RE: Distant Worlds AI

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

RE: Distant Worlds AI

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Distant Worlds 1 Series >> RE: Distant Worlds AI

Page: << < prev 1 2 [3] 4 5 next > >>

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: Distant Worlds AI - 6/3/2014 12:08:39 PM

Gregorovitch55

Posts: 191
Joined: 2/11/2014
Status: offline

FWIW a few comments on what IMO are examples of an epic fail and and a pretty good system for AI ship design.

SotS2 failed badly at this and is one reason I stopped playing it. Two main reasons leap out as to why. Firstly there are a lot of race specific techs in that game which means there also have to be race specific build plans (templates if you will). The problem is once the player figures out how to counter a particular race's basic build plans it's too easy to kill their ships. The second reason is the random element in research which simply denies a faction access to a particular technology (for example shields) randomly on a per game basis. This obviously plays merry hell with the AI's ship design plans and from what I could see it had no fallback strategies to speak of and simply sat on it's hands doing nothing upgrade wise - again easy peasy to kill them.

I think the moral is that anything that enriches and particularly diversifies the game environment is unfortunately the enemy of successful AI ship design algorithms.

The GalCiv2 was/is IMO very good at dynamic ship design in response to both AI and human players. of course GalCiv's system is very simple, but in this context that is it's strength. From what i could see what it did was use three factors to calculate if it needed to either redesign it's ships or undertake further specific research before taking on (or defend against) a particular faction: fleet size limit, opponent's main weapons strength vs it's corresponding defense strength, it's main weapon strength vs opponents corresponding defense strength. From these numbers it calculates whether it can or cannot defeat a full size enemy fleet on current designs, or if not if it could on redesign within its current tech levels. If those numbers show it still can't, then it will slam it's production and social sliders as far left as it can and shove it's research slider far right so it can rush the required weapon and defense techs to change the numbers so it can defeat the target faction's full size stack with it's own full size stack. There is still a curved ball in that ships accumulate both offense and defense capability with experience, but that cuts both ways.

As far as I can see most races in GalCiv do have basic ship design plans (or templates) that they always seem tho start with and persist with until something comes along that can trounce them, but after that they alter dynamically based on circumstance.

A lot of this is not applicable to DW of course (e.g. fleet size limits) but I think the moral is that this ability to crunch the numbers and translate them into a competitive ship design against a specific opponent, factoring additional research if necessary, on the fly is crucial to generating those "Oh Sh*t" moments you get in GalCiv when your missiles are suddenly next to useless against a pile of point defense and some relatively modest looking mass drivers are ripping your ships to pieces 'cos your shields are useless against them.

_____________________________

(in reply to Icemania)

Post #: 61

RE: Distant Worlds AI - 6/3/2014 12:21:30 PM

Icemania

Posts: 1847
Joined: 6/5/2013
From: Australia
Status: offline

Okay I've just watched the AI Research on full automatic in Pre-Warp.

I'm in shock right now so please excuse me for a moment ... [puts head under the water and screams]

I had to turn it off after 4 years because my Laptop was close to getting thrown through a window. I just can't watch that **** again.

Okay.

Constructive mode ... ON. Stick to the facts.

Wow.

1. The AI builds a Medium Spaceport and Energy Research Lab and then stopped. It's running at about 40% of research potential and does absolutely nothing to fix it.

2. 19 Energy Research Projects were finished and not one of them was Warp Field Precursors because the AI has not found the Pre-Warp Ruins yet (Explorer AI should prioritise ruins). Otherwise to provide a positive the build order was okay.

Shields
Energy Collection
Space Construction
Proton Ionization
Advanced Nuclear Fission
Enhanced Construction
Fusion Ignition
Enhanced Shields
Enhanced Engines
Accelerated Construction
Shield Reinforcement
Accelerated Shield Recharge
Component Prefabrication
Intensified Shield Strength
High Volume Thrust
Efficient Energy Conversion
Damage Control
High Storage Capacitors
Maximised Thrust Output

3. The Construction Ships built a Mining Station ... after 3.5 years!

4. With 3 HighTech Labs the AI decides to research Colonisation. Good idea!

Transport Systems
Colonisation
Proximity Sensors
Target Tracking
Countermeasures
Long Range Scanners
Enhanced Countermeasures
Continental Colonisation

5. Quameno Race files say they are meant to focus on Beams and Torpedoes. Only two of the first 13 Weapons Technologies were in this group. No mid-tier weapons yet. 3 Weapons Labs.

