Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Battle for Okinawa!

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Battle for Okinawa! Page: <<   < prev  98 99 [100] 101 102   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Battle for Okinawa! - 11/29/2013 8:57:58 PM   
JeffroK


Posts: 6391
Joined: 1/26/2005
Status: offline
Has Matrix fixed the disappearing posts bug???

I always Control C before hitting OK, and never lose them?????

_____________________________

Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum

(in reply to JeffroK)
Post #: 2971
RE: Battle for Okinawa! - 11/29/2013 9:08:23 PM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: JeffK

Has Matrix fixed the disappearing posts bug???

I always Control C before hitting OK, and never lose them?????


Nope its still present! Ran into it just a couple of days ago! I try to remember to copy the text before I post. But sometimes I forget and its always those times I have written a lot of text and it disappears!

(in reply to JeffroK)
Post #: 2972
RE: Battle for Okinawa! - 11/29/2013 9:11:00 PM   
Bullwinkle58


Posts: 11302
Joined: 2/24/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: JocMeister


quote:

ORIGINAL: JeffK

Has Matrix fixed the disappearing posts bug???

I always Control C before hitting OK, and never lose them?????


Nope its still present! Ran into it just a couple of days ago! I try to remember to copy the text before I post. But sometimes I forget and its always those times I have written a lot of text and it disappears!


It just happened to me five minutes ago. Yep, forgot to save. But in the refusal window there's a "Back" hot-point which I clicked and the post came back long enough for me to cut & paste into Notepad, close the compose window, open a new one, and paste it in. Saved it, barely.

_____________________________

The Moose

(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 2973
RE: Manila liberated!!! - 11/30/2013 3:31:13 AM   
Lokasenna


Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Commander Cody

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lokasenna

My friends just moved to Woodbridge. The Calvert Woodley store I mentioned earlier is in NW DC, on Connecticut Ave. I'll ask them if there's a good beer shop nearby, but I kind of doubt it...


Thanks a lot, Lokasenna. I think that's where I'll be heading. My dad said Virginia still has the archaic ABC store system, and I don't think the government will have the latest and greatest craft beer.

EDIT: Nice Okinawa operation, Joc.

Cheers,
CC


I was just over on that side of town tonight. It occurs to me that Calvert Woodley doesn't actually have that much beer, but they're otherwise a good liquor store. In VA, you go to the grocery stores to sell beer. If you're after craft brews, you can try a Whole Foods or Trader Joes.

In DC, I walked by a place in Cleveland Park called Cleveland Fine Wines or something (it's just to the left of the Cleveland Park Bar & Grill), I think basically across the street from the Metro stop. I could see in the window that they had at least several shelving sections of beer, floor to ceiling. I didn't catch a glimpse of any particular brand, but you might try that one. Other options would be D'vines in Columbia Heights (I found my favorite 'wee heavy' for the first time there), and finally there's this place that allegedly has 1,200 brands on display: http://www.chevychasewine.com/.


@Jocke - that whiskey isn't very dark. If you weren't international I'd look up where you could get my preference, a 'real' whiskey from the Midwest : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Templeton_Rye

(in reply to CaptBeefheart)
Post #: 2974
RE: Battle for Okinawa! - 11/30/2013 3:33:26 AM   
Lokasenna


Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: JeffK

Naha should have had 2-3000 AV and 7-9 forts.

Is it a common thread that JFB max their aircraft building, optimise their Fleet and upgrade their LCU and the "infrastructure" gets the hind teat?

Just like in real life, there are many very important bases, maybe not for the JFB to use but to take them out of the AFB hands, which get no attention until too late. IMVHO, places like Okinawa, Iwo Jima etc shoul have had been fortified to the max, the airbase and port could be ignored so that the AFB has to build them.

I know the JFB is short on engineers but this very long term planning becomes vital.




From my perspective, not THAT short on engineers. Short for the first objectives and line of defense, for sure. You can't build forts everywhere that far out. But by late '43 there are enough engineer units, plus the organic engineers, that it should be possible to have built up the really important places like Iwo, Okinawa, Luzon, etc.

