Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Amazed at defensive prowess of modern fighters.

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> Amazed at defensive prowess of modern fighters. Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Amazed at defensive prowess of modern fighters. - 11/7/2013 2:30:39 PM   
GBS

 

Posts: 903
Joined: 7/3/2002
From: Southeastern USA
Status: offline
I mean in CMANO. I remember games in past years where firing two AIM 120s was money. Now these fighters just turn perpendicular to the incoming missile and shrug it off like a pesky fly....especially Flankers. In one scenarios I sent 6 Dutch F16s, which I thought were pretty good fighters, to take on two Venezuelan Flankers. Fired 24 AIM 120s and got one Flanker. I of course lost all the F16s.
In another scenario playing as India I fired an entire magazine of Grizzly AA missiles at two South African fighters (forget the make)and missed with ALL. I finally got one with AA fire when it came too close but my ship was left totally defenseless except at very close range. It was soon sunk.
Seems to be, based on how CMANO plays, that offensive capabilities of AA missles need to go quite a ways to catch up with the Fighters defensive abilities.
The best defense for an F16 against a Flanker is RUN LIKE HELL!

< Message edited by GBS -- 11/7/2013 3:34:20 PM >
Post #: 1
RE: Amazed at defensive prowess of modern fighters. - 11/7/2013 2:37:40 PM   
Dimitris

 

Posts: 13282
Joined: 7/31/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: GBS
In one scenarios I sent 6 F16s, which I thought were pretty good fighters, to take on two Flankers. Fired 24 AIM 120s and got one Flanker.

I'd love to see the AALog of that. Usually there's a good reason for everything that happens.

quote:


The best defense for an F16 against a Flanker is RUN LIKE HELL!

Or don't go up against it in the first place unless really necessary. There are alternatives to killing a fighter _in the air_.


_____________________________


(in reply to GBS)
Post #: 2
RE: Amazed at defensive prowess of modern fighters. - 11/7/2013 2:47:13 PM   
GBS

 

Posts: 903
Joined: 7/3/2002
From: Southeastern USA
Status: offline

[
Or don't go up against it in the first place unless really necessary. There are alternatives to killing a fighter _in the air_.

[/quote]
That is why I sent 6 on 2! Does the US have any fighter to counter a Flanker?

(in reply to Dimitris)
Post #: 3
RE: Amazed at defensive prowess of modern fighters. - 11/7/2013 2:52:29 PM   
Dimitris

 

Posts: 13282
Joined: 7/31/2005
Status: offline
Depends a lot on the Flanker variant (a Su-35S is a whole different story than an early Su-27). Generally you want at the very least an updated F-15 (preferably with AESA) or ideally an F-22, and lots of AMRAAMs.

You also want to stack the deck in your favor as much as possible (AWACS, tankers, jammers etc. and kill the enemy's counterparts).

_____________________________


(in reply to GBS)
Post #: 4
RE: Amazed at defensive prowess of modern fighters. - 11/7/2013 2:59:46 PM   
ExMachina


Posts: 462
Joined: 9/25/2013
Status: offline
quote:

In one scenarios I sent 6 Dutch F16s, which I thought were pretty good fighters, to take on two Venezuelan Flankers. Fired 24 AIM 120s and got one Flanker.


Just curious: were you playing at 1 second time compression with Hi-Fi mode "on"?

(EDIT: asking because Baloogan reported here that he's noticed problems with some A-A engagements when Hi-Fi mode is not enabled)

< Message edited by ExMachina -- 11/7/2013 4:08:08 PM >

(in reply to GBS)
Post #: 5
RE: Amazed at defensive prowess of modern fighters. - 11/7/2013 3:09:07 PM   
GBS

 

Posts: 903
Joined: 7/3/2002
From: Southeastern USA
Status: offline
When the missiles draw close I always switch to HiFi mode and watch the missiles just disappear which I assume means they detonate harmlessly.

