Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Turnaround? Lowpe (J) vs Tiemanj (A) Stock

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Turnaround? Lowpe (J) vs Tiemanj (A) Stock Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Turnaround? Lowpe (J) vs Tiemanj (A) Stock - 2/25/2014 4:43:50 AM   
obvert


Posts: 14050
Joined: 1/17/2011
From: PDX (and now) London, UK
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

A few R&D experiments.

Moving a r&d factory back down the line to production of the available plane (in line) does yield factory loss and complete damage.

Moving a r&d facility forward to the next generation plane also yields loss and complete damage.


You have to wait until the factory is fully repaired to move it to the next in line with no damage. It's also imperative to make sure you're really going to the next in line. Some airframes have strange upgrade paths. Things like the various A6M upgrade paths and the Ki-61c NOT being the upgrade from the Ki-61b.
quote:


---

Game notes: I have managed to get some troops to Marcus, Ponape, Eniwetok. Mostly defensive air measures in Java, bombing Ambon, Manila heavily...

Getting supply, AA, AV, and mines to Denpasar. Also mined the hex west of Denpasar. Heavy cruiser, dd task forces should control the seas west of Java. Bombing his ground forces in northern java along with a DD bombardment.

Truk now has a small CL force working out of it...not having ships in theater is tough. Got some ASW search planes up in Pescadores finally. Thank goodness for dud torpedoes as he had hit but dudded on several ships.


Fly some night search as well as day search and ASW missions. Helps prevent night sub attacks.

_____________________________

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 121
RE: Turnaround? Lowpe (J) vs Tiemanj (A) Stock - 2/25/2014 4:54:08 AM   
obvert


Posts: 14050
Joined: 1/17/2011
From: PDX (and now) London, UK
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

We are patching up to the Beta. Is there anything special to worry about migrating a pbem game to the beta?

Should I offer to wait given the chance of a game breaking fight on the morrow?

I feel very much the visitor in this game and don't want to upset the Allies.

We choose this date when I agreed to play over a week ago in game days. Plenty of time to adjust I think.

Any advice?

----
Edit: No worries, patching up on schedule. It is good to have a good opponent. I really lucked I think....knock on wood.


There are a few things to think about.

1. You will have much worse air coordination from here on out. That will hurt you a bunch early, so make sure and mostly sweep a LOT rather than send bombers in with escorts, at least until CAP is worn down. His strikes will also suffer this, so take advantage.

2. Flak is better for both sides. This means low strikes you may have been sending will now take more losses and be disrupted more. Don't touch Colombo with a ten foot pole! Big AA there!

3. Logistics are easier, with lots of nice format changes that will reduce clicks.

4. You can use coastal routing for some tankers which keeps them feel away from most sub patrols.



_____________________________

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 122
RE: Turnaround? Lowpe (J) vs Tiemanj (A) Stock - 2/25/2014 12:07:12 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline

quote:


There are a few things to think about.

1. You will have much worse air coordination from here on out. That will hurt you a bunch early, so make sure and mostly sweep a LOT rather than send bombers in with escorts, at least until CAP is worn down. His strikes will also suffer this, so take advantage.

2. Flak is better for both sides. This means low strikes you may have been sending will now take more losses and be disrupted more. Don't touch Colombo with a ten foot pole! Big AA there!

3. Logistics are easier, with lots of nice format changes that will reduce clicks.

4. You can use coastal routing for some tankers which keeps them feel away from most sub patrols.



I am forwarding this to the Allies...I have never played stock, only versions of the beta. Whereas the Allies have only played stock...





(in reply to obvert)
Post #: 123
RE: Turnaround? Lowpe (J) vs Tiemanj (A) Stock - 2/25/2014 12:13:01 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: obvert
You have to wait until the factory is fully repaired to move it to the next in line with no damage. It's also imperative to make sure you're really going to the next in line. Some airframes have strange upgrade paths. Things like the various A6M upgrade paths and the Ki-61c NOT being the upgrade from the Ki-61b.
quote:



My test shows you can move a partially repaired factory to the next generation plane without damage too. At least in the non Beta.

(in reply to obvert)
Post #: 124
RE: Turnaround? Lowpe (J) vs Tiemanj (A) Stock - 2/25/2014 10:19:35 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
Quiet turn...American CV forces retreat to the west. Downed 10-20 assorted allied fighters over Java, missed two submarine attacks on juicy allied xAPs near India.

