Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Battle for Korea

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Battle for Korea Page: <<   < prev  128 129 [130] 131 132   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Battle for Korea - 3/8/2014 11:55:34 AM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline
It was! Stay tuned for an update!

(in reply to paullus99)
Post #: 3871
Death of the IJN! - 3/8/2014 12:10:35 PM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline
Death of the IJN! - Night at Moppo
______________________________________________________________________________

Sadly it was the AI that ended the IJN and not the superior ships of the Allied Navy. While the outcome was pretty much given I would much rather have seen a naval battle then this.

It is risky business trying to do things under enemy air power as I found out when I lost 2 of the Iowas a couple of weeks back. Now it was Eriks turn to get hit with the AI stick.

During the night some smaller TFs entered Moppo. They were swiftly dealt with by the defenders. The biggest ships was 3 CLs that clashed with a DD TF. The battle was inconclusive.

quote:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Night Time Surface Combat, near Moppo at 100,54, Range 12,000 Yards

Japanese Ships
CL Oyodo
CL Yahagi, Shell hits 1
CL Sakawa
CL Kiso
DD Kisaragi, Shell hits 1
DD Satsuki, Shell hits 1
DD Minazuki
DD Yakaze


Allied Ships
DD Fletcher
DD Ammen
DD Anthony
DD Bell, Shell hits 1
DD Bennion
DD Bullard
DD Bush
DD Cogswell
DD Converse
DD Daly
DD Heywood Edwards
DD Erben


Another CL was sunk by a 5 Ship Baltimore TF.

quote:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Night Time Surface Combat, near Moppo at 100,54, Range 8,000 Yards

Japanese aircraft
no flights

Japanese aircraft losses
E13A1 Jake: 1 destroyed

Japanese Ships
CL Kashii, Shell hits 14, Torpedo hits 1, and is sunk
E No.10, Shell hits 4, and is sunk
E No.18, Shell hits 4, and is sunk


Allied Ships
CA Boston
CA Pittsburgh
CA St. Paul
DD Brush
DD Hyman
DD Maddox
DD Mansfield
DD Moale
DD Samuel Moore
DD Lyman K. Swenson
DD Taussig
DD Hazelwood
CA Canberra II
CA Quincy II, Shell hits 1





Attachment (1)

(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 3872
RE: Death of the IJN! - 3/8/2014 12:20:42 PM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline
Death of the IJN! - Daybreak
______________________________________________________________________________

Disaster strike the IJN Battleships as they found themselves within Allied air power when the sun comes up. First a small LBA strike from Moppo attacks. Strangely even this small TF manages to penetrate the LRCAP.

quote:

Afternoon Air attack on TF, near Fusan at 102,55

Weather in hex: Light rain

Raid detected at 77 NM, estimated altitude 15,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 35 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M5b Zero x 24
A7M2 Sam x 9
J2M5 Jack x 7
N1K1 Rex x 12
N1K2-J George x 68
Ki-43-IV Oscar x 8
Ki-84a Frank x 8
Ki-84r Frank x 14
Ki-100-I Tony x 18
Ki-102a Randy x 2


Allied aircraft
SB2C-4 Helldiver x 28
TBM-3 Avenger x 37


No Japanese losses

Allied aircraft losses
SB2C-4 Helldiver: 12 destroyed
SB2C-4 Helldiver: 2 destroyed by flak
TBM-3 Avenger: 17 destroyed, 2 damaged
TBM-3 Avenger: 1 destroyed by flak


Japanese Ships
BB Hyuga
BB Mutsu
BB Musashi, Torpedo hits 2
BB Fuso
BB Ise





Attachment (1)

< Message edited by JocMeister -- 3/8/2014 1:21:29 PM >

(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 3873
RE: Death of the IJN! - 3/8/2014 12:30:32 PM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline
Death of the IJN! - Daybreak
______________________________________________________________________________

After the small LBA strike the a full Allied CV strike takes off. This is the beginning of the end for the Japanese behemoths.

quote:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Afternoon Air attack on TF, near Fusan at 102,55

