Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Battle for Bangkok begins!

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Battle for Bangkok begins! Page: <<   < prev  69 70 [71] 72 73   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Battle for Bangkok begins! - 10/13/2013 5:32:58 PM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Cannonfodder

If you want to close the hexsides you'll have to cross the river (and shock on each hexside). There is no other way to isolate a hex completely if it is already occupied by enemy forces.


I was afraid of that. Looks like 4 of the US EABs in the area suddenly had their life expectancy drop dramatically all of the sudden!


(in reply to KenchiSulla)
Post #: 2101
RE: Battle for Bangkok begins! - 10/13/2013 5:35:47 PM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline
You can be the only side with a unit in the adjacent hex instead of actually crossing the hex side. Consider that each hex has its own hex sides. So, that means each hex boundary has two hex sides, one that is part of each adjacent hex.

Let's use Pegu (the hex east of Rangoon) as an example of a siege of Rangoon. Let's say that defender owns the east hex side of the Rangoon hex. Pegu is unoccupied. Now, attacker moves a unit into Pegu. That means attacker (the only player in the hex) owns all six hex sides in Pegu. As far as the boundary between Rangoon and Pegu, the defender owns the Rangoon side and the attacker owns the Pegu side. Supply will not pass because you must own both halves of the boundary between the hexes.

Next the defender moves a relief force (unit) up from Moulmein. The unit enters Pegu, which gives the defender ownership of the SE side of the Pegu hex. Supply still will not pass because that boundary between Rangoon and Pegu because the boundary between them is still not fully owned by the defender. To get supply moving, the defender would have to A) evict the attacker from Pegu, or B) move a unit from Rangoon to Pegu via that boundary, thereby taking ownership of that hex side within Pegu.

So if the attacker gets there first, they can sit as a blocking force and require the defender to somehow change things.

_____________________________


(in reply to KenchiSulla)
Post #: 2102
RE: Battle for Bangkok begins! - 10/13/2013 6:05:52 PM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: witpqs

You can be the only side with a unit in the adjacent hex instead of actually crossing the hex side. Consider that each hex has its own hex sides. So, that means each hex boundary has two hex sides, one that is part of each adjacent hex.

Let's use Pegu (the hex east of Rangoon) as an example of a siege of Rangoon. Let's say that defender owns the east hex side of the Rangoon hex. Pegu is unoccupied. Now, attacker moves a unit into Pegu. That means attacker (the only player in the hex) owns all six hex sides in Pegu. As far as the boundary between Rangoon and Pegu, the defender owns the Rangoon side and the attacker owns the Pegu side. Supply will not pass because you must own both halves of the boundary between the hexes.

Next the defender moves a relief force (unit) up from Moulmein. The unit enters Pegu, which gives the defender ownership of the SE side of the Pegu hex. Supply still will not pass because that boundary between Rangoon and Pegu because the boundary between them is still not fully owned by the defender. To get supply moving, the defender would have to A) evict the attacker from Pegu, or B) move a unit from Rangoon to Pegu via that boundary, thereby taking ownership of that hex side within Pegu.

So if the attacker gets there first, they can sit as a blocking force and require the defender to somehow change things.


Using you example the defender in Rangoon is still free to move to the Pegu hex right? Because he "owns" the Rangoon hex so he is free to move out of it however he wants.

This is what I want to avoid. Erik has 2000 AV in Bangkok and I don´t want to guard 5 possible escape routes. I want to close the hexsides so he can´t move out Rangoon. And the only way to do that is to "sucide cross" the river from each possible way out from Bangkok. Right?

(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 2103
RE: Battle for Bangkok begins! - 10/13/2013 6:08:46 PM   
Lokasenna


Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline
If you control the hexes outside of it though, they won't be able to retreat. You just have to hold the hexes. Which can be hard.

(in reply to KenchiSulla)
Post #: 2104
RE: Battle for Bangkok begins! - 10/13/2013 6:09:50 PM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline
Right - he could move from Rangoon to Pegu. If you want to actually own all the hex sides for a given hex that you are not the sole occupier of, then you must move into that hex across each of the enemy-owned hex sides.

_____________________________


(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 2105
RE: Battle for Bangkok begins! - 10/13/2013 6:11:03 PM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lokasenna

If you control the hexes outside of it though, they won't be able to retreat. You just have to hold the hexes. Which can be hard.

Even just having a unit in a hex stops an enemy from retreating into that hex, regardless of hex side ownership.