(in reply to JeffroK)
Post #: 2975
RE: Manila liberated!!! - 11/30/2013 5:04:39 AM   
richlove


Posts: 196
Joined: 5/1/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lokasenna


quote:

ORIGINAL: Commander Cody

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lokasenna

My friends just moved to Woodbridge. The Calvert Woodley store I mentioned earlier is in NW DC, on Connecticut Ave. I'll ask them if there's a good beer shop nearby, but I kind of doubt it...


Thanks a lot, Lokasenna. I think that's where I'll be heading. My dad said Virginia still has the archaic ABC store system, and I don't think the government will have the latest and greatest craft beer.

EDIT: Nice Okinawa operation, Joc.

Cheers,
CC


I was just over on that side of town tonight. It occurs to me that Calvert Woodley doesn't actually have that much beer, but they're otherwise a good liquor store. In VA, you go to the grocery stores to sell beer. If you're after craft brews, you can try a Whole Foods or Trader Joes.

In DC, I walked by a place in Cleveland Park called Cleveland Fine Wines or something (it's just to the left of the Cleveland Park Bar & Grill), I think basically across the street from the Metro stop. I could see in the window that they had at least several shelving sections of beer, floor to ceiling. I didn't catch a glimpse of any particular brand, but you might try that one. Other options would be D'vines in Columbia Heights (I found my favorite 'wee heavy' for the first time there), and finally there's this place that allegedly has 1,200 brands on display: http://www.chevychasewine.com/.


@Jocke - that whiskey isn't very dark. If you weren't international I'd look up where you could get my preference, a 'real' whiskey from the Midwest : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Templeton_Rye


http://www.chevychasewine.com has a very good selection of beer. I don't know if it's 1200 brands, but it's at least 500. Very good place.

(in reply to Lokasenna)
Post #: 2976
RE: Manila liberated!!! - 11/30/2013 5:26:32 AM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lokasenna
@Jocke - that whiskey isn't very dark. If you weren't international I'd look up where you could get my preference, a 'real' whiskey from the Midwest : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Templeton_Rye


Not my usual drinking. I came across it by chance in London as it was recommended to me by a salesperson on the Whiskey Exchange. (It happens to be the greatest store EVER. If you are in London this is a more important visit than Big Ben, The Towern and Trafalgar! )

This is my usual drinking :)

http://www.ardbeg.com/ardbeg/whisky/ardbeg-corryvreckan#

That Templeton Rye looks really tempting. Sadly it cost a fortune here. 150 USD is a tad too much for trying something out I may not like!

(in reply to Lokasenna)
Post #: 2977
Battle for Okinawa! - 11/30/2013 7:01:11 AM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline
Imperial Japanese Army
______________________________________________________________________________

Looking through tracker and the VP section I noticed something quite interesting.

This is the VP score concerning LCU losses on 21st September 1944

4280:13010

And now on the 13th March 1945

12320:14296

Quite a significant loss. Basically the Japanese Army has suffered twice the losses in the last 6 months then what they did during the entire war up to September -44. This has to put a tremendous strain on his ability to resist. I would estimate Japan has suffered around half a million losses or more during this 6 months span. Something like 30 divisions including 4 Tank Divisions have been either annihilated completely or completely wrecked.

To put it simply. The IJ Army has turned into a 1942 Chinese army.

Here are some numbers:

Infantry (Anti Soft/Anti Armor)
IJA Infantry Squad 1943 20/5

USMC Rifle Squad 1944 43/55
USA Rifle Squad 1944 37/55
AIF Infsection 1944 23/75
Indian Infsection 1944 22/75


AFVs (Armor/Anti Armor/Antisoft

Type 97 Medium Tank 25/50/24

M4 Sherman 90/120/32
T34/85 90/115/25
M26 Pershing 135/220/34


I think the numbers show pretty clearly just how much more firepower that is contained in the Allied squads alone. This is not taking into account the tremendous differences in the TOE between an Allied and a Japanese ID at this stage. I´ll see if I can dig up some screens on that!