Weather in hex: Light rain

Raid detected at 80 NM, estimated altitude 12,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 34 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M5b Zero x 17
A7M2 Sam x 4
J2M5 Jack x 3
N1K1 Rex x 1
N1K2-J George x 32
Ki-43-IV Oscar x 4
Ki-84a Frank x 6
Ki-84r Frank x 8
Ki-100-I Tony x 13
Ki-102a Randy x 1


Allied aircraft
Hellcat I x 36
Hellcat F.II x 20
F6F-5 Hellcat x 417
SB2C-4 Helldiver x 175
TBM-3 Avenger x 17


Japanese aircraft losses
A6M5b Zero: 3 destroyed
A7M2 Sam: 2 destroyed
N1K2-J George: 5 destroyed
Ki-43-IV Oscar: 3 destroyed
Ki-84a Frank: 1 destroyed
Ki-84r Frank: 1 destroyed
Ki-100-I Tony: 3 destroyed
Ki-102a Randy: 1 destroyed


Allied aircraft losses
Hellcat I: 2 destroyed
F6F-5 Hellcat: 8 destroyed
SB2C-4 Helldiver: 2 destroyed, 17 damaged
SB2C-4 Helldiver: 3 destroyed by flak
TBM-3 Avenger: 1 destroyed, 1 damaged


Japanese Ships
BB Fuso, Bomb hits 12, heavy fires
BB Mutsu, Bomb hits 12, Torpedo hits 2, heavy fires
BB Yamato, Bomb hits 10, heavy fires
BB Ise, Bomb hits 16, Torpedo hits 3, heavy fires, heavy damage
BB Hyuga, Bomb hits 11, heavy fires
BB Musashi, Bomb hits 11, heavy fires
DD Tsubaki, Bomb hits 3, heavy fires, heavy damage
DD Kaba, Bomb hits 1, on fire
DD Yanagi
DD Hinoki
DD Nara, Bomb hits 2, heavy fires, heavy damage


While this strike didn´t sink any ships it made the BBs use up most of their AA ammo as well as knocking out a lot of radars and AA guns. With fires raging on most of the ships it opened up for the LBA.

The next strike saw almost no LRCAP for cover and AA fire was sporadic. The Ise goes down as the first Japanese BB after 4 British Avengers score 4 hits!

quote:

Afternoon Air attack on TF, near Fusan at 102,55

Weather in hex: Light rain

Raid detected at 79 NM, estimated altitude 11,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 34 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M5b Zero x 3
N1K2-J George x 5
Ki-84r Frank x 1
Ki-100-I Tony x 1


Allied aircraft
Avenger II x 20
SB2C-4 Helldiver x 28
SBD-5 Dauntless x 15


No Japanese losses

Allied aircraft losses
Avenger II: 6 destroyed, 2 damaged
SB2C-4 Helldiver: 8 destroyed, 5 damaged
SB2C-4 Helldiver: 1 destroyed by flak
SBD-5 Dauntless: 3 destroyed

Japanese Ships
BB Fuso, heavy fires
BB Yamato, Bomb hits 2, Torpedo hits 1, heavy fires
BB Hyuga, heavy fires
DD Keyaki
DD Kaya
BB Ise, Torpedo hits 4, and is sunk







Attachment (1)

(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 3874
RE: Death of the IJN! - 3/8/2014 12:44:32 PM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline
Death of the IJN! - Daybreak
______________________________________________________________________________

After this many smaller LBA stikes come in. All achieving better and better as the BBs are slowed down with each hit and AA almost ceases from the BBs.

quote:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Afternoon Air attack on TF, near Fusan at 102,55

Weather in hex: Light rain

Raid detected at 78 NM, estimated altitude 13,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 33 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M5b Zero x 1
N1K2-J George x 2


Allied aircraft
SB2C-4 Helldiver x 21
TBM-3 Avenger x 21


No Japanese losses

Allied aircraft losses
SB2C-4 Helldiver: 3 destroyed, 4 damaged
SB2C-4 Helldiver: 1 destroyed by flak
TBM-3 Avenger: 3 destroyed, 2 damaged