_____________________________


(in reply to Lokasenna)
Post #: 2106
RE: Battle for Bangkok begins! - 10/13/2013 6:12:07 PM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lokasenna

If you control the hexes outside of it though, they won't be able to retreat. You just have to hold the hexes. Which can be hard.


Yes, Because some of them are in clear terrain and there are 5 of them! I´m not too keen on having a 6-8.000 AV garrison surrounding 2000 AV inside Bangkok!

< Message edited by JocMeister -- 10/13/2013 6:19:31 PM >

(in reply to Lokasenna)
Post #: 2107
RE: Battle for Bangkok begins! - 10/13/2013 6:42:54 PM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline
Don't bother to guard the ones where you would be happy tot have them retreat. How about the swamps to the left, for example?

_____________________________


(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 2108
RE: Battle for Bangkok begins! - 10/13/2013 7:48:10 PM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: witpqs

Don't bother to guard the ones where you would be happy tot have them retreat. How about the swamps to the left, for example?


True that. I would still feel a bit more comfortable if he couldn´t move around. And losing 4 small EABs at this stage ins´t that bad. Well, its not good but you know what I mean.

(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 2109
RE: Battle for Bangkok begins! - 10/13/2013 8:08:12 PM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline
Using EAB to flip a hex side against a massive army - I would just feel dirty after doing that!

_____________________________


(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 2110
RE: Battle for Bangkok begins! - 10/13/2013 8:20:34 PM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline
16-18th December -44
______________________________________________________________________________

An unexpected turn of events today!

------------------------
Thailand
------------------------

So, lets start with the big news. As I wrote in my last post Erik superstack has stopped moving since a few days back. Turns out he has been flying in supply to it. And he shock attacked.

I did not see that one coming...so I had moved out a bunch of troops to the NW to cover the next position when he shifted hex...

quote:

Ground combat at 55,59 (near Tavoy)

Japanese Shock attack

Attacking force 168715 troops, 2013 guns, 2438 vehicles, Assault Value = 5414

Defending force 79249 troops, 1291 guns, 968 vehicles, Assault Value = 2381

Japanese adjusted assault: 430

Allied adjusted defense: 5857

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 13

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), leaders(+)
Attacker: shock(+)

Japanese ground losses:
28212 casualties reported
Squads: 366 destroyed, 1920 disabled
Non Combat: 12 destroyed, 141 disabled
Engineers: 49 destroyed, 203 disabled
Guns lost 155 (21 destroyed, 134 disabled)
Vehicles lost 255 (81 destroyed, 174 disabled)


Allied ground losses:
664 casualties reported
Squads: 10 destroyed, 93 disabled
Non Combat: 8 destroyed, 63 disabled
Engineers: 3 destroyed, 11 disabled
Guns lost 96 (7 destroyed, 89 disabled)
Vehicles lost 68 (4 destroyed, 64 disabled)


Assaulting units:
16th Division
24th Ind.Mixed Brigade
79th Brigade
22nd Tank Regiment
5th Division
33rd Division
18th Division
2nd Guards Division
55th Division
39th Division
2nd Division
38th Division
2nd Tank Division
21st Division
3rd Tank Division

29th Ind.Mixed Brigade
75th Infantry Brigade
1st Ind.Mixed Regiment
19th Army
34th Field AA Battalion
10th RF Gun Battalion
1st RF Gun Battalion
25th Army
14th Mortar Battalion
2nd Hvy.Artillery Regiment
1st Medium Field Artillery Regiment
32nd Field AA Battalion
38th Field AA Battalion
2nd Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
56th Field AA Battalion
2nd Army
10th Ind. Mountain Gun Regiment
70th Field AA Battalion
11th RF Gun Battalion
5th Mortar Battalion
8th Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
11th Mortar Battalion
17th Medium Field Artillery Regiment
15th Army
28th Army
51st Field AA Battalion
1st Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
2nd RF Gun Battalion
33rd Road Const Co
68th Field AA Battalion
1st Hvy.Artillery Regiment
2nd Area Army
49th AA Machinecannon Company
8th RF Gun Battalion
5th Ind.Hvy.Art Battalion
40th Field AA Battalion
69th Field AA Battalion
10th Medium Field Artillery Regiment
Burma Area Army
14th RF Gun (Pack) Battalion
43rd Const Co
3rd Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
52nd Field AA Battalion
4th Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
3rd Medium Mortar Battalion
1st Air Defense AA Regiment
2nd Medium Mortar Battalion
3rd Mortar Battalion
27th Fld AA Gun Co
1st Art.Mortar Regiment
18th Medium Field Artillery Regiment
8th Medium Field Artillery Regiment
21st AA Regiment
39th Field AA Battalion
115th AA Regiment
20th AA Regiment
50th Field AA Battalion
7th JAAF Base Force


