Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> Mods and Scenarios >> RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues Page: <<   < prev  44 45 [46] 47 48   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 1/16/2015 7:55:19 AM   
Tomcat84

 

Posts: 1952
Joined: 7/10/2013
Status: offline 		[ADDED DB v436]

Interesting article on B-52 upgrade. Unfortunately no real info (that I can see) on what amounts of weapons this would lead to or an IOC. Considering things described I would reckon at least a year away so maybe for a 2016 or 2017 B-52 variant in the database? Anyone have any info on what kind of numbers to expect? (for GBU-38/31 etc I am assuming higher numbers than current?)

http://www.af.mil/News/ArticleDisplay/tabid/223/Article/560252/bomber-force-prepares-for-new-b-52-bomb-bay-upgrade-testing.aspx

edit: found an article from when they were starting out that has some numbers:

http://www.af.mil/News/ArticleDisplay/tabid/223/Article/467185/upgrade-gives-b-52-more-teeth.aspx

It mentions ALL being upgraded by late 2017 so a 2016 variant for the first operational examples might make sense?

< Message edited by emsoy -- 6/7/2015 9:34:26 AM >

_____________________________

My Scenarios and Tutorials for Command

(Scenarios focus on air-warfare :) )

(in reply to Triode)
Post #: 1351
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 1/18/2015 1:03:37 PM   
Rudd

 

Posts: 1501
Joined: 7/10/2013
Status: offline 		[ADDED DB v436]

quote:

ORIGINAL: Tomcat84

Interesting article on B-52 upgrade. Unfortunately no real info (that I can see) on what amounts of weapons this would lead to or an IOC. Considering things described I would reckon at least a year away so maybe for a 2016 or 2017 B-52 variant in the database? Anyone have any info on what kind of numbers to expect? (for GBU-38/31 etc I am assuming higher numbers than current?)

http://www.af.mil/News/ArticleDisplay/tabid/223/Article/560252/bomber-force-prepares-for-new-b-52-bomb-bay-upgrade-testing.aspx

edit: found an article from when they were starting out that has some numbers:

http://www.af.mil/News/ArticleDisplay/tabid/223/Article/467185/upgrade-gives-b-52-more-teeth.aspx

It mentions ALL being upgraded by late 2017 so a 2016 variant for the first operational examples might make sense?

More on this...from http://www.dtic.mil/descriptivesum/Y2015/AirForce/stamped/0101113F_7_PB_2015.pdf

quote:

Increment 1.1 consists of internal carriage of eight Joint Direct Attack Munitions (JDAM) and variants, to include Laser JDAM (LJDAM), on a rotary launcher. This increment also develops the capability for external carriage for 16 LJDAM. The CRL Hardware modification consists of Group A (equipment racks and electrical wiring) and Group B (one Survivability/Vulnerability (SV) junction box and one Integrated Weapons Interface Unit (IWIU) per CRL). The IWIU Line Replaceable Unit (LRU) was previously developed under the Advanced Weapons Integration (AWI) project. No CSRL replacements will be required as a result of this project. Increment 1.1 completed Preliminary Design Review in February 2013 and awarded an EMD contract in September 2013. Critical Design Review (CDR) was conducted in October 2013.


Sounds like 8 Mk84 size in bomb bay, plus an increase to 16 on pylons...

quote:

Increment 1.2 develops the capability for internal carriage of eight Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missiles (JASSM) and its variants, to include JASSM Extended Range (JASSM-ER), and eight Miniature Air Launched Decoys (MALD) and its variants, to include MALD Jammer (MALD-J). This increment also develops the capability for external carriage for 12 JASSM-ER.


8 JASSM/-ER/MALD size in bomb bay, but keeping 12 external with addition of JASSM-ER?







http://foxtrotalpha.jalopnik.com/the-b-52-is-becoming-a-terrifyingly-intelligent-smart-w-1679885252 says
quote:

...Under the first phase of this upgrade, the Conventional Rotary Launcher will be able to hold 24 GBU-38 500lb JDAMs or a whopping 20 of the GBU-31 2,000lb JDAMs. Laser guided JDAMs and other smart gravity and glide bombs will follow soon after. Yet short-range weapons will not be the CRL's only claim to combat fame. Soon, the launcher will be able to sling gobs of stand-off weapons such as the stealthy AGM-158 Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile (JASSM) and the very guileful Miniture Air Launched Decoy Jammers (MALD-J)...