< Message edited by GBS -- 11/7/2013 4:09:25 PM >

(in reply to ExMachina)
Post #: 6
RE: Amazed at defensive prowess of modern fighters. - 11/7/2013 3:23:31 PM   
ExMachina


Posts: 462
Joined: 9/25/2013
Status: offline
quote:

When the missiles draw close I always switch to HiFi mode and watch the missiles just disappear which I assume means they detonate harmlessly.


Just to be clear, when you say you "switch" to HiFi, do you mean that you actually go into the game options menu and ensure that the check box is checked? Just curious...

< Message edited by ExMachina -- 11/7/2013 4:24:50 PM >

(in reply to GBS)
Post #: 7
RE: Amazed at defensive prowess of modern fighters. - 11/7/2013 4:26:31 PM   
GBS

 

Posts: 903
Joined: 7/3/2002
From: Southeastern USA
Status: offline
No. I always have that checked, what I mean is I just slow the action down from, say 5 sec. to 1 sce.

(in reply to GBS)
Post #: 8
RE: Amazed at defensive prowess of modern fighters. - 11/7/2013 5:41:41 PM   
RoryAndersonCDT

 

Posts: 1830
Joined: 6/16/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ExMachina

quote:

In one scenarios I sent 6 Dutch F16s, which I thought were pretty good fighters, to take on two Venezuelan Flankers. Fired 24 AIM 120s and got one Flanker.


Just curious: were you playing at 1 second time compression with Hi-Fi mode "on"?

(EDIT: asking because Baloogan reported here that he's noticed problems with some A-A engagements when Hi-Fi mode is not enabled)



For missile engagements it doesn't seem to have an effect. Its where aircraft get into a dogfight that Hi-Fi mode really helps resolve combat.

_____________________________

Command Dev Team
Technical Lead

(in reply to ExMachina)
Post #: 9
RE: Amazed at defensive prowess of modern fighters. - 11/7/2013 5:56:45 PM   
Dimitris

 

Posts: 13282
Joined: 7/31/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Baloogan
For missile engagements it doesn't seem to have an effect. Its where aircraft get into a dogfight that Hi-Fi mode really helps resolve combat.


When you say "helps resolve combat", do you mean that in non-HiFi mode, weapons miss more frequently than in HiFi mode? Or that the animation is far smoother in HiFi ?

_____________________________


(in reply to RoryAndersonCDT)
Post #: 10
RE: Amazed at defensive prowess of modern fighters. - 11/7/2013 5:57:57 PM   
Showtime 100_MatrixForum

 

Posts: 29
Joined: 9/25/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: GBS

I mean in CMANO. I remember games in past years where firing two AIM 120s was money. Now these fighters just turn perpendicular to the incoming missile and shrug it off like a pesky fly....especially Flankers. In one scenarios I sent 6 Dutch F16s, which I thought were pretty good fighters, to take on two Venezuelan Flankers. Fired 24 AIM 120s and got one Flanker. I of course lost all the F16s.
In another scenario playing as India I fired an entire magazine of Grizzly AA missiles at two South African fighters (forget the make)and missed with ALL. I finally got one with AA fire when it came too close but my ship was left totally defenseless except at very close range. It was soon sunk.
Seems to be, based on how CMANO plays, that offensive capabilities of AA missles need to go quite a ways to catch up with the Fighters defensive abilities.
The best defense for an F16 against a Flanker is RUN LIKE HELL!


It certainly doesn't help that aircraft seem to be able to evade as if they had maximum energy every time. Agility doesn't decrease as they expend energy while evading, or if it does, it's not nearly as much of an issue as it should be (and neither is awareness of the exact distance and bearing of the incoming missile -- which is crucial to timing your evasive maneuvers!). Trying to go between Falcon BMS and Command always throws me off, haha; AAMs in BMS are pretty deadly, especially the AMRAAM and R-77, but in Command (vs agile aircraft) it feels like I'm shooting FFARs instead!