I think his carriers are headed to Cocos, ordered a port attack on Cocos with Bettys and a 7 hex CV strike on Cocos shipping. Also running the Oi and her sister right by Chirstmas Island 10 to evade the American CVs.

I am still playing catch up, finding units and splinters of units in strange locations, changing leaders...I am starting to get shipping and transports to where they are needed.

Way behind the power curve in the North Pacific...it worries me, but if the Allies concentrate in Java I should be able to catch up.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 125
RE: Turnaround? Lowpe (J) vs Tiemanj (A) Stock - 2/26/2014 2:44:23 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
Aug 1st, 1942.

The Val2 shows up. I am not going to produce any and stay with the Val 1. Val 2 factories will build to the 30 level and switch to R&D for the next generation.

I am one month away for the first Tojo, and my R&D plants are repairing nicely.

Here are the major ship losses so far...




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 126
RE: Turnaround? Lowpe (J) vs Tiemanj (A) Stock - 2/27/2014 12:41:56 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
A raid on Cocos turns up loaded tankers in port and some xak out. Nothing confirmed sunk, but burning....

The Junyo's planes raided Cocos too, then she is heading north to join the mini KB.

Hopefully this will draw the American CVs from the Java area long enough for me to do some major landings without interference from the carriers.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 127
RE: Turnaround? Lowpe (J) vs Tiemanj (A) Stock - 2/27/2014 2:19:47 AM   
Lokasenna


Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

I was thinking the same thing...upgrades?

Lady Lex loses her big guns and gets lots of ack ack but I thought that was a couple of months ago? I can't remember if the CVs start with radar or not, but lots of AA upgrades.

I was also wondering if Warspite is with the carriers. I don't like that ship as the crew is very experienced...

I hope I am not getting too clever here with my force dispositions...should I simply mass the KB and mini KB and seek out a slugfest? There is a lot of the Japanese Navy north of Cocos and south of Ceylon...and some south of Cocos, and west of Cocos.

If I had to guess, the Allies will think that the KB will head north to join with Junyo west of Merak and take advantage of the 150 land base fighters in that area with the damaged CA retreating to the Ternate area....I have other plans however that are somewhat hamstrung by the complete lack of AKEs.














The CVs do not start with radar. By this time, a few of them should have a radar set.

One of the Lexington class upgrades, and I think it is the 7/1/42 upgrade, actually reduces her AA rating. Of course it skyrockets again later and it's still 1100 or so, but the AA rating definitely goes down sometime during/after the removal of the 8" turrets but before the addition of 40mm's in their place.

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 128
RE: Turnaround? Lowpe (J) vs Tiemanj (A) Stock - 2/27/2014 2:31:02 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
Lots happening in Java, as he sneaks the Dauntless and other DD out and away to the south. Most of my air force is defensive in nature as I am still rebuilding them to get experience, training, and morale up.

Lightnings at 37,000 feet are very dangerous, but he has only one squadron in Java for now.

The 4th Division, which had been all but wiped out on July 22 & 23 is up over 200 points in AV.

I am planning on taking Cocos and Island 10 as well a southern Java. A lot of the timing will depend upon his carriers...Island 10 is ready now, Cocos in a day or two, while southern Java the shipping, and forces are still getting into position.









Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Lowpe -- 2/27/2014 3:33:17 PM >

(in reply to Lokasenna)
Post #: 129
RE: Turnaround? Lowpe (J) vs Tiemanj (A) Stock - 2/27/2014 3:59:32 PM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline
Nice working on getting all those BBs. He is going to miss those when he start doing atoll landings!

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 130
RE: Turnaround? Lowpe (J) vs Tiemanj (A) Stock - 2/27/2014 5:14:10 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: JocMeister

Nice working on getting all those BBs. He is going to miss those when he start doing atoll landings!


If only I had defenses on those atolls! Working on it..

I feel that the momentum has shifted a little. If only the Allies don't push in the Central Pacific and North Pacific I should be able to make a long game out of this.

Of course this WITP and everything can change in one day.

EDIT: Of course, the very next day two small allied task forces show up heading for Kursai and Nauru. I have an ENG unit landing on Kusai this day, and Nauru should get some help from a light cruiser task force. Bettys and Nells naval attack range increased to greater than escort range.

Naval Guards units tasked with holding these islands are just now loading at Truk.






Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Lowpe -- 2/28/2014 3:04:15 PM >

(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 131
RE: Turnaround? Lowpe (J) vs Tiemanj (A) Stock - 2/28/2014 1:55:26 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
Another relatively quiet day with plenty of troops and ships moving...in North Burma he attacked the lone defenders the 14th Tank Rgt. My oversight in not flying it supplies.

I have the half strength 1st Division heading to Ramree. Of all my depleted divisions in Singapore it was in the best shape strength and morale wise. Support units are also going with it. There is an air force unit there now building an airport.

Elsewhere, I landed troops on Christmas Island 10, my subs sank some damaged xAKs at Cocos, and there is a race on in the Central Pacific to secure some islands....it should be an exciting day.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Lowpe -- 2/28/2014 2:57:14 PM >

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 132
RE: Turnaround? Lowpe (J) vs Tiemanj (A) Stock - 3/1/2014 10:47:20 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
On Java the Allied stack launched another bombardment, but this time against reinforced troops.

Otherwise, pretty quiet, his carriers launched a ground attack on Christmas Island 10 for little damage, and I will start high level sweeps of Java with this next turn.

Given the plane factories that I inherited I am thinking of not researching or probably building the Jack or the Tony. Instead concentrate on those lines I can R&D quickly or have huge factories for: Zero, Sen Baku, Oscar, Tojo, Frank.

Bombardment results on Java:






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 133
RE: Turnaround? Lowpe (J) vs Tiemanj (A) Stock - 3/2/2014 11:58:08 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
Allied cruisers attempt to bombard Xmas Island 10 only to be met by my favorite light cruisers...




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Lowpe -- 3/2/2014 2:40:07 PM >

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 134
RE: Turnaround? Lowpe (J) vs Tiemanj (A) Stock - 3/2/2014 12:04:36 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
After yesterdays failed Allied bombardment, the ABDA puts their entire air force, augmented by over 100 F4F's flown in from carriers in an attempt to break the air defenses and bomb the Kali airport back to the stone age....the attempt fails as the newly revitalized and led IJN and IJA fighters give a very strong performance in dogfights.

Meanwhile high level sweeps at Soerabaja also point to a much improved Japanese fighter force.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 135
RE: Turnaround? Lowpe (J) vs Tiemanj (A) Stock - 3/2/2014 12:22:53 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
After many dogfights, the KB1 strikes at the juicy shipping around southern Java.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 136
RE: Turnaround? Lowpe (J) vs Tiemanj (A) Stock - 3/2/2014 12:30:36 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
Shipping present in great numbers...the pilots pick and choose their targets....




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 137
RE: Turnaround? Lowpe (J) vs Tiemanj (A) Stock - 3/2/2014 12:51:36 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
And some solid results...




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 138
RE: Turnaround? Lowpe (J) vs Tiemanj (A) Stock - 3/2/2014 1:02:54 PM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline
Nice work!

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 139
RE: Turnaround? Lowpe (J) vs Tiemanj (A) Stock - 3/2/2014 1:10:01 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
Nauru Island area...still a cause for great concern amongst the Japanese High Command.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 140
RE: Turnaround? Lowpe (J) vs Tiemanj (A) Stock - 3/2/2014 1:34:30 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
Java. In one day two paratroop units will be in striking distance of the southern Java bases. In addition there is plenty of transports, both fast and amphib to reinforce the paratroops to secure the bases however most of the troops are simply Naval Guards units, some art and eng to work the airports.

I miss all my depeleted infantry divisions...still one of them will have to rebuild and be sent to southern Java. In city terrain they should be able to hold ok.

But by grabbing southern Java I should doom any attempts at ABDA air dominance in Java despite him flying his carrier fighters there. I am quite happy to see those fighters based in Java rather than on his carriers and a threat to the KB.

I worry about the carrier bombers. Where are they? If in southern Java they could make operations a little tricky.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 141
RE: Turnaround? Lowpe (J) vs Tiemanj (A) Stock - 3/2/2014 1:52:18 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
Plane losses.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 142
RE: Turnaround? Lowpe (J) vs Tiemanj (A) Stock - 3/2/2014 2:10:19 PM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline
Remember that his plane pools are extremely fragile at this stage. Right now I think he gets 45 or something F4Fs per month. Only 35 P40Es and 25 Aircobras. While your losses may seem heavy you just took out a month worth of Wildkittens and almost a month worth of Aircobras. In a day. Not too shabby I think.