Defending units:
77th Chindit Brigade
14th Indian Division
9th Indian Division
26th Indian Division

111th Chindit Brigade
11th (East African) Division
2nd New Chinese Corps
33rd Indian Mountain Gun Regiment
8th Medium Regiment
X' Force
8th Belfast Heavy Regiment
86th Medium Regiment
NCAC
6th Medium Regiment
24th Indian Mountain Gun Regiment
6th Mixed A/T Mtr Regiment
23rd Indian Mountain Gun Regiment
87th Medium Regiment
28th Indian Mountain Gun Regiment
XXXIII Indian Corps
Provisional GMC Grp


Makes me pretty glad I kept the 4Es pounding and pounding. Kudos to Erik for trying. Without a doubt this was a deathblow to his stack and I´m going to leave them there to feed on each other until nothing is left of it.

This couldn´t have happened at a better time. The 3500 AV on the East side of his stack immediately set off towards Bangkok. It will be 2,5 week before they get there though. They will take over the siege of Bangkok. Another 1500 AV worth of Indian divisions also set off towards central Thailand. I´ll leave the Chinese to deal whats left while we move for Indochina.

Bangkok turned out to be a tougher nut then expected. Looks like Erik has decided to make a stand here. No movement out so far. I have a US corp on the East side and a Indian/British corps on the West side. I will not invest in Bangkok right now.

quote:

Ground combat at Bangkok (56,62)

Allied Bombardment attack

Attacking force 70917 troops, 1319 guns, 943 vehicles, Assault Value = 3037

Defending force 80874 troops, 851 guns, 523 vehicles, Assault Value = 1933

Japanese ground losses:
72 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 5 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Allied ground losses:
303 casualties reported
Squads: 3 destroyed, 29 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 9 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 3 disabled
Guns lost 19 (4 destroyed, 15 disabled)
Vehicles lost 7 (1 destroyed, 6 disabled)


Assaulting units:
XXXIII Corps Engineer Battalion
XV Corps Engineer Battalion
209th Combat Engineer Battalion
41st Infantry Division
I Aus Corps Engineer Battalion
18th British Division
IV Corps Engineer Battalion
2nd British Division
36th British Division
6th Australian Division
9th Australian Division
Southeast Asia
2/9th Field Regiment
2/11th Field Regiment
XV Indian Corps
2/13th Field Regiment


Defending units:
34th Ind.Mixed Brigade
4th Ind.Mixed Regiment
6th Ind.Infantry Brigade
35th Ind.Mixed Brigade
9th Division
2nd INA Gandhi Regiment
48th Division
36th Ind.Mixed Brigade
4th Division
4th South Seas Det.
33rd Road Const Co /1
87th JAAF AF Bn
65th Construction Battalion
21st Field AF Construction Battalion
39th Army
33rd Army
17th JAAF AF Bn
61st Construction Battalion
14th Base Force
Southern Army
72nd JAAF AF Bn
21st Air Defense AA Battalion
13th JAAF Base Force
20th Ind. Mtn Gun Battalion
9th Air Division
54th Const Co
23rd JNAF AF Unit
21st Medium Field Artillery Battalion
30th JAAF Base Force
12th Field AF Construction Battalion
82nd JAAF AF Bn
11th Shipping Engineer Regiment
14th Ind.Art.Mortar Battalion
67th JNAF AF Unit
23rd AA Rgt /2


Behind high forts and x2 terrain I don´t want to slog it out. The Chinese can do that later.

For the first time in probably 2 months I stood the 4Es in Burma down. They will probably be out for 2 weeks now doing maintenance.

------------------------
Luzon
------------------------

The reinforcement part is now done. Tomorrow the last unit will unload. Its now time to repeat the process with BFs and engineers. I have some 15 engineer units that will shuttle in the same way. One at a time under heavy CAP and fragments left at Iloilo.

I also made a pretty big decision concerning Luzon. More on that tomorrow.