That said, I'm still having a lot of fun with it. This is just an area I'd like to see some refinement in in the future.

(in reply to GBS)
Post #: 11
RE: Amazed at defensive prowess of modern fighters. - 11/7/2013 8:06:40 PM   
Tomcat84

 

Posts: 1952
Joined: 7/10/2013
Status: offline
Yeah I've brought up that agility affects it too much, and that theres no penalty for depleting energy after multiple maneuvers / or when carrying bombs etc.

It is a known point and should be worked on in future.

In the meantime it is my opinion that setting the Proficiency slider to the lowest setting (on both sides) generates more realistic PH for modern A/A missiles and I will be doing this in the scenarios I am building.

(in reply to Showtime 100_MatrixForum)
Post #: 12
RE: Amazed at defensive prowess of modern fighters. - 11/7/2013 10:12:47 PM   
SSN754planker


Posts: 448
Joined: 10/2/2013
Status: offline
Where are you guys getting this proficiency slider at? Is this in a closed build?

_____________________________

MY BOOK LIST
ST1/SS SSN 754

(in reply to Tomcat84)
Post #: 13
RE: Amazed at defensive prowess of modern fighters. - 11/7/2013 10:33:41 PM   
henri51


Posts: 1151
Joined: 1/16/2009
Status: offline
The Flankers were presumably SU-27s and not SU-33s, the latter being for Soviet aircraft carriers. Note that the SU-27s were designed to fight against F-15s and not F-16s which are much less capable than F-15s. So although I am no expert, I would guess that sending F-16s against Su-27s is an unequal fight in the Flankers' advantage. But I would guess that it would also depend on which sophisticated equipment the Russians put on aircraft sold to foreigners. For example US aircraft sold to other countries are generally not equipped with the best electronic equipment available to US aircraft.However I would like to hear and expert opinion on the ability of Flankers to avoid AMRAAM missiles (AIM-120), which are pretty sophisticated and even have the capability of homing in on jamming signals.

As a matter of fact, I don't understand how such a missile can be avoided except by maneuvering or perhaps a decoy, because the missile is either following its radar lock-on or the jamming signal that unlocked it...

Thinking about it, I guess that a parachute-dropped jammer could fool the missile into attacking the jammer, assuming that Flankers are equipped with such a sophisticated decoy.

< Message edited by henri51 -- 11/7/2013 11:37:05 PM >

(in reply to SSN754planker)
Post #: 14
RE: Amazed at defensive prowess of modern fighters. - 11/7/2013 11:59:52 PM   
jdkbph


Posts: 339
Joined: 2/11/2007
From: CT, USA
Status: offline
Why do you assume the 16 is much less capable than the 15? Both carry AIM9 and AIM120, and once in contact with the enemy, any advantage, such as range, the 15 might have is irrelevant.

But to the main point...

That an Su27 in CMANO can consistently dominate in a fight with a contemporary model F16 (and I'm taking the OP's word on that... I haven't experienced it myself yet) - let alone with a 2 or 3 to 1 disadvantage - suggests that there's an error or oversight in the DB.

IMHO of course.

JD

(in reply to henri51)
Post #: 15
RE: Amazed at defensive prowess of modern fighters. - 11/8/2013 12:19:21 AM   
henri51


Posts: 1151
Joined: 1/16/2009
Status: offline
Jdk, it was my impression that the F15 electronics (jamming etc) are much superior to those of the F-16, but I could be wrong, since this I read this on Wikipedia...

(in reply to jdkbph)
Post #: 16
RE: Amazed at defensive prowess of modern fighters. - 11/8/2013 1:55:38 AM   
ExMachina


Posts: 462
Joined: 9/25/2013
Status: offline
FWIW, I just made a quick test scenario of 3 F16s vs 1 Flanker (not sure exactly which variants you used). Fired 2 AMRAAM at ~20nm at the Flanker and the first one hit and killed it. So with that simple test, I'd guess that either a) you had really bad luck b) there's a DB problem with the specific variant(s) you were using or c) there were extenuating circumstances in the scenario that were somehow favoring the Flankers over the F16/AMRAAAM combo.