Improved Assault Tactics
Gravitic Weapons
Enhanced Missiles
Star Fighters
Area Weapons
Armor Plating
Improved Defence Tactics
Energy Torpedo
Enhanced Beam Weapons
Enhanced Gravitic Beams
Point Defense Weapons
Light Interceptors
Planetary Defence Units

WTF!

< Message edited by Icemania -- 6/3/2014 2:21:01 PM >

(in reply to Icemania)

Post #: 62

RE: Distant Worlds AI - 6/3/2014 12:28:45 PM

SirFinbar

Posts: 33
Joined: 6/3/2014
Status: offline

Well that settles it, I won't be playing pre-warp again.

On my new game I'm leaving tax automated to default settings, as that's what I assume the AI uses. It's just too unfair otherwise.

EDIT: Also I'm new here. Thanks to Spidey; I've read a number of your very informative posts, helped me with a couple different things.

< Message edited by SirFinbar -- 6/3/2014 1:30:04 PM >

(in reply to Icemania)

Post #: 63

RE: Distant Worlds AI - 6/3/2014 12:39:27 PM

Icemania

Posts: 1847
Joined: 6/5/2013
From: Australia
Status: offline

I don't know why we should consider modding the Empire Policy or Ship Design files because the problems are more fundamental than what we can change.

We need a patch that fixes AI explorer ruins prioritisation, AI research capacity, AI research order and the AI needs to actually follow the Tech Focus set in the Policy Files.

< Message edited by Icemania -- 6/3/2014 5:14:33 PM >

(in reply to SirFinbar)

Post #: 64

RE: Distant Worlds AI - 6/3/2014 12:47:18 PM

Icemania

Posts: 1847
Joined: 6/5/2013
From: Australia
Status: offline

Welcome to the boards SirFinbar!

Where are my manners ... sorry a bit distracted!

(in reply to Icemania)

Post #: 65

RE: Distant Worlds AI - 6/3/2014 1:10:29 PM

Icemania

Posts: 1847
Joined: 6/5/2013
From: Australia
Status: offline

Okay I've narrowed down one problem. I thought full automatic meant full automatic but it doesn't ... you need to ensure "Newly built ships are automated" is checked. The observations are all still valid except ship movements. EDIT: Post updated above.

< Message edited by Icemania -- 6/3/2014 2:20:35 PM >

(in reply to Icemania)

Post #: 66

RE: Distant Worlds AI - 6/3/2014 1:20:29 PM

Wanabe

Posts: 30
Joined: 6/1/2014
From: New Zealand
Status: offline

Yeah I've also been watching the AI a bit here and there over the last few days while I've been working on my design templates.

I've noticed the issue of it refusing to put some research labs down, it seems like it has a large weight towards putting them down at research bonus locations but if it can't find any it extremely often doesn't build any at the homeworld.

Civilian mining ships sometimes sit around at base a bit too much even if they have enough fuel to travel to a mining spot and back.

AI will also try to build space ports/defenses on planets that are completely surrounded by their enemy when they have no hope in hell completing the project which wastes a bit of money aswell.

I wonder if there would be a downside for a rule of the AI to not recruit any troops on planets until it encounters its first non-pirate empire, wouldn't help a lot (if it actually would help) but relatively simple to add depending on how the game keeps track of what empires are known to each empire.

The investigations every one is doing is very good I think. Keep it up! :)

(in reply to Icemania)

Post #: 67

RE: Distant Worlds AI - 6/3/2014 1:28:22 PM

Bingeling

Posts: 5186
Joined: 8/12/2010
Status: offline

Icemania:

I have never seen it have issues with exploring the ruin required. They get out of space after all. I have seen them build two research stations, at least, but not always two energy.