< Message edited by JocMeister -- 11/30/2013 8:24:28 AM >

(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 2978
RE: Battle for Okinawa! - 11/30/2013 9:52:21 AM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline
China
______________________________________________________________________________

Here is the situation. I´m slowly turning this into a reversed China. The difference will be that that Erik actually have a air force to fight back with. If he chooses to. He most likely will. I´m pretty certain he is mightily frustrated with the lack of air war lately.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 2979
RE: Battle for Okinawa! - 11/30/2013 1:52:20 PM   
Crackaces


Posts: 3858
Joined: 7/9/2011
Status: offline
Joc, Have you thought about what bases are required to get to 2:1 VP's before December 1945?



_____________________________

"What gets us into trouble is not what we don't know. It's what we know for sure that just ain't so"

(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 2980
RE: Battle for Okinawa! - 11/30/2013 3:31:44 PM   
Lokasenna


Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline
Hong Kong is worth a lot. If you don't have a focus yet in China, other than pushing forward, it should be this. And then along the coast to Shanghai, though I doubt you have time to make it to Shanghai before 1946.

Another place that is worth a lot is the Sakhalins. If he's committed his navy to the south and you can destroy or damage enough of it, you could move on the Kuriles/Sakhalins, I would think. Easier than before Okinawa, anyway.

(in reply to Crackaces)
Post #: 2981
RE: Battle for Okinawa! - 11/30/2013 4:19:26 PM   
Crackaces


Posts: 3858
Joined: 7/9/2011
Status: offline
quote:

Hong Kong is worth a lot. If you don't have a focus yet in China, other than pushing forward, it should be this. And then along the coast to Shanghai, though I doubt you have time to make it to Shanghai before 1946.


In my last game I made it in 3 months from Hong Kong/Canton line to Shanghai/Nanking using 1QTR 1944 OOB. The OOB is greatly expanded at this point and the Allies have opportunities to land.
Things start to collapse once supply is interdicted ...

Shanghai has an Allied Multiplier of 100, which given Basic VP# x [ ( current size of port ) + ( current size of airfield x 2) ]can yield airbase 9 port 9 2700 points!
Hong Kong is a mere 40 multiplier for the Allies ..



_____________________________

"What gets us into trouble is not what we don't know. It's what we know for sure that just ain't so"

(in reply to Lokasenna)
Post #: 2982
RE: Battle for Okinawa! - 11/30/2013 5:41:06 PM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline
Obviously HK and Shanghai are on the wishlist. I don´t think any of them are unattainable. As I know from playing the allies once supply runs out the collapse goes VERY quick. I need about 25.000 more VPs for AV. With the current rate I will hit it in about 3 months. I hope to get a viable strat campaign going again and that it will keep the VPs rolling in. If I can get the Japanese army in China to collapse thats probably another 10k VP. Another 1700 VPs will come from Nago once that is built up.

I´ve actually started looking at Formosa again. With 300.000 troops there and another 1000 VPs in the bases it might actually not be a bad target VP wise...

In all honestly the KB and the BBs are a pretty juice target VP wise too. But that is also true for the Allied fleet as Crackaces pointed out earlier!

(in reply to Crackaces)
Post #: 2983
RE: Battle for Okinawa! - 11/30/2013 6:14:59 PM   
Crackaces


Posts: 3858
Joined: 7/9/2011
Status: offline
quote:

I need about 25.000 more VPs for AV.


Not to harp on this, but the IJ are going to be losing VP's depending on how well those bases were supplied before you capture them.
Each point in the denominator is like 2 points gained in the numerator .. AV could be closer than you think

If this is an objective .. Singapore has to be on your target list .. (20) multiplier for the IJ (90) plus this port/airbase can be built up to a maximum for the Allies this base can have a 2200 point swing. Plus the 420 or so points are like 840 points toward AV ,,
Peiping seems like a huge win at (100) allied multiplier, but in contrast is only a (1) IJ multiplier and no port! Not as big as swing ..

One landing to explore is Chinnampo (BigMac hits Inchon early! ) and March to Heijo Allied (50) multiplier . This cuts off supply from Pusan ..

_____________________________

"What gets us into trouble is not what we don't know. It's what we know for sure that just ain't so"

(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 2984
RE: Battle for Okinawa! - 11/30/2013 7:02:21 PM   
zuluhour


Posts: 5244
Joined: 1/20/2011
From: Maryland
Status: offline
Broadway Liquors on Joppa rd Towson is a supermarket of wine and booze. It's the size of an old A&P and well staffed. I often pick out wines at the Bin in Baltimore or Pinehurst in Roland Park then buy them at Beltway.