but this may be incorrect, as they say the CRL will be able to hold 20 when above PDF says 8

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by emsoy -- 6/7/2015 2:46:11 PM >

(in reply to Tomcat84)
Post #: 1352
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 1/19/2015 8:50:20 PM   
Tailhook

 

Posts: 293
Joined: 1/18/2015
Status: offline 		[MOSTLY PER DESIGN, MINOR MODS MADE DB v437]

I'm not seeing the option to load any KH-31 A's to the SU-34, SU-24M, or SU-24M2 via loadout. All are listed as "Air Force" but I can't find any Navy variants in the DB (these are meant to be Crimean Defenders, which is a SU-24M Naval Aviation Squadron). I can load the P ARM version just fine. I have been able to load them with the MiG-29K "Navy". I'm using 1.06, DB3000 Build 420 in a scenario set in 2017. I think there's a bug here as all should be able to load the -31A (and say they can).

Also the Bastion system is missing the Monolit-B radar system. An article on Janes (I can't post links) lists a system as comprising two TELs and two Monolit-B radars, presumably command vehicles.



< Message edited by emsoy -- 6/7/2015 3:42:07 PM >

(in reply to Rudd)
Post #: 1353
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 1/21/2015 2:26:25 PM   
Primarchx


Posts: 3102
Joined: 1/20/2013
Status: offline 		[ADDED DB pre-v436]

AC-208 Combat Caravan (Iraq) ... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cessna_208_Caravan

< Message edited by emsoy -- 6/7/2015 3:42:32 PM >

(in reply to Tailhook)
Post #: 1354
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 1/21/2015 4:02:48 PM   
Vici Supreme

 

Posts: 558
Joined: 12/4/2013
From: Southern Germany
Status: offline 		[ADDED DB v437]

I think most of the necessary informations are given so this might be an easy add?

Thales LMM (Lightweight Multirole Missile)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lightweight_Multirole_Missile
https://www.thalesgroup.com/en/content/thaless-lightweight-multirole-missile-enter-production
http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/contract-kicks-off-production-for-thales-small-lmmfasgw-l-missiles-06829/
http://www.thinkdefence.co.uk/2012/02/lightweight-multirole-missile/

As a result, platform #3352 Wildcat HMA.2 [AW.159] gets an additional ASuW loadout equipped with 5x2 LMM / Martlet.

Thanks!

< Message edited by emsoy -- 6/7/2015 4:09:32 PM >

_____________________________


(in reply to Tailhook)
Post #: 1355
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 1/21/2015 6:10:02 PM   
hellfish6


Posts: 843
Joined: 6/15/2008
Status: offline 		[ADDED DB v437]

I was doing a sorta AAR/demo of Command on another forum and one of the guys pointed out something about the Talwar. I don't know enough about the Indian navy to know the veracity of the comment, but I'll post it here just in case, as he made an effort to provide documentation.


quote:

The ECM/ESM system on Talwar class frigates is called TK-25E. Sometimes it is also referred to as ASOR-11356, but this is a generic name (ASOR for an ECM system and 11356 being the ship type).

Here's what the antennas look like on the first 3 ships of the class:





Here's the same system on the second batch, the next 3 ships. The system is still TK-25E, just a slightly updated model:






And here's what the MP-405 ECM system that is mentioned in your screenshots looks like. It was present on the earlier generation of ships.



There are some descriptions of both systems in this book: https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=4S3h8j_NEmkC

And here's the manufacturer's website with some specs: http://kret.com/ru/product/13/ (use Google Translate)


< Message edited by emsoy -- 6/7/2015 4:58:24 PM >

_____________________________


(in reply to Vici Supreme)
Post #: 1356
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 1/22/2015 1:25:54 AM   
mikmykWS

 

Posts: 11524
Joined: 3/22/2005
Status: offline 		Requests added to our list up until this point. Thank you!

Mike

_____________________________


(in reply to hellfish6)
Post #: 1357
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 1/22/2015 3:28:44 PM   
comsubpac


Posts: 114
Joined: 9/2/2014
Status: offline 		[FIXED DB v437]

1. The DB says that the German Type 703 tankers went out of service in 2001 while two ships are still in service: Ammersee“ (A 1425), „Tegernsee“ (A 1426).

2. The DB says that the 212A has a maximum of 6 torpedos. actually the boats can carry up to 13 torpedos with a "revolver"-like reload mechanism for fast reloading of the tubes.
The Sonar seems to under perform too since it is supposed to be a lot better then the sonar of the american 688 boats.

