Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

[FIXED B525] Harm shot down by Fulcrum Cannon

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> Tech Support >> [FIXED B525] Harm shot down by Fulcrum Cannon Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
[FIXED B525] Harm shot down by Fulcrum Cannon - 4/27/2014 6:21:56 AM   
dillonkbase

 

Posts: 177
Joined: 5/2/2009
Status: offline 		No expert here but it seems like a tough shot for a head on hit at a missile going mach 3, when the fulcrum is going just .64, radar off. to hit a harm with ones nose cannon

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Sunburn -- 5/11/2014 7:25:33 PM >
Post #: 1
RE: Harm shot down by Fulcrum Cannon - 4/27/2014 6:25:56 AM   
dillonkbase

 

Posts: 177
Joined: 5/2/2009
Status: offline 		I mean its not a CIWS




Attachment (1)

(in reply to dillonkbase)
Post #: 2
RE: Harm shot down by Fulcrum Cannon - 4/27/2014 4:03:54 PM   
Tomcat84

 

Posts: 1952
Joined: 7/10/2013
Status: offline 		A HARM doesn't go Mach 3, but I agree that a fulcrum should not be gunning it lol

_____________________________

My Scenarios and Tutorials for Command

(Scenarios focus on air-warfare :) )

(in reply to dillonkbase)
Post #: 3
RE: Harm shot down by Fulcrum Cannon - 4/27/2014 10:04:43 PM   
dillonkbase

 

Posts: 177
Joined: 5/2/2009
Status: offline 		nearly mach 3 pardon... 195 kts

(in reply to Tomcat84)
Post #: 4
RE: Harm shot down by Fulcrum Cannon - 4/27/2014 10:13:38 PM   
thewood1

 

Posts: 6529
Joined: 11/27/2005
Status: offline 		I think you missed a digit there.

(in reply to dillonkbase)
Post #: 5
RE: Harm shot down by Fulcrum Cannon - 4/28/2014 8:18:24 AM   
dillonkbase

 

Posts: 177
Joined: 5/2/2009
Status: offline 		i did... 1950kts.

(in reply to thewood1)
Post #: 6
RE: Harm shot down by Fulcrum Cannon - 4/30/2014 10:53:01 PM   
dillonkbase

 

Posts: 177
Joined: 5/2/2009
Status: offline 		ermmm... is this normal?

(in reply to dillonkbase)
Post #: 7
RE: Harm shot down by Fulcrum Cannon - 5/7/2014 6:00:19 PM   
Dimitris

 

Posts: 13282
Joined: 7/31/2005
Status: offline 		No. Added to our list.

_____________________________

Facebook
Twitter

(in reply to dillonkbase)
Post #: 8
RE: Harm shot down by Fulcrum Cannon - 5/11/2014 6:25:07 PM   
Dimitris

 

Posts: 13282
Joined: 7/31/2005
Status: offline 		Added vs-missile modifiers to unguided/ballistic weapons in Build 525.

Sample logs:
* 5/11/2014 5:58:24 PM: Gun (20mm/85 Mk15 Phalanx Blk 0 Burst [200 rnds]) is attacking RGM-84D Harpoon IC #16 with a base-Ph of 70%. Base-Ph adjusted for distance: 70%. Target speed modifier: -4%. Target size modifier: -9%. Final Ph: 57%. Die Roll: 44 - HIT
* 5/11/2014 6:00:23 PM: Gun (20mm/85 Mk15 Phalanx Blk 0 Burst [200 rnds]) is attacking SS-N-12 Sandbox Mod 1 [P-500 Bazalt] #27 with a base-Ph of 70%. Base-Ph adjusted for distance: 70%. Target speed modifier: -21%.Final Ph: 49%. Die Roll: 24 - HIT

_____________________________

Facebook
Twitter

(in reply to Dimitris)
Post #: 9
RE: Harm shot down by Fulcrum Cannon - 5/11/2014 10:17:17 PM   
dillonkbase

 

Posts: 177
Joined: 5/2/2009
Status: offline 		This looks like a good improvement. One thing about that harm engagement is that the Fulcrum didn't have a radar on(if I remember correctly), does the type of sensor affect the accuracy of these weapons (I know for naval gunfire having range data is important, I would think having visual data alone for shooting a missile would be challenging, I mean could AEW really vector a fighter to intercept a missile without using its radar?)?

No target size mod for the sandbox?



< Message edited by dillonkbase -- 5/11/2014 11:20:08 PM >

(in reply to Dimitris)
Post #: 10
RE: Harm shot down by Fulcrum Cannon - 5/11/2014 11:06:08 PM   
mikmykWS

 

Posts: 11524
Joined: 3/22/2005
Status: offline 		Might be something to consider.

Mike

_____________________________


(in reply to dillonkbase)
Post #: 11
RE: Harm shot down by Fulcrum Cannon - 5/11/2014 11:49:36 PM   
Dimitris

 

Posts: 13282
Joined: 7/31/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: dillonkbase

This looks like a good improvement. One thing about that harm engagement is that the Fulcrum didn't have a radar on(if I remember correctly), does the type of sensor affect the accuracy of these weapons (I know for naval gunfire having range data is important, I would think having visual data alone for shooting a missile would be challenging, I mean could AEW really vector a fighter to intercept a missile without using its radar?)?

Fire control sensor for unguided weapons matters only if you have enabled detailed gunfire control from the realism options, check the manual for details.

quote:


No target size mod for the sandbox?

Not needed.The nominal pk value assumes a large target and the sandbox is exactly that.


< Message edited by Sunburn -- 5/12/2014 12:50:42 AM >

_____________________________

Facebook
Twitter

(in reply to dillonkbase)
Post #: 12
RE: Harm shot down by Fulcrum Cannon - 5/12/2014 12:25:44 AM   
dillonkbase

 

Posts: 177
Joined: 5/2/2009
Status: offline 		Thanks guys!

(in reply to Dimitris)
Post #: 13
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> Tech Support >> [FIXED B525] Harm shot down by Fulcrum Cannon Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.125