Japanese Ships
BB Fuso, Torpedo hits 1, heavy fires
BB Hyuga, Bomb hits 1, Torpedo hits 1, heavy fires
BB Yamato, Torpedo hits 2, heavy fires
BB Mutsu, heavy fires, heavy damage
BB Musashi, Bomb hits 2, heavy fires


Then comes the most ineffectual Allied strike of the day.

quote:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Afternoon Air attack on TF, near Fusan at 102,55

Weather in hex: Light rain

Raid detected at 79 NM, estimated altitude 10,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 36 minutes

Japanese aircraft
N1K2-J George x 1

Allied aircraft
SB2C-4 Helldiver x 28
TBM-3 Avenger x 44


No Japanese losses

Allied aircraft losses
SB2C-4 Helldiver: 3 damaged
TBM-3 Avenger: 2 destroyed, 9 damaged


Japanese Ships
BB Hyuga, Bomb hits 2, Torpedo hits 1, heavy fires
BB Fuso, Torpedo hits 6, heavy fires, heavy damage
DD Kashi
BB Mutsu, Bomb hits 2, heavy fires, heavy damage
DD Hinoki
BB Yamato, heavy fires, heavy damage
DD Yanagi
DD Keyaki, Torpedo hits 1, on fire, heavy damage
BB Musashi, Bomb hits 2, heavy fires
DD Tsubaki, heavy fires, heavy damage


That is followed up but an astonishing British (again) performance.

quote:

Afternoon Air attack on TF, near Fusan at 102,55

Weather in hex: Light rain

Raid detected at 64 NM, estimated altitude 10,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 28 minutes

Japanese aircraft
no flights

Allied aircraft
Avenger II x 18

No Japanese losses

Allied aircraft losses
Avenger II: 4 damaged

Japanese Ships
BB Musashi, Torpedo hits 3, heavy fires, heavy damage
BB Yamato, Torpedo hits 3, heavy fires, heavy damage
BB Hyuga, Torpedo hits 1, heavy fires, heavy damage
BB Fuso, and is sunk
DD Kaya


Another big LBA strike comes in. By now pilots are regularly targeting the small DDs instead of the BBs. Probably due to the smoke.

quote:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Afternoon Air attack on TF, near Fusan at 102,55

Weather in hex: Light rain

Raid detected at 80 NM, estimated altitude 12,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 36 minutes

Japanese aircraft
no flights

Allied aircraft
SBD-5 Dauntless x 15
TBM-1C Avenger x 42


No Japanese losses

Allied aircraft losses
TBM-1C Avenger: 3 damaged
TBM-1C Avenger: 1 destroyed by flak


Japanese Ships
DD Kashi
DD Yanagi, Bomb hits 2, heavy fires, heavy damage
BB Yamato, Bomb hits 2, heavy fires, heavy damage
BB Musashi, Bomb hits 3, Torpedo hits 1, heavy fires, heavy damage
BB Hyuga, Bomb hits 4, Torpedo hits 1, heavy fires, heavy damage
BB Mutsu, Torpedo hits 1, and is sunk
DD Tsubaki, Torpedo hits 2, and is sunk
DD Hinoki, Torpedo hits 2, and is sunk

DD Odake
DD Keyaki, Torpedo hits 1, and is sunk


Amazingly the Yamatos and the Hyuga is still afloat. Then comes the death blow...

quote:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Afternoon Air attack on TF, near Fusan at 102,55

Weather in hex: Light rain

Raid detected at 80 NM, estimated altitude 13,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 37 minutes

Japanese aircraft
no flights

Allied aircraft
TBM-3 Avenger x 67

No Japanese losses

Allied aircraft losses
TBM-3 Avenger: 3 damaged

Japanese Ships
BB Musashi, Torpedo hits 3, and is sunk
DD Odake
BB Hyuga, Torpedo hits 3, and is sunk
DD Kashi, Torpedo hits 1, on fire, heavy damage
DD Kaya, Torpedo hits 1, and is sunk
BB Yamato, Torpedo hits 3, and is sunk
DD Kaba, Torpedo hits 1, and is sunk
DD Nara, Torpedo hits 3, and is sunk
DD Yanagi, Torpedo hits 1, and is sunk