(in reply to henri51)
Post #: 17
RE: Amazed at defensive prowess of modern fighters. - 11/8/2013 2:08:23 AM   
jdkbph


Posts: 339
Joined: 2/11/2007
From: CT, USA
Status: offline
I seem to recall that with the F16C/D variants (Block 25s) the USAF had more or less abandoned the low cost LWF idea and added a bunch of upgrades - particularly in the avionics and combat systems. By the time the Block 50/52s were rolling off the line they were pretty much on par with the F15C in that department. It's been a while since I've read up on this stuff so I may be mistaken about the details, but I believe this is essentially correct.

Can anyone confirm or correct me about this?

JD

(in reply to henri51)
Post #: 18
RE: Amazed at defensive prowess of modern fighters. - 11/8/2013 3:51:35 AM   
Wiz33

 

Posts: 147
Joined: 5/16/2007
Status: offline
Yep. late model C/D have about 95% of the electronics of a 15C except for range and payload.

(in reply to jdkbph)
Post #: 19
RE: Amazed at defensive prowess of modern fighters. - 11/8/2013 4:25:03 AM   
navwarcol

 

Posts: 637
Joined: 12/2/2009
Status: offline
I think that the next patch which will incorporate pilot skill, will have an effect here also... the primary way US pilots plan to defeat an enemy is better training, and that should be a factor with this next patch.

(in reply to Wiz33)
Post #: 20
RE: Amazed at defensive prowess of modern fighters. - 11/8/2013 5:00:34 AM   
RoryAndersonCDT

 

Posts: 1830
Joined: 6/16/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sunburn

quote:

ORIGINAL: Baloogan
For missile engagements it doesn't seem to have an effect. Its where aircraft get into a dogfight that Hi-Fi mode really helps resolve combat.


When you say "helps resolve combat", do you mean that in non-HiFi mode, weapons miss more frequently than in HiFi mode? Or that the animation is far smoother in HiFi ?



In non-HiFi mode 2 aircraft who are circling to try to unmask their cannons at certain speeds just circle around eachother until one runs out of fuel. I saw it happen with F-18s during one of my episodes, I'll try to create a scenario which exhibits this behavior and post it as a bug in the development forum.

_____________________________

Command Dev Team
Technical Lead

(in reply to Dimitris)
Post #: 21
RE: Amazed at defensive prowess of modern fighters. - 11/8/2013 5:13:33 AM   
RoryAndersonCDT

 

Posts: 1830
Joined: 6/16/2009
Status: offline
Posted at http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=3460878&mpage=1&key=�

_____________________________

Command Dev Team
Technical Lead

(in reply to RoryAndersonCDT)
Post #: 22
RE: Amazed at defensive prowess of modern fighters. - 11/8/2013 7:26:55 AM   
Broncepulido

 

Posts: 385
Joined: 9/26/2013
Status: offline
The ultimate site about F-16 variants, weapons and ECM gear: http://www.f-16.net/f-16_versions.html

(in reply to RoryAndersonCDT)
Post #: 23
RE: Amazed at defensive prowess of modern fighters. - 11/8/2013 7:31:25 AM   
Broncepulido

 

Posts: 385
Joined: 9/26/2013
Status: offline
And here a very good and comprehensive site (but in the lovely Brazilian Portuguese!!!), recopilatory of almost every open source data about AAMs, showing missile type-by-type historical low probability to hit/to kill. I think probably the same outcome with AIM-120 against a better prepared enemy and with better ECM and campaing preparation than Iraq or Serbia: http://sistemasdearmas.com.br/

