Mad Russian
Posts: 13256
Joined: 3/16/2008 From: Texas Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: dholedays Part of the reason is that I'm not as familiar with NATO reporting names. For example, I find myself often having to stop and look up on Wikipedia that my units armed with SA-14 Gremlins are in fact carrying Strela-3s. While the game has the numbers available, it is easier for me to evaluate a unit's capabilities when I can recognize it's real world basis. The other part is that I just plain like the native names better. It's hard to explain because it's a preference, but I'd much rather see Malyutka than AT-3 Sagger, for another example. Your units carrying SA-14 Gremlins are carrying SA-14 Gremlins. They are also, in fact, carrying Strela-3's. We had to call them something. There's a really good chance that most gamers that will play the game served in NATO and not the Warsaw Pact units. With that in mind, we went with the nomenclature that most gamers would recognize. quote:
So, these aren't terrible issues, but preferences aside though, I'm sure sooner or later someone will want to tweak the capabilities of various units and will like to see how it affects the way scenarios play out. It would be nice to be able to export some of the default scenarios for offline play, since they are more polished than anything I have been able to throw together myself. I understand though that it depends on what you are comfortable doing. The reason they are more polished is simply that they've been played more. Good Hunting. MR
_____________________________
The most expensive thing in the world is free time. Founder of HSG scenario design group for Combat Mission. Panzer Command Ostfront Development Team. Flashpoint Campaigns: Red Storm Development Team.
|