The exploration for the ruin, though, is not a "zoom to the ruin" that the human player can do, it is a natural exploration order inside out or similar. How long it takes to find depends on the star system and on lot of random stuff.

If you watch the AI a lot, you learn that it does a lot of stupid things, and that it does not learn from its mistakes. Do you ever have pirates attack your colony with similar fleets and fail again and again? That is stupid AI, for instance. Did you win? A complete AI failure, they were many against one.

You appear a hardcore mini-maxer in this game, how do you expect the AI to compete?

You may scoff at everything the AI does, but I am a bit satisfied when a lot of glaring AI errors does not happen (at least not frequently) anymore, because I have reported it, and it was fixed. You may be depressed at 1 energy research station, I am happy there is one, because there was a time without even that.

(in reply to Icemania)

Post #: 68

RE: Distant Worlds AI - 6/3/2014 1:41:39 PM

Icemania

Posts: 1847
Joined: 6/5/2013
From: Australia
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bingeling

Icemania:

I have never seen it have issues with exploring the ruin required. They get out of space after all. I have seen them build two research stations, at least, but not always two energy.

The exploration for the ruin, though, is not a "zoom to the ruin" that the human player can do, it is a natural exploration order inside out or similar. How long it takes to find depends on the star system and on lot of random stuff.

If you watch the AI a lot, you learn that it does a lot of stupid things, and that it does not learn from its mistakes. Do you ever have pirates attack your colony with similar fleets and fail again and again? That is stupid AI, for instance. Did you win? A complete AI failure, they were many against one.

You appear a hardcore mini-maxer in this game, how do you expect the AI to compete?

You may scoff at everything the AI does, but I am a bit satisfied when a lot of glaring AI errors does not happen (at least not frequently) anymore, because I have reported it, and it was fixed. You may be depressed at 1 energy research station, I am happy there is one, because there was a time without even that.

Please don't misunderstand ... I don't expect the AI to compete ... but I do expect the AI to implement the really really basic stuff. It would be trivial to improve the Explorer AI to go to ruins as a priority.

I just did a repeat and the ruin was found a little earlier and the AI did go straight to Hyperdrive research as you said earlier, so found another positive!

Every other observation is valid and could easily be fixed.

< Message edited by Icemania -- 6/3/2014 2:43:34 PM >

(in reply to Bingeling)

Post #: 69

RE: Distant Worlds AI - 6/3/2014 1:50:11 PM

Icemania

Posts: 1847
Joined: 6/5/2013
From: Australia
Status: offline

Since the AI builds a Medium Spaceport (or Large Spaceport for some settings) and an Energy Research Station at the start of pre-warp change Medium Spaceport from 3, 3 and 3 Labs to 8, 8 and 8 labs. Total would be 8, 14 and 8 labs i.e. 30 labs total. The problem then is overbuilding labs as the game progresses of course as the design files don't allow a homeworld special or equivalent.

< Message edited by Icemania -- 6/3/2014 2:54:11 PM >

(in reply to Icemania)

Post #: 70

RE: Distant Worlds AI - 6/3/2014 2:20:49 PM

Icemania

Posts: 1847
Joined: 6/5/2013
From: Australia
Status: offline

Okay I have repeated the test with the Medium Spaceport change above. The AI has 3 mid-tier weapons with #4 on the way whereas before it had 0 (weapons research is going almost three times faster after all). Same story with High Tech. LargeScale Construction (Size 500) available in Energy. Massive difference. I've updated the base design post earlier with this suggested improvement. Obviously it costs more though so probably worth reducing some other components a bit to compensate in the design so the AI doesn't freak out.

The AI must have a script for the "basics".

So will now delete fighter bays, ion cannons, ion defences, point defences and torpedoes from the design ... keep beams only ... and change the Quameno Race file so it focused on Beams only and not Torpedoes.

< Message edited by Icemania -- 6/3/2014 3:30:44 PM >

(in reply to Icemania)

Post #: 71

RE: Distant Worlds AI - 6/3/2014 2:48:57 PM

Spidey

Posts: 411
Joined: 12/8/2013
Status: offline

@ SirFinbar
Happy to be of help. Welcome to the forum.