(in reply to Crackaces)
Post #: 2985
RE: Battle for Okinawa! - 12/1/2013 4:48:50 AM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Crackaces

Not to harp on this, but the IJ are going to be losing VP's depending on how well those bases were supplied before you capture them.
Each point in the denominator is like 2 points gained in the numerator .. AV could be closer than you think

If this is an objective .. Singapore has to be on your target list .. (20) multiplier for the IJ (90) plus this port/airbase can be built up to a maximum for the Allies this base can have a 2200 point swing. Plus the 420 or so points are like 840 points toward AV ,,
Peiping seems like a huge win at (100) allied multiplier, but in contrast is only a (1) IJ multiplier and no port! Not as big as swing ..

One landing to explore is Chinnampo (BigMac hits Inchon early! ) and March to Heijo Allied (50) multiplier . This cuts off supply from Pusan ..


While Singers has its lure with its 3000 VPs I´m not sure its worth the effort. Troops and supply has probably been plentiful there throughout the game. That probably means big forts. I´m not too keen on doing a shock attack into 150.000 well supplied Japanese troops sitting behind level 7-9 Forts... This would require a full US army. Maybe more. I´m not so sure I want to divert that much.

Looks like China is about to become really interesting too....

(in reply to Crackaces)
Post #: 2986
RE: Battle for Okinawa! - 12/1/2013 6:14:26 AM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline
14th-15th March 1945
______________________________________________________________________________

Some interesting developments on the 15th.

------------------------
Destination Okinawa
------------------------

The fleet has rendezvoused with the replenishment fleet. Tomorrow we move back towards Okinawa. We havn´t been spotted for two days now. Erik has the KB on station between China and Formosa.

------------------------
South China Sea
------------------------

Our DE patrols run into two more lone ships sinking them both. I anticipated Eriks move here as he lunged parts of the KB forward to strike at the 6 DEs hunting his lone ships. So we moved out of range in time. I love this kind of behavior. Erik must have burned a tremendous amount of fuel during the last week. By all means do move around to try and get a few 5 VP DEs.

I have no clue what he trying to do here. He has a gazillion ASW TFs moving towards Formosa and the KB on station.

------------------------
Palembang
------------------------

Erik tries again to get ships back here. I have no clue why he bothers. He lose another 4 ships to the TBs on Java.

------------------------
China
------------------------

Here is the real news. Erik abandons his roadblock outside Nanning! I´m stunned. Happily stunned. He just opened the door to China for me. I wonder if his supply situation is so bad he can´t get it to flow that far West?

His stack is now in a clear hex. Four hexes from two allied level 9 AFs (Both Hanoi and Haiphong reached level 9 on the 15th). And 7 hexes from the closest Japanese large airfield. I don´t think I have to paint a picture on what tomorrow will bring. Every bomber on Luzon is going to rebase to China tomorrow and its going to be glorious!

I need to decide on how to move forward now that the door is open!

------------------------
Japanese strategy
------------------------

Usually I can read Erik pretty well and have a general idea on what he is doing. But right now I feel like I´m missing a big part of the puzzle.

-Why does he have the KB by Formosa? He has 1500 Fighters there already. Whats the point of having the KB there? ---Why is he moving a huge number of ASW TFs towards the area when he knows my subs have retired to Luzon.
-Why on earth is he using half the KB to chase a couple of DEs?
-Whats up with the single ship TFs trying to leave the DEI? 3 of them have been AKs. Why does he feel its necessary to risk them with a move towards the HI?
-Why is he trying to get oil from PB at this stage?

The only thing I can think of that makes all those things add up is if he intends to move into the SCS. Is he going to get all the ships and troops out from Singers with the help of the Navy? That would be insane on a grand scale.

I just don´t get what his motives are right now. I need to figure that out.

Maps are coming up in a couple of hours.

