Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Burma Bungle!

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Burma Bungle! Page: <<   < prev  50 51 [52] 53 54   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Burma Bungle! - 8/3/2014 6:14:30 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Rangoon...planes still on the ground. Can't destroy them.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1531
RE: Burma Bungle! - 8/3/2014 11:39:36 PM   
mind_messing

 

Posts: 3393
Joined: 10/28/2013
Status: offline 		Can I ask for a list of LCU's on both sides at Prome?

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1532
RE: Burma Bungle! - 8/4/2014 12:49:30 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mind_messing

Can I ask for a list of LCU's on both sides at Prome?


Certainly. My infantry had forts 1 and a couple of them took it on the chin.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to mind_messing)
Post #: 1533
RE: Burma Bungle! - 8/4/2014 10:55:05 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Feb 26, 1943

Night bombing on Rangoon destroys a Mitchell on the ground, while AA downs a few planes over Prome.

Allies bomb Prome, and Japanese fighters contest the air and not much damage is done at all.

Then, the main event, what would the Allies do at Prome? They bombard, and a much more normal result occurs. Can't figure out this game at times.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1534
RE: Burma Bungle! - 8/4/2014 11:03:58 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Big picture at Burma...






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1535
RE: Burma Bungle! - 8/4/2014 10:05:47 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Plane R&D

Finished off the r&d plane factory build for the Ki202. 14 size 30 roughly. Two of the factories have already repaired two points. Now, to keep them safe and build several size 10 AF on the HI both in contested areas and hopefully in safe areas. If Spidery's program is close to correct I can expect it early 1st qtr 1945.

A7M3-J Sam has 9 factories roughly size 30. It has 11 total repaired, with one factory size 4 and two at size 3.

These will be my endwar uber planes. I hope.

I should get the Tojo IIc sometime late March. I really feel the need for an armored fighter, as the IIa version just dies in droves while the A6M5c puts up a much stiffer fight.

I actually increased my production of the Tony, and will continue to use them in Burma until the Tojo IIc comes along, then it will be off to research the Ki100I with them.

KAI Dinah fighter is doing very well in a night fighting role. I am super pleased with this plane in that role. Other roles not so much.

Lilly IIb divebomber. In its one engagement it got overwhelmed by enemy CAP and suffered losses but penetrated the CAP but failed to score any hits. I have three Sentai now operating one each in Burma, Marshalls/Truk/Rabaul and Kuriles. It still is a very flexible bomber because of its range.

Carriers: Judy version one is on most of the Carriers, the A6M5c is on all of them, and I am planning to try and CAP Trap his planes in the Marshalls while I plant some mines at Jaluit.

Nicks: I am producing the A and B version, which have gotten chewed up by the Americans and British, but in turn have chewed up the Chinese really well with the added benefit of being able to strafe the Chinese too. No luck with them against Lightnings.

Lightning defense: Nothing seems to work real well, but the best I have come up with is to fly very low with different models and hope the A6M5c doesn't get the brunt of the dive attacks...if the Lightnings aren't sweeping they are much more manageable.







(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1536
RE: Burma Bungle! - 8/4/2014 11:38:47 PM   
Sangeli


Posts: 1132
Joined: 3/29/2012
From: San Francisco
Status: offline 		I've seen huge bombardments like that in the past as well. As a hardware engineer I'm inclined to believe that it is due to a bad register value being used for a calculation or some other bug in the running of the software. It's not like this game is bug free and I've encountered my share in the past (such as being able to control my opponents air units once) so this seems like the most probable cause.

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1537
RE: Burma Bungle! - 8/4/2014 11:51:46 PM   
mind_messing

 

Posts: 3393
Joined: 10/28/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe


quote:

ORIGINAL: mind_messing

Can I ask for a list of LCU's on both sides at Prome?


Certainly. My infantry had forts 1 and a couple of them took it on the chin.








Well, that's quite the Allied stack, and more powerful than you'd think from the AV.

Plenty of Allied tanks (and probably good ones, if your oponent has managed his pools well), as well as USA infantry, and even a USMC unit!

You've got to give this stack a good kicking - heavy losses will put a dent in the Allied pools for quite some time. It's a powerful stack, but it's stuck in an open hex, and provided you can take Rangoon and the surrounding bases, you can isolate it from air support and pound them into dust.

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1538
RE: Burma Bungle! - 8/5/2014 12:56:18 AM   
Lokasenna


Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline 		That's a huge investment of supply on the Ki-202.

(in reply to mind_messing)
Post #: 1539
RE: Burma Bungle! - 8/5/2014 9:46:03 AM   
setloz

 

Posts: 97
Joined: 1/14/2013
From: Romania
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lokasenna

That's a huge investment of supply on the Ki-202.


14 factories of 30 equal 462.000 supplies to set-up and fully repair if my math doesn't fail me. If you add up the other factories that you are retooling, the supply for R&D is starting to get into the millions.
Did you make a full inventory of supplies spent/to be spent until 1945?

