|
Triode -> RE: BPC Vladivostok to be delivered Nov 14 (11/12/2014 11:19:15 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Styx3
triode what will be leader class destroyer armamente and displacement?
Well, under project "Leader" there is four variant of ship
Variant 1 (aka "Our Berk", aka "Destroer for Ministry of Finance")
7500/9000 tons, ~ 160 m length, CODAG,> 30 knots
Artillery: 1x1x130,
Air Defense : 2xCIWS(Naval Pantsir), 64xRedut cells
Missiles: 32xUKSK cells
2x4 Paket-NK torpedo tubes
hangar for 2 helicopters
Navy dont like this variant for some reasons
Variant 2 (aka "better than Tika",aka "minimum of we can agree")
9500/11500 tons ~ 190 meters in length, CODAG, ~ 30 knots
Artillery: 1x1x130
Air Defense: 4xCIWS(Naval Pantsir), 80xRedut cells
Missiles: 48xUKSK cells
2x4Paket-NK torpedo tubes
hangar for 2 helicopters
this is minimal configuration Russian Navy can agree to choose
Variant 3 (aka "What we want",aka "Worthy successor for 1144")
12500/14700 tons, about 200 meters long, CODAG or nuclear power unit, ~ 30 knots
artillery 2x2x152 or 2x1x130 or 1x1x130
Air Defense: 4xCIWS(Naval Pantsir), 80xRedut cells
Missiles: 64xUKSK cells
2x4 Paket-NK
hangar for 2 helicopters
This is what Russian navy want when talk about "Nuclear DDG"
Variant 4 (aka "successor of 1155")
13000/15200 tons ~ 210 meters in length, CODAG , ~ 30 knots
artillery 1x2x152 or 1x1x130
Air Defense: 4xCIWS(Naval Pantsir),48xRedut cells
Missiles 16xUKSK cells
2x4 Paket-NK
hangar for 5 helicopters
something similar to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shirane-class_destroyer but bigger
this ship is forced by former captains of Project 1155. The basic idea:
take off from an aircraft carrier as much helicopters as possible to take more planes,transfer ASW duties to such ships as variant 4
On variants 1,2,3 "Poliment" (in variant 3K96-1, the difference from 3K96-2 is ability to fire "big"
SAM from UKSK, Navy want 40N6 from UKSK but NPO "Almaz-Antey" has enough hemorrhoids with the integration of the missile in the S-400 , and they do not want to double their problems.On the other hand OKB "Novator" vows to "as soon as possible to integrate 9M83M into UKSK".)
on variant 4 it is "Poliment" in variant 3K96-2
My reasons to not like variant 4 is simple, places on Russian shipyards are limited
so +1"variant 4" = -1 "variants 1,2 or 3" and I think Russian Navy need moar UKSK
Keep in mind that all this variants from early 2013 and can be changes
|
|
|
|