A small band of bombers paid Northern Luzon a visit for the first time. I want Erik to bunch up with everything in Manila. Some sweeps were followed by the bombers.

quote:

AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR Dec 17, 44
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Morning Air attack on Aparri , at 82,73

Weather in hex: Severe storms

Raid spotted at 48 NM, estimated altitude 33,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 18 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M3a Zero x 15

Allied aircraft
F4U-1D Corsair x 24

Japanese aircraft losses
A6M3a Zero: 6 destroyed

No Allied losses

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Morning Air attack on Aparri , at 82,73

Weather in hex: Severe storms

Raid spotted at 38 NM, estimated altitude 11,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 11 minutes

Japanese aircraft
no flights

Allied aircraft
B-24J Liberator x 27
B-25D1 Mitchell x 67
B-25G Mitchell x 6
B-25H Mitchell x 18
B-25J1 Mitchell x 15
B-25J11 Mitchell x 15
PBJ-1D Mitchell x 15


Japanese aircraft losses
E13A1 Jake: 4 destroyed on ground
B6N2a Jill: 7 destroyed on ground
A6M3a Zero: 1 destroyed on ground
B5N2 Kate: 1 destroyed on ground


Allied aircraft losses
B-24J Liberator: 3 damaged
B-25D1 Mitchell: 2 damaged
B-25J1 Mitchell: 2 damaged
B-25J11 Mitchell: 1 damaged





I of course forgot to up the altitude as usual and it cost me a bunch of 4Es. 50 bombers are destroyed on the ground though. Lets see if every plane on Luzon shows up in Manila tomorrow!

------------------------
Strategic bombing
------------------------

Another raid is going in over the HI tomorrow. 110 B29s are set to hit Nagoya. I´m going to experiment a bit with altitude in the coming weeks. I always go in at 9k. Erik has probably not missed that. I´m thinking perhaps I can dodge a few of the NFs going higher or lower. Have to watch the Flak down low though. Going to be a lot of shifting targets here. I don´t want to run into a massed NF cap yet. Only have 6 B29s in the pools. Have to be very careful.

Also going to start bombing the LI on Formosa. Its 80 in total on the Island. I want him to have to ship it from the HI if he wants to stay in supply.






Attachment (1)

< Message edited by JocMeister -- 10/14/2013 11:29:37 AM >

(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 2111
RE: Battle for Bangkok begins! - 10/13/2013 8:28:33 PM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: witpqs

Using EAB to flip a hex side against a massive army - I would just feel dirty after doing that!


Well, in the real world I wouldn´t have do 4 river crossing to surround his troops in Bangkok. The hexside system is what it is. I used a small 100 AV BDE to halt the superstack with 5500 AV a few weeks ago. It sucks but it goes both ways and can be used and manipulated equally by both sides.

I´m not going to wreck 4 divisions sealing off Bangkok thats for sure.

What do people think? I using EABs for this knowing they will be crushed in the crossing not Kosher? I set this up in a sandbox and using proper combat regiments they were all destroyed. Not damaged or disabled. Simply destroyed. "poof" gone. I tested it with IDs and while they survived the actually crossing they were absolutely gutted. Probably out for the rest of the war.

I hadn´t considered this could be something despicable though so I would love to hear what people think. Can´t really ask Erik without giving away too much. Consider this too: What if it wasn´t a river crossing and I used an EAB to close the hexside?


< Message edited by JocMeister -- 10/13/2013 8:46:06 PM >

(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 2112
RE: Battle for Bangkok begins! - 10/13/2013 9:39:02 PM   
Bullwinkle58


Posts: 11302
Joined: 2/24/2009
Status: offline
The hexside system is what it is. Completely artificial and conceptual. And equal to both sides.

The better question to me is, if not an EAB then what WOULD be sufficient and why? What's the lower limit and on what parameters? In supply? A leadership cut-off? A morale or disruption cut-off? You get into spiraling debates on things like this. Just play the rules.

_____________________________

The Moose

(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 2113
RE: Battle for Bangkok begins! - 10/13/2013 9:50:14 PM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline
You can get into a spiraling debate about many things, but you don't have to.

_____________________________


(in reply to Bullwinkle58)
Post #: 2114
RE: Battle for Bangkok begins! - 10/13/2013 10:22:19 PM   
princep01

 

Posts: 943
Joined: 8/7/2006
From: Texas
Status: offline
Hummm, I am surely missing something here, but why are the Bankokograd hexsides so important to you.  Given the large group of nasties (Jungleograd) still in your rear, straving though they are, I'd liquidate these crumps before worrying so much about Bankokograd.  You have Bangkokograd interdicted.  Any movement, by land or sea, is subject to sub and air interdiction inflicting much grief.  I'd even consider leaving a hex open (of your choosing) to allow him to leave.  Otherwise, I'd kill off the nuisance to the rear and move an infantry force with mucho AA and artillery into Bangkokograd from the adjacent city and commence making life in Bangkok most unpleasant.  I would suggest not throwing awway units, but rather a seige like approach.  if he takes the "escape" gambit, all the better.

