Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Command Decisions: Yeomen vs. Samurai RA 6.4

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Command Decisions: Yeomen vs. Samurai RA 6.4 Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Command Decisions: Yeomen vs. Samurai RA 6.4 - 12/9/2013 12:33:36 AM   
DOCUP


Posts: 3073
Joined: 7/7/2010
Status: offline 		John go in 2 good port strikes. That's rough. The only thing worse than those old BBs sinking, is having them clog up the shipyards.

Larry: I would expect Johns air loses to go up with a second strike. PH's AF doesn't look like its closed. If it's not close you can put up some CAP. That will increase his loses. I don't know about the paratroopers.

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 121
RE: Command Decisions: Yeomen vs. Samurai RA 6.4 - 12/9/2013 12:36:07 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Note to Jim Moore: Um......Santa Barbara is one of the cities outputting Resources and it's got 30 factories to repair and there's no
engineers there to fix it and the supply is way way too low, so I request some engineers to build up the RC and a load of supplies to
enable the fix. Thanks.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 122
RE: Command Decisions: Yeomen vs. Samurai RA 6.4 - 12/9/2013 12:39:30 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Hey Jim: same story for Santa Ana. It's got 20 factories to repair. I only need them for a month or less. Okay?




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 123
RE: Command Decisions: Yeomen vs. Samurai RA 6.4 - 12/9/2013 12:42:14 AM   
DOCUP


Posts: 3073
Joined: 7/7/2010
Status: offline 		Damn this is a popular place.

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 124
RE: Command Decisions: Yeomen vs. Samurai RA 6.4 - 12/9/2013 12:51:07 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		I have temporarily turned off the repair of the Light Industry in those bases that also have a Resource Center that needs repair so that
the repair efforts will be devoted to the repair of the Resource Centers. As soon as they are repaired I'm going to turn on the repair of
the Light Industry. I expect the light industry to be off for most of the factories just a month or so. Longer on the bigger loads.







Attachment (1)

< Message edited by larryfulkerson -- 12/9/2013 1:54:16 AM >

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 125
RE: Command Decisions: Yeomen vs. Samurai RA 6.4 - 12/9/2013 12:53:09 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DOCUP
Damn this is a popular place.

It's because of the excellent advice we get from you experts. Everybody wants to be in on the secret to this game.

(in reply to DOCUP)
Post #: 126
RE: Command Decisions: Yeomen vs. Samurai RA 6.4 - 12/9/2013 1:02:48 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		I just happened to notice that John3rd has a TF headed NW from Talaud-eilanden and it looks like he's going to intercept a lot of those
ships fleeing Manila and the south PI. This promises to be bloody. D'oh.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 127
RE: Command Decisions: Yeomen vs. Samurai RA 6.4 - 12/9/2013 1:15:51 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		I found two fighter units and a bomber unit that I could move from Balikpapan to Tarakan and thereby be in a better position to harry
that Jap TF coming from the NE. I don't expect that I'll get any hits on anything but I'll feel better for trying.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 128
RE: Command Decisions: Yeomen vs. Samurai RA 6.4 - 12/9/2013 1:33:45 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Here's the current situation w/ the KB. It seems to be sitting to the north of Pearl not going anywhere. That presages a second day of
attacks on Pearl. I'm guessing.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 129
RE: Command Decisions: Yeomen vs. Samurai RA 6.4 - 12/9/2013 1:50:25 AM   
EHansen


Posts: 360
Joined: 12/6/2013
Status: offline 		I don't think you need Engineers to repair LI or resources( or any other factory). You should just need to increase the supply demand by about 4,000 at each city to gather about 12,000 supply. Then you can repair 2 factories each turn.

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 130
RE: Command Decisions: Yeomen vs. Samurai RA 6.4 - 12/9/2013 3:22:18 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Hey there EHansen dude: I thought I read somewhere that engineers were needed to repair factories. I could be wrong,. I've been wrong before. If I really don't need engineers then that's really good news and thank you very much.

(in reply to EHansen)
Post #: 131
RE: Command Decisions: Yeomen vs. Samurai RA 6.4 - 12/9/2013 3:42:38 AM   
CaptBeefheart


Posts: 2301
Joined: 7/4/2003
From: Seoul, Korea
Status: offline 		EHansen is correct: Engineers are definitely not needed to repair factories. They only help with port and airfield repair and construction, plus forts. Also, I think in a few days your factories should be working in most places once resources get properly distributed.

