Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Noob question: Combat engineers

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> Noob question: Combat engineers Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Noob question: Combat engineers - 4/4/2014 7:03:26 AM   
margeorg

 

Posts: 160
Joined: 1/3/2012
Status: offline 		Hello,


here´s another noob question: I´m currently playing a stock PBEM game as the allies, and my question is: Do US (or potentially others) combat engineers have a dual role? I.e. are they fighting troops AND engineers, that means being able to expand bases and construct fortifications etc.?

Thanks for your shared knwledge :)

_____________________________

Cheers
Martin
Post #: 1
RE: Noob question: Combat engineers - 4/4/2014 7:50:09 AM   
KenchiSulla


Posts: 2948
Joined: 10/22/2008
From: the Netherlands
Status: offline 		Combat engineers can build up bases and are great in combat. They provide firepower, AV + they can drop forts before the final AV calculation.






Attachment (1)

_____________________________

AKA Cannonfodder

"It happened, therefore it can happen again: this is the core of what we have to say. It can happen, and it can happen everywhere.”
¯ Primo Levi, writer, holocaust survivor

(in reply to margeorg)
Post #: 2
RE: Noob question: Combat engineers - 4/4/2014 8:51:16 AM   
Yaab


Posts: 4552
Joined: 11/8/2011
From: Poland
Status: offline 		Combat engineers can:
-fight
-reduce enemy fortifications
-build ports, forts, airfields and repair them

Non-combat engineers can do the same, but they have lower anti-soft/anti-hard stats which means they are very weak in combat.

(in reply to KenchiSulla)
Post #: 3
RE: Noob question: Combat engineers - 4/4/2014 10:10:51 AM   
Gaspote


Posts: 303
Joined: 6/30/2013
From: France
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Yaab

Combat engineers can:
-fight
-reduce enemy fortifications
-build ports, forts, airfields and repair them

Non-combat engineers can do the same, but they have lower anti-soft/anti-hard stats which means they are very weak in combat.


Are you sure normal engineer reduce fortifications the same ? I always thought only combat engineer could reduce fort.

(in reply to Yaab)
Post #: 4
RE: Noob question: Combat engineers - 4/4/2014 10:29:12 AM   
castor troy


Posts: 14330
Joined: 8/23/2004
From: Austria
Status: offline 		only combat eng reduce forts, they can do everything. Normal eng only build/repair but don't reduce forts. Like every squad they also contribute in defensive battles.

_____________________________


(in reply to Gaspote)
Post #: 5
RE: Noob question: Combat engineers - 4/4/2014 10:34:15 AM   
Yaab


Posts: 4552
Joined: 11/8/2011
From: Poland
Status: offline 		Stock game, December 1941, Chinese attack Ichang:

Ground combat at Ichang (83,48)

Allied Deliberate attack

Attacking force 84156 troops, 502 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 2295

Defending force 22611 troops, 223 guns, 168 vehicles, Assault Value = 817

Allied adjusted assault: 2087

Japanese adjusted defense: 876

Allied assault odds: 2 to 1 (fort level 3)

Allied Assault reduces fortifications to 2

-------------------

The Chinese corps have standard Engineer squads in their TOE, so it seems that if such Engineers are part of infantry units they reduce forts just as combat engineers do.

The manual says otherwise (see page 195), but the game behaves differently...

< Message edited by Yaab -- 4/4/2014 11:37:33 AM >

(in reply to castor troy)
Post #: 6
RE: Noob question: Combat engineers - 4/4/2014 11:02:24 AM   
Itdepends

 

Posts: 937
Joined: 12/12/2005
Status: offline 		A successful attack reduces forts by a single level- if you'd had combat engineers there you would have had a chance to drop the forts 2 levels.

(in reply to Yaab)
Post #: 7
RE: Noob question: Combat engineers - 4/4/2014 11:04:09 AM   
CowboyRonin


Posts: 360
Joined: 8/14/2009
Status: offline 		I don't think it's quite the same, Yaab. The combat engineer reduction occurs before the assault goes in; the assault reduction occurs after. The combat engineer reduction just counts engineers; the assault reduction has to get positive odds to work. I don't think you even need engineers to get the assault reduction (although it's hard to not have a few here or there)-it's just looking at a positive odds assault that didn't get through the forts.

(in reply to Yaab)
Post #: 8
RE: Noob question: Combat engineers - 4/4/2014 11:04:56 AM   
Yaab


Posts: 4552
Joined: 11/8/2011
From: Poland
Status: offline 		You are right. Thanks for correcting me.

< Message edited by Yaab -- 4/4/2014 12:05:31 PM >

(in reply to Itdepends)
Post #: 9
RE: Noob question: Combat engineers - 4/4/2014 11:11:26 AM   
dr.hal


Posts: 3335
Joined: 6/3/2006
From: Covington LA via Montreal!
Status: offline 		As for the US Marines, they say that everyone is an infantry man first and then an engineer, cook, clerk, etc....