Man, joc, I congratulate you on cutting off 12 divisions and many support units in the middle of nowheresville.  I was hired by Zhukov and Stalin to sue you for stealing pages from their recent book, How I Dicked Hitler at Stalingrad, but I decide to take a pass on that job.  Nicely done.

< Message edited by princep01 -- 10/13/2013 10:23:20 PM >

(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 2115
RE: Battle for Bangkok begins! - 10/13/2013 11:16:16 PM   
Bullwinkle58


Posts: 11302
Joined: 2/24/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: witpqs

You can get into a spiraling debate about many things, but you don't have to.


We are in violent agreement.

_____________________________

The Moose

(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 2116
RE: Battle for Bangkok begins! - 10/14/2013 12:28:47 AM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: princep01

Hummm, I am surely missing something here, but why are the Bankokograd hexsides so important to you.  Given the large group of nasties (Jungleograd) still in your rear, straving though they are, I'd liquidate these crumps before worrying so much about Bankokograd.  You have Bangkokograd interdicted.  Any movement, by land or sea, is subject to sub and air interdiction inflicting much grief.  I'd even consider leaving a hex open (of your choosing) to allow him to leave.  Otherwise, I'd kill off the nuisance to the rear and move an infantry force with mucho AA and artillery into Bangkokograd from the adjacent city and commence making life in Bangkok most unpleasant.  I would suggest not throwing awway units, but rather a seige like approach.  if he takes the "escape" gambit, all the better.

Man, joc, I congratulate you on cutting off 12 divisions and many support units in the middle of nowheresville.  I was hired by Zhukov and Stalin to sue you for stealing pages from their recent book, How I Dicked Hitler at Stalingrad, but I decide to take a pass on that job.  Nicely done.

I assumed he just said it wrong and really meant Rangoonistan.

_____________________________


(in reply to princep01)
Post #: 2117
RE: Battle for Bangkok begins! - 10/14/2013 4:07:11 AM   
Quixote


Posts: 773
Joined: 8/14/2008
From: Maryland
Status: offline
quote:

What do people think? I using EABs for this knowing they will be crushed in the crossing not Kosher? I set this up in a sandbox and using proper combat regiments they were all destroyed. Not damaged or disabled. Simply destroyed. "poof" gone. I tested it with IDs and while they survived the actually crossing they were absolutely gutted. Probably out for the rest of the war.

I hadn´t considered this could be something despicable though so I would love to hear what people think. Can´t really ask Erik without giving away too much. Consider this too: What if it wasn´t a river crossing and I used an EAB to close the hexside?


Objectively - I'm with Bullwinkle. It's a game.
Subjectively - I'm with witpqs. This isn't something I'd do unless I felt I had no choice. That said, it's a game. Do what you have to.
Lastly - I know it's been a month, but does anyone else remember how obvert (over) reacted the last time a small unit crossed a river into a big stack? http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=3403798

(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 2118
RE: Battle for Bangkok begins! - 10/14/2013 8:24:48 AM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline
Hey guys. Thanks a bunch for the feedback!

I´ll ponder this for a few days. But if I don´t seal of the hexsides I have only two options.
-Either a direct assault on the city. This I don´t want to as it would cost me loads of casualties in a battle I don´t want. I don´t even need or want Bangkok.
-Isolate it without closing the hexsides which would require a massive amount of troops. 2 clear hexes and 2 wood hexes. Thats probably 8000 AV needed to seal it off. No way.

I don´t want any of that. I want to leave the city to rot. In the real war I wouldn´t have to do 4 separate river crossings to seal the city off. I wouldn´t need to do a single one. The question I keep asking myself is: If it hadn´t been a river crossing and I closed the hexsides using HQ units and whatever. No one would object?

And I cant just leave 2000 AV including some good combat units in my rear while advancing on Indochina. As I said I´ll continue to ponder this but gamey or not I think I´m going to close those hexsides. Both Erik and I have used the hexside system to our advantage throughout the game. He used it to block the entire allied army in Burma for two years for example. And I used it to contain his superstack. Its just an integral part of the game.

quote:

ORIGINAL: princep01

Hummm, I am surely missing something here, but why are the Bankokograd hexsides so important to you.  Given the large group of nasties (Jungleograd) still in your rear, straving though they are, I'd liquidate these crumps before worrying so much about Bankokograd.  You have Bangkokograd interdicted.  Any movement, by land or sea, is subject to sub and air interdiction inflicting much grief.  I'd even consider leaving a hex open (of your choosing) to allow him to leave.  Otherwise, I'd kill off the nuisance to the rear and move an infantry force with mucho AA and artillery into Bangkokograd from the adjacent city and commence making life in Bangkok most unpleasant.  I would suggest not throwing awway units, but rather a seige like approach.  if he takes the "escape" gambit, all the better.