< Message edited by emsoy -- 6/7/2015 5:09:56 PM >

(in reply to mikmykWS)
Post #: 1358
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 1/22/2015 8:16:40 PM   
Midcon113


Posts: 86
Joined: 12/18/2014
From: Wheaton, IL
Status: offline 		[ADDED DB v438]

F-16XL

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Dynamics_F-16XL

An interesting option for the deep strike fighter competition eventually won by the F-15E Strike Eagle. I love the 15 Echo, but the 16XL definitely has the better look.

< Message edited by emsoy -- 6/7/2015 5:10:30 PM >

(in reply to comsubpac)
Post #: 1359
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 1/22/2015 9:00:24 PM   
Primarchx


Posts: 3102
Joined: 1/20/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Midcon113

F-16XL

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Dynamics_F-16XL

An interesting option for the deep strike fighter competition eventually won by the F-15E Strike Eagle. I love the 15 Echo, but the 16XL definitely has the better look.


I used to fly those all the time back in the old GDW Air Superiority and Air Strike games!

(in reply to Midcon113)
Post #: 1360
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 1/22/2015 9:23:39 PM   
hellfish6


Posts: 843
Joined: 6/15/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Midcon113

I love the 15 Echo, but the 16XL definitely has the better look.


You so crazy. You probably think the Draken looked good too.

_____________________________


(in reply to Midcon113)
Post #: 1361
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 1/22/2015 10:21:18 PM   
Midcon113


Posts: 86
Joined: 12/18/2014
From: Wheaton, IL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Primarchx

quote:

ORIGINAL: Midcon113

F-16XL

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Dynamics_F-16XL

An interesting option for the deep strike fighter competition eventually won by the F-15E Strike Eagle. I love the 15 Echo, but the 16XL definitely has the better look.


I used to fly those all the time back in the old GDW Air Superiority and Air Strike games!


Loved those games! Still have them but nobody to play with these days. Also have the Speed of Heat version that added all the early jets as well. As I start to get a handle on making scenarios in CMANO, I'm definitely going to start examining some of the more interesting air-to-air battles from that era!

(in reply to Primarchx)
Post #: 1362
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 1/22/2015 10:23:34 PM   
Midcon113


Posts: 86
Joined: 12/18/2014
From: Wheaton, IL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: hellfish6


quote:

ORIGINAL: Midcon113

I love the 15 Echo, but the 16XL definitely has the better look.


You so crazy. You probably think the Draken looked good too.


LOL Hellfish! Why yes, the Draken is a nice looking bird, though I find the Viggen even better looking!

(in reply to hellfish6)
Post #: 1363
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 1/22/2015 11:18:52 PM   
Vici Supreme

 

Posts: 558
Joined: 12/4/2013
From: Southern Germany
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: hellfish6


quote:

ORIGINAL: Midcon113

I love the 15 Echo, but the 16XL definitely has the better look.


You so crazy. You probably think the Draken looked good too.


Haha

_____________________________


(in reply to hellfish6)
Post #: 1364
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 1/23/2015 1:36:10 PM   
riekelt

 

Posts: 51
Joined: 8/21/2014
From: Netherlands
Status: offline 		[ADDED DB pre-437]

Is it possible to put the Dutch F-35 inside the database? I use now always the USA F-35 inside scenario's

< Message edited by emsoy -- 6/7/2015 5:11:58 PM >

(in reply to ultradave)
Post #: 1365
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 1/24/2015 3:08:23 AM   
ClaudeJ


Posts: 1213
Joined: 3/8/2006
From: Belgique
Status: offline 		[ADDED DB v438]

(Posting it on the behalf of Excroat3 as he can't do it by himself yet)

#2252 North Korea 531 Najin (Kola Copy) 2004

would have been updated:

At Nampho the outdated anti-ship missiles, aft 57mm dual cannon, Drum Tilt fire-control radar and surface search radar were removed, and several new systems were installed. Most clearly identifiable are two 30mm automated turrets at the aft, likely based on the Soviet AK-630 CIWS. These systems are quite capable at providing close-in protection against aircraft or guided munitions, yet fail to give a 360- degree radius of cover, leaving the bow of the ship vulnerable.

At Pip’agot Kim Jong Un was seen inspecting a rack used for mounting four Kh-35 anti-ship missiles, placed in the midsection of the ship which used to house the two P-15/HY-2/KN-01 anti-ship missiles. Although not visible on existing imagery, it is likely that there are four of these racks considering the space available; meaning the refit Najin-class has at least eight Kh-35 missiles ready to fire.