_____________________________


(in reply to Yaab)
Post #: 10
RE: Noob question: Combat engineers - 4/4/2014 11:44:05 AM   
Bullwinkle58


Posts: 11302
Joined: 2/24/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: dr.hal

As for the US Marines, they say that everyone is an infantry man first and then an engineer, cook, clerk, etc....


Rifleman first. Don't ever call a Marine an "infantryman."

_____________________________

The Moose

(in reply to dr.hal)
Post #: 11
RE: Noob question: Combat engineers - 4/4/2014 12:36:13 PM   
dr.hal


Posts: 3335
Joined: 6/3/2006
From: Covington LA via Montreal!
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bullwinkle58


quote:

ORIGINAL: dr.hal

As for the US Marines, they say that everyone is an infantry man first and then an engineer, cook, clerk, etc....


Rifleman first. Don't ever call a Marine an "infantryman."

Sorry Moose how true!

_____________________________


(in reply to Bullwinkle58)
Post #: 12
RE: Noob question: Combat engineers - 4/4/2014 1:26:51 PM   
margeorg

 

Posts: 160
Joined: 1/3/2012
Status: offline 		Thanks guys for all the responses!

_____________________________

Cheers
Martin

(in reply to dr.hal)
Post #: 13
RE: Noob question: Combat engineers - 4/4/2014 1:57:12 PM   
Lecivius


Posts: 4845
Joined: 8/5/2007
From: Denver
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bullwinkle58


quote:

ORIGINAL: dr.hal

As for the US Marines, they say that everyone is an infantry man first and then an engineer, cook, clerk, etc....


Rifleman first. Don't ever call a Marine an "infantryman."



I have been known to say such things, and more. It always seems to cause an enlightened, spirited conversation



(in reply to Bullwinkle58)
Post #: 14
RE: Noob question: Combat engineers - 4/4/2014 5:29:41 PM   
crsutton


Posts: 9590
Joined: 12/6/2002
From: Maryland
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bullwinkle58


quote:

ORIGINAL: dr.hal

As for the US Marines, they say that everyone is an infantry man first and then an engineer, cook, clerk, etc....


Rifleman first. Don't ever call a Marine an "infantryman."


You mean when the shoot their "guns?"

_____________________________

I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg

(in reply to Bullwinkle58)
Post #: 15
RE: Noob question: Combat engineers - 4/4/2014 9:09:50 PM   
Bullwinkle58


Posts: 11302
Joined: 2/24/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: crsutton


quote:

ORIGINAL: Bullwinkle58


quote:

ORIGINAL: dr.hal

As for the US Marines, they say that everyone is an infantry man first and then an engineer, cook, clerk, etc....


Rifleman first. Don't ever call a Marine an "infantryman."


You mean when the shoot their "guns?"


"Take a lap, Sutton. You too, Denver."

_____________________________

The Moose

(in reply to crsutton)
Post #: 16
RE: Noob question: Combat engineers - 4/5/2014 12:00:08 PM   
jmalter

 

Posts: 1673
Joined: 10/12/2010
Status: offline 		hi margeorg,

Combat Engineers will function as regular engineers in the stock game you are playing.

But many mod scenarios have taken advantage of editor functions to create different kinds of engineer devices w/ varied capabilities. I'm pretty sure that the DBB-B scenario I'm playing currently does not allow Combat Engineers to build or repair.

(in reply to Bullwinkle58)
Post #: 17
RE: Noob question: Combat engineers - 4/5/2014 12:02:26 PM   
jmalter

 

Posts: 1673
Joined: 10/12/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bullwinkle58
"Take a lap, Sutton. You too, Denver."

"This is my rifle, this is my gun.
One is for shootin', the other's for fun."

(in reply to Bullwinkle58)
Post #: 18
RE: Noob question: Combat engineers - 4/5/2014 4:39:11 PM   
castor troy


Posts: 14330
Joined: 8/23/2004
From: Austria
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Yaab

Stock game, December 1941, Chinese attack Ichang:

Ground combat at Ichang (83,48)

Allied Deliberate attack

Attacking force 84156 troops, 502 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 2295

Defending force 22611 troops, 223 guns, 168 vehicles, Assault Value = 817

Allied adjusted assault: 2087

Japanese adjusted defense: 876

Allied assault odds: 2 to 1 (fort level 3)

Allied Assault reduces fortifications to 2

-------------------

The Chinese corps have standard Engineer squads in their TOE, so it seems that if such Engineers are part of infantry units they reduce forts just as combat engineers do.

The manual says otherwise (see page 195), but the game behaves differently...




your 2:1 adjusted assault reduced a fort level, not engineers. If combat engineers reduce forts you will see that message further above.

_____________________________


(in reply to Yaab)
Post #: 19
RE: Noob question: Combat engineers - 4/5/2014 10:35:23 PM   
wdolson

 

Posts: 10398
Joined: 6/28/2006
From: Near Portland, OR
Status: offline 		Additionally when combat engineers reduce forts, you see a message saying "engineers reduce fortifications" or something along those lines. If the fort level goes down without that message, it was due to the assault itself and not engineers.