Man, joc, I congratulate you on cutting off 12 divisions and many support units in the middle of nowheresville.  I was hired by Zhukov and Stalin to sue you for stealing pages from their recent book, How I Dicked Hitler at Stalingrad, but I decide to take a pass on that job.  Nicely done.


Thank you princep!

I´m not going to kill the troops in the superstack. I´m going to leave them there to rot. Atleast for a couple of months. If I kill them off Erik is just going to buy them back and use them to boost the defenses around the HI. Better to have them in the jungles of Thailand!

Same with the stack at Bangkok. I don´t want to kill them off and I don´t want Bangkok. I just wan´t to contain them and leave them there. Thats why I´m so anxious about the hexsides. I want to go to Indochina ASAP.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Quixote

Objectively - I'm with Bullwinkle. It's a game.
Subjectively - I'm with witpqs. This isn't something I'd do unless I felt I had no choice. That said, it's a game. Do what you have to.
Lastly - I know it's been a month, but does anyone else remember how obvert (over) reacted the last time a small unit crossed a river into a big stack? http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=3403798


Hmm, I forgot that thread. Thanks for reminding me. But I hope Erik sees this a bit differently. He is hard to predict. Sometimes he shrugs things off with a simple "Hey that the game" and sometimes he blows up for things I could never imagine.

(in reply to Quixote)
Post #: 2119
RE: Battle for Bangkok begins! - 10/14/2013 12:06:49 PM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline
19th December -44
______________________________________________________________________________

Another quiet turn.


------------------------
Thailand
------------------------

Erik paradrops the empty Ayuthia. Stupid mistake by me. Luckily no units were on the rail and its another 5 days or so before the first units can use it. I moved an ID back from Bangkok to deal with this and they will arrive in two days.

------------------------
Strategic bombing
------------------------

The Nagoya strike turns out to be a complete debacle. Only 40 of the 110 B29s arrive over target. They only cause 2700 fires. 8 are lost to NFs. A 20% loss ratio. This can not be maintained for the miniscule gains..

Whoever thinks NFs are underpowered needs to check again...

The Takao strike goes alot better creating 140k fires. But in the morning only 2 LI of the 40 is destroyed.

On the positive side I finally found the first NF factory! This will be a prime target. No idea how many there is though.


(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 2120
RE: Battle for Bangkok begins! - 10/14/2013 12:48:24 PM   
koniu


Posts: 2763
Joined: 2/28/2011
From: Konin, Poland, European Union
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: JocMeister

Strategic bombing
------------------------
The Nagoya strike turns out to be a complete debacle. Only 40 of the 110 B29s arrive over target. They only cause 2700 fires. 8 are lost to NFs. A 20% loss ratio. This can not be maintained for the miniscule gains..

Whoever thinks NFs are underpowered needs to check again...

The Takao strike goes alot better creating 140k fires. But in the morning only 2 LI of the 40 is destroyed.

On the positive side I finally found the first NF factory! This will be a prime target. No idea how many there is though.



I think it is good. Not having ability to destroy entire city industry in one raid must be considered as realistic and well balanced. It will require lot longer campaign to burn everything to bare ground. Also NF working as they should. They are not so strong as day CAP and You can`t bomb for free. I should give for both of You and Erik feeling that this is fair to both sides. At lest for me it is.


< Message edited by koniu -- 10/14/2013 12:52:03 PM >


_____________________________

"Only the Dead Have Seen the End of War"

(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 2121
RE: Battle for Bangkok begins! - 10/14/2013 1:13:24 PM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: koniu

I think it is good. Not having ability to destroy entire city industry in one raid must be considered as realistic and well balanced. It will require lot longer campaign to burn everything to bare ground. Also NF working as they should. They are not so strong as day CAP and You can`t bomb for free. I should give for both of You and Erik feeling that this is fair to both sides. At lest for me it is.



Yes I agree. Of course you shouldn´t be able to burn down an entire city on one night. My comment wasn´t meant as criticism towards the game.