The last DDs are hunted down and sunk.

quote:

Afternoon Air attack on TF, near Fusan at 102,55

Weather in hex: Light rain

Raid detected at 78 NM, estimated altitude 11,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 36 minutes

Allied aircraft
TBM-3 Avenger x 21

No Allied losses

Japanese Ships
DD Odake, Torpedo hits 2, and is sunk
DD Kashi, Torpedo hits 3, and is sunk


Another 200 strike planes fly from the CVs and Moppo but find only debris. The Imperial Japanese Fleet is no more...






Attachment (1)

< Message edited by JocMeister -- 3/8/2014 1:47:30 PM >

(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 3875
RE: Death of the IJN! - 3/8/2014 12:58:26 PM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline
Korea - Decisive Battle for Gunzan
______________________________________________________________________________

The BB bombardments turns out to be a big disappointment. The LCI bombardment...not so!

quote:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Night Naval bombardment of Gunzan at 102,52

Allied Ships
BB Nelson
BB Howe
BB Idaho
BB California
BB Colorado

DD Rocket
DD Redoubt
DD Rapid
DD Racehorse
DD Quilliam
DD Queensborough
DD Quadrant
DD Porterfield
DD Metcalfe


Japanese ground losses:
288 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 16 disabled
Non Combat: 2 destroyed, 33 disabled
Engineers: 2 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 16 (1 destroyed, 15 disabled)
Vehicles lost 4 (2 destroyed, 2 disabled)

Manpower hits 4
Fires 4006
Airbase hits 1
Runway hits 2
Port hits 5
Port fuel hits 3
Port supply hits 1


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Night Naval bombardment of Gunzan at 102,52

Allied Ships
BB Queen Elizabeth
BB Valiant
BB King George V
BC Renown

DD Tyrian
DD Tuscan
DD Tumult
DD Troubridge
DD Terpsichore
DD Termagant
DD Tenacious
DD Teazer


Japanese ground losses:
154 casualties reported
Squads: 4 destroyed, 8 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 7 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 5 (2 destroyed, 3 disabled)

Airbase supply hits 2
Runway hits 2
Port hits 5
Port fuel hits 1
Port supply hits 2




Less then spectacular results to say the least... But then comes the Rocket, Gun and Mortar LCIs...and BOOOM!

quote:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pre-Invasion action off Gunzan (102,52)
Defensive Guns engage approaching landing force

255 Coastal gun shots fired in defense.

Allied Ships
LCI(G)-470
LCI(G)-469
LCI(G)-468
LCI(G)-454
LCI(G)-453
LCI(G)-452
LCI(G)-451
LCI(G)-450
LCI(G)-449
LCI(G)-442
LCI(G)-441
LCI(G)-440
LCI(G)-439
LCI(G)-438
LCI(G)-437
LCI(G)-408
LCI(G)-407
LCI(G)-406
LCI(G)-405
LCI(G)-404
LCI(G)-403
LCI(G)-401
LCI(G)-398
LCI(M)-805
LCI(M)-804
LCI(M)-802
LCI(M)-801
LCI(M)-674
LCI(M)-673
LCI(M)-670
LCI(M)-669
LCI(M)-664
LCI(M)-660
LCI(M)-659
LCI(M)-658
LCI(M)-633
LCI(M)-632
LCI(M)-631
LCI(R)-648
LCI(R)-647
LCI(R)-646
LCI(R)-645
LCI(R)-644
LCI(R)-643
LCI(R)-642
LCI(R)-342
LCI(R)-341
LCI(R)-340
LCI(R)-339
LCI(R)-338
LCI(R)-337
LCI(R)-230
LCI(R)-226
LCI(R)-225
LCI(R)-224
LCI(R)-74
LCI(R)-73
LCI(R)-72
LSM(R)-199
LSM(R)-198
LSM(R)-197
LSM(R)-196
LSM(R)-195
LSM(R)-194
LSM(R)-193
LSM(R)-192
LSM(R)-191
LSM(R)-190
LSM(R)-189
LSM(R)-188
LSM-417, Shell hits 1
LSM-413
LSM-415, Shell hits 1, on fire
LST-911
LST-912
LST-915
LST-914