Bill

_____________________________

WitP AE - Test team lead, programmer

(in reply to castor troy)
Post #: 20
RE: Noob question: Combat engineers - 4/6/2014 4:44:22 PM   
Symon


Posts: 1928
Joined: 11/24/2012
From: De Eye-lands, Mon
Status: offline 		Once again … It’s not hard, one just has to pay attention. Find the device number of the engineer squad you are interested in; open the editor; go to that device number; look at it.

If the Device Type is 24 – Engineer, it can always help build.
If the Device Type is 23 – Squad, it cannot ever help build.
If the Device Anti-Armor is >1, it will add to the fort reduction algorithm.
If the Device Anti-Armor is 0 or 1, it will not add to the fort reduction algorithm.
If the Device Anti-Soft is >9, it will add to the assault value algorithm.
If the Device Anti-Soft is 9 or less, it will not add to the assault value algorithm.
If the Device Shore Party switch is set, it will add to the load/unload algorithm.
If the Device Shore Party switch is not set, it will not add to the load/unload algorithm.

The Device “Name” is merely a text string. It is meaningless. The Device data field values are everything.


_____________________________

Nous n'avons pas peur! Vive la liberté! Moi aussi je suis Charlie!
Yippy Ki Yay.

(in reply to wdolson)
Post #: 21
RE: Noob question: Combat engineers - 4/7/2014 12:40:17 PM   
margeorg

 

Posts: 160
Joined: 1/3/2012
Status: offline 		Thanks, Symon, for the explanations. So far I´ve always overlooked the editor, as I´m just playing, and not modding. Seems this tool contains something for the average player too ...

_____________________________

Cheers
Martin

(in reply to Symon)
Post #: 22
RE: Noob question: Combat engineers - 4/7/2014 2:33:52 PM   
crsutton


Posts: 9590
Joined: 12/6/2002
From: Maryland
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Symon

Once again … It’s not hard, one just has to pay attention. Find the device number of the engineer squad you are interested in; open the editor; go to that device number; look at it.

If the Device Type is 24 – Engineer, it can always help build.
If the Device Type is 23 – Squad, it cannot ever help build.
If the Device Anti-Armor is >1, it will add to the fort reduction algorithm.
If the Device Anti-Armor is 0 or 1, it will not add to the fort reduction algorithm.
If the Device Anti-Soft is >9, it will add to the assault value algorithm.
If the Device Anti-Soft is 9 or less, it will not add to the assault value algorithm.
If the Device Shore Party switch is set, it will add to the load/unload algorithm.
If the Device Shore Party switch is not set, it will not add to the load/unload algorithm.

The Device “Name” is merely a text string. It is meaningless. The Device data field values are everything.



Thanks, it helps to know this but a little common sense does not hurt. One should not need to go to the editor to know that a sherman tank is going to help reduce fortifications and a truck is not. Players need only think about the historical roles of units and have a little knowledge of WWII combat and then need not worry too much about checking the editor. In that respect you guys have designed a damned good game.


_____________________________

I am the Holy Roman Emperor and am above grammar.

Sigismund of Luxemburg

(in reply to Symon)
Post #: 23
RE: Noob question: Combat engineers - 4/7/2014 3:09:43 PM   
Yaab


Posts: 4552
Joined: 11/8/2011
From: Poland
Status: offline 		What if there are two devices, the first one is:

anti-armor 1 / anti-soft 10

the second one is:

anti-armor 10 / anti-soft 1

Do they add to assault calculations?


< Message edited by Yaab -- 4/7/2014 4:20:58 PM >

(in reply to crsutton)
Post #: 24
RE: Noob question: Combat engineers - 4/7/2014 3:34:16 PM   
Symon


Posts: 1928
Joined: 11/24/2012
From: De Eye-lands, Mon
Status: offline 		The editor does help. The Device listing, above, is to answer the “engineering” question. And no, Shermans are not adders to the fort reduction algorithm. They are part of the nominal assault value reduction process.

Many engineering devices have “names” that are misleading. A squad can be called somethingorother “Eng” yet not be able to add to the fort reduction algorithm, and not add to the assault value. Others may be able to do one or the other, still others might be able to do both. Yet others are simply labor devices and can’t do anything except consume supply. One needs to consult the editor data to determine which is which.

As one can see, some engineer units (devices) may contribute twice to fort reduction; once by being assault value capable (Anti-Soft >9) thereby contributing to the nominal, AV odds based, reduction process, and again by being “Eng” Typed, and having Anti-Armor >1, thereby contributing to the “Eng Adder” portion of the process. Other engineer devices can’t contribute to either.

LCUs very often have a mix of two, or even three, different types of engineer devices. It behooves a player to understand the differences between their capabilities in order to avoid those embarrassing wtfo? moments.

Consulting the editor is not a difficult process, and one quickly becomes familiar with all the various types, making it eventually unnecessary.


_____________________________

Nous n'avons pas peur! Vive la liberté! Moi aussi je suis Charlie!
Yippy Ki Yay.

(in reply to Yaab)
Post #: 25
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> Noob question: Combat engineers Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

5.656