RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> Mods and Scenarios >> RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

Page: << < prev 14 15 [16] 17 18 next > >>

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 2/20/2014 11:29:00 PM

SuaveWatermelon

Posts: 65
Joined: 1/3/2014
Status: offline

Howdy

Additional link for FA-50 Armament

http://bemil.chosun.com/nbrd/data/10040/upfile/201009/20100925140812_2.jpg

(in reply to SuaveWatermelon)

Post #: 451

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 2/20/2014 11:37:34 PM

Mgellis

Posts: 2054
Joined: 8/18/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: NickD

quote:

ORIGINAL: emsoy
Hi Nick, would be great if you could post some more info on these, incl web links. Saves us a ton of time on research. Thanks!

I'd really like to, but because I'm a new user the forum software isn't letting me post links... The Wikipedia article on these patrol boats is very comprehensive, and (possibly more usefully) includes links to the manufacturer's summary of the patrol boats specifications and data on them in the various guides to warships. I think that all 22 are still active (and have been recently refitted), so recent editions of Jane's Fighting Ships and the like will also have data on their individual configurations.

Here are some links...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pacific-class_patrol_boat <-- ye olde Wikipedia page

http://www.worldwarships.com/class/asi-315

http://web.archive.org/web/20071010064531/http://www.tenix.com/PDFLibrary/206.pdf <-- look under 31.5-meter patrol boat

http://www.defence.gov.au/media/DepartmentalTpl.cfm?CurrentId=8810

http://www.pinterest.com/pin/84161086760073087/ <-- nice image; don't know if it is in the public domain or not

http://navyleague.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/The-Navy-Vol_49_Part2-1987-Jul-and-Oct-1987.pdf <-- some detailed data

Combat Fleets lists the Tonga version of the class as having...

D: 165 tons
S: 21 knots
Dim: 31.50 x 8.1 x 2.12
A: 2 x single 12.7 mm machine guns
Electronics: Radar: 1 Furuno 1101 nav.
M: 2 Caterpillar 3516 diesels; 2 props; 2,820 bhp
Electric: 116 kw tot.
Range: 2,500/12 (2,500 nm at 12 knots?)
Fuel: 27.9 tons
Endurance: 10 days
Crew: 4 officers, 9 enlisted

...and here are some additional articles that may be of interest...

http://www.m2cms.com.au/uploaded/5/Appendix%206%20-%20Project%205%20-%20Regional%20Capability.pdf
http://apdforum.com/en_GB/article/rmiap/articles/print/features/2011/07/01/feature-pr-06
http://www.defence.gov.au/adc/docs/Publications2013/Linda%20McCann%20-%20Shedden%20Paper%20%28final%29.pdf

...and, just for laughs, it turns out that ASI-315 is not ONLY the official designation of the Pacific-class...

https://www.myedu.com/KSU-Kansas-State-University/ASI-315-Livestock-And-Meat-Evaluation/course/861001/

Anyway, I hope all this helps.

Mark

(in reply to NickD)

Post #: 452

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 2/20/2014 11:43:02 PM

Mgellis

Posts: 2054
Joined: 8/18/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: NickD

quote:

ORIGINAL: emsoy
Hi Nick, would be great if you could post some more info on these, incl web links. Saves us a ton of time on research. Thanks!

I'd really like to, but because I'm a new user the forum software isn't letting me post links... The Wikipedia article on these patrol boats is very comprehensive, and (possibly more usefully) includes links to the manufacturer's summary of the patrol boats specifications and data on them in the various guides to warships. I think that all 22 are still active (and have been recently refitted), so recent editions of Jane's Fighting Ships and the like will also have data on their individual configurations.

(in reply to NickD)

Post #: 453

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 2/20/2014 11:51:20 PM

Mgellis

Posts: 2054
Joined: 8/18/2007
Status: offline

Sorry...my last post went through twice for some reason. Oops.

(in reply to Mgellis)

Post #: 454

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 2/21/2014 1:37:53 PM

ComDev

Posts: 5735
Joined: 5/12/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: SuaveWatermelon

Howdy

Does this mean you also added the other things to the F-35 that currently aren't in the DB (the LRASM, JSM, AARGM, SDB, SDB II, WCMD, etc.)? Not to be pushy, but I would be greatly appreciative if the F-35s could get their armament list completed

http://www.kongsberg.com/en/kds/products/missilesystems/jointstrikemissile/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_Range_Anti-Ship_Missile

http://www.reuters.com/article/2009/01/21/idUS152956+21-Jan-2009+PRN20090121

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Small_Diameter_Bomb

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GBU-53/B

Also noticed something with ROK FA-50, the real thing is AMRAAM and WCMD capable but not in the DB

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KAI_T-50_Golden_Eagle

Okay I'll give the F-35 another workover. But please note that not all variants will carry all weapon types. I'm not even sure if the type will carry AARGM and SDB initially. SDB II integration will take place after 2018 or whatever, and if I remember correctly, WCMD was stricken from the list.

