyland! Just how much do the French BBQ?

You've got to like having some of your Frenchies in the Mod...

Algerie got buffed up some due to comments from the playtesters. She is oil-fired in 1941.



No coal or coal bunkers on Algerie. Except may be for BBQ.



Hey Skyland! How much BBQ do the French do?

Bet you like having some of your Frenchies in the Mod...


< Message edited by John 3rd -- 10/8/2013 10:19:45 PM >

_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to Skyland)
Post #: 355
RE: Playtesting RA 6.0 - 10/12/2013 1:13:20 AM   
ny59giants


Posts: 9869
Joined: 1/10/2005
Status: offline 		Bake Island (ID 607) shows up as AF, not Base. Thus, you cannot build up the port.

Tom (Mr Kane) upgraded data base to 6.2 and I still DON'T have any aircraft on CVB Midway or FDR.

_____________________________


(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 356
RE: Playtesting RA 6.0 - 10/12/2013 4:39:44 AM   
Cpt Sherwood

 

Posts: 837
Joined: 12/1/2005
From: A Very Nice Place in the USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ny59giants

Bake Island (ID 607) shows up as AF, not Base. Thus, you cannot build up the port.

Tom (Mr Kane) upgraded data base to 6.2 and I still DON'T have any aircraft on CVB Midway or FDR.


My CVBs have air units assigned. Maybe you need to get the ones John used.

_____________________________

“Luck is what happens when preparation meets opportunity.” ― Lucius Annaeus Seneca

(in reply to ny59giants)
Post #: 357
RE: Playtesting RA 6.0 - 10/12/2013 4:39:48 AM   
John 3rd


Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline 		How is that possible?

IT IS FIXED.

Everyone checked....


_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to ny59giants)
Post #: 358
RE: Playtesting RA 6.0 - 10/12/2013 4:43:28 AM   
John 3rd


Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline 		Dammit Michael. It isn't.

Think I'm gonna sharpen my Katana right now...


_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 359
RE: Playtesting RA 6.0 - 10/14/2013 12:32:32 PM   
Cavalry Corp

 

Posts: 3107
Joined: 9/2/2003
From: Sampford Spiney Devon UK
Status: offline 		John,

May I have the 6.2 files I had 6 so assume I just need to replace all the scn files only?

gingerdragon@btconnect.com

Many Thanks
michael

(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 360
Page:   <<   < prev  10 11 [12] 13 14   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> Scenario Design and Modding >> RE: Some Dutch LCU errors Page: <<   < prev  10 11 [12] 13 14   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.110