Triode
Posts: 283
Joined: 9/26/2014 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Styx3 triode what will be leader class destroyer armamente and displacement? Well, under project "Leader" there is four variant of ship Variant 1 (aka "Our Berk", aka "Destroer for Ministry of Finance") 7500/9000 tons, ~ 160 m length, CODAG,> 30 knots Artillery: 1x1x130, Air Defense : 2xCIWS(Naval Pantsir), 64xRedut cells Missiles: 32xUKSK cells 2x4 Paket-NK torpedo tubes hangar for 2 helicopters Navy dont like this variant for some reasons Variant 2 (aka "better than Tika",aka "minimum of we can agree") 9500/11500 tons ~ 190 meters in length, CODAG, ~ 30 knots Artillery: 1x1x130 Air Defense: 4xCIWS(Naval Pantsir), 80xRedut cells Missiles: 48xUKSK cells 2x4Paket-NK torpedo tubes hangar for 2 helicopters this is minimal configuration Russian Navy can agree to choose Variant 3 (aka "What we want",aka "Worthy successor for 1144") 12500/14700 tons, about 200 meters long, CODAG or nuclear power unit, ~ 30 knots artillery 2x2x152 or 2x1x130 or 1x1x130 Air Defense: 4xCIWS(Naval Pantsir), 80xRedut cells Missiles: 64xUKSK cells 2x4 Paket-NK hangar for 2 helicopters This is what Russian navy want when talk about "Nuclear DDG" Variant 4 (aka "successor of 1155") 13000/15200 tons ~ 210 meters in length, CODAG , ~ 30 knots artillery 1x2x152 or 1x1x130 Air Defense: 4xCIWS(Naval Pantsir),48xRedut cells Missiles 16xUKSK cells 2x4 Paket-NK hangar for 5 helicopters something similar to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shirane-class_destroyer but bigger this ship is forced by former captains of Project 1155. The basic idea: take off from an aircraft carrier as much helicopters as possible to take more planes,transfer ASW duties to such ships as variant 4 On variants 1,2,3 "Poliment" (in variant 3K96-1, the difference from 3K96-2 is ability to fire "big" SAM from UKSK, Navy want 40N6 from UKSK but NPO "Almaz-Antey" has enough hemorrhoids with the integration of the missile in the S-400 , and they do not want to double their problems.On the other hand OKB "Novator" vows to "as soon as possible to integrate 9M83M into UKSK".) on variant 4 it is "Poliment" in variant 3K96-2 My reasons to not like variant 4 is simple, places on Russian shipyards are limited so +1"variant 4" = -1 "variants 1,2 or 3" and I think Russian Navy need moar UKSK Keep in mind that all this variants from early 2013 and can be changes
|