I'd be really surprised if they actually arm the FA-50 with AMRAAMs and all those other munitions. Perhaps they'll go for three or four weapon types but not all. Would really appreciate more photos

_____________________________

Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!

(in reply to SuaveWatermelon)

Post #: 455

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 2/21/2014 1:39:38 PM

ComDev

Posts: 5735
Joined: 5/12/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: NickD

quote:

ORIGINAL: emsoy
Thanks, looked at the boats in Wikipedia and there is a whole bunch of smaller nations operating these (some I don't even think I've heard of before hehe). May I ask exactly which countries you need these boats for, so that I can add those?

Papua New Guinea, the Federated States of Micronesia, the Solomon Islands, Tonga and Fiji (in that order of priority) would be great.

From memory, the Solomon Islands' boats were involved in the domestic fighting which took place in the mid-2000s. PNG may have also used their Pacific-class boats in combat during the long-running insurgency on Bougainville island.

Thanks okay I'll take a look

_____________________________

Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!

(in reply to NickD)

Post #: 456

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 2/21/2014 2:02:55 PM

ComDev

Posts: 5735
Joined: 5/12/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mgellis

quote:

ORIGINAL: NickD

quote:

ORIGINAL: emsoy
Hi Nick, would be great if you could post some more info on these, incl web links. Saves us a ton of time on research. Thanks!

I'd really like to, but because I'm a new user the forum software isn't letting me post links... The Wikipedia article on these patrol boats is very comprehensive, and (possibly more usefully) includes links to the manufacturer's summary of the patrol boats specifications and data on them in the various guides to warships. I think that all 22 are still active (and have been recently refitted), so recent editions of Jane's Fighting Ships and the like will also have data on their individual configurations.

Here are some links...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pacific-class_patrol_boat <-- ye olde Wikipedia page

http://www.worldwarships.com/class/asi-315

http://web.archive.org/web/20071010064531/http://www.tenix.com/PDFLibrary/206.pdf <-- look under 31.5-meter patrol boat

http://www.defence.gov.au/media/DepartmentalTpl.cfm?CurrentId=8810

http://www.pinterest.com/pin/84161086760073087/ <-- nice image; don't know if it is in the public domain or not

http://navyleague.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/The-Navy-Vol_49_Part2-1987-Jul-and-Oct-1987.pdf <-- some detailed data

Combat Fleets lists the Tonga version of the class as having...

D: 165 tons
S: 21 knots
Dim: 31.50 x 8.1 x 2.12
A: 2 x single 12.7 mm machine guns
Electronics: Radar: 1 Furuno 1101 nav.
M: 2 Caterpillar 3516 diesels; 2 props; 2,820 bhp
Electric: 116 kw tot.
Range: 2,500/12 (2,500 nm at 12 knots?)
Fuel: 27.9 tons
Endurance: 10 days
Crew: 4 officers, 9 enlisted

...and here are some additional articles that may be of interest...

http://www.m2cms.com.au/uploaded/5/Appendix%206%20-%20Project%205%20-%20Regional%20Capability.pdf
http://apdforum.com/en_GB/article/rmiap/articles/print/features/2011/07/01/feature-pr-06
http://www.defence.gov.au/adc/docs/Publications2013/Linda%20McCann%20-%20Shedden%20Paper%20%28final%29.pdf

...and, just for laughs, it turns out that ASI-315 is not ONLY the official designation of the Pacific-class...

https://www.myedu.com/KSU-Kansas-State-University/ASI-315-Livestock-And-Meat-Evaluation/course/861001/

Anyway, I hope all this helps.

Mark

Thanks Mark, VERY helpful

_____________________________

Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!

