STEF78
Posts: 2094
Joined: 2/19/2012 From: Versailles, France Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: rbrockman2 The primary goal of the Germans is to isolate and kill groups of Russian units. What makes this doable is that for a long time there are always some Russians that are off by themselves and vulnerable: the Germans simply rail their mobile units to wherever the "victim" units are, surround them, and toast them. Killing Russian units thin the Russian lines, leading to more groups of vulnerable Russians that can be toasted next, etc. From this perspective, the recent Crimean operation in this AAR was great because it toasted a bunch of Russian divisions while freeing up a bunch of Axis units to go rampage elsewhere. Usually (historically), Axis advance into the Caucasus is a bad idea because it extends the Axis forces over a wide area capturing territory without allowing the capture of Russian units. The situation in this AAR is different: the Axis forces in the Eastern Caucasus have been allowed to outflank the Russians and drive down the Caspian. Am I correct in assuming that all the Russian units in the Caucasus depend on Baku for supply? If so, when the Axis reaches the southern map edge then a stack of Russian divisions are toast, regardless of how the defense of Baku itself goes. Note that the situation in the Caucasus has inexplicably lured a bunch of Guards units into tangling with the SS, in clear terrain, far away from anything the Russians need to defend, near a big body of water with no nearby ports. This doesn't seem very healthy for the Russians. Your right, the supply source is Baku, and on turn 92, I've cut the railline Baku/Tbilissi so the units in Georgia are dead ducks.
|