(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 2987
RE: Battle for Okinawa! - 12/1/2013 8:31:38 AM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline
Formosa/SCS
______________________________________________________________________________

Here is the situation. I don´t understand what Erik is doing here.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 2988
RE: Battle for Okinawa! - 12/1/2013 9:15:25 AM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline
China
______________________________________________________________________________

I can´t explain the retreat other then supply issues or that the bombardment was really starting to effect his troops. Now they are in a death trap though. Clear hexes are a death sentence for Japanese troops at this stage.

Whatever the reason this just opened the front door to China wide open. I can now really start to counter Eriks superstacking with maneuver. There are simply too many roads to cover with a superstack each. The newly formed Combined Motorized Army will race ahead (2 Motorized IDs + all the armor 1500 AV) and drive a wedge into China.

First objective is simply to separate the Nanning superstack from the HK/Canton one. The CMA will also be tasked with securing a port on the southern coast.

I have to admit...the prospect of this "reversed China" is hugely satisfying. Now its time for the Japanese side to feel how much fun it is to play without supply and hopeless troops while suffering thousands of casualties from the air each turn. But as I have been told its no problem to defend under those circumstances. Its all about defending in the right spot ey? We will see about that....This is kind of a personal vendetta so you will probably see some irrantional and strange behaviour here in the coming months! I really, really hate China.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 2989
RE: Battle for Okinawa! - 12/1/2013 12:37:43 PM   
Crackaces


Posts: 3858
Joined: 7/9/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: JocMeister

quote:

ORIGINAL: Crackaces

Not to harp on this, but the IJ are going to be losing VP's depending on how well those bases were supplied before you capture them.
Each point in the denominator is like 2 points gained in the numerator .. AV could be closer than you think

If this is an objective .. Singapore has to be on your target list .. (20) multiplier for the IJ (90) plus this port/airbase can be built up to a maximum for the Allies this base can have a 2200 point swing. Plus the 420 or so points are like 840 points toward AV ,,
Peiping seems like a huge win at (100) allied multiplier, but in contrast is only a (1) IJ multiplier and no port! Not as big as swing ..

One landing to explore is Chinnampo (BigMac hits Inchon early! ) and March to Heijo Allied (50) multiplier . This cuts off supply from Pusan ..


While Singers has its lure with its 3000 VPs I´m not sure its worth the effort. Troops and supply has probably been plentiful there throughout the game. That probably means big forts. I´m not too keen on doing a shock attack into 150.000 well supplied Japanese troops sitting behind level 7-9 Forts... This would require a full US army. Maybe more. I´m not so sure I want to divert that much.

Looks like China is about to become really interesting too....


If the IJ still have troops (vs. low grade support forces) in Singers than I agree 100% not worth the time and blood spent ..
Korea although might offer a worthwhile adventure and close by level 7 built to level 9 airfields ...

_____________________________

"What gets us into trouble is not what we don't know. It's what we know for sure that just ain't so"

(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 2990
RE: Battle for Okinawa! - 12/1/2013 4:43:38 PM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Crackaces
If the IJ still have troops (vs. low grade support forces) in Singers than I agree 100% not worth the time and blood spent ..
Korea although might offer a worthwhile adventure and close by level 7 built to level 9 airfields ...


I´m actually not sure what he has in place. But I think he superstacked the troops from Java, lower DEI, Sumatra and Borneo at Singers. Recon lists 90.000 troops in 57 units.

I´m 95% sure he won´t have a division there but probably loads of NavGuards and smaller BDEs. The thing that worries me though is the forts that could be all the way up to 9.

My gut says it won´t be worth it!

(in reply to Crackaces)
Post #: 2991
RE: Battle for Okinawa! - 12/1/2013 5:42:40 PM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline
Got the turn from Erik and have watched the replay.

No time to do the turn tonight though as I promised the missus to watch a movie with her.

Using ONLY the 2Es I caused something like 2500 casaulties in the clear hex. I wonder what happens when you add 500 4Es to that?

(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 2992
RE: Battle for Okinawa! - 12/1/2013 6:53:41 PM   
RogerJNeilson


Posts: 1277
Joined: 4/12/2012
From: Bedlington, Northumberland, UK
Status: offline
Regarding Singers, its like he is running his own POW camp for you. If he cannot do anything to your plans from there, and you don't need its facilities then I'd say you can leave it for months with maybe some irritant bombing to run down supplies.