Japanese ground losses:
3268 casualties reported
Squads: 5 destroyed, 241 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 348 disabled
Engineers: 1 destroyed, 34 disabled
Guns lost 101 (1 destroyed, 100 disabled)


Sadly the bombers rain in for the first time in two weeks. Go figure... Still, we get the decisive win we wanted.

quote:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ground combat at Gunzan (102,52)

Allied Deliberate attack

Attacking force 195607 troops, 3482 guns, 7113 vehicles, Assault Value = 8208

Defending force 221319 troops, 2830 guns, 987 vehicles, Assault Value = 7369

Allied engineers reduce fortifications to 1

Allied adjusted assault: 2929

Japanese adjusted defense: 1272

Allied assault odds: 2 to 1 (fort level 1)

Allied Assault reduces fortifications to 1

Combat modifiers
Defender: disruption(-), preparation(-), supply(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
24080 casualties reported
Squads: 378 destroyed, 1195 disabled
Non Combat: 50 destroyed, 241 disabled
Engineers: 88 destroyed, 148 disabled
Guns lost 334 (92 destroyed, 242 disabled)
Vehicles lost 206 (56 destroyed, 150 disabled)
Units destroyed 1


Allied ground losses:
9775 casualties reported
Squads: 55 destroyed, 1225 disabled
Non Combat: 50 destroyed, 510 disabled
Engineers: 9 destroyed, 182 disabled
Guns lost 329 (45 destroyed, 284 disabled)
Vehicles lost 900 (110 destroyed, 790 disabled)



In a couple of days Gunzan will be secured and with it Japanese resistance in Korea is doomed. Erik gambled with an aggressive move here and it failed. Had he managed to seal off Korea it could have worked. But with an open allied LOC it was doomed.

Looks like this was the last turn of the war. Peace talks are ongoing right now!

< Message edited by JocMeister -- 3/8/2014 3:34:49 PM >

(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 3876
RE: Death of the IJN! - 3/8/2014 1:07:25 PM   
aztez

 

Posts: 4031
Joined: 2/26/2005
From: Finland
Status: offline
Nice ambush and those were some stubborn IJN battleships!

If that was the last turn at least you went in with an bang... well played.

(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 3877
RE: Death of the IJN! - 3/8/2014 1:36:28 PM   
princep01

 

Posts: 943
Joined: 8/7/2006
From: Texas
Status: offline
My, oh my! After a beatdown like that, it is not surprising to see the Emperor take mercy on his subjects and demand that the government initiate peace talks. Those IJN BBs are hard cases, but the hornet's nest of LB and CV aircraft was just overwhelming. Nice tactical surprise and a well played hand, admiral.

Say, do Swedish admirals ever come to the US War College to give us poor Yanks lessons in naval strategy? Maybe they should:). Again, well done!

(in reply to aztez)
Post #: 3878
RE: Death of the IJN! - 3/8/2014 2:09:38 PM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline
Thanks guys!

Not too surprised by the result. But I´m a bit disappointed his BBs didn´t make it to Moppo for some old fashion naval battle. The outcome would have been the same in the end though as Erik would never have had enough OPS to make it back to safety. Would have loved to see what the Fast BBs would have done to the Japanese BBs though.

Can´t say I blame Erik for his lack of motivation. It just feels like we are waiting for the inevitable right now.
China - Last Japanese stack about to get cut off by 3500 Allied AV at Ningpo.
Korea - Gunzan about to crack and with that the end of Korea and Manchuria.
HI - Much of the prime fighter factories are knocked out. Shindens and Ki-83 factories are gone. Only 100 Frank factories gone.

I need 13k more VPs for AV. Shanghai will give me almost 3k. Korean/Manchurian LCU losses will probably make up the rest and if needed I can always just bomb the HI for more VPs. With Moppo now completely secure I can have 1500 4Es and 600 2Es flying within normal range starting tomorrow.