(in reply to Lokasenna)
Post #: 1540
RE: Burma Bungle! - 8/5/2014 10:27:21 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: setloz


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lokasenna

That's a huge investment of supply on the Ki-202.


14 factories of 30 equal 462.000 supplies to set-up and fully repair if my math doesn't fail me. If you add up the other factories that you are retooling, the supply for R&D is starting to get into the millions.
Did you make a full inventory of supplies spent/to be spent until 1945?


I really don't have much of an r&d program left repairing other than those two, night fighters, and the odd ones I inherited like 130 size Frank r factory.

My Tojo IIc, Oscar IV, A6M5c, Tony KI100 are all done.

I am at 4.2 million supplies now and I am not planning on any more expenditures.

I am hoping these planes can help stave off the destruction of the industry on the HI temporarily, but long enough for a solid payback in supplies.

Of course, I am probably all wrong.












< Message edited by Lowpe -- 8/5/2014 12:28:57 PM >

(in reply to setloz)
Post #: 1541
RE: Burma Bungle! - 8/5/2014 11:20:55 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Feb 27, 1943

Lost another bomber on a night run. Have now suspended all night bombing. Only 5 4E's attack in Burma, Allied planes exhausted I think. I have flown in a fresh Tojo squadron, and will add another 50 A6M5cs in two days when I will resume offensive sweeps.

If I have worn out the Allied bombers allowing my push from Magwe to get into the Jungle Ridge mostly intact, it will be worth all the planes lost.

Attempting a CAP trap in the Marshalls.

A very poor attack in the the central plains of China. Despite being bombed for weeks, and no flak showing up, the Chinese Corp gets supply for the battle, and I get a horrendous roll cutting my AV by 1/3 netting a 1-4 attack. Ugh.

Allied bombardment at Burma is fairly even. My Magwe push on the road is off and running to cross the river. I actually don't think they are spotted, as they don't show up during the combat replay. Wouldn't that be great!

No planes at Rangoon damaged during the bombardment. Two days running.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1542
RE: Burma Bungle! - 8/5/2014 11:25:03 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Bombardment at Prome

The more guns and vehicles I can destroy here the better.

Funky report of the attacking forces.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1543
RE: Burma Bungle! - 8/5/2014 11:32:23 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mind_messing

You've got to give this stack a good kicking - heavy losses will put a dent in the Allied pools for quite some time. It's a powerful stack, but it's stuck in an open hex, and provided you can take Rangoon and the surrounding bases, you can isolate it from air support and pound them into dust.


I am not taking Rangoon any time soon, but I am going to cut the supply road I think.

I think I have made a good start on attrition of the Allied air forces. No more planes based out of Prome, and fairly weak bombing this day. Lightnings active are down to 4. However, it is going to be slow and very bloody.

Next up will be a continuation of sweeps....



(in reply to mind_messing)
Post #: 1544
RE: Burma Bungle! - 8/5/2014 11:38:51 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Sangeli

I've seen huge bombardments like that in the past as well. As a hardware engineer I'm inclined to believe that it is due to a bad register value being used for a calculation or some other bug in the running of the software. It's not like this game is bug free and I've encountered my share in the past (such as being able to control my opponents air units once) so this seems like the most probable cause.


It was a nasty hit, and very inappropriate given followup bombardments.

(in reply to Sangeli)
Post #: 1545
RE: Burma Bungle! - 8/5/2014 11:53:15 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		My worst blunder so far. I honestly thought they had no supply, and were disrupted from constant bombing. Well, losing Zuikaku to a submarine and then a surface group was my biggest blunder so far. This is just the second biggest blunder.

My bad.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Lowpe -- 8/5/2014 1:42:05 PM >

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1546
RE: Burma Bungle! - 8/5/2014 4:37:46 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Pilot reserves

This is from memory, but I believe I have over 250 in tracom which are all slated for night fighting duties. And I have roughly 750 or more in reserves....I have to double check to be more accurate.

Planes losses in the game are incredibly heavy 9000 Japanese, 7000 Allies, total 16,000. Wowzah!

For kamikazes are naval (high, low), experience, and defense the only important skills?


< Message edited by Lowpe -- 8/5/2014 9:33:48 PM >

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1547
RE: Burma Bungle! - 8/6/2014 12:22:37 AM   
Miller


Posts: 2226
Joined: 9/14/2004
From: Ashington, England.
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

Pilot reserves

This is from memory, but I believe I have over 250 in tracom which are all slated for night fighting duties. And I have roughly 750 or more in reserves....I have to double check to be more accurate.

Planes losses in the game are incredibly heavy 9000 Japanese, 7000 Allies, total 16,000. Wowzah!

For kamikazes are naval (high, low), experience, and defense the only important skills?



Low naval is the only skill that matters for Kami pilots. I believe no matter what altitude you set them to attack at, they will always rely on LowNav skill to hit the target.