@ Ice
How about using player stunts? If players can have fun with labs on mines then why can't the AI? If we're cutting costs by throwing scanners on mines instead of state bases then why can't the AI? And wouldn't this also serve to ensure research capacity without resulting in the AI going bankrupt?

(in reply to Icemania)

Post #: 72

RE: Distant Worlds AI - 6/3/2014 2:58:11 PM

Erik Rutins

Posts: 37503
Joined: 3/28/2000
From: Vermont, USA
Status: offline

Hi Icemania,

quote:

ORIGINAL: Icemania
Okay I've just watched the AI Research on full automatic in Pre-Warp.

I'm in shock right now so please excuse me for a moment ... [puts head under the water and screams]

I had to turn it off after 4 years because my Laptop was close to getting thrown through a window. I just can't watch that **** again.

Okay.

Constructive mode ... ON. Stick to the facts.

Wow.

1. The AI builds a Medium Spaceport and Energy Research Lab and then stopped. It's running at about 40% of research potential and does absolutely nothing to fix it.

2. 19 Energy Research Projects were finished and not one of them was Warp Field Precursors because the AI has not found the Pre-Warp Ruins yet (Explorer AI should prioritise ruins). Otherwise to provide a positive the build order was okay.

Shields
Energy Collection
Space Construction
Proton Ionization
Advanced Nuclear Fission
Enhanced Construction
Fusion Ignition
Enhanced Shields
Enhanced Engines
Accelerated Construction
Shield Reinforcement
Accelerated Shield Recharge
Component Prefabrication
Intensified Shield Strength
High Volume Thrust
Efficient Energy Conversion
Damage Control
High Storage Capacitors
Maximised Thrust Output

3. The Construction Ships built a Mining Station ... after 3.5 years!

4. With 3 HighTech Labs the AI decides to research Colonisation. Good idea!

Transport Systems
Colonisation
Proximity Sensors
Target Tracking
Countermeasures
Long Range Scanners
Enhanced Countermeasures
Continental Colonisation

5. Quameno Race files say they are meant to focus on Beams and Torpedoes. Only two of the first 13 Weapons Technologies were in this group. No mid-tier weapons yet. 3 Weapons Labs.

Improved Assault Tactics
Gravitic Weapons
Enhanced Missiles
Star Fighters
Area Weapons
Armor Plating
Improved Defence Tactics
Energy Torpedo
Enhanced Beam Weapons
Enhanced Gravitic Beams
Point Defense Weapons
Light Interceptors
Planetary Defence Units

WTF!

I haven't seen the AI do that poorly since Shadows Alpha before release. I believe you that this happened, but it's clearly not typical or common given that the AI players are regularly getting into the hyperspace era and competing with human players.

I would be very interested in seeing any save files you have for this to try to figure out what happened.

The only instances in Universe where I've seen an AI not get out of its system have had to do with very strong pirates, rather than any exploration or research issues.

With all that said, we are always working on the AI but I see this report not as anything "normal" but some kind of weird corner case that you found.

Regards,

- Erik

_____________________________

Erik Rutins
CEO, Matrix Games LLC

For official support, please use our Help Desk: http://www.matrixgames.com/helpdesk/

Freedom is not Free.

(in reply to Icemania)

Post #: 73

RE: Distant Worlds AI - 6/3/2014 3:07:43 PM

Icemania

Posts: 1847
Joined: 6/5/2013
From: Australia
Status: offline

Similar outcome in this test i.e. 2-3 mid-tier weapons. While the AI didn't research Torpedoes a lot of time was wasted researching other weapons technologies. Tried to set ResearchDesignTechFocus1-6 all to Beams but again similar outcome.

I noticed sometimes the AI will build a small spaceport to start with so probably not a good idea to delete the labs in fact I'll update the design post to go the other way ...