Its basically just a waiting game. This is the first time Erik has asked me if its time to call quits. He will play on if I ask him no doubt about it. But I also respect him far too much to ask him to do that. If he feels he is done I´ll respect that without any hard feelings. In all honestly I feel pretty much done with this game too. Its like those last 50 turns of CIV. You already know you have won but you have to get through the turns to finish the spaceship/mop up the last CIV


(in reply to princep01)
Post #: 3879
RE: Death of the IJN! - 3/8/2014 2:19:00 PM   
Encircled


Posts: 2024
Joined: 12/30/2010
From: Northern England
Status: offline
Well done mate!

Going to have to find another AAR to bother

Well played to both of you!

_____________________________


(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 3880
RE: Death of the IJN! - 3/8/2014 2:32:27 PM   
Gaspote


Posts: 303
Joined: 6/30/2013
From: France
Status: offline
Nice game, that's sad I really would like to see nuke but if it's already end

(in reply to Encircled)
Post #: 3881
Game over! - 3/8/2014 4:31:00 PM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline
Game over!
______________________________________________________________________________

So this is it then! Last turn was the last of the war. Havn´t really had time to digest it yet. Feels good. Good but odd. And a bit sad.

Its been a fantastic game. We have had our differences at times and there has been harsh words. Despite that we always managed to sort out the differences. But all our differences came out of inexperience. No such discussions would have taken place if we had known what we know now.

My hats off to Erik. He has played a solid game and shown its quite possible to stay competitive right up to the end even in SCEN 1. He also made some big concessions in China because I thought the game would have been lost otherwise (silly me!).

I´ll probably write some kind of summary of the game in the coming days. Need to collect my thoughts a bit first. Actually a bit emotional right now. Its been a long journey. My daughter wasn´t even a thought by the time we started this and now she is running around the house and I have another one coming in just 4 weeks. Puts things into a perspective.

A big thank you to all that has read and contributed to this AAR. Without you guys I would have given up a long time ago. You guys rock!

Have to send a special thank you to three individuals that really made all the difference in the early days.
- Micheal aka ny59giants)
- Dan Nichols (I hope you are still alive and well)
- BB Fanboy (I hope you are still around too!)

(in reply to Gaspote)
Post #: 3882
RE: Game over! - 3/8/2014 4:37:23 PM   
paullus99


Posts: 1985
Joined: 1/23/2002
Status: offline
Death Ride of the IJN.....very much like what happened to the Yamato originally.

Must have been fun to watch, if a bit anticlimactic.

_____________________________

Never Underestimate the Power of a Small Tactical Nuclear Weapon...

(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 3883
RE: Game over! - 3/8/2014 4:48:56 PM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline
Game over!
______________________________________________________________________________

Here is a map showing the borders of the Japanese Empire on the 1st of July 1945.





Attachment (1)

(in reply to paullus99)
Post #: 3884
RE: Game over! - 3/8/2014 4:49:09 PM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline
Good going, guys! Great game, amazing to watch. Watching to see what each of you does next.

_____________________________


(in reply to paullus99)
Post #: 3885
RE: Game over! - 3/8/2014 4:49:43 PM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: paullus99

Death Ride of the IJN.....very much like what happened to the Yamato originally.

Must have been fun to watch, if a bit anticlimactic.


I don´t often watch the full replay but I did this time.

(in reply to paullus99)
Post #: 3886
RE: Game over! - 3/8/2014 4:55:16 PM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: witpqs

Good going, guys! Great game, amazing to watch. Watching to see what each of you does next.


Thanks George!

A couple of weeks back I was sure I wouldn´t start another game. Not as sure anymore...Then I had two games going. Now I all of the sudden I have zero games going!

Feels very odd and I´m not sure I can adjust to that!

(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 3887
RE: Game over! - 3/8/2014 5:06:29 PM   
GreyJoy


Posts: 6750
Joined: 3/18/2011
Status: offline
Thanks Joc!

Great game. Great AAR

(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 3888
RE: Game over! - 3/8/2014 5:13:29 PM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: GreyJoy

Thanks Joc!