(in reply to Mgellis)

Post #: 457

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 2/21/2014 2:32:08 PM

SuaveWatermelon

Posts: 65
Joined: 1/3/2014
Status: offline

Thank you Emsoy, will try to find some

(in reply to ComDev)

Post #: 458

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 2/21/2014 2:51:43 PM

SuaveWatermelon

Posts: 65
Joined: 1/3/2014
Status: offline

Howdy

Additional link from source stating that F-35s will use AARGM

http://www.naval-technology.com/projects/agm-88e-advanced-anti-radiation-guided-missile-aargm/

quote:

The missile has a length of 417cm, diameter of 25.4cm and a wingspan of 112cm. The weight of the missile is 361kg. It can intercept targets within the range of 60+ nm while travelling at a speed of Mach 2+.

The AARGM can be integrated on the FA-18 C/D, FA-18 E/F, EA-18 G, and Tornado ECR aircraft. It is also compatible with the F-35, EA-6B, and F-16 aircraft.

Will continue to find sources for other stuff

(in reply to SuaveWatermelon)

Post #: 459

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 2/21/2014 3:04:55 PM

SuaveWatermelon

Posts: 65
Joined: 1/3/2014
Status: offline

Howdy

Additional Link for SDB II integration (specifically fit check(sadly no dates of integration

))

http://raytheon.mediaroom.com/index.php?item=2260

quote:

"Completion of the fit check is critical because it further validates SDB II's compatibility with the F-35 and keeps SDB II on track for a smooth transition to production," said Harry Schulte, Raytheon Missile Systems' vice president of Air Warfare Systems. "Once fielded, SDB II will provide the warfighter with an unprecedented capability to precisely strike moving targets in adverse weather conditions and through battlefield obscurants."

SDB II is designed to be carried by a host of 4th- and 5th-generation aircraft, including the U.S. Air Force F-15E; the U.S. Marine Corps variant of the Joint Strike Fighter, F-35B; and the U.S. Navy F-35C. The GBU-53/B is also compatible with the Air Force F-35A, F/A-22 and F-16C/D, as well as the Navy F/A-18E/F.

(in reply to SuaveWatermelon)

Post #: 460

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 2/21/2014 3:14:55 PM

Dimitris

Posts: 13282
Joined: 7/31/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: SuaveWatermelon

Howdy

Additional link from source stating that F-35s will use AARGM

http://www.naval-technology.com/projects/agm-88e-advanced-anti-radiation-guided-missile-aargm/

quote:

The missile has a length of 417cm, diameter of 25.4cm and a wingspan of 112cm. The weight of the missile is 361kg. It can intercept targets within the range of 60+ nm while travelling at a speed of Mach 2+.

The AARGM can be integrated on the FA-18 C/D, FA-18 E/F, EA-18 G, and Tornado ECR aircraft. It is also compatible with the F-35, EA-6B, and F-16 aircraft.

Will continue to find sources for other stuff

"compatible with" doesn't necessarily mean "will use". (e.g. AGM-86B on B-1B)

_____________________________

Facebook
Twitter

(in reply to SuaveWatermelon)

Post #: 461

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 2/21/2014 3:19:10 PM

SuaveWatermelon

Posts: 65
Joined: 1/3/2014
Status: offline

Just to put things in context IOC dates for the respective F-35 Variants are

Late 2015 for USMC (F-35B)

Late 2016 for USAF (F-35A)

Early 2019 for USN (F-35C)

From the FAQs on the official Lockheed Martin Site

https://www.f35.com/resources/faqs/P10

quote:

Based on the current F-35 Joint Program Office schedule, the F-35A will reach the initial operational capability (IOC) milestone by December 2016; the F-35B will reach the IOC milestone by December 2015; and the F-35C will reach the IOC milestone by February 2019.

(in reply to SuaveWatermelon)

Post #: 462

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 2/21/2014 3:27:44 PM

SuaveWatermelon

Posts: 65
Joined: 1/3/2014
Status: offline

Howdy

Well considering that this platform isn't in service yet, we have no way of knowing what it will operationally use at this time.

However, if the Gripen NG (a plane that hasn't even been designed yet) is going to get its full weapons complement then i see no reason why the F-35 shouldn't get some of its projected weapons (depending how long this game lasts as the premier Naval Wargame things like this will probably need to be regularly updated anyways if accuracy is to be maintained)

(in reply to Dimitris)

Post #: 463

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 2/21/2014 5:04:13 PM

ComDev

Posts: 5735
Joined: 5/12/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: SuaveWatermelon
However, if the Gripen NG (a plane that hasn't even been designed yet) is going to get its full weapons complement then i see no reason why the F-35 shouldn't get some of its projected weapons (depending how long this game lasts as the premier Naval Wargame things like this will probably need to be regularly updated anyways if accuracy is to be maintained)

Understood. But for the Gripen NG we've also played it safe and only added the stuff that we know for certain it will carry. Adding too many options now and then delete them later on is a real pain because those loadouts may have been used in a scenario....