< Message edited by Icemania -- 6/3/2014 5:12:49 PM >

(in reply to Icemania)

Post #: 74

RE: Distant Worlds AI - 6/3/2014 3:22:09 PM

Icemania

Posts: 1847
Joined: 6/5/2013
From: Australia
Status: offline

Erik:

Please try the following settings: Ancient Galaxy Theme, Quameno, Prewarp, Normal Difficulty, No Pirates, Very Cheap Research (everything else default).

I've now repeated this test about 6 times and always stopped at the 4 year mark. Some starts the AI builds a Small Spaceport (presumably due to limited cashflow) which I restart (or bump planet quality a bit in Editor) as I'm looking closely at the Medium to start with.

Warp
Within 4 years I did get out of Warp most times but in 2 tests I did not. If you watch why it's very clearly the Explorer AI when the ruin is at the end of the Explorer AI algorithm in placement. The improvement suggestion here is for the Explorer AI to target ruins first which would help the AI get out of pre-warp a lot faster.

Research
The level of Research completion is very repeatable in every test with fairly minor variations.

The root cause is the Base Designs. If you see my recent posts, increasing the number of labs has vastly improved the AI's performance.

This is also repeatable so please give it a try.

Please have a look at Weapons. I'm trying to give Beams priority in the Empire Policy Files but it's very limited in how much priority is actually given.

< Message edited by Icemania -- 6/3/2014 4:29:00 PM >

(in reply to Erik Rutins)

Post #: 75

RE: Distant Worlds AI - 6/3/2014 3:36:56 PM

Erik Rutins

Posts: 37503
Joined: 3/28/2000
From: Vermont, USA
Status: offline

Thanks, I will give that a try. This won't likely fit in this week's update but if we find anything we'll fix it for next week.

_____________________________

Erik Rutins
CEO, Matrix Games LLC

For official support, please use our Help Desk: http://www.matrixgames.com/helpdesk/

Freedom is not Free.

(in reply to Icemania)

Post #: 76

RE: Distant Worlds AI - 6/3/2014 3:52:30 PM

Icemania

Posts: 1847
Joined: 6/5/2013
From: Australia
Status: offline

Erik (and anyone else interested) please refer HERE for a save file.

This includes the modifications I've made to the Medium Spaceport design (more labs in particular) and Empire Policy for Quameno as documented in the posts above.

Notes

1. Warp Field Ruins has not been found yet. Only two Explorers were built and they are focused on extremely low priority targets instead. The Explorer AI should always prioritise Ruins (not just pre-warp but generally).

2. Compare the massively greater amount of research completed due to the Medium Spaceport design change (compared to the post previously with default designs which you can repeat and get similar results). This enables the AI to research at full capacity rather than at a fraction of capacity.

These two changes alone would make a significant difference to AI performance prewarp.

Other Notes

1. Please have a look at the Weapons research. It looks like ResearchTechFocus on beams has a minor effect only. Could this effect be increased?
2. Conditional Logic. I assume this in the too hard basket but refer previous posts e.g. the Explorer example. With Conditional Logic I think it would be possible to fully emulate player designs.

< Message edited by Icemania -- 6/3/2014 5:10:59 PM >

(in reply to Erik Rutins)

Post #: 77

RE: Distant Worlds AI - 6/3/2014 3:56:43 PM

Icemania

Posts: 1847
Joined: 6/5/2013
From: Australia
Status: offline

Erik, any chance Elliot can look at Post 38 with the proposed default Base Design Changes? I'm worried about knock-on effects. Items like more labs and extractors really should be default as they would help everyone's AI experience a little.

< Message edited by Icemania -- 6/3/2014 5:11:11 PM >

(in reply to Icemania)

Post #: 78

RE: Distant Worlds AI - 6/3/2014 3:57:46 PM

Erik Rutins

Posts: 37503
Joined: 3/28/2000
From: Vermont, USA
Status: offline

Hi Icemania,

Don't worry, we've been reading everything and discussing internally. Some AI improvements will already be in this week's update.

Regards,

- Erik

_____________________________

Erik Rutins
CEO, Matrix Games LLC

For official support, please use our Help Desk: http://www.matrixgames.com/helpdesk/

Freedom is not Free.