Great game. Great AAR


Thanks GJ!

(in reply to GreyJoy)
Post #: 3889
RE: Game over! - 3/8/2014 5:26:07 PM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline
Game over!
______________________________________________________________________________

Here is the Intelligence screen.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 3890
RE: Game over! - 3/8/2014 5:41:55 PM   
EHansen


Posts: 360
Joined: 12/6/2013
Status: offline
Great game and great AAR. It would have been interesting to see a huge Surface Battle, but it didn't happen.
Considering where you were at the beginning of this AAR, excellent job.

(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 3891
RE: Game over! - 3/8/2014 5:48:07 PM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: EHansen

Great game and great AAR. It would have been interesting to see a huge Surface Battle, but it didn't happen.
Considering where you were at the beginning of this AAR, excellent job.


Thanks!

(in reply to EHansen)
Post #: 3892
RE: Game over! - 3/8/2014 6:50:43 PM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline
Game over!
______________________________________________________________________________

Here is a screen of the air losses. Very pleased to find only the Hellcat versions on the list...and the...C-47. I have felt for some time that something is wrong with the C-47 and I think this screen confirms it pretty clearly. I have mainly used the C-47 flying in Burma from a level 9 AF to another at short range. Despite that and a 50% rest setting with fully trained pilots you seem to suffer 3-8 OPS losses per turn. Don´t even think about flying the hump. You will lose hundreds of planes per month to OPS losses.

I don´t know what is causing this but looking at total number of allied losses the C-47 ranks in at number 4. Only the two Hellcats and the B24 have suffered more losses. Something is definitively off with this air frame.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 3893
RE: Battle for Korea - 3/8/2014 7:21:30 PM   
jonreb31


Posts: 714
Joined: 11/26/2006
From: Santa Cruz, California
Status: offline
Wow, great game & great players! I've been watching both sides for 5+ months now and my hat's off to the Joc and Obvert.

What am I going to check daily every 15 minutes now? You could always redo the last turn so we can see that naval clash!

_____________________________


(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 3894
RE: Battle for Korea - 3/8/2014 7:30:05 PM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: JonReb

Wow, great game & great players! I've been watching both sides for 5+ months now and my hat's off to the Joc and Obvert.

What am I going to check daily every 15 minutes now? You could always redo the last turn so we can see that naval clash!


Thanks! If I get REALLY bored I´ll ask him.

(in reply to jonreb31)
Post #: 3895
RE: Battle for Korea - 3/8/2014 7:36:35 PM   
FeurerKrieg


Posts: 3397
Joined: 6/15/2005
From: Denver, CO
Status: offline
Great game - been watching both sides so haven't piped up to much, but congrats on getting to the end!

_____________________________


Upper portion used with permission of www.subart.net, copyright John Meeks

(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 3896
RE: Battle for Korea - 3/8/2014 7:40:21 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
Great game....my hat is off to you both.

Many thanks for posting great AARs...

(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 3897
RE: Battle for Korea - 3/8/2014 8:01:36 PM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline
Thanks guys!

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 3898
RE: Battle for Korea - 3/8/2014 8:06:10 PM   
Grollub


Posts: 6674
Joined: 10/9/2005
From: Lulea, Sweden
Status: offline
Väl spelat och tack för en bra AAR! Det är inte ofta man kan läsa parallella AAR med så hög kvalitet!

< Message edited by Grollub -- 3/8/2014 9:08:16 PM >


_____________________________

“Not mastering metaphores is like cooking pasta when the train is delayed"

(in reply to JocMeister)
Post #: 3899
RE: Battle for Korea - 3/8/2014 8:17:17 PM   
JocMeister

 

Posts: 8262
Joined: 7/29/2009
From: Sweden
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Grollub

Väl spelat och tack för en bra AAR! Det är inte ofta man kan läsa parallella AAR med så hög kvalitet!


Tackar och bockar!

(in reply to Grollub)
Post #: 3900
Page:   <<   < prev  128 129 [130] 131 132   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Battle for Korea Page: <<   < prev  128 129 [130] 131 132   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.906