While the 100mm guns might have been included in the new design because their replacement requires too much room to place, the 57mm dual cannon at the bow and the six 2M3 25mm dual cannons especially serve little purpose on the new refit version of the Najin-class. Therefore, it is likely that the ship’s modernization program is still ongoing, yet continuing at Pip’agot naval base instead of at Nampho. Plausible future modifications might be the replacement of the 2M3s by with the DPRK’s indigenously-designed six-barreled 14.5mm Gatling cannon, the placement of short-range surface -to -air missile systems and more modern radars (although these may already have been fitted).

http://www.nknews.org/2014/12/kpa-navy-flag-ship-undergoing-radical-modernization/


< Message edited by emsoy -- 6/7/2015 5:22:23 PM >

(in reply to riekelt)
Post #: 1366
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 1/24/2015 3:11:14 AM   
Excroat3

 

Posts: 436
Joined: 1/24/2015
Status: offline 		As I cannot post links yet, I had Jan post for me. But I would like to warn you, try to copy down the information from that page as quick as possible, for after a certain amount of time, the page will not let you continue to read unless you subscribe. Thanks!

EDIT: nvm

< Message edited by Excroat3 -- 1/26/2015 12:14:25 AM >

(in reply to ClaudeJ)
Post #: 1367
Agusta Westland AW139 - HH139 - 1/26/2015 6:03:45 AM   
Dide


Posts: 156
Joined: 5/10/2009
From: Italy
Status: offline 		Hi! The variant HH is used by Italy Air Force for SAR missions, replacing the old HH-3F
and the HH-212.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AgustaWestland_AW139
http://www.aeronautica.difesa.it/Mezzi/velivoliDotazione/Pagine/HH-139A.aspx
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Italian_Air_Force

Thanks again!

(in reply to Excroat3)
Post #: 1368
DB Request - 1/27/2015 8:11:42 AM   
Jabbman


Posts: 30
Joined: 1/17/2015
Status: offline 		[ADDED DB pre-v438]

Russia

Yak-130 Trainer/Attack

I would post a link or two, but, well, you know... Check it on Wikipedia or elsewhere!

< Message edited by emsoy -- 6/7/2015 5:22:57 PM >

(in reply to Dide)
Post #: 1369
RE: DB Request - 1/27/2015 7:10:19 PM   
mikmykWS

 

Posts: 11524
Joined: 3/22/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Jabbman

Russia

Yak-130 Trainer/Attack

I would post a link or two, but, well, you know... Check it on Wikipedia or elsewhere!


Need links etc. or ya know...we won't add squat.

_____________________________


(in reply to Jabbman)
Post #: 1370
RE: DB Request - 1/27/2015 7:11:03 PM   
mikmykWS

 

Posts: 11524
Joined: 3/22/2005
Status: offline 		All items added to our list. Thanks!

Mike

_____________________________


(in reply to mikmykWS)
Post #: 1371
RE: DB Request - 1/27/2015 9:03:48 PM   
Jabbman


Posts: 30
Joined: 1/17/2015
Status: offline 		[ADDED DB v438]

quote:

ORIGINAL: mikmyk


quote:

ORIGINAL: Jabbman

Russia

Yak-130 Trainer/Attack

I would post a link or two, but, well, you know... Check it on Wikipedia or elsewhere!


Need links etc. or ya know...we won't add squat.


I was just joking about the fact that, due to anti-spam, I can't actually post links or images for the next week or so!

If someone could post a link for me, it would be much appreciated!

Wikipedia: Yakovlev_Yak-130

Type: Advanced trainer/fighter/attack
Nation: Russia
Introduction: 2010
Crew: 2
Length: 11.49m
Wingspan: 9.72m

< Message edited by emsoy -- 6/7/2015 5:23:19 PM >

(in reply to mikmykWS)
Post #: 1372
RE: DB Request - 1/27/2015 9:34:40 PM   
Vici Supreme

 

Posts: 558
Joined: 12/4/2013
From: Southern Germany
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Jabbman


I was just joking about the fact that, due to anti-spam, I can't actually post links or images for the next week or so!

If someone could post a link for me, it would be much appreciated!