If your opponent is inexperienced in PBEM he may not keep a close enough watch on his pools and drain them before he realize. This has happen to many very experienced player too!

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 143
RE: Turnaround? Lowpe (J) vs Tiemanj (A) Stock - 3/2/2014 3:48:33 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
Good points. He has a fair number of Hurricane and Airacobra losses to date.

I was commenting more about my plane losses for the entire campaign game...ugly.

The recent action over Java was a great win for Japan I think. A far cry from my first turn two weeks or so ago where 8 lightnings shot down 5 oscars & zeroes and I was questioning my ability to even contest the skies. Two weeks of retooling have done wonders.

I think this replay might get the Allies rethinking. Certainly all the allied shipping I have sunk must make him start to question the Java defense. Everything in Java favors the Empire right now...lines of supply, pools, troops, reinforcements, ships, leadership, etc. A sharp enough defeat here for the allies will give me enough time to establish a solid perimeter and take advantage of realist r&d off.


And on the positive side I haven't committed all the fighter units in the area as several good ones are resting, refitting and training in Singapore, Palembang, Ternate, Oosthaven, Toboali and Balikpapen. So I should be able to keep the pressure on him while rotating in and out fighter squadrons.



(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 144
RE: Turnaround? Lowpe (J) vs Tiemanj (A) Stock - 3/2/2014 4:16:38 PM   
Lokasenna


Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

Good points. He has a fair number of Hurricane and Airacobra losses to date.

I was commenting more about my plane losses for the entire campaign game...ugly.

The recent action over Java was a great win for Japan I think. A far cry from my first turn two weeks or so ago where 8 lightnings shot down 5 oscars & zeroes and I was questioning my ability to even contest the skies. Two weeks of retooling have done wonders.

I think this replay might get the Allies rethinking. Certainly all the allied shipping I have sunk must make him start to question the Java defense. Everything in Java favors the Empire right now...lines of supply, pools, troops, reinforcements, ships, leadership, etc. A sharp enough defeat here for the allies will give me enough time to establish a solid perimeter and take advantage of realist r&d off.


And on the positive side I haven't committed all the fighter units in the area as several good ones are resting, refitting and training in Singapore, Palembang, Ternate, Oosthaven, Toboali and Balikpapen. So I should be able to keep the pressure on him while rotating in and out fighter squadrons.





Things are looking up.

*singing* Springtime, for Hit-

I mean, Springtime for Hirohito...

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 145
RE: Turnaround? Lowpe (J) vs Tiemanj (A) Stock - 3/2/2014 7:11:37 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
Here is even more good news...




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lokasenna)
Post #: 146
RE: Turnaround? Lowpe (J) vs Tiemanj (A) Stock - 3/2/2014 7:20:49 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
I really stream lined and focused plane production and r & d this turn. Planes actively being produced and researched are those that are generational: zero (both branches), oscar, tojo, helen, betty, judy. myojo Even a little Jake for the radar improved version. An inherited a huge Frank factory so that line is also in there for late war. I should be able to really accelerate those planes and the better frames earlier should help with pilot losses.

No r&d for tony, jack or most others. Sad, because I like the lines on the Tony....

Could be a risky turn if the SBDs are in southern Java, but I have taken some precautions in that likelihood. Shock attack in Manila...could be ugly depending on the rolls.







< Message edited by Lowpe -- 3/2/2014 8:21:46 PM >

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 147
RE: Turnaround? Lowpe (J) vs Tiemanj (A) Stock - 3/3/2014 12:58:14 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
Aug 8th, 1942

The KB had orders to head south and east outside the range of Soerajba while I dangled a destroyer task force...however, I neglected to select remain on station and the KB moved back where it was within range of the airbase at Soerabaja. Oh no...




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 148
RE: Turnaround? Lowpe (J) vs Tiemanj (A) Stock - 3/3/2014 1:01:43 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
While SBDs were attacking the KB, he launched another full raid on the beach head at Kali...where for the second day heavy dogfights ensued. But the air attacks came uncoordinated...




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 149
RE: Turnaround? Lowpe (J) vs Tiemanj (A) Stock - 3/3/2014 1:03:57 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
The SBDs and TBs kept coming at the KB...the Allied pilots were brave...




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 150
Page:   <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Turnaround? Lowpe (J) vs Tiemanj (A) Stock Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

5.281