But regarding the Nagoya strike I destroyed 11 LI and 7 Engine factories for 8 B29s. Not a exchange I´m willing to do. The Takao strike I didn´t lose any planes but despite 140k fires only 2 LI was burned down.

I can only strike with the B29s every 7-12 days so I have to make them count. Last night was a waste. I need to look at what went wrong.

< Message edited by JocMeister -- 10/14/2013 1:36:45 PM >

(in reply to koniu)
Post #: 2122
RE: Battle for Bangkok begins! - 10/14/2013 1:16:18 PM   
Bullwinkle58


Posts: 11302
Joined: 2/24/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: JocMeister

19th December -44
______________________________________________________________________________
------------------------
Strategic bombing
------------------------

The Nagoya strike turns out to be a complete debacle. Only 40 of the 110 B29s arrive over target. They only cause 2700 fires. 8 are lost to NFs. A 20% loss ratio. This can not be maintained for the miniscule gains..

Whoever thinks NFs are underpowered needs to check again...

The Takao strike goes alot better creating 140k fires. But in the morning only 2 LI of the 40 is destroyed.

On the positive side I finally found the first NF factory! This will be a prime target. No idea how many there is though.



Be careful, J. I know this looks rough, but what if 110 had made the target? I think losses would have still been in the 8 range and you would shrug. NFs are what they are. He can't have them at every base. Mix it up, keep plowing ahead.

Also, using just B-29s from long range you're always goingt o be fragile. Keep focusing on getting closer. Even a medium-sized base. Then you can use P-51s for what they were designed for. And get the B-17s into the game.

_____________________________

The Moose

(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 2123
RE: Battle for Bangkok begins! - 10/14/2013 1:56:03 PM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bullwinkle58
Be careful, J. I know this looks rough, but what if 110 had made the target? I think losses would have still been in the 8 range and you would shrug. NFs are what they are. He can't have them at every base. Mix it up, keep plowing ahead.

Also, using just B-29s from long range you're always goingt o be fragile. Keep focusing on getting closer. Even a medium-sized base. Then you can use P-51s for what they were designed for. And get the B-17s into the game.


I´ve clarified a bit what I meant in my reply to koniu!


quote:

ORIGINAL: JocMeister

Yes I agree. Of course you shouldn´t be able to burn down an entire city on one night. My comment wasn´t meant as criticism towards the game.

But regarding the Nagoya strike I destroyed 11 LI and 7 Engine factories for 8 B29s. Not a exchange I´m willing to do. The Takao strike I didn´t lose any planes but despite 140k fires only 2 LI was burned down.

I can only strike with the B29s every 7-12 days so I have to make them count. Last night was a waste. I need to look at what went wrong.

(in reply to Bullwinkle58)
Post #: 2124
RE: Battle for Bangkok begins! - 10/14/2013 2:01:59 PM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline
Some good info is to be found in the CR...

quote:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Night Air attack on Nagoya , at 111,60

Weather in hex: Heavy cloud

Raid detected at 61 NM, estimated altitude 13,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 19 minutes

Japanese aircraft
J1N1-S Irving x 14
J1N1-Sa Irving x 23

Allied aircraft
B-29-25 Superfort x 17

Japanese aircraft losses
J1N1-S Irving: 1 destroyed
J1N1-Sa Irving: 1 destroyed

Allied aircraft losses
B-29-25 Superfort: 1 destroyed, 6 damaged

Manpower hits 4
Fires 2700

Aircraft Attacking:
6 x B-29-25 Superfort bombing from 9000 feet *
City Attack: 10 x 500 lb GP Bomb
2 x B-29-25 Superfort bombing from 9000 feet *
City Attack: 10 x 500 lb GP Bomb
5 x B-29-25 Superfort bombing from 9000 feet *
City Attack: 10 x 500 lb GP Bomb
3 x B-29-25 Superfort bombing from 9000 feet *
City Attack: 10 x 500 lb GP Bomb

CAP engaged:
S-804 Hikotai with J1N1-Sa Irving (9 airborne, 0 on standby, 0 scrambling)
9 plane(s) intercepting now.
Group patrol altitude is 10000
Raid is overhead
S-812 Hikotai with J1N1-Sa Irving (3 airborne, 9 on standby, 2 scrambling)
3 plane(s) intercepting now.
Group patrol altitude is 9000 , scrambling fighters between 3000 and 9000.
Time for all group planes to reach interception is 53 minutes
S-851 Hikotai with J1N1-S Irving (4 airborne, 9 on standby, 0 scrambling)
4 plane(s) intercepting now.
0 plane(s) not yet engaged, 0 being recalled, 1 out of immediate contact.
Group patrol altitude is 10000 , scrambling fighters between 6000 and 13000.
Time for all group planes to reach interception is 21 minutes


This confirms what I wrote in an earlier post. I need to change things up a bit. Now he can place his NFs spot on my B29s. I need to start changing the altitude around a bit. Going down will of course hit flak but it will generate better hits. And going up does the opposite. I´m too predictable right now.