Eventually he will run out of supplies - and you can take it if you still need it. Its become a bit of a backwater though so it would divert your offensive forces needlessly.

Roger

_____________________________

An unplanned dynasty: Roger Neilson, Roger Neilson 11, Roger Neilson 3 previous posts 898+1515 + 1126 = 3539.....Finally completed my game which started the day WITP:AE was released

(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 2993
RE: Battle for Okinawa! - 12/2/2013 4:11:49 AM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Roger Neilson 3

Regarding Singers, its like he is running his own POW camp for you. If he cannot do anything to your plans from there, and you don't need its facilities then I'd say you can leave it for months with maybe some irritant bombing to run down supplies.

Eventually he will run out of supplies - and you can take it if you still need it. Its become a bit of a backwater though so it would divert your offensive forces needlessly.

Roger


Good point. I can move my "training squadrons" from bombing in the lower DEI to bomb Singers instead.

And if I find I need the VPs later on I can divert.

(in reply to RogerJNeilson)
Post #: 2994
RE: Battle for Okinawa! - 12/2/2013 5:45:16 AM   
Speedysteve

 

Posts: 15998
Joined: 9/11/2001
From: Reading, England
Status: offline
I'm sure it's already done but make sure Singers industry is taken out to prevent supply creation

_____________________________

WitE 2 Tester
WitE Tester
BTR/BoB Tester

(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 2995
RE: Battle for Okinawa! - 12/2/2013 5:47:56 AM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline
16th March 1945
______________________________________________________________________________

A good day in the air for the allies. Been some time since that happened last.

------------------------
Destination Okinawa
------------------------

A bit worryingly I lost sight of the KB. She is probably hiding somewhere around Formosa and my search was grounded due to weather. Only thing I can think of.

Erik strikes at the AF at Naha again with good result. Little bit disappointed with the AA here as I have one of the big 72 gun AA units. But it wasn´t propperly prepped and is still suffering 46 disruption. I hope once that goes down I can really start to hit some things. Only 11 Jap planes are shot down.

AF is again closed. Doesn´t look like combat Engineers help with repair? Or is lack of supply (still have 28k at the base but its in yellow) effecting repair?

Erik again got a fix on my CVs.

quote:

Afternoon Air attack on TF, near Daito Shoto at 96,70

Weather in hex: Clear sky

Raid detected at 40 NM, estimated altitude 2,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 11 minutes

Japanese aircraft
Ki-67-Ib Peggy x 9

Allied aircraft
Corsair II x 92
Corsair IV x 51
Hellcat I x 6
Seafire IIC x 10
Seafire L.III x 4
F4U-1A Corsair x 55
F4U-1D Corsair x 449
F6F-3 Hellcat x 136
F6F-5 Hellcat x 198


Japanese aircraft losses
Ki-67-Ib Peggy: 5 destroyed


I don´t know if Erik will try and interfere with this landing. No juicy combat troops or Amphibs. Only LSTs and AKs. Might be a good opportunity to wreck his strike planes for little risk.

------------------------
China
------------------------

It was indeed glorious! The 4Es struck at the surrounding airfields while the 2Es hit the troops in the clear moving for Nanning. We send out multiple sweeps hitting some a halfhearted LRCAP over his troops.

Morning Air attack on 35th Army, at 72,56 , near Nanning

Weather in hex: Light cloud

Raid spotted at 27 NM, estimated altitude 34,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 10 minutes

Japanese aircraft
J2M5 Jack x 12
Ki-84r Frank x 19


Allied aircraft
F4U-1D Corsair x 42

Japanese aircraft losses
J2M5 Jack: 2 destroyed
Ki-84r Frank: 2 destroyed


Allied aircraft losses
F4U-1D Corsair: 2 destroyed
quote:



After the day is over 23 Jacks and Franks are shot down for 4 Corsairs. Another 15 are destroyed on the airfields. No allied pilots lost. Good times.

