Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Missile Miss Distances - Should be Kills not Misses

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> Tech Support >> Missile Miss Distances - Should be Kills not Misses Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Missile Miss Distances - Should be Kills not Misses - 10/8/2013 9:28:51 PM   
bsq


Posts: 517
Joined: 1/5/2007
Status: offline 		I am increasingly noticing that missiles are being reported as a miss with miss distance of single digit metres. Except in the case of 'hittle's' such a small miss distance is actually a 'hit' as the prox fuze and B/F warhead does its 'thing'.

I guess I will be asked for a save file of this, but I am sure anyone could model this and show it to be true.

I noticed in mainly with AGM-88's doing some profile modelling against an SA-20 and saw reported misses of 4 metres, 6 metres etc. AGM-88 has a fragmentation warhead that would not work as advertised if the missile bullseyed the target, it needs to pass close to activate the fuze and then 'spread the love' of all those tungsten fragments.
Post #: 1
RE: Missile Miss Distances - Should be Kills not Misses - 10/8/2013 9:37:36 PM   
MaB1708

 

Posts: 336
Joined: 8/13/2006
From: Freiburg(Germany)
Status: offline
quote:

but I am sure anyone could model this and show it to be true.


such is the case, indeed.

(in reply to bsq)
Post #: 2
RE: Missile Miss Distances - Should be Kills not Misses - 10/8/2013 9:51:28 PM   
ExMachina


Posts: 462
Joined: 9/25/2013
Status: offline 		Does CMANO maybe factor proximity fusing into it's hit/miss probabilities?

(in reply to MaB1708)
Post #: 3
RE: Missile Miss Distances - Should be Kills not Misses - 10/8/2013 9:53:27 PM   
Der Zeitgeist


Posts: 280
Joined: 9/5/2013
Status: offline 		The status message you get from these "misses" seems misleading, as in most of these cases, a lot of damage is done to the target, which can be checked with god's eye view in the editor. It seems to be mostly an issue with data presentation to the player.

(in reply to MaB1708)
Post #: 4
RE: Missile Miss Distances - Should be Kills not Misses - 10/8/2013 10:04:55 PM   
ExMachina


Posts: 462
Joined: 9/25/2013
Status: offline
quote:

The status message you get from these "misses" seems misleading, as in most of these cases, a lot of damage is done to the target, which can be checked with god's eye view in the editor. It seems to be mostly an issue with data presentation to the player


Interesting and good to know. Since air burst (and air burst distance from target) are reported for surface shell fire, then the player would expect to be informed of all air bursts.

(in reply to Der Zeitgeist)
Post #: 5
RE: Missile Miss Distances - Should be Kills not Misses - 10/8/2013 10:07:03 PM   
Dimitris

 

Posts: 13282
Joined: 7/31/2005
Status: offline 		I was writing here a diatribe on that but the @#%$@#%$@# ASP.NET session expired and the message was lost.

Long story short: With explosive & frag warheads this already happens in the game. Frags in particular are deadly against personnel & soft vehicles at up to a few tens of meters (depending on warhead).

Try a HARM attack in ScenEdit and once the impacts occur switch to the other side and observe the message log & damage stats for each target. More often than not, you'll see results.

_____________________________

Facebook
Twitter

(in reply to ExMachina)
Post #: 6
RE: Missile Miss Distances - Should be Kills not Misses - 10/8/2013 10:11:31 PM   
MaB1708

 

Posts: 336
Joined: 8/13/2006
From: Freiburg(Germany)
Status: offline 		So, Zeitgeist, what you are saying is that "misses the target by 10 m" does not mean that no damage is done. Target is penetrated to some extend (based amongst other on impact distance) and the message in the log just alludes to the fact that weapon is not fully on target. Message does not mean that target got away with no damage.

(in reply to ExMachina)
Post #: 7
RE: Missile Miss Distances - Should be Kills not Misses - 10/9/2013 6:27:12 AM   
Der Zeitgeist


Posts: 280
Joined: 9/5/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MartinB

So, Zeitgeist, what you are saying is that "misses the target by 10 m" does not mean that no damage is done. Target is penetrated to some extend (based amongst other on impact distance) and the message in the log just alludes to the fact that weapon is not fully on target. Message does not mean that target got away with no damage.



Exactly.

(in reply to MaB1708)
Post #: 8
RE: Missile Miss Distances - Should be Kills not Misses - 10/10/2013 12:03:53 AM   
opfor06

 

Posts: 7
Joined: 10/2/2013
Status: offline 		I have been playing a China vs India scenario and I had several instances of YJ-83 or YJ-62 missing by 10m or less and cause no damage to the ship it was targeted on. (It was my ship and I checked the damage to be sure) I am not sure if this is because it is a missile hitting open water or it means it overflew to high or what. I am far from an expert on what would happen to a modern naval vessel that had a 600Kg warhead impact 9m away but I would think it would cause at least some damage. I know that 500lber near misses in WW2 often caused damage to ships so I would image a larger modern warhead would do the same.

Land targets seem to be effected by near misses, light damage and fires often occur.

(in reply to Der Zeitgeist)
Post #: 9
RE: Missile Miss Distances - Should be Kills not Misses - 10/10/2013 5:29:34 PM   
bsq


Posts: 517
Joined: 1/5/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Boochar

I have been playing a China vs India scenario and I had several instances of YJ-83 or YJ-62 missing by 10m or less and cause no damage to the ship it was targeted on. (It was my ship and I checked the damage to be sure) I am not sure if this is because it is a missile hitting open water or it means it overflew to high or what. I am far from an expert on what would happen to a modern naval vessel that had a 600Kg warhead impact 9m away but I would think it would cause at least some damage. I know that 500lber near misses in WW2 often caused damage to ships so I would image a larger modern warhead would do the same.

Land targets seem to be effected by near misses, light damage and fires often occur.


If the fuze is modeled to be an impact, delayed type, then a miss is a miss. Many antiship missiles are designed to explode inside the ship expending both warhead and unspent fuel to cause max damage and have no proximity setting.

(in reply to opfor06)
Post #: 10
RE: Missile Miss Distances - Should be Kills not Misses - 10/10/2013 6:08:08 PM   
opfor06

 

Posts: 7
Joined: 10/2/2013
Status: offline 		I can understand the lack of a proximity fuse (though I would think most modern missiles would have one even if it is not the primary). It is the radius of the shrapnel and blast once it hits just like weapons that just miss land targets to a lesser degree. If it is supposed to be like this then so be it. If it is supposed to cause some damage then there is a bug.

(in reply to bsq)
Post #: 11
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> Tech Support >> Missile Miss Distances - Should be Kills not Misses Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.906