< Message edited by Broncepulido -- 11/8/2013 8:31:51 AM >

(in reply to Broncepulido)
Post #: 24
RE: Amazed at defensive prowess of modern fighters. - 11/8/2013 7:33:28 AM   
Broncepulido

 

Posts: 385
Joined: 9/26/2013
Status: offline
In short, at the bottom of this page, the AIM-120 historical PK is between 40%-60%: http://sistemasdearmas.com.br/aam/amraam3desemp.html

(in reply to Broncepulido)
Post #: 25
RE: Amazed at defensive prowess of modern fighters. - 11/8/2013 10:09:57 AM   
mrfeizhu


Posts: 131
Joined: 10/13/2013
Status: offline
It seems that ecm or maneuverability is over rated for aircraft, missiles just don't seem to hit them, (Sam's and AA missiles). Hit rates are really a subjective number. How many Air to air missiles are fired in anger? not many, in test there are a lot more, but tests are tests. The game will crunch numbers and come up with the answer it is programmed to give. The game is a game its not a simulation of real life, no game can be. Its the programmers universe and the books or information he uses to get numbers from. But all war games are like that, If you play war in the Pacific you know you have the atomic bomb and B-29's coming towards the end of the war. Is the game fun to play and make you think? yes of course it does. Is it worth the money it cost? yes of course. After playing the game for a while, if I were a government in the programmers universe , I would just buy submarines

(in reply to Broncepulido)
Post #: 26
RE: Amazed at defensive prowess of modern fighters. - 11/8/2013 10:39:40 AM   
JCR

 

Posts: 160
Joined: 11/4/2013
Status: offline
If you look at even modern dogfights, AAM hit rate isn't 100%
How many AMRAAMs did they fire at the MiGs over Serbia in 1999?
And not all US vs Iraq encounters resulted in the MiGs being killed, sometimes they just escaped.

(in reply to mrfeizhu)
Post #: 27
RE: Amazed at defensive prowess of modern fighters. - 11/8/2013 11:19:52 AM   
Flankerk

 

Posts: 417
Joined: 6/21/2006
Status: offline

Is this before or after the proficiency is taken into account? As far as I can see that resolves this one. I'm also not all that convinced that aircraft are overated. Air to air I agree there aren't as many combats we can draw upon, but on surface to air, I think we have some good examples. I seem to recall a YouTube video showing an F-18 I think dodging mutliple incoming SAM's over an extended period. Must admit I especially like the fact that any of my fighters running out of missiles and going RTB seems to attract a straggler trying (and usually succeeding) to pick them off with a rear aspect shot.

(in reply to mrfeizhu)
Post #: 28
RE: Amazed at defensive prowess of modern fighters. - 11/8/2013 11:28:54 AM   
JCR

 

Posts: 160
Joined: 11/4/2013
Status: offline
Not so much proficiency, but energy conservation.
Radical evasive maneuvers take energy, meaning the pilot sacrifices either airspeed or altitude or both to evade. Depending on his airspeed and altitude, there is a finite amount of energy he can use for evasion.
For example take a fighter flying low and fast and getting shot at by a missile. The pilot doesn't have altitude but speed, so he will make some sort of radical turn to evade. It succeeds. However when he is engaged a second time, he is low and slow because the turn bled off his speed, so he can't evade the next missile.

(in reply to Flankerk)
Post #: 29
RE: Amazed at defensive prowess of modern fighters. - 11/8/2013 11:48:08 AM   
ExMachina


Posts: 462
Joined: 9/25/2013
Status: offline
Modeling aircraft energy sounds ideal and about a month ago CMANO developers were considering such an idea. Sunburn said in this thread

quote:

The solution we are considering revolves around the concept of bleeding energy (primarily kinematic but also potential) at every evasion, gradually recovering it with enough time, so there is an incentive to attack a unit with successive blows in order to exhaust its ability to evade.


I hope they follow through with the idea

(in reply to JCR)
Post #: 30
Page:   [1] 2   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> Amazed at defensive prowess of modern fighters. Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.734