obvert
Posts: 14050
Joined: 1/17/2011 From: PDX (and now) London, UK Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Lowpe quote:
ORIGINAL: obvert The use of B-29s by the AI is going to give you no idea how they will work in the hands of a good human. The AI is relentless, doesn't stand them down, but more importantly will not prioritize targets that a PBEM opponent would, consistently. They work best massed, with 3-5 days rest between missions. In answer to your Ki-83 question, yes, it's a MUST have. The Ki-83 has wicked range and will fight evenly or better with anything. The Ki-100 pretty much sucks, yet I say it's a must as it's all you can get at service 1 that has a chance in late war. With Symon's air frame recalculations it gets a boost to closer to what it was in the war, but in stock it's slower than a Tojo. Good for lower level CAP but will suffer against any Allied fighter. Thanks, all very good points. So far, I can only find 22 squadrons that become night fighters, and then some of them get taken out of service late war...which means you can try to protect maybe 3 areas...if that. A pretty bleak picture. Yes. Never enough. You've probably looked, but there are some NF groups that come from recon groups, FB groups, and other strange places. At some point in 43 I just recombined all of my groups to see what the upgrades would be and came up with a few I hadn't known about. The use of NF doesn't have to be a static thing, only defending three bases. The HI is a pretty small area and you can have them mutually supporting with a few hexes range, but most groups in the bigger centers. You really need them to disrupt the bombing more than to shoot down B-29s. With the time needed to stand down between missions, even making a run less effective is a win sometimes.
_____________________________
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill
|