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1548
RE: Burma Bungle! - 8/6/2014 6:51:21 AM   
Spidery

 

Posts: 1821
Joined: 10/6/2012
From: Hampshire, UK
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

Pilot reserves

This is from memory, but I believe I have over 250 in tracom which are all slated for night fighting duties. And I have roughly 750 or more in reserves....I have to double check to be more accurate.

Planes losses in the game are incredibly heavy 9000 Japanese, 7000 Allies, total 16,000. Wowzah!

For kamikazes are naval (high, low), experience, and defense the only important skills?



Is that 750 total in reserves or just fighter reserve? Also, is that the number from when you look at the reserve pool or when you try and draw a pilot from reserves? The former seems to include many WIA pilots which I tend to discount.

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1549
RE: Burma Bungle! - 8/6/2014 10:41:46 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Feb 28, 1942

No night bombing.

5 4Es attack both Prome and the push from Magwe. We down 3...but the Lightning sweep returns in the afternoon, I am guessing poor morale led to a failed fly check in the morning, and they down 3 fighters for no loss on the Lightnings.

Bombardment goes well at Prome destroying tanks and guns.

My torpedo bombers don't fly against a spotted CV...sub attack on the Nestor there. Lilly IIb divebombers with escort were just within range and don't fly. Probably weather for the torpedo bombers and morale for the lilly IIb.

No CAP trap in the Marshalls, despite the bait being spotted.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Spidery)
Post #: 1550
RE: Burma Bungle! - 8/6/2014 11:24:13 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Miller
Low naval is the only skill that matters for Kami pilots. I believe no matter what altitude you set them to attack at, they will always rely on LowNav skill to hit the target.


Thanks.

(in reply to Miller)
Post #: 1551
RE: Burma Bungle! - 8/6/2014 11:28:28 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Spidery
The former seems to include many WIA pilots which I tend to discount.


Oh, my! Quite a discrepancy. Thanks for pointing that out to me.


(in reply to Spidery)
Post #: 1552
RE: Burma Bungle! - 8/7/2014 10:34:29 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		March 1, 1943

Wow, March already.

No night attacks.

Two Allied sweeps, one in Burma the other in the Marshalls downs 8 Japanese fighters for no Allied losses. No Allied bombing.

In Burma, the Lilly IIb strikes a small convoy. This was a 8-9 hex attack...

It is great having Army pilots in this role, almost 50 percent of the bombs hit. This is perhaps the best it will ever get for the Lilly IIb, hitting fragile cargo ships unescorted.

Interesting the bomber pictured here is using SAP bombs...




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Lowpe -- 8/7/2014 9:40:24 PM >

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1553
RE: Burma Bungle! - 8/7/2014 10:43:29 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		The heavy guns at Prome start to deliver some damage to the Allied forces. This is exactly what I am hoping for, a constant grinding attrition of Allied afvs and guns -- which are slow to be replaced.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1554
RE: Burma Bungle! - 8/7/2014 10:51:06 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Burma

The bigger picture.

Looks like we will have to fight to close the dirt supply road.

Mandalay is low on supplies because a full infantry division and a 1/3 of a RTA division just arrived.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Lowpe -- 8/7/2014 11:59:20 AM >

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1555
RE: Burma Bungle! - 8/7/2014 11:18:04 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Changteh falls in China for no loss to the IJA, but significant losses to the Chinese.






Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Lowpe -- 8/7/2014 12:22:17 PM >

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1556
RE: Burma Bungle! - 8/7/2014 5:06:29 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		In a stunning bit of advanced r&d goodness, I just now have activated the Nakajima -45 engine.

Good thing I won't get the Frank and George early.

I did build two size 30 factories for George and they are almost repaired -- maybe I will get them a month early.

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1557
RE: Burma Bungle! - 8/7/2014 9:05:27 PM   
obvert


Posts: 14050
Joined: 1/17/2011
From: PDX (and now) London, UK
Status: offline 		About your China question above, I'd have to see a bigger picture. Can you post a larger shot of China?

The clock is ticking here, and I'd be thinking territory rather than cleaning up run-down Chinese units at the minute. You want the mountains especially. Are you there yet?

_____________________________

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1558
RE: Burma Bungle! - 8/8/2014 10:39:41 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		March 2, 1943

Since the Lilly IIb divebomber did so well on the 1st of March flying out of Magwe, I figured the Allies would bomb Magwe. I had the Lillies relocate and beefed up the air defenses with a fresh Sentai of Tojo IIa's.

I was not disappointed...the bombers, flew and flew.

Allies bombed at 6000 feet but I didn't see any balloon damage.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Lowpe -- 8/8/2014 11:45:49 AM >

(in reply to obvert)
Post #: 1559
RE: Burma Bungle! - 8/8/2014 10:44:21 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Unfortunately the Lightning sweep is back up to 18 planes and comes in the afternoon, along with some other sweeps.

Damage to Magwe is 70% runway, 45% service.

The butcher's bill for the day:




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1560
Page:   <<   < prev  50 51 [52] 53 54   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Burma Bungle! Page: <<   < prev  50 51 [52] 53 54   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.656