bo
Posts: 4176
Joined: 5/1/2009 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Numdydar quote:
ORIGINAL: bo Hi Num You are a very thoughtful person and a lot of what you say is true, BUT, I am going to have to respectively disagree with you on a couple of issues you brought up. Now I never played the board game, any board games are not my kind of game. I believe, but could be very wrong that the board game players might not give a hoot about the AI. They played the game always against a human opponet, they know no other way. I believe their desire will be to play all of their old time friends who played against them for years in apts., homes wherevere. And the answer to that is net play not the AI. Now this coming from a person [me] who has begged Steve and Matrix for an AI on release, I am very fond of Steve and more so after I met him but he knows my feelings on this. No AI is a bad decision in the initial release, but it is what it is the die is cast and I have to move on from that. I personally do not care about netplay, the reason being I want to play when I want play. My good friends Bjorn and Peter live in the Europen section of the world and the time difference is 5, 6, or 7 hours not good, hot seat is ok but my sons are into combat mission Normandy and could care less about this game. Now that kinda leaves me playing solo [Ugh] but not really I had to eat crow when I said no game can be played solitaire. This game can be played solitiare. Now whether you buy the game or not I could care less, why because I aint getting a dime from this beta testing thing and Matrix's sales of this game Now the last thing you said actually scares me, we have to have a Budweiser together and straighten that out. "I can buy 2 or 3 games from Matrix for the price of MWIF" Oh you can buy 3 games alright. Name me those 3 games please so I can get them, how about a remake for Carriers at war, it might be redone, Scourge of War with little horse running all over the place crashing into each other, or maybe another Gary Grigsby monster of a game like his older game WITP, or better yet how about Civil war 2 where no one yet has ever figured out the calculation of combat from the famous Civil war 1 [Blue and the Gray]. Read some of the posts on that one. I think you are a good guy and I love your posts but this one Hmmmmm. And I hopefully we can disagree with honor and not this We may have a language issue and not a disagreement issue As far as I can tell, I did not say that the players of the board game would not care about the AI. Of course they would. The point I was making is that players of the board version would not care as much about the AI as people like myself. So they may be willing to pay a higher price for the game without an AI than someone like me who would not. If the non-AI version is cheap enough then, I may be tempted to give it a shot. If it is not, then I will wait until the AI is ready like a lot of other people are going to do. As for the other games I would buy instead Civil War 2 - and yes I have been following the threads there too War in the West Crown of Glory Empire Edition Buzz Adrian Space Manager Strategic Command 3 And these are just the ones that Matrix is doing. There are others by other companies that I am interested in too. While I cannot get everything listed for a high priced WiF, I can certainly get enough to compensate for not buying WiF if the price for it without an AI is too high. No language issue Num lets just say I misread you, I was going to answer this post in another way but after seeing your selection of games I decided not to, and I will just say " I have nerver known fear until now" and leave it at that. Bo
< Message edited by bo -- 10/2/2013 10:10:03 PM >
|