Also, I use those YOs as single-ship TFs to fuel exposed front-line bases from supply dumps. Of course, your HRs might preclude such usage.

Simonsez: Love your avatar. "Hello Peter. What's happening? Um, I'm gonna need you to go ahead and come in tomorrow. So if you could be here around nine, that would be great. Mmmkay?"

Cheers,
CC

_____________________________

Beer, because barley makes lousy bread.

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 132
RE: Command Decisions: Yeomen vs. Samurai RA 6.4 - 12/9/2013 3:45:09 AM   
Capt. Harlock


Posts: 5358
Joined: 9/15/2001
From: Los Angeles
Status: offline
quote:

Here's the current situation w/ the KB. It seems to be sitting to the north of Pearl not going anywhere. That presages a second day of
attacks on Pearl.


I trust this time there will be American fighters in the air.

_____________________________

Civil war? What does that mean? Is there any foreign war? Isn't every war fought between men, between brothers?

--Victor Hugo

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 133
RE: Command Decisions: Yeomen vs. Samurai RA 6.4 - 12/9/2013 3:47:29 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Capt. Harlock
quote:

Here's the current situation w/ the KB. It seems to be sitting to the north of Pearl not going anywhere. That presages a second day of
attacks on Pearl.

I trust this time there will be American fighters in the air.

That's USARMY stuff and that belongs to Jim, but I'm pretty sure he's on top of it.

(in reply to Capt. Harlock)
Post #: 134
RE: Command Decisions: Yeomen vs. Samurai RA 6.4 - 12/10/2013 12:08:10 AM   
moore4807


Posts: 1089
Joined: 6/2/2000
From: Punta Gorda FL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Capt. Harlock

I trust this time there will be American fighters in the air.


Capt.
EVERY available fighter at Pearl is on 80%CAP/20% REST... AAF forces are at 15K (P-40) 10K (P-26) 20K (F4F-3)
I pooled all the fighters to Manila and did the same minus the Navy F's

Larry,
I didn't read this until after the turn was sent, Noted for next turn, checking all US bases for supply. I saw SF & LA were red exclamation points...

I was hurrying since the internet problems occurred and I didnt want to be down for a third night without getting this done and off to John.

I am appreciative of all the hits (readers) and even more so of the comments, "Aww Youse guys!!!" Keep hitting us with the ideas!

1) Accomplished list for turn 2
a) Undamaged SS at major US bases have been sortied and ordered to interdict shipping along Japans southern coast, Pearl is now the Central Base for all but the S boats. (S-boats will use Johnston Is)
b) Damaged SS at Manila got shipyard space (2 S boats will have to wait) avg 5-10 days in dock.
c) Pearl Harbor dock is in reverse order of damage - lightly damaged got shipyard time (2 CA's mainly) medium damage (2 BB, 2 CL's, 3 DD's) also got docked, mostly all other warships got pierside until the yards free up. 2 BB's are terminal (85% Flt or worse) but no scuttle option yet.
d) Manila ships are getting the Dutch Harbor escape route, it worked once before but I figure the Betty/Nell's will get most of them in the Phillipine Sea.
e) Sent PBY4's from Phillipines to Columbo, I will transfer them over to Larry, (I don't remember who's suggestion it was, but it's a d*mn good one!)


Plans for turn 3 for US Armed Forces...
1) Check all US bases for supply and set proper amounts
2) See what John is doing with the CV's north of PH.
3) Start getting the CONUS troops organized. Engineers have the early priority.

More to add as I think of it...

_____________________________


(in reply to Capt. Harlock)
Post #: 135
RE: Command Decisions: Yeomen vs. Samurai RA 6.4 - 12/10/2013 8:00:32 PM   
moore4807


Posts: 1089
Joined: 6/2/2000
From: Punta Gorda FL
Status: offline 		12/8/42

We are at WAR!!!, and getting our butts kicked for the most part!

US Forces report a naval encounter with Japanese CVTF west of Pearl Harbor...