Now for the glorious part.

quote:

Morning Air attack on 17th Division, at 72,56 , near Nanning

Weather in hex: Light cloud

Raid detected at 42 NM, estimated altitude 11,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 12 minutes

Allied aircraft
B-25G Mitchell x 3
B-25H Mitchell x 48
B-25J1 Mitchell x 56
B-25J11 Mitchell x 56
P-38J Lightning x 3
P-38L Lightning x 52
F4U-1D Corsair x 35
PBJ-1D Mitchell x 29
PV-1 Ventura x 12


Allied aircraft losses
B-25J1 Mitchell: 1 damaged

Japanese ground losses:
1647 casualties reported
Squads: 11 destroyed, 73 disabled
Non Combat: 15 destroyed, 131 disabled
Engineers: 3 destroyed, 5 disabled
Vehicles lost 25 (1 destroyed, 24 disabled)


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Morning Air attack on 60th Division, at 72,56 , near Nanning

Weather in hex: Light cloud

Raid spotted at 33 NM, estimated altitude 12,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 9 minutes

Allied aircraft
B-25D1 Mitchell x 4
PBJ-1H Mitchell x 14
PBJ-1J Mitchell x 14


No Allied losses

Japanese ground losses:
284 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 18 disabled
Non Combat: 2 destroyed, 31 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Morning Air attack on 65th Brigade, at 72,56 , near Nanning

Weather in hex: Light cloud

Raid spotted at 15 NM, estimated altitude 10,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 4 minutes

Allied aircraft
B-25J11 Mitchell x 22

No Allied losses

Japanese ground losses:
129 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 9 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 8 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled



There are about 5 more of these. With the air fields closed and AA fire negligible tomorrow will see 500 4Es added to the strike and altitude dropped down a tad more. There is a good possibility my troops can catch up with his troops. If I can keep them in the hex for two more turns I will... Even if I fail to do that I hope Erik will have a really hard time recovering all those disablements. ´

Another set of 4Es close the AF Tsuyung. Tomorrow we will hit the 3 IDs in the mountains. Would be nice to open up that path too and get the Burma road open again.

Overnight Eriks situation has deteriorated significantly. With the Nanning stack at least temporarily out of the picture the last remaining troops are in the Canton/HK area. I think if Erik wants to avoid a complete collapse here he will need to start shifting unrestricted troops from Formosa to China. That would be a strategical Allied victory IMO.

------------------------
Strat bombing
------------------------

The B29s hit the HI/LI at Shanghai. Results were okay. 5 HI and 73 LI for 3 B29s.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 2996
RE: Battle for Okinawa! - 12/2/2013 5:48:56 AM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Speedy

I'm sure it's already done but make sure Singers industry is taken out to prevent supply creation


Good point. Thanks for reminding me. Actually havn´t done that. Forgot about it!

(in reply to Speedysteve)
Post #: 2997
RE: Battle for Okinawa! - 12/2/2013 7:17:34 AM   
Speedysteve

 

Posts: 15998
Joined: 9/11/2001
From: Reading, England
Status: offline
In fact (don't remember seeing a pic of Malaya recently) make sure all the industry in Malaya is blitzed (HI at Georgetown etc) to prevent supply creation

_____________________________

WitE 2 Tester
WitE Tester
BTR/BoB Tester

(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 2998
RE: Battle for Okinawa! - 12/2/2013 7:33:22 AM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Speedy

In fact (don't remember seeing a pic of Malaya recently) make sure all the industry in Malaya is blitzed (HI at Georgetown etc) to prevent supply creation


Georgetown I´ve dealt with. But when I did I was out of range of Singers. And then forgot about it. Pretty much as I did in China. Quite embarrassing!

So, thanks for reminding me!

(in reply to Speedysteve)
Post #: 2999
RE: Battle for Okinawa! - 12/2/2013 7:36:00 AM   
Speedysteve

 

Posts: 15998
Joined: 9/11/2001
From: Reading, England
Status: offline
NP. I now have more spare time to think of these things...until my next game starts!

_____________________________

WitE 2 Tester
WitE Tester
BTR/BoB Tester

(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 3000
Page:   <<   < prev  98 99 [100] 101 102   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Battle for Okinawa! Page: <<   < prev  98 99 [100] 101 102   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.047