Wikipedia: Yakovlev_Yak-130

Type: Advanced trainer/fighter/attack
Nation: Russia
Introduction: 2010
Crew: 2
Length: 11.49m
Wingspan: 9.72m


The Yakovlev Yak-130 has already been requested by several others and, as far as I was told, is supplied with sufficient informations. Just wait and see if it's in the next update or the one after that.

Supreme

_____________________________


(in reply to Jabbman)
Post #: 1373
RE: DB Request - 1/27/2015 9:58:16 PM   
mx1

 

Posts: 76
Joined: 1/16/2014
Status: offline 		[FIXED DB v438]

Minor issue: SS-21 Scarab B (Tochka U) (#584, #650 and #1452) has incorrect service dates. It is still operational in Russian Army while the DB incorrectly has 2006 as 'Until' date.

< Message edited by emsoy -- 6/7/2015 5:25:41 PM >

(in reply to Vici Supreme)
Post #: 1374
RE: DB Request - 1/27/2015 11:11:32 PM   
orca

 

Posts: 501
Joined: 11/6/2013
Status: offline 		Can you add the hypothetical/in development VLA-ER?

http://www.lockheedmartin.com/content/dam/lockheed/data/ms2/documents/launchers/Vertical_Launch_Antisubmarine_Missile_VLA_productcard.pdf


(in reply to mx1)
Post #: 1375
RE: DB Request - 1/29/2015 2:26:24 PM   
Mundy


Posts: 2869
Joined: 6/26/2002
From: Neenah
Status: offline 		[FIXED DB v438]

Hi guys,

I've been playing the "Detect, Deter, Defend" scenario (I think that's the name), and am having fun with it.

I did find a couple of database anomalies with some of the aircraft.

The F-101B never carried 20mm cannon.  It was only the A and C (single seat) models which did.  The B had the 2+2 flip rack of Falcons/Genies on the bottom.

The F-102 never carried the Genie rocket.  It was tested, I think on the YF-102, but never progressed past that point.  I'm unsure, if the Deuce carried the nuke Falcons, though.

Hope this helps.

Ed

< Message edited by emsoy -- 6/7/2015 5:30:09 PM >

_____________________________


(in reply to orca)
Post #: 1376
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 1/29/2015 11:37:20 PM   
orca

 

Posts: 501
Joined: 11/6/2013
Status: offline 		Links showing engine sound enclosure and ability of FREMM to run on electric propulsion supporting lower acoustic signature in DB.

http://higherlogicdownload.s3.amazonaws.com/SNAME/c94aa3c4-ac81-452f-83a9-e8fdbd2e7837/UploadedFiles/ModernNaval%20Solutions_2final.Ohmayer.Nov%202012c.pdf

http://www.acabiz.com/library/pdf/The-FREMM-Architecture-a-first-Step-towards-Innovation-261.pdf




(in reply to xavierv)
Post #: 1377
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 1/30/2015 3:57:24 AM   
Vici Supreme

 

Posts: 558
Joined: 12/4/2013
From: Southern Germany
Status: offline 		[CORRECTED DB v438]

Did a little bit of research on the SA-22 Greyhound [Pantsir-S1]. Stumbled accross pictures of the Iraqi version which does employ a different search radar than other units exported elsewhere. So, the Database gives all SA-22s a radar designated as Hot Shot [2L80 Pantsir S1]. Ausairpower.net does mention an aquisition radar designated as 2RL80 and developed by the Russian company VNIIRT. Except Ausairpower.net, I couldn't find any other source (except those linking to the article...) claiming the existence of any sensor that bears this name. I checked the company website of VNIIRT for sensors produced for the Pantsir-S1.

http://www.vniirt.ru/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=10&Itemid=20

RLM SOC S-Band radar fitted onto the Iraqi and supposedly Syrian SA-22 Greyhound.




The 1RS1-1E that is in use with the Russian and UAE's SA-22 Greyhound.






It appears that the 1RS1-1E and RLM SOC S-Band have been merged into the 2L80 Pantsir S1(2LR80/2LR80-E??) in the DB. Both radars share fairly similar performance so in the end that might be fine anyways.
However, all SA-22 Greyhound lack the 1RS2-1E which is ,as far as I understand, the actual FCR.




I might getting fussy here but you may want to change the name for all SA-22 Greyhound DB platforms to SA-22 Greyhound [96K6 Pantsir-S1] (Russian sources claim that the export version for the UAE is designated 96K6 Pantsir-S1E)?