_____________________________

Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!

(in reply to SuaveWatermelon)

Post #: 464

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 2/21/2014 5:37:24 PM

SuaveWatermelon

Posts: 65
Joined: 1/3/2014
Status: offline

Howdy

Fair enough, that makes sense. Still though, difficult to make future scenarios when certain capabilities are completely missing from platforms. But i guess playing it safe makes more sense from a development stance. I know you guys said you wouldn't, but this is part of the reason why some sort of Aircraft editor would be perfect. But you guys already have your plate full making this the best wargame ever so i understand why it is a difficult thing to address.

(in reply to ComDev)

Post #: 465

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 2/21/2014 5:41:23 PM

SuaveWatermelon

Posts: 65
Joined: 1/3/2014
Status: offline

BTW

Since you said that WCMD was canceled as a requirement for the F-35 then you might want to consider removing it from the F-35As armaments list

quote:

and if I remember correctly, WCMD was stricken from the list.

(in reply to SuaveWatermelon)

Post #: 466

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 2/21/2014 6:18:42 PM

ComDev

Posts: 5735
Joined: 5/12/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: SuaveWatermelon

Howdy

Fair enough, that makes sense. Still though, difficult to make future scenarios when certain capabilities are completely missing from platforms. But i guess playing it safe makes more sense from a development stance. I know you guys said you wouldn't, but this is part of the reason why some sort of Aircraft editor would be perfect. But you guys already have your plate full making this the best wargame ever so i understand why it is a difficult thing to address.

I'd like to make a loadout editor where the scen designer can create custom loadouts or edit/delete existing loadouts much the same way he can now add/edit/remove mounts from ships/subs/facilities. But this is far down on my priority list. Have to build the strike mission editor first, amongst other things

_____________________________

Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!

(in reply to SuaveWatermelon)

Post #: 467

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 2/21/2014 6:21:04 PM

ComDev

Posts: 5735
Joined: 5/12/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: SuaveWatermelon

BTW

Since you said that WCMD was canceled as a requirement for the F-35 then you might want to consider removing it from the F-35As armaments list

quote:

and if I remember correctly, WCMD was stricken from the list.

Yeah will double-check. In any case the WCMD is an Air Force-only weapon.

_____________________________

Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!

(in reply to SuaveWatermelon)

Post #: 468

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 2/21/2014 10:17:35 PM

NakedWeasel

Posts: 500
Joined: 1/14/2014
Status: offline

I'm currently working on a Cold War era NATO vs PACT scenario, and I would like my Royal Danish Air Force Vikings to be better equipped to hold the line...

I have been doing a fair bit of research and have discovered that the RDAF J-35XDs were quite a bit more capable than the standard Drakens. According to many websites, they had a greater internal fuel capacity, 10 hardpoints (8 on the wings, 2 under the fuselage) and the ability to carry the AGM-12 Bullpup missile. The inner three hardpoints on either wing were rated to 1000lbs, and could of course also be loaded with various size fuel tanks for even greater range. The outer pylons seemed to be typically loaded with AIM-9. Nearly all pics I've seen with Bullpup show a mixed load of 2xAGM-12, 2x500lb, 2x1000lb.

I humbly request some slight changes made to the RDAF J-35XD. Please, and thank you...

*I am somewhat ashamed and embarrassed to admit, that I could not actually find any real photos of the J-35XD with Bullpups loaded. I did find this model-maker's excellent website of a Danish Draken, http://modelingmadness.com/review/mod/sweden/plesdraken.htm and there's multiple mentions of AGM-12 capability on Danish Drakens. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saab_35_Draken , http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AGM-12_Bullpup , http://www.globalaircraft.org/planes/saab_35_draken.pl , http://www.fighter-planes.com/info/j35.htm

(in reply to ComDev)

Post #: 469

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 2/22/2014 10:51:44 AM

mx1

Posts: 76
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

While working on my scenario I've noticed bug with unit #496 - SAM Grp SA-5c Gammon, Poland. While I can remove and add weapon mounts other than SA-5c Gammon, I can not remove SA-5c Gammon Single Rail from the unit. When I click on "remove weapon mount" nothing happens. I've tried various other SAM units and have not noticed such behavior. I don't know if this is DB bug or engine bug but I'd like to report it.

