Catalina 5(A) vs. Liberator PB4Y-1

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

Catalina 5(A) vs. Liberator PB4Y-1

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> The War Room >> Catalina 5(A) vs. Liberator PB4Y-1

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

Catalina 5(A) vs. Liberator PB4Y-1 - 3/5/2015 7:29:57 PM

margeorg

Posts: 160
Joined: 1/3/2012
Status: offline

Hiya,

are there any objections against replacing Catalinas in VB-xxx squads equipped with Catalinas and trained for naval search for PB4Y-1 Liberators? From just comparing stats the Lib seems to be much sturdier, and also having a slightly larger range. Both a/c are equipped with ASB radar, so they should be equal in their ability to conduct naval searches.

Anything I might have overlooked?

_____________________________

Cheers
Martin

Post #: 1

RE: Catalina 5(A) vs. Liberator PB4Y-1 - 3/5/2015 8:48:11 PM

witpqs

Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline

No general objections. Is PDU on or off in your game?

If PDU is on, I can't imagine why an opponent would object (but ask your opponent if you are unsure). If PDU is off, you will not be able to unless that is the upgrade path for that group.

_____________________________

Intel Monkey: https://sites.google.com/view/staffmonkeys/home

(in reply to margeorg)

Post #: 2

RE: Catalina 5(A) vs. Liberator PB4Y-1 - 3/6/2015 1:54:23 AM

wdolson

Posts: 10398
Joined: 6/28/2006
From: Near Portland, OR
Status: offline

In the real war a lot of patrol units were converted to PB4Ys because they were better patrol planes under most situations.

Bill

_____________________________

WitP AE - Test team lead, programmer

(in reply to witpqs)

Post #: 3

RE: Catalina 5(A) vs. Liberator PB4Y-1 - 3/6/2015 10:13:47 AM

jmalter

Posts: 1673
Joined: 10/12/2010
Status: offline

Be careful w/ the upgrades - PB4Y-1 has a 4 svc-rating, & needs to operate from an AF level 4, but PBY's have a 2 svc-rating, & can operate from minimal bases w/ support from naval auxiliaries.

Plus, the PB4Y-1 is the only true Hvy bomber that that USN gets, I'd prefer to keep them in the pools, rather than expend them. One might consider to prevent 1 of the factories that produce them from upgrading to the PB4Y-2. This late-war Privateer is a great NavS plane, but it's not really a hvy bomber, it's more the hvy search-plane that you're looking for.

I'm averse to using Liberators as replacements for Catalinas in the NavS role.

(in reply to wdolson)

Post #: 4

RE: Catalina 5(A) vs. Liberator PB4Y-1 - 3/6/2015 1:49:55 PM

Lecivius

Posts: 4845
Joined: 8/5/2007
From: Denver
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: jmalter

I'm averse to using Liberators as replacements for Catalinas in the NavS role.

I am too. But you never get enough Cats. I always train a couple of -24 squadrons in NavS. They cover a lot of water, and are nice from larger bases. Plus they don't get shot down anywhere near as much.

(in reply to jmalter)

Post #: 5

RE: Catalina 5(A) vs. Liberator PB4Y-1 - 3/7/2015 1:13:54 PM

margeorg

Posts: 160
Joined: 1/3/2012
Status: offline

Hmmm,

PDU is on, so technically I�m free to swap.

I�m in March 1943, and I have about 90 Catalinas model 5 and 5A in reserve. PB4Y-1 stocks are nearing 70. Just from the numbers I doubt that I will ever get into a shortage of Catalinas again. But as the Liberators had better endurance and better durability, I thought about them replacing the Cats.

On the other hand, the svc-rating 4 and the AF4 requirements are two serious arguments against the plan. Well, perhaps a few groups whicha re operating from large bases ...

Thanks for all replies!

< Message edited by margeorg -- 3/7/2015 2:14:07 PM >

_____________________________

Cheers
Martin

(in reply to Lecivius)

Post #: 6

RE: Catalina 5(A) vs. Liberator PB4Y-1 - 3/9/2015 1:24:50 AM

Treetop64

Posts: 926
Joined: 4/12/2005
From: 519 Redwood City - BASE (Hex 218, 70)
Status: offline

Also, Libs are high maintenance, if the frequent and lengthy maintenance down times my other AAF Liberator units in OZ and Burma are anything to go by. I put Libs only on lvl 6 or greater bases, with more than enough supplies (20k or better), support, and maintenance units on hand, yet they will still spend literally weeks in downtime for maintenance and repairs. Liberators are powerful assets but you really have to forcibly meter their use. Frankly, they annoy me more than anything else, as I often have to stand down entire bomber groups for weeks, just to make sure I have enough serviceable aircraft available for an important operation I'm planning.

I'm in March of '43, I have PDU on, and all of my Navy liberators are in the pools. I don't plan on using them. There are more than enough of the much more tolerable PBYs (and increasingly more of the Lockheed Venturas) to go around...

_____________________________

(in reply to margeorg)

Post #: 7

RE: Catalina 5(A) vs. Liberator PB4Y-1 - 3/9/2015 2:56:42 AM

jmalter

Posts: 1673
Joined: 10/12/2010
Status: offline

What I found frustrating was the games insistence on having me withdraw Cat airgroups in the late-war, to the point where I feel just as starved of operating NavS groups as I did in '42! I'm down w/ using PV-1 Venturas & their late-war replacement PV-2 Harpoons when their lesser range isn't too much of a prob, but they're more suited to ASW patrol.

(in reply to Treetop64)

Post #: 8