(in reply to Icemania)

Post #: 79

RE: Distant Worlds AI - 6/3/2014 4:06:41 PM

Icemania

Posts: 1847
Joined: 6/5/2013
From: Australia
Status: offline

Okay great thanks Erik, looks like I've timed these comments well!

And better develop some more while the patch window is open ...

My Laptop is safe and no windows were smashed in the making of these e-mails.

(in reply to Erik Rutins)

Post #: 80

RE: Distant Worlds AI - 6/3/2014 4:12:35 PM

Velihopea

Posts: 68
Joined: 5/26/2012
Status: offline

Anything coming to the taxation AI? Biggest balance problem IMO. I play custom galaxy pre-warp without pirates. Setting tax to 0% at game start seems to be the winning move. I've got to 20000m population by the time the average computer player gets to 5000m.

I think I'm going to scrap my current game and start a new one with SirFinbar suggestion: set Tax on "fully automate" with default settings.

_____________________________

(in reply to Erik Rutins)

Post #: 81

RE: Distant Worlds AI - 6/3/2014 4:22:41 PM

Icemania

Posts: 1847
Joined: 6/5/2013
From: Australia
Status: offline

Agreed Velihopea. Needs care that one. Looking at the Empire Policy file, Matrix could change "ColonyTaxRateMediumColony" to 0 (i.e. no tax) across the board. Problem is that it looks like a Large Colony is defined as only 3B ... which means for bigger worlds they would still be taxed too early. Maybe this can be increased as well.

Note to self: Try using DisallowedResearchArea tomorrow ... might be another way to improve AI Weapon Research focus.

(in reply to Velihopea)

Post #: 82

RE: Distant Worlds AI - 6/3/2014 4:29:30 PM

Erik Rutins

Posts: 37503
Joined: 3/28/2000
From: Vermont, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Velihopea
Anything coming to the taxation AI? Biggest balance problem IMO. I play custom galaxy pre-warp without pirates. Setting tax to 0% at game start seems to be the winning move. I've got to 20000m population by the time the average computer player gets to 5000m.

Yes, we're addressing that further this week.

_____________________________

Erik Rutins
CEO, Matrix Games LLC

For official support, please use our Help Desk: http://www.matrixgames.com/helpdesk/

Freedom is not Free.

(in reply to Velihopea)

Post #: 83

RE: Distant Worlds AI - 6/3/2014 5:08:49 PM

Lonck

Posts: 106
Joined: 11/23/2010
Status: offline

AI is just so freaking frustrating. Playing game right now (minimized) where I have 9k emeros crystals sitting in a mining base while having emeros shortage. The only freighter who finally picks up some decides to send it across the galaxy to a monitoring station an explorer found. I also have 10 super mining ships who are mining gold and lead and I think one of them was mining an empty asteroid though Im not too sure. Or the fact that my construction ship isn't building a base because it has no resources in the cargo bay, so instead of freighter and the ship itself going to resupply it just sits there waiting for resources.

< Message edited by Lonck -- 6/3/2014 6:39:02 PM >

(in reply to Erik Rutins)

Post #: 84

RE: Distant Worlds AI - 6/3/2014 5:17:16 PM

Erik Rutins

Posts: 37503
Joined: 3/28/2000
From: Vermont, USA
Status: offline

Hi Lonck,

Overall, the AI works very well. If you're seeing odd or illogical behavior, the best way to fix it is to save the game right there and upload a save file for us. There are so many variables that can affect what's going on that it's almost impossible for us to successfully investigate these kinds of issues without a save file.

Regards,

- Erik

_____________________________

Erik Rutins
CEO, Matrix Games LLC

For official support, please use our Help Desk: http://www.matrixgames.com/helpdesk/

Freedom is not Free.

(in reply to Lonck)

Post #: 85

RE: Distant Worlds AI - 6/3/2014 6:33:31 PM

Raap

Posts: 404
Joined: 1/12/2011
Status: offline

The outcome of AI empires vary greatly. I've met a few strong ones(even lost to one), both in terms of ship design and economy, but for the most part they're as weak as they used to be.

