MrsWargamer
Posts: 1655
Joined: 6/18/2014 Status: offline
|
I still think there are too many games, but, I'm changing my stance, to there are too many machines. I hear Nintendo is redoing the 3dsXL all over again, and you get to pay 300 bucks for it. I think there has to be a limit to how many ways you can tweak technology, and then demand several hundred bucks for it just a couple of years later. I am doubtful the XxBox One and the PS4 are also sufficiently greater to have sufficiently warranted the expense of several hundred bucks when the previous machine has nothing really wrong with it. Am I asking for tech to just stop innovating? Who knows, maybe I am in some cases. I am tempted to buy a new laptop, but you know, this one has zero wrong with it. It does EVERYTHING, there isn't a single game it won't run, not one. It might not play some at max, but that is not always worth it anyway. I don't mind maybe upgrading an OS, but this hardware will need to actually DIE on me before I can sensibly buy a better one. Maybe they need to make games better, make THEM more different from each other, and stop just crying for new hardware. If they can't continue to make say decent PS3 games, then yes, there are too many PS3 games after all.
_____________________________
Wargame, 05% of the time. Play with Barbies 05% of the time. Play with Legos 10% of the time. Build models 20% of the time Shopping 60% of the time. Exlains why I buy em more than I play em.
|