(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 2125
RE: Battle for Bangkok begins! - 10/14/2013 2:35:10 PM   
princep01

 

Posts: 943
Joined: 8/7/2006
From: Texas
Status: offline
Joc, just an idea, but I would not go low with those B-29s.  You are manpower bombing.  All you have to do is hit the city.  As a result, I'd go high high most of the time.  Say 20K ft.  Tough for NFs at 10 feet to climb to intercept.  Okay, so some B-29 crews cannot even hit a city at night from 20K feet; so what?  Your attacks will suffer some "misses".  The relevant point is your planes will be all but immune to flak, the NFs will swing and miss until he sets them higher AND your crews will grow in expirence and survive as you slowly build up B-29 reserves.

Like Moose and others said.  Move things around and move your altitude up (most the time) and down.  Drop incendies, stir the ashes and see what burned to the ground.

Now, back to Jungleograd.  Why wouldn't you kill these yo-yos off?  Yeah, he can build some (a small some) of them back, but you're talking 12 + divisions and great piles of artillery in that cauldron.  The game is kind to the Japanese re political points and rebuilds, but not that kind.  Dump this lot in the trash can of history, grab the points, remove the threat of them breaking out and causing mischief and watch him rebuild 3 low grade divisions that you get to knock off again.  Besides, given his recent moves, he is likely to banzai attack again and again to finish them off himself.

And Bangkok.  Do you really think you need to seal it off?  Leave him an out for the 3 divisions and assorted stuff.  If you cover the rail, where's he going to go?  Into the ether of open terrain or jungle?  Great.  He's stuck out there for days while bombs rain down like monsoon.  Just interdict them to death at low cost and you get Bangkok for free (even if it isn't that important to you).  Think of all those grounded AC you get to kill for free when you take the base.  He can fly out most of the troops anyway the way you are planning on the seal off.  Get him in the open, grab him by the nose and kick him in the pants.

And, none of this should slow your blitz into Indochina.

(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 2126
RE: Battle for Bangkok begins! - 10/14/2013 3:48:26 PM   
Bullwinkle58


Posts: 11302
Joined: 2/24/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: princep01

Now, back to Jungleograd.  Why wouldn't you kill these yo-yos off?  Yeah, he can build some (a small some) of them back, but you're talking 12 + divisions and great piles of artillery in that cauldron.  The game is kind to the Japanese re political points and rebuilds, but not that kind. 


Yep. He can get them back on the board, but twelve (?) divisions of rebuild is a lot of supply. Hope he uses it for that and not flying CAP. If you ever have to set foot on the HI you played this wrong.

_____________________________

The Moose

(in reply to princep01)
Post #: 2127
RE: Battle for Bangkok begins! - 10/14/2013 4:38:31 PM   
catwhoorg


Posts: 686
Joined: 9/27/2012
From: Uk expat lving near Atlanta
Status: offline
Lot of supply, and a lot of VPs for their destruction.


(in reply to Bullwinkle58)
Post #: 2128
RE: Battle for Bangkok begins! - 10/14/2013 4:52:43 PM   
Speedysteve

 

Posts: 15998
Joined: 9/11/2001
From: Reading, England
Status: offline
At this stage of the war I'd also vote for destroying the blighters and gaining VP's for them whilst also freeing up your troops.

Sure Erik can re-build them but it will cost him in PP's, supply AND take a long time for them to be operational

< Message edited by Speedy -- 10/14/2013 4:53:18 PM >


_____________________________

WitE 2 Tester
WitE Tester
BTR/BoB Tester

(in reply to catwhoorg)
Post #: 2129
RE: Battle for Bangkok begins! - 10/14/2013 5:36:33 PM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline
quote:

If it hadn´t been a river crossing and I closed the hexsides using HQ units and whatever. No one would object?


Strictly to answer your question and not to belabor the point, my own comment had nothing to do with it being a river crossing.

It's really between you and your opponent.

_____________________________


(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 2130
Page:   <<   < prev  69 70 [71] 72 73   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Battle for Bangkok begins! Page: <<   < prev  69 70 [71] 72 73   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.766