Also, the UAE version is mounted on a MAN SX 45 8õ8 chassis instead of the Russian KAMAZ.

http://www.kbptula.ru/en/productions/air-defense-weapon-systems/pantsir-s1 (Great source! Provides information regarding battery composition.)
http://survincity.com/2013/04/shells-for-all-occasions/
http://www.ausairpower.net/APA-Engagement-Fire-Control.html#mozTocId853844
http://warfiles.ru/show-9406-kompleks-96k6-pancir-s1-sa-22-greyhound.html (find specifications for 1RS2/1RS2-1E here)
http://www.army-technology.com/projects/pantsyr/
http://xn----7sbb5ahj4aiadq2m.xn--p1ai/guide/army/pv/96k6.shtml
http://militaryedge.org/armaments/pantsyr-1s-sa-22/

Supreme

(Edit: Renewed/Fixed facts and links)

< Message edited by emsoy -- 6/7/2015 5:57:47 PM >

_____________________________


(in reply to Mgellis)
Post #: 1378
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 1/30/2015 7:10:55 AM   
Ocel0t

 

Posts: 40
Joined: 10/13/2014
Status: offline 		[DeWolf ADDED DB v440]

Hello!

A few ideas for consideration:

RQ-180 UAV(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northrop_Grumman_RQ-180) for USAF, TARANIS UAV(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BAE_Systems_Taranis) for the UK. The Harry DeWolf (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harry_DeWolf-class_offshore_patrol_vessel) class AOPS for Canada just had a big announcement ceremony last week, I believe they're building 6.

Thanks for considering these ideas.

(edits: fixed facts and links)

< Message edited by emsoy -- 6/27/2015 8:38:56 AM >

(in reply to ComDev)
Post #: 1379
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 1/30/2015 3:44:09 PM   
ClaudeJ


Posts: 1213
Joined: 3/8/2006
From: Belgique
Status: offline 		[FIXED DB pre-437]

AS.565 Panther


Sources:
- http://www.defense.gouv.fr/marine/decouverte/equipements-moyens-materiel-militaire/aeronefs/panther
- http://www.airbushelicopters.com/site/en/ref/Overview_153.html
- Panther’s new claws, Henri-Pierre Grolleau, Air Forces Monthly #313 April 2014.


  • #264 - SA.565MA Panther -- France (Navy), 1996-0, 15x, Floreal + Lafayette + Cassard, Ex-SA.365M Dauphin 2
  • #2404 - SA.565SA Panther -- China (Navy), 1988-0, 4x, Luda, Ex-SA.365M Dauphin 2
  • #2405 - SA.565SA Panther [Atalef] -- Israel (Navy), 1998-0, 4x, SAAR 5, Ex-Dauphin 2
  • #3150 - SA.565MA Panther -- Morocco (Navy), 2002-0, 3x, Floreal, Ex-SA.365M Dauphin 2
  • #1687 - SA.565SB Panther -- UAE (Navy), 2000-0, 7x, Ex-SA.365M Dauphin 2

    Name: is AS.565 (because of AéroSpatiale being the manufacturer, instead of Sud-Aviation)

    ----------------------------------------------

  • #264 - SA.565MA Panther -- France (Navy), 1996-0, 15x, Floreal + Lafayette + Cassard, Ex-SA.365M Dauphin 2

    Crew: 3 (pilot, co-pilot, sensor operator)



    Sensors:
    - delete #1952 - Varan
    - add #884 - ORB 32
    - add #4607 - Generic IR Camera (Thales Sophie hand-held IR cameras for SAR, also used for Target Identification in Libya)

    ----------------------------------------------
  • #??? - SA.565MA Panther Standard 2 -- France (Navy), 2012-0
    Upgraded platforms deliveries started in May 2012, 8 were in May 2014, all Panther planned to have been upgraded by mid-2016. Along the obvious FLIR mentioned below, the upgrades are about the avionics and navigation system.

    Sensors: add #4834 - Euroflir 410
    Comms: add Link 11 datalink



    < Message edited by emsoy -- 6/7/2015 6:03:18 PM >

    (in reply to Ocel0t)
    • Post #: 1380
    Page:   <<   < prev  44 45 [46] 47 48   next >   >>
    All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> Mods and Scenarios >> RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues Page: <<   < prev  44 45 [46] 47 48   next >   >>
    Jump to:





    New Messages No New Messages
    Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
    Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
     Post New Thread
     Reply to Message
     Post New Poll
     Submit Vote
     Delete My Own Post
     Delete My Own Thread
     Rate Posts


    Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

    0.891