[FIXED B547] [B546]Generally slower performance than B538

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

[FIXED B547] [B546]Generally slower performance than B538

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> Tech Support >> [FIXED B547] [B546]Generally slower performance than B538

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

[FIXED B547] [B546]Generally slower performance than B538 - 6/20/2014 12:17:06 AM

poaw

Posts: 107
Joined: 12/17/2001
From: Houston, Texas
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mikmyk

Guys if you can take a quick of save of this when you experience it and put into troubleshooting. This will help find out what may be slowing things down.

Thanks!

Mike

There isn't a discrete moment it occurs, it's just generally slower performance in all situations. I think it even starts up slower.

Here is my test scenario:

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Sunburn -- 6/21/2014 4:20:44 PM >

Post #: 1

RE: [B546]Generally slower performance than B538 - 6/20/2014 1:45:17 AM

thewood1

Posts: 6529
Joined: 11/27/2005
Status: offline

I would agree, but its only a perception right now. In at least 504, I never had a major slow down with hi fi on, no-pulse, and with 500-1000 unit scenarios. I use Bass Drum as a benchmark. Now at 1:1, it takes three-four seconds to run a second in game time.

(in reply to poaw)

Post #: 2

RE: [B546]Generally slower performance than B538 - 6/20/2014 1:46:18 AM

mikmykWS

Posts: 11524
Joined: 3/22/2005
Status: offline

Thanks Poaw.

No this is great. Thank you! Programmers can do some profiling to determine what might be causing it.

Logged.

Mike

_____________________________

(in reply to poaw)

Post #: 3

RE: [B546]Generally slower performance than B538 - 6/20/2014 1:50:37 AM

thewood1

Posts: 6529
Joined: 11/27/2005
Status: offline

I have to be careful with my perceptions though. I am running a new supposedly faster laptop. But I am finding heat issues are sometimes throttling the CPU throughput.

I might load up a fresh 1.03 install and benchmark some stuff.

(in reply to mikmykWS)

Post #: 4

RE: [B546]Generally slower performance than B538 - 6/20/2014 4:19:37 AM

ComDev

Posts: 5735
Joined: 5/12/2006
Status: offline

What are your range ring settings like?

Try turning them off completely. Does the sim run faster now?

_____________________________

Developer "Command: Modern Air/Naval Operations" project!

(in reply to thewood1)

Post #: 5

RE: [B546]Generally slower performance than B538 - 6/20/2014 9:57:34 AM

thewood1

Posts: 6529
Joined: 11/27/2005
Status: offline

That was the first thing I did. It did not change much that I could perceive. Turning hi fi off helped a lot. But I never had to do that before. I'll keep poking at it over the weekend and see if this is real or me being nostalgic.

(in reply to ComDev)

Post #: 6

RE: [B546]Generally slower performance than B538 - 6/20/2014 10:02:56 AM

Dimitris

Posts: 13282
Joined: 7/31/2005
Status: offline

Was this in 1-1 or in time acceleration ?

_____________________________

Facebook
Twitter

(in reply to thewood1)

Post #: 7

RE: [B546]Generally slower performance than B538 - 6/20/2014 11:16:26 AM

thewood1

Posts: 6529
Joined: 11/27/2005
Status: offline

1:1...it is definitely faster in accelerated time. I am looking at what I think is the worst case scenario for loading...1:1, hi fi, non-pulsed, 700 units. I have range circles on for selected unit only and merged.

(in reply to Dimitris)

Post #: 8

RE: [B546]Generally slower performance than B538 - 6/21/2014 3:21:05 PM

Dimitris

Posts: 13282
Joined: 7/31/2005
Status: offline

Fixed in Build 547.

_____________________________

Facebook
Twitter

(in reply to thewood1)

Post #: 9

RE: [B546]Generally slower performance than B538 - 6/21/2014 3:32:13 PM

Kitchens Sink

Posts: 402
Joined: 5/4/2014
Status: offline

I am running GibraltarV2 in editor mode on my "average" laptop with Build 546, full individual range rings...1170 units, 1:1 time and no hi-fi or pulsing. The scenario has been zipping along just fine, no problems.

(in reply to Dimitris)

Post #: 10

RE: [B546]Generally slower performance than B538 - 6/21/2014 6:34:19 PM

ryszardsh

Posts: 93
Joined: 1/4/2007
Status: offline

Just a data point - 546 seemed slower to me - intermittent spikes of 3-4000ms time rather than the more normal 2-300 per turn. I noticed that as soon as a pair of SU24 jammers died the latency spikes went away. Running a larger scenario, one of the Med to Libya scenarios. Quite striking - even backed up to oldest autosave and killed the fencers as fast as I could and game accelerated immediately. Lots of emitters in scenario, all lit up and being jammed by the fencers.

RAS

(in reply to Kitchens Sink)

Post #: 11

Page: [1]

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> Tech Support >> [FIXED B547] [B546]Generally slower performance than B538

Page: [1]