Night Time Surface Combat, near Lihue at 177,109, Range 12,000 Yards

Japanese Ships
CV Shokaku
CV Zuikaku
CVL Zuiho
CA Tone, Shell hits 1
CA Chikuma, Shell hits 3
CL Isuzu, Shell hits 2
DD Susuzuki
DD Hatsuzuki
DD Yugumo
DD Isokaze
DD Shiranui
DD Arare
DD Kasumi

Allied Ships
CL Helena, Shell hits 1
DD Cummings
DD Case
DD Conyngham
DD Shaw
DD Downes, Shell hits 2
DD Cassin
DD Reid
DD Tucker, Shell hits 2

Day Time Surface Combat, near Niihau at 174,107, Range 23,000 Yards

Japanese Ships
CV Shokaku, Shell hits 1
CV Zuikaku, Shell hits 2, on fire
CVL Zuiho, Shell hits 1
CA Tone
CA Chikuma, Shell hits 3
CL Isuzu, Shell hits 1
DD Susuzuki, Shell hits 1, on fire
DD Hatsuzuki, Shell hits 2
DD Yugumo
DD Isokaze
DD Shiranui
DD Arare
DD Kasumi, Shell hits 1, on fire

Allied Ships
CA Indianapolis, Shell hits 10, on fire
DMS Dorsey
DMS Long, Shell hits 1, on fire
DMS Elliot
DMS Southard
DMS Hopkins, Shell hits 2

And the payback for not hitting the carrier's more

Morning Air attack on TF, near Niihau at 175,107

Weather in hex: Moderate rain

Raid spotted at 12 NM, estimated altitude 11,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 4 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 10
B5N2 Kate x 24

Japanese aircraft losses
B5N2 Kate: 3 damaged

Allied Ships
CA Indianapolis, Torpedo hits 2, heavy fires, heavy damage
DMS Dorsey


Putting everything flying at Manila... doesn't seem to matter other than a lot less ships/subs to worry about...

Morning Air attack on Manila , at 79,77

Weather in hex: Overcast

Raid detected at 104 NM, estimated altitude 13,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 41 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 83
G3M2 Nell x 32
G4M1 Betty x 35

Allied aircraft
P-40B Warhawk x 12
P-40E Warhawk x 22

Japanese aircraft losses
A6M2 Zero: 1 destroyed
G3M2 Nell: 1 destroyed, 6 damaged
G4M1 Betty: 4 destroyed, 1 damaged

Allied aircraft losses
P-40B Warhawk: 1 destroyed
P-40E Warhawk: 2 destroyed

Allied Ships
AS Canopus, Bomb hits 1, on fire
AO Trinity, Bomb hits 1, on fire
SS Sturgeon, Bomb hits 1, and is sunk
AV Langley, Bomb hits 2, on fire
SS Pickerel, Bomb hits 1, heavy damage
SS Seadragon, Bomb hits 2, and is sunk
SS Swordfish, Bomb hits 1, and is sunk
AM Tanager, Bomb hits 1, on fire, heavy damage
SS S-41, Bomb hits 1, and is sunk
AS Otus, Bomb hits 2, on fire
SS Sealion, Bomb hits 2, and is sunk
SS Porpoise, Bomb hits 1, heavy damage
SS Saury, Bomb hits 1, and is sunk

Allied ground losses:
7 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Pearl Harbor on the other hand... Defends itself nicely

Morning Air attack on TF, near Pearl Harbor at 180,107

Weather in hex: Heavy rain

Raid detected at 89 NM, estimated altitude 16,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 33 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 16
D3A1 Val x 12

Allied aircraft
P-26A x 1
P-36A Mohawk x 23
P-40B Warhawk x 42
F4F-3 Wildcat x 9
SNJ-3 Texan x 1

Japanese aircraft losses
A6M2 Zero: 1 destroyed
D3A1 Val: 6 destroyed

Allied aircraft losses
P-26A: 1 destroyed
P-40B Warhawk: 1 destroyed

Afternoon Air attack on TF, near Pearl Harbor at 180,107

Weather in hex: Light cloud

Raid detected at 67 NM, estimated altitude 9,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 28 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 24
B5N2 Kate x 21

Allied aircraft
P-36A Mohawk x 23
P-40B Warhawk x 40
F4F-3 Wildcat x 8
SNJ-3 Texan x 1

Japanese aircraft losses
A6M2 Zero: 1 destroyed
B5N2 Kate: 11 destroyed

Allied aircraft losses
P-36A Mohawk: 2 destroyed
P-40B Warhawk: 1 destroyed

For the rest of the ugly truth I'm enclosing the Combat Report in it's entirety for your reading pleasure...

Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to moore4807)
Post #: 136
RE: Command Decisions: Yeomen vs. Samurai RA 6.4 - 12/10/2013 8:15:36 PM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline 		Way to go west of Pearl! Sometimes you can really put some hurt on those carriers if they hang around for a second attack.

_____________________________

Intel Monkey: https://sites.google.com/view/staffmonkeys/home

(in reply to moore4807)
Post #: 137
RE: Command Decisions: Yeomen vs. Samurai RA 6.4 - 12/10/2013 8:21:31 PM   
moore4807


Posts: 1089
Joined: 6/2/2000
From: Punta Gorda FL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: witpqs

Way to go west of Pearl! Sometimes you can really put some hurt on those carriers if they hang around for a second attack.


Thanks witpqs,

At the risk of seeming knowledgeable - I see two things from the KB2 going westward... He's out to trap Enterprise and/or Lexington CV groups out by Wake, and he's going to support Wake invasion and or Guam before refitting. The help from the encounter is maybe he will take the CV's home first now to patch-n-paint!

adding SigInt for 12/8/41 to get opinions of intentions so far...

SIG INT REPORT FOR Dec 08, 41

2/16th Engineer Regiment is loaded on a Japanese TK moving to Legaspi.
Radio transmissions detected at Canton (77,59).
13th RGC Temp. Division is located at Ichang(83,48).
55th Mountain Gun Regiment is planning for an attack on Tavoy.
10th Ind. Mountain Gun Regiment is located at 78,60.
146th Infantry Regiment is planning for an attack on Davao.
1/16th Recon Regiment is loaded on a Std-E Cargo class xAKL moving to Legaspi.
30th Infantry Regiment is located at Harbin(109,39).
Gifu JAAF Base Force is located at Gifu(110,59).
24th Infantry Regiment is loaded on a Keihuku Maru class xAP moving to Jaluit.
16th Infantry Regiment is planning for an attack on Singapore.
Kimura Det is loaded on a Japanese PG moving to Cotabato.
13/90th Infantry Regiment is planning for an attack on Davao.
12/1st Maizuru Assault Division is loaded on a Aden Cargo class xAK moving to Wake Island.
2/42nd Infantry Regiment is loaded on a Yusen S Cargo class AK moving to Patani.
1st Ind.Mixed Brigade is located at Sinyang(86,48).
49th Infantry Regiment is located at Sunwu(113,34).
113th Infantry Regiment is planning for an attack on Kota Bharu.
3/21st Infantry Regiment is loaded on a Ku'dai Cargo class xAKL moving to Mersing.
4/20th Infantry Regiment is planning for an attack on Mauban.

< Message edited by moore4807 -- 12/10/2013 9:26:11 PM >

_____________________________


(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 138
RE: Command Decisions: Yeomen vs. Samurai RA 6.4 - 12/10/2013 9:57:43 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Hey you guys: I just got through watching the combat animations and was mildly annoyed w/ the screen jumping up and down on the
right side. I can still make out the rough draft of what's happening on the right side but I'd really prefer that it stand still and lemme
see the movie like it's supposed to be seen. I'm hoping there's a command-line switch I can use or something. I'm running Windows 7
for an operating system and I wouldn't be surprised to hear that's there's no cure. It's MicroSoft after all.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to moore4807)
Post #: 139
RE: Command Decisions: Yeomen vs. Samurai RA 6.4 - 12/10/2013 10:08:32 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Here's an edited ( for size ) version of the Tracker alerts:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 140
RE: Command Decisions: Yeomen vs. Samurai RA 6.4 - 12/10/2013 10:11:22 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Here's what the Resources Trend is now:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 141
RE: Command Decisions: Yeomen vs. Samurai RA 6.4 - 12/10/2013 10:13:50 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Here's how the Allied economy is doing right now:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 142
RE: Command Decisions: Yeomen vs. Samurai RA 6.4 - 12/10/2013 10:21:45 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Here's a view Tracker gives of the date of arrival of the carriers that the Allies are going to get. I've sorted the DOA column in
increasing order to give a better idea of how many carriers are coming and when.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 143
RE: Command Decisions: Yeomen vs. Samurai RA 6.4 - 12/10/2013 10:29:21 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		According to Tracker the Allies are building about 530 planes per month of various kinds. In the red rectangle I have sorted into
ascending order how many planes are being built ( inside the parenthacees ) per month. The P-40 is being pumped out the most
and the transports aren't getting many new ones.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 144
RE: Command Decisions: Yeomen vs. Samurai RA 6.4 - 12/10/2013 10:58:30 PM   
moore4807


Posts: 1089
Joined: 6/2/2000
From: Punta Gorda FL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: larryfulkerson

Hey you guys: I just got through watching the combat animations and was mildly annoyed w/ the screen jumping up and down on the
right side. I can still make out the rough draft of what's happening on the right side but I'd really prefer that it stand still and lemme
see the movie like it's supposed to be seen. I'm hoping there's a command-line switch I can use or something. I'm running Windows 7
for an operating system and I wouldn't be surprised to hear that's there's no cure. It's MicroSoft after all.





Larry,

I can't help you there, sorry. I've only heard two theories - Its your video card and how the game uses it. and the second is its from the bomb's and TT's hits to accentuate the effects... I have no problem being wrong in either case...

I just get colored blocks aproximating the size of the animation and it suddenly appears after the battle starts... then the box stays for 10-15 sec after the battle finishes and makes a discolored box on the right hand side. It clears up by the end though! <grin>

_____________________________


(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 145
RE: Command Decisions: Yeomen vs. Samurai RA 6.4 - 12/10/2013 11:07:23 PM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: moore4807


quote:

ORIGINAL: larryfulkerson

Hey you guys: I just got through watching the combat animations and was mildly annoyed w/ the screen jumping up and down on the
right side. I can still make out the rough draft of what's happening on the right side but I'd really prefer that it stand still and lemme
see the movie like it's supposed to be seen. I'm hoping there's a command-line switch I can use or something. I'm running Windows 7
for an operating system and I wouldn't be surprised to hear that's there's no cure. It's MicroSoft after all.





Larry,

I can't help you there, sorry. I've only heard two theories - Its your video card and how the game uses it. and the second is its from the bomb's and TT's hits to accentuate the effects... I have no problem being wrong in either case...

I just get colored blocks aproximating the size of the animation and it suddenly appears after the battle starts... then the box stays for 10-15 sec after the battle finishes and makes a discolored box on the right hand side. It clears up by the end though! <grin>

I have had that. Try adding one or both of these switches to the shortcut command line that you use to start AE:

-fixedArt

-noFire



_____________________________

Intel Monkey: https://sites.google.com/view/staffmonkeys/home

(in reply to moore4807)
Post #: 146
RE: Command Decisions: Yeomen vs. Samurai RA 6.4 - 12/10/2013 11:15:31 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Yeah thanks dude. -fixedArt and -noFire one or both of them fixed the problem I was having. I don't get to see the planes firing their guns and the naval bombardment doesn't light up the coastline anymore but at least the picture is rock steady now.

Here's a list of the industry that is failing still. Most are failing because of a lack of resources still.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by larryfulkerson -- 12/11/2013 12:48:39 AM >

(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 147
RE: Command Decisions: Yeomen vs. Samurai RA 6.4 - 12/11/2013 12:04:31 AM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Here's the situation around Pearl. It looks like the KB has split up and both parts are headed NW so as to flee the scene of the crime.
Jim has an excellent opportunity to jump on at least the southernmost part of the KB and scratch the paint some more. I'm guessing
John is going to try to get the separate parts back together somehow, to get the undamaged carriers to protect the scratched ones.
I keep saying the scratched ones.......I mean those carriers that got a shell hit in the most recent naval action. At least two of them
were hit and they have probably already repaired the damage and are applying another coat of paint even as we speak.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 148
RE: Command Decisions: Yeomen vs. Samurai RA 6.4 - 12/11/2013 12:06:50 AM   
DOCUP


Posts: 3073
Joined: 7/7/2010
Status: offline 		Nice job giving the KB a bloody nose.

(in reply to larryfulkerson)
Post #: 149
RE: Command Decisions: Yeomen vs. Samurai RA 6.4 - 12/11/2013 12:14:28 AM   
moore4807


Posts: 1089
Joined: 6/2/2000
From: Punta Gorda FL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DOCUP

Nice job giving the KB a bloody nose.


Why thank you kind Sir! Although I really just had them out there to avoid being Pearl Harbor bait for the bombs and torps... Just proof that Irishmen are lucky as a four leaf clover LOL! I'll take it anyway!

The turn is back to John3rd, so hopefully we will see something back tonight... two turns in a day? hehehe

_____________________________


(in reply to DOCUP)
Post #: 150
Page:   <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Command Decisions: Yeomen vs. Samurai RA 6.4 Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.969