(in reply to NakedWeasel)

Post #: 470

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 2/22/2014 1:24:13 PM

mikmykWS

Posts: 11524
Joined: 3/22/2005
Status: offline

Its a dialog refresh issue. Remove it and then leave the weapons dialog and then jump back in and you'll notice its gone. I've got this one on my list.

Let me know if this isn't actually the case though!

Mike

_____________________________

(in reply to mx1)

Post #: 471

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 2/22/2014 1:56:35 PM

ComDev

Posts: 5735
Joined: 5/12/2006
Status: offline

Okay have made various updates, incl adding Norwegian F-35 with JSM, AGM-88E AARGM on Italian Tornadoes (only F/A-18C/D/E/G, EA-18G and Italian Tornadoes carries this weapon), updated IOC dates for the F-35, etc.

_____________________________

Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!

(in reply to mikmykWS)

Post #: 472

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 2/22/2014 2:15:06 PM

ComDev

Posts: 5735
Joined: 5/12/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: NakedWeasel

I'm currently working on a Cold War era NATO vs PACT scenario, and I would like my Royal Danish Air Force Vikings to be better equipped to hold the line...

I have been doing a fair bit of research and have discovered that the RDAF J-35XDs were quite a bit more capable than the standard Drakens. According to many websites, they had a greater internal fuel capacity, 10 hardpoints (8 on the wings, 2 under the fuselage) and the ability to carry the AGM-12 Bullpup missile. The inner three hardpoints on either wing were rated to 1000lbs, and could of course also be loaded with various size fuel tanks for even greater range. The outer pylons seemed to be typically loaded with AIM-9. Nearly all pics I've seen with Bullpup show a mixed load of 2xAGM-12, 2x500lb, 2x1000lb.

I humbly request some slight changes made to the RDAF J-35XD. Please, and thank you...

*I am somewhat ashamed and embarrassed to admit, that I could not actually find any real photos of the J-35XD with Bullpups loaded. I did find this model-maker's excellent website of a Danish Draken, http://modelingmadness.com/review/mod/sweden/plesdraken.htm and there's multiple mentions of AGM-12 capability on Danish Drakens. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saab_35_Draken , http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AGM-12_Bullpup , http://www.globalaircraft.org/planes/saab_35_draken.pl , http://www.fighter-planes.com/info/j35.htm

Hmmmmmm okay took a look in the database and the F-35XD should already be according to your wishes?

The Danish 1977-1982 version is armed with the AGM-12 Bullpup, and it can be armed with 6x 1000lb weapons (the Swedish version can not), etc. The 1986 version of the plane does not carry Bullpups because the weapons were phased out in the early 1980s. I found that I had accidently forgotten to add some of the bomb loadouts to the 1986 version, though.

So have made some mods:

- Added 1983 version of the plane which is a 1977 version without the AGM-12.
- Added AIM-9 Std CAP, short-range Mk82 and heavy (6x bomb) Mk83 loadouts to 1986 version which I accidently had left out (doh!)
- Added super-heavy AGM-12 + iron bombs loadout, although not entirely sure it would have been carried operationally, and added it to the 1977 version of the plane only.

Fair?

< Message edited by emsoy -- 2/22/2014 3:15:40 PM >

_____________________________

Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!

(in reply to NakedWeasel)

Post #: 473

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 2/22/2014 2:22:29 PM

mx1

Posts: 76
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mikmyk

Its a dialog refresh issue. Remove it and then leave the weapons dialog and then jump back in and you'll notice its gone. I've got this one on my list.

Let me know if this isn't actually the case though!

Mike

You are right, removed mounts are not shown after closing and reopening weapons dialog. Thanks.

(in reply to mikmykWS)

Post #: 474

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 2/22/2014 2:48:05 PM

ComDev

Posts: 5735
Joined: 5/12/2006
Status: offline

Added:

01 Palikir [Pacific / Pacific Forum / ASI 315 Class] -- Federated States of Micronesia (Navy), 1990, 3x
03 Lata [Pacific / Pacific Forum / ASI 315 Class] -- Solomon Islands (Navy), 1989, 2x
201 Kula [Pacific / Pacific Forum / ASI 315 Class] -- Fiji (Navy), 1994, 3x
P 01 Rabaul [Pacific / Pacific Forum / ASI 315 Class] -- Papua New Guinea (Navy), 1987, 4x
P 201 Neiafu [Pacific / Pacific Forum / ASI 315 Class] -- Tonga (Navy), 1990, 3x

Thanks guys

_____________________________

Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!