The base problem is definitely how it handles the start; the few times circumstances give the AI a great start, they get a big population, good economy and great research, which in turn leads to stronger individual ships and fleets and thus a challenge for the player. But if their start is shaky or not optimal, which is usually the case, they'll never become powerful since they'll just end up too far behind in the economy, colony, tech and design races, given how closely these are linked together.

The good thing about this is that most of it should be easily tweakable and that the overall AI behavior works fairly well. It shouldn't be too difficult to have it maximize its research output, improve its explorers, tweak tax system so it's less exploitable(or better exploited by the AI), give AI research priorities a look-through, increase focus on bigger ship sizes, and generally improve the AI ship design.

Should probably also have a look at the ground troop construction automation/AI; in my own games I've noticed it pretty much tends to recruit until almost all my surplus is gone. If it's the same with the AI, then I can see how it might get in trouble; not much point with troops without a fleet to back it up.

Might also want to have a look at the 'create fleet' automation. In my experience, it's way too fond of strike forces. These are usually highly ineffective, at least when used against a player. Generally it's much better with a few large fleets that can deal with large challenges than lots of small fleets that get picked off easily unless they vastly out-tech their enemies.

< Message edited by Raap -- 6/3/2014 7:37:30 PM >

(in reply to Erik Rutins)

Post #: 86

RE: Distant Worlds AI - 6/3/2014 6:39:02 PM

Tanaka

Posts: 4378
Joined: 4/8/2003
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Erik Rutins

Hi Icemania,

Don't worry, we've been reading everything and discussing internally. Some AI improvements will already be in this week's update.

Regards,

- Erik

Hi Erik would it be possible to give the races the same copycat power as the pirates to copy and use our own designs instead of having to redo entire design files?

_____________________________

(in reply to Erik Rutins)

Post #: 87

RE: Distant Worlds AI - 6/3/2014 6:40:37 PM

ASHBERY76

Posts: 2136
Joined: 10/10/2001
From: England
Status: offline

If you start in pre warp it's comment sense the A.I empires will not do as well.Not being able to colonize and prioritise the correct tech mixed with pirate rape.

_____________________________

(in reply to Raap)

Post #: 88

RE: Distant Worlds AI - 6/4/2014 1:00:49 AM

Raap

Posts: 404
Joined: 1/12/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ASHBERY76

If you start in pre warp it's comment sense the A.I empires will not do as well.Not being able to colonize and prioritise the correct tech mixed with pirate rape.

Yeah, pre-warp's particularly bad, but it doesn't have to be that way. It wouldn't take very much work to make the AI generally favor protection treaties with pirates early on, make exploration ships go for ruins first, have it always build enough stations to max research potential, and have some more sensible tech priorities, particularly hyperdrive speed, ship size and weapon focus. Add in a rework of the tax/population growth system and there's no reason the player should come out of pre-warp with a massive advantage, especially not when the AI gets various bonuses(which I assume most of us are playing with).

< Message edited by Raap -- 6/4/2014 2:04:13 AM >

(in reply to ASHBERY76)

Post #: 89

RE: Distant Worlds AI - 6/4/2014 1:22:36 AM

Tcby

Posts: 342
Joined: 12/16/2013
From: Australia
Status: offline

Just got around to reading all this. Good work Ice for doing these tests and reporting the effects of minor changes. Big thanks to to Erik and Elliot for being open to suggestions and active in this area. The biggest problem I'm having at the moment is that I often lose incentive to finish my games after a somewhat early point. This is because I prefer to start in prewarp for thematic reasons, but the ability of the AI to keep pace in terms of research and colony growth is very limited. Because of this I tend to have more challenging (but less immersive) games from a classic start.

I do believe that the AI is fundamentally good; small changes to exploration priority, spaceport design, and taxation policy will surely make a great difference. As Ice has demonstrated.

As a side note, I got a very vivid image from Ice here:
"[puts head under the water and screams]"
...I laughed out loud.

< Message edited by Tcby -- 6/4/2014 2:31:49 AM >

(in reply to Raap)

Post #: 90