(in reply to mx1)

Post #: 475

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 2/22/2014 5:53:48 PM

Blu3wolf

Posts: 198
Joined: 9/30/2013
From: Western Australia
Status: offline

Low Priority, but adding the P-8A Poseidon to Australia post 2017 would be in order I think : )

its been on the back burner for a little while, but we just confirmed purchase of 8 of them, to be delivered in 2017 through to 2021.

there is also discussion about the aussie ones getting their own upgrades but nothing concrete on that yet. probably not likely to be for some time, either.

Thanks again!

_____________________________

To go up, pull back on the stick.
To go down, pull back harder...

Speed is life. Altitude is life insurance.

(in reply to ComDev)

Post #: 476

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 2/22/2014 9:23:51 PM

Mgellis

Posts: 2054
Joined: 8/18/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: emsoy

Added:

01 Palikir [Pacific / Pacific Forum / ASI 315 Class] -- Federated States of Micronesia (Navy), 1990, 3x
03 Lata [Pacific / Pacific Forum / ASI 315 Class] -- Solomon Islands (Navy), 1989, 2x
201 Kula [Pacific / Pacific Forum / ASI 315 Class] -- Fiji (Navy), 1994, 3x
P 01 Rabaul� [Pacific / Pacific Forum / ASI 315 Class] -- Papua New Guinea (Navy), 1987, 4x
P 201 Neiafu [Pacific / Pacific Forum / ASI 315 Class] -- Tonga (Navy), 1990, 3x

Thanks guys

Cool! Thank you! When will the next version of the database be released?

(in reply to ComDev)

Post #: 477

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 2/22/2014 9:52:01 PM

mx1

Posts: 76
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline

Requesting some DB changes/additions to Poland forces:

1. PZL W3 helicopter is missing from DB. Over 150 units built - used by Poland, Czech, Burma, Philippines, Algeria. Description and basic data at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PZL_W-3_Sok%C3%B3%C5%82.
Most used military versions in Poland are:
Sokol W-3T - transport, 4 units Air Force, 2 units Navy
Sokol W-3W - attack, 10 in Army
Sokol W-3WA - modernized attack, 4 in Air Force (unarmed), 13 in Army
Anakonda W-3RM - maritime search & rescue, 4 in Navy
Anakonda W-3WARM - modernized search & rescue 3 in Navy
Gluszec W-3PL - combat search & rescue - 4 in Air Force
Procjon W-3RR - electronic warfare, 3 in Army

2. 3 out of 4 Kaman SH-2G Super Seasprites (#2828) have been upgraded in 2008 with machine gun (PK 7.62mm) -> http://dziennikzbrojny.pl/artykuly/art,6,27,449,lotnictwo,smiglowce,sh-2g---polskie-modyfikacje

3. Modernized "M28B Bryza 1RM bis" is missing from DB. This is M28 (#3128) with better radar (ARS-800), Star Safire II infrared system, ESM, MAD and sonobuoys (SSQ-62C DICASS). Only one unit has been built.

Also bumping request for polish radars from post http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/fb.asp?m=3527848

(in reply to ComDev)

Post #: 478

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 2/22/2014 9:57:16 PM

NickD

Posts: 163
Joined: 2/14/2014
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: emsoy

Added:

01 Palikir [Pacific / Pacific Forum / ASI 315 Class] -- Federated States of Micronesia (Navy), 1990, 3x
03 Lata [Pacific / Pacific Forum / ASI 315 Class] -- Solomon Islands (Navy), 1989, 2x
201 Kula [Pacific / Pacific Forum / ASI 315 Class] -- Fiji (Navy), 1994, 3x
P 01 Rabaul� [Pacific / Pacific Forum / ASI 315 Class] -- Papua New Guinea (Navy), 1987, 4x
P 201 Neiafu [Pacific / Pacific Forum / ASI 315 Class] -- Tonga (Navy), 1990, 3x

Thanks guys

Thanks a lot!

(in reply to ComDev)

Post #: 479

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 2/23/2014 12:40:13 AM

SuaveWatermelon

Posts: 65
Joined: 1/3/2014
Status: offline

Howdy

Thank You Emsoy, looking forward to next update

(in reply to ComDev)

Post #: 480

Page: << < prev 14 15 [16] 17 18 next > >>

